These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Jita Park Speakers Corner

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
Previous page12
 

Welp

Author
subtle turtle
Doozer Mining Cartel
#21 - 2013-02-18 04:37:59 UTC
Marc Scaurus wrote:

For PVP: I also intend to push forward for improvements to the war dec system, bounty hunting, as well as to help improve the sad state of affairs with such time honored (but swiftly diminishing) gameplay options as the ninjas of high sec.



I am glad to see a FW candidate, and VERY glad to see someone say this.

When I first started in Eve, I ran missions, like most newbies. My first experiences with PVP were when Suddenly Ninjas came to town and started wrecking the place up. I don't recall ever losing a ship to them, but I was in awe at the ease in which they tore apart "experienced" missioners in expensive (to me) ships. It was this experience that led me to the PVP dark-side, and it's really sad that I don't see similar things happening anymore.

+1
Marc Scaurus
Native Freshfood
Minmatar Republic
#22 - 2013-02-18 19:02:49 UTC
Dyvim Slorm wrote:
Just listened to your interview on Crossing Zebras and you mention a subject close to my heart, improving the wardec system. It has received some attention recently but still needs a lot more work to make it fit for purpose, what do you have in mind for this?

Coming back to your lowsec side here are a couple of ideas (perhaps concepts) I would like to see which may tempt more corps into lowsec.

1/ There should be a real benefit for an industrial corp to set up a lowsec operation, perhaps by having a significant boost to production and research, particularly in a POS

2/ I do have a bit of an rp background and to me lowsec should be the place where respectable highsec corps do their dirty business (slave labour, illegal scientific experiments, corporate assassination etc). Lowsec should be the place where the Board can deny wrongdoing because they didn't know about it (as what happens in rl) so some mechanism to allow corps to deal in unethical but very profitable areas would seem a way forward.

In the early stages of the game 2003/4/5 I have fond memories of lowsec along the Aridia pipe (and elsewhere) with small communities that sprang up, both pirate and non pirate which made areas have a distinct feeling of place. It would be great to get that back, which could come about if lowsec was developed and became the vibrant place it once was. Unfortunately at present lowsec's just the place in the way between highsec and nullsec.


The main thing with wardecs right now is ensuring that they stay a viable option for pursuing 'non mutual' affairs. There was a disconcerting conversation in the last minutes where the possibility of 'mutual only' war decs was brought up that shouldn't have even been a topic for discussion. A lot of work has been done on wars, especially with regards to crimewatch changes, to get them up to speed for modern EVE Online. However, they do not appear to be on the table for more improvements in the near future, so right now I just want to make sure that we don't lost any more non mutual PVP options.

As for your lowsec points, I do agree that more could be done in lowsec with regards to production and research. The exact nature of the opportunities available obviously won't be known until CCP announces what they have planned for production/research and POSes in general, but I think that giving lowsec an edge in the industry arena is something that is way overdue.

I'm a bit of a closet RP nerd, so when it comes to lowsec I definitely would love to see something done to make the reality of the area match more closely with the concept for the area - a place where police do not go, faction navies operate in a limited capacity, etc. Pirates, drug dealers, all sorts of nefarious character should be able to call lowsec home. Contraband should be available to be made and smuggled throughout lowsec for some tangible benefit that makes an impact on the rest of the game.

Blogger, JustForCrits.com

Red vs. Blue - Ain't Dead Yet

Marc Scaurus
Native Freshfood
Minmatar Republic
#23 - 2013-02-18 19:04:17 UTC
subtle turtle wrote:
Marc Scaurus wrote:

For PVP: I also intend to push forward for improvements to the war dec system, bounty hunting, as well as to help improve the sad state of affairs with such time honored (but swiftly diminishing) gameplay options as the ninjas of high sec.



I am glad to see a FW candidate, and VERY glad to see someone say this.

When I first started in Eve, I ran missions, like most newbies. My first experiences with PVP were when Suddenly Ninjas came to town and started wrecking the place up. I don't recall ever losing a ship to them, but I was in awe at the ease in which they tore apart "experienced" missioners in expensive (to me) ships. It was this experience that led me to the PVP dark-side, and it's really sad that I don't see similar things happening anymore.

+1


Your story is one of many that I've heard where, by being exposed to the darker side of EVE Online, a player learns the joys of PVP and all that that entails. The curtailing of the ability for players to be exposed to that side of the game is tragic and something that no one is really addressing in a satisfactory manner, which is something I plan on changing (with the usual caveat of 'if elected' of course).

Blogger, JustForCrits.com

Red vs. Blue - Ain't Dead Yet

Malcanis
Vanishing Point.
The Initiative.
#24 - 2013-02-20 14:29:55 UTC
Marc, I would like to hear your opinion on a couple of concepts:

(1) At the moment, hi-sec does not offer the opportunity for hi-sec players to experience large scale fights and extended fights. Do you think FW is the correct platform to extend this class of experience to hi-sec players?

(2) Would you like to see FW extended to be able to change the sovereignty of systems from one faction to another? How would you envisage this happening if so?

Additionally, I would like to hear your opinion on something that concerns me: currently, lo-sec is the place where PvPers can go and operate in small groups. If some "Unique Selling Point" is added to lo-sec, isn't there a danger of encroaching on that small group environment? How would you like to see this issue addressed?

Thirdly, as you may be aware, a core tenet of my campaign is the repatriation of nullsec alts from hi-sec to null, by allowing them to viably operate there. Do you forsee any impact on lo-sec from this? What would be your perspective here?

"Just remember later that I warned against any change to jump ranges or fatigue. You earned whats coming."

Grath Telkin, 11.10.2016

Marc Scaurus
Native Freshfood
Minmatar Republic
#25 - 2013-02-22 08:45:17 UTC
Malcanis wrote:
Marc, I would like to hear your opinion on a couple of concepts:

(1) At the moment, hi-sec does not offer the opportunity for hi-sec players to experience large scale fights and extended fights. Do you think FW is the correct platform to extend this class of experience to hi-sec players?

(2) Would you like to see FW extended to be able to change the sovereignty of systems from one faction to another? How would you envisage this happening if so?

Additionally, I would like to hear your opinion on something that concerns me: currently, lo-sec is the place where PvPers can go and operate in small groups. If some "Unique Selling Point" is added to lo-sec, isn't there a danger of encroaching on that small group environment? How would you like to see this issue addressed?

Thirdly, as you may be aware, a core tenet of my campaign is the repatriation of nullsec alts from hi-sec to null, by allowing them to viably operate there. Do you forsee any impact on lo-sec from this? What would be your perspective here?


1 - This would have to depend entirely on your definition of large scale fights. However, facwar has had some very impressive battles in hotly contested systems. As an entry point into PVP in general, both solo and small to mid sized gang varieties, I think faction warfare is doing an admirable job of things. As for it being the 'correct platform...for hi-sec players', I'm not sure if that statement makes much sense. Those fights obviously occur in lowsec among lowsec based entities (the militias). If the thrust of the question is whether it is the correct way to get players from high sec into lowsec, then my answer would be yes - it is a good avenue.

2 - That could be one way to accomplish giving faction warfare some impact on the map as a whole, however I would have to see specifics of such a proposal to see if it actually amounts to changing anything. The goal of providing faction warfare (and lowsec as a whole) a way to make an impact on the game isn't just about changing a system's ownership tag - its about making an impact on the players of the game as well.

As for ways to make this happen, holding a system for XX amount of days would be a simple way to make sovereignty change to the holding faction.

2.5 - The addition of a unique selling point to lowsec should only be done while preserving the existing playstyle of its residents. Outlaws have called lowsec home since its inception, with groups like the Guristas Associates, Tuskers, Blood Money Cartel, Bastards and countless others personifying the sov-less, semi-nomadic, pirating lifestyle. If elected and informed that CCP was changing things in such a way as to kill off that playstyle, there would be no end to the fight I would put up against such a change. I think there are ways to ensure that this doesn't happen, however.

3 - There would probably be some impact, as I'm sure there are at least a few nullsec residents that run L5s or other ISK-generating things in lowsec. However, the impact would in all likelihood be slight - and if a change to the way nullsec income is generated on an individual level is paired with a net boost to the ISK generating potential of lowsec, I'd be happy to make that trade.

Blogger, JustForCrits.com

Red vs. Blue - Ain't Dead Yet

Zloco Crendraven
BALKAN EXPRESS
Shadow Cartel
#26 - 2013-02-23 11:50:38 UTC
Marc will be having my vote for sure. Good thoughts a focus of lowsec is what makes him the right choice for mua.

BALEX, bringing piracy on a whole new level.

Endeavour Starfleet
#27 - 2013-02-27 07:28:57 UTC
Hello there!

I would like to name several situations that I feel are detrimental to the game. Give a solution and ask you for your stance on both. I do need answers to all the situations for my vote(s)

POS those three letters bring nightmares to just about anyone having the misfortune of having to operate one. The solution in the long term is obviously modular POS. Yet CCP seems to be backpedaling on implementing this despite the MANY benefits. What is your stance on the possibility of a near term bandage of a form of player POS that is only designed to be the equilivant of a Secure Container for ships until modular POS is ready?

Overpowered passive cloaking. It is now to the point where people are now beyond AFK cloaking but running Twitch.tv streams of enemy stations and systems! Would you support balancing cloaking to punish those who go AFK (Eventually able to be scanned down for decloak) while maintaining the benefits to people actively cloaking (Remaining at their keyboard)

Lack of Ring Mining. Again with the CCP backpedaling despite the many benefits for nullsec and other areas for the game. What is your stand on the crap that is moon mining?

The silly push by some in the community to end or delay "Local" or any effective means for those in a nullsec system to determine if a hostile or unknown is in system in them. This obviously needs no solution but I want your thoughts.

The horrible state of missions in hisec. The solution in my opinion is a complete rewrite to allow for a more incursion like approach that rewards those who want to train up logistic frigs and cruisers or be a specific role in a fleet. Also providing a way for newer players to experience group play in EVE.

Incursion suckage. With the nerfs to Incursions fleets have slowed to a trickle and it was sad to see CCP willing to spend more development time nerfing entire expansions instead of doing what was right being making other aspects of EVE better. Modular POS and Ring mining need dev time sooner so I will admit this ought to be looked at later however I wanted to get your views on them and have this to be some context to the next aspect of Logi.

Logi suckage. Logis do not have the tools to do their job. They need to be able to tell who is locked and taking damage and in large fleets the watchlist can't handle that leading to dependence on broadcasts that most of EVE seems to not know or refuse to use right. Look at any average HQ incursion fleet where people don't broadcast right stressing out logi or in fleet fights where following FCs orders makes it harder to broadcast properly. A solution is a logi only screen that is completely configurable to show who is taking the most DPS and who has the most locks in fleet.

Logi Suckage #2 Reps don't get you on mails? Wut? Solution obviously is to have repping those in fleet land you on killmails generated from fleet.
Xylorn Hasher
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#28 - 2013-02-27 13:23:21 UTC
Marc Scaurus wrote:
For those who can’t be bothered with large amounts of words, here’s a recap:

Marc Scaurus for CSM8


  • Increasing lowsec’s impact across EVE Online
  • Bringing a wider variety of gameplay to lowsec
  • Revitalizing industry in lowsec
  • Continuing improvements to faction warfare



To learn more about my campaign, please check out this blog post and keep an eye on my blog at scaurus.com. If you wish to get ahold of me, here's how:

Twitter - @marcscaurus
Skype - marcscaurus
Email - scaurus2013@gmail.com
Evemail - Marc Scaurus


Funny thing that a guy with -1,8 security status wants to represent lowsec residents, even funnier when you check his killboard and see that he lives and be a part of nullsec blob warfare for a year at least.

Marc Scaurus do me a favour and go be lowsec representative elseware you carebear anf F1 pusher!


All my posts are made shortly after Marihuana consumption.

Marc Scaurus
Native Freshfood
Minmatar Republic
#29 - 2013-02-27 16:18:13 UTC
Xylorn Hasher wrote:
Marc Scaurus wrote:
For those who can’t be bothered with large amounts of words, here’s a recap:

Marc Scaurus for CSM8


  • Increasing lowsec’s impact across EVE Online
  • Bringing a wider variety of gameplay to lowsec
  • Revitalizing industry in lowsec
  • Continuing improvements to faction warfare



To learn more about my campaign, please check out this blog post and keep an eye on my blog at scaurus.com. If you wish to get ahold of me, here's how:

Twitter - @marcscaurus
Skype - marcscaurus
Email - scaurus2013@gmail.com
Evemail - Marc Scaurus


Funny thing that a guy with -1,8 security status wants to represent lowsec residents, even funnier when you check his killboard and see that he lives and be a part of nullsec blob warfare for a year at least.

Marc Scaurus do me a favour and go be lowsec representative elseware you carebear anf F1 pusher!




Ah my first troll. I was beginning to worry when one of you didn't show up. For someone so well versed in reading killboards and corp history, you should also be able to determine that I wasn't terribly active in null (half my kills were blue kills, RIP Vile Rat) and that of my 1000+ kills, nearly all of them have taken place in lowsec. But let's not let facts get in the way of things, right?

Blogger, JustForCrits.com

Red vs. Blue - Ain't Dead Yet

Karl Hobb
Imperial Margarine
#30 - 2013-03-01 18:34:07 UTC
Marc, I just had a listen to your Crossing Zebras interview and I must say I am impressed with you and your platform. I'm very happy to hear that small-time, "casual" jerks like myself and my corp are very welcome (even desired) in your vision of EVE. I have a few questions:

1. I'm not a huge fan of blogs. Do you plan to have an active forum presence and how would you prioritize communication on the forums here as opposed to your blog? Do you consider the forums merely a place to link to your blog?

2. Low-sec is, unfortunately, non-contiguous. Would you support additional "pirate gates" to help the sub -5.0 get around or do you think that's a bad idea? If so, why?

3. Solo PVP: Dead or Undead?

Good luck, you'll be in my top three when the voting starts.

A professional astro-bastard was not available so they sent me.

JAF Anders
Adenosine Inhibition
The Chicken Coop
#31 - 2013-03-08 17:11:03 UTC
Friendly bump and endorsement.

The pursuit of excellence and stabbed plexing alts.

Roime
Mea Culpa.
Shadow Cartel
#32 - 2013-03-09 10:05:04 UTC
Nice platform, will vote.

.

Vaju Enki
Secular Wisdom
#33 - 2013-03-09 11:25:41 UTC
So many good CSM candidates this year.

The Tears Must Flow

Marc Scaurus
Native Freshfood
Minmatar Republic
#34 - 2013-03-12 15:47:37 UTC
Vaju Enki wrote:
So many good CSM candidates this year.


Thank you for the kind words, sir. Unfortunately, you'll be down one, as I have been forced to withdraw due to family medical issues. More info in the OP to come.

Blogger, JustForCrits.com

Red vs. Blue - Ain't Dead Yet

Karl Hobb
Imperial Margarine
#35 - 2013-03-12 16:14:06 UTC
Marc Scaurus wrote:
Thank you for the kind words, sir. Unfortunately, you'll be down one, as I have been forced to withdraw due to family medical issues. More info in the OP to come.

I hope all ends up well for you and yours, sir.

A professional astro-bastard was not available so they sent me.

Previous page12