These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Intergalactic Summit

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

A Necessary Peace

Author
Pieter Tuulinen
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#81 - 2013-03-07 05:59:04 UTC
James Syagrius wrote:
Pieter Tuulinen wrote:
James Syagrius wrote:

We are not forcing anyone to do anything, we are simply attempting to see that those who choose to resist oppression have the tools to do so effectively.

I think your expression of concern for the Federal citizens of Luminaire VII rings a bit hollow. I know how you and your ilk would like to frame the “peace”. Forgive me if I don’t share your vision.

So now you expect people born and raised in a place to simply submit to their homes being occupation by a foreign power? One wonders if you hold yourselves to the same standard . One wishes you had taken your own advice.


It takes more than gifted weapons to resist effectively. They simply die with expensive toys clutched in their hands. I wonder if they curse the libertine propaganda that led them to that fate, judged wanting by the Winds and cursed by Ancestors that know them not? Perhaps there really is no more point in discussion. Maybe we have to get your attention some other way.

We told you that we would return. You didn't beleive us. Any tragedy that befell or befalls as a result is on your head.

Yes, yes, yes, very poetic, answering my question might have been nice. But you keep right on blaming the victims and making your threats. We will see what rises from those ashes.


It has already been stated that the single largest sticking point in this conflict, larger than Executor Heth, larger than the Titan and larger than the atrocities of previous centuries, is the Federation's inability to conceive of the fact that a race's RIGHT to the cradle of it's civilisation is more profound than the historical equivalent of squatter's rights.

I really don't know how to put this to you in any other way - we are ready to commit whatever resources are required to take this all the way. We have a military that can project force FAR better than yours. We have a population that is fully behind the reasons for this war.

We're prepared to bleed and sacrifice and wait - however patiently is necessary - to get our Home back. Again, this is not chest-beating, you just don't seem to be intellectually prepared to accept the truth here. If I'm using poetry, it's because polite explanation has failed and hyperbole is my last resort on the road to brute force.

For the first time since I started the conversation, he looks me dead in the eye. In his gaze are steel jackhammers, quiet vengeance, a hundred thousand orbital bombs frozen in still life.

Katran Luftschreck
Royal Ammatar Engineering Corps
#82 - 2013-03-07 09:19:51 UTC
Andreus Ixiris wrote:
Let me tell you a thing or two about the military realities in New Eden...


Even I am inclined to agree with your assessment. You've put a lot of research into this and it shows.

http://youtu.be/t0q2F8NsYQ0

Andreus Ixiris
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#83 - 2013-03-07 12:00:47 UTC  |  Edited by: Andreus Ixiris
Pieter Tuulinen wrote:
We MUST make it abundantly clear that any military push against the Caldari Navy would lbe utterly ruinous for the Federation

The fact is it most likely wouldn't be. Gallentean admirals chafe at the restriction of CONCORD a great deal more than their Caldari counterparts and for good reason.

Andreus Ixiris > A Civire without a chin is barely a Civire at all.

Pieter Tuulinen > He'd be Civirely disadvantaged, Andreus.

Andreus Ixiris > ...

Andreus Ixiris > This is why we're at war.

Malcolm Khross
Doomheim
#84 - 2013-03-07 12:19:22 UTC
I urge any and all capsuleers who claim to support and desire peace to place action where you words are, to prove your merit and honor with deed and not simply voice.

Terms have been laid out, first by Oniseki-haani and echoed by Syagrius and others, terms that appear to be agreeable to most of us. However, not every aspect of those terms can be accomplished by the capsuleer community alone, for all of our power and wealth, certain things must still be handled through politics.

If you support peace, then defend the areas of the warzone that you believe should be considered sovereign space for your respective nation. (Placid, Essence and Verge Vendor for the Federation/ Black Rise and THe Citadel for the State) Cease and desist all hostile entry into the opposing regions of contested space.

Force this war into an unchanging standoff, with both sides equally punishing all offenders of this stand-off and perhaps there will be the realization that this war can have an end. We are the weapons waging this war, if those weapons refuse to keep striking, then the war grinds to a halt.

Perhaps I am merely a visionary and a delusional one at that, but this has always been my purpose and always will be. From the formation of the Wiyrkomi Honor Guard, to my individual service in the Protectorate and now as the Chief Executive of Wirykomi Tactical Response Directive. I urge others to follow suit and let us see how many of us are truly committed to peace.

~Malcolm Khross

Ston Momaki
Disciples of Ston
#85 - 2013-03-07 15:49:02 UTC
Malcolm Khross wrote:

Perhaps I am merely a visionary and a delusional one at that, but this has always been my purpose and always will be. From the formation of the Wiyrkomi Honor Guard, to my individual service in the Protectorate and now as the Chief Executive of Wirykomi Tactical Response Directive. I urge others to follow suit and let us see how many of us are truly committed to peace.


Peace is not a delusion. Peace is the only sane mindset, even for a military person. All other visions will end in self-anihilation. Hold on to your visions for peace. Find ways to be faithful to your values and allow others to be true to their's while agreeing together to pursue peace. The pursuit of peace is the motive of a sound mind. I hope that many sound minds, though in disagreement over the details, will agree on the goal of peace.

The Disciples of Ston bid you peace

Vihtor Heishi
Doomheim
#86 - 2013-03-07 16:18:53 UTC
James Syagrius wrote:

We will see what rises from those ashes.


Indeed we will, but it is our earth to salt. You don't give our resolve to see our home back in our hands enough credit. As Tululinen-haan has said we are commited to taking this as far as need be, are you?

Malcom Khross wrote:
Perhaps I am merely a visionary and a delusional one at that


Visionary, yes. I could agree with that quite easily given what I've seen from you here alone, but you are not delusional Khross-haan. I don't see either side of this war stopping at the border. Capsuleers may be the weapons waging this war, but not all of the weapons are as civil as you are.

Seifuku suru ishi wa shōri e no saisho no kagi to narimasu.

BloodBird
The Crucible.
#87 - 2013-03-07 17:00:20 UTC
Aquila Shadow wrote:
James Syagrius wrote:
What does the Federation get for the concession of Luminaire VII?


The Federation citizens on Caldari Prime and Gallente Prime get to live. Why you want something more?


Yeah, in fact. How about we also get to keep the promise that every signatory member of this Union has that they will not be abandoned when in need? That the collective weight of the Federation will help them when needed? All those annexed Caldari Nations on Caldari Prime are Federation member-states, and the Union in general owe them our support, whatever that is.

It could be military liberation, or something else - if the corporate hegemony that is the Caldari State wants the homeworld they fled from back under their sway, those who lived there from the beginning and whose ancestors moved there generations ago needs the rights to come and go as they wish, for starters, and the right to live their lives as they please, as a good second.

I wonder what your State will do with all the sovereign nations and their citizens that resides on that planet. Scratch that. I wonder what they HAVE done to them.

Fredfredbug4 wrote:


If CONCORD is truly about preserving peace between the empires, they would of demanded the resignation of Tibus Heth years ago. However, there are ways to kick Heth out without declaring war on the State. After all, that's what the Black Eagles were created for.


As mentioned before CONCORD does not have that power. However the SDII was not created to drive Heth out of office, as your statement here might claim, but to provide internal security in war-time. We can argue how well that has gone some other day however.


Simon Louvaki wrote:
Black Rise never was nor ever has been Federation territory. Caldari Prime is a different story in regards to the State. I'm afraid, with or without Heth, Black Rise is simply not going to be on the table, but I can certainly guarantee that the loss of Caldari Prime is not either. Your asking for an entire region for a planet, terms that are outrageous even considering the value of Caldari Prime to our people. Your asking to trade hundreds of billions of Caldari citizens and assets for reliquishing claims on a planet we already have.

Is there a more reasonable demand that wont ensure rejection?


Hundred of billion of citizens? You do know that Black Rise is thinly populated by a few million people at most, and that many are considered non-entities in the State for not being employees of any mega, right?

Right?

Simon Louvaki wrote:


Indeed. The entire system would need to be labeled as DMZ, not just Caldari Prime.


Completely unacceptable. De-militarize one of the Federation's cultural hearts for the benefit of the State? Not going to happen.

If the Federation agrees to make the planet and the surrounding space a DMZ however you can rest assured that it will be honored. There is to much to lose and practically nothing to gain from breaking such an arrangement once made, especially if it starts another war with the State who has CONCORD's assistance. Far more likely that such a deal will never be made to start with.
Malcolm Khross
Doomheim
#88 - 2013-03-07 17:24:56 UTC  |  Edited by: Malcolm Khross
BloodBird wrote:

I wonder what your State will do with all the sovereign nations and their citizens that resides on that planet. Scratch that. I wonder what they HAVE done to them.


While I personally disagree with Shadow's original assertion that you should be happy that these citizens get to live, and I understand your viewpoint. This last part that I have quoted is speculation, it is best left out of constructive discussion.

BloodBird wrote:
Hundred of billion of citizens? You do know that Black Rise is thinly populated by a few million people at most, and that many are considered non-entities in the State for not being employees of any mega, right?


This was the same error made before. Black Rise is a part of the State and how the State runs itself is not up for debate or "correction" from the Federation. Black Rise is not "on the table."

BloodBird wrote:
Completely unacceptable. De-militarize one of the Federation's cultural hearts for the benefit of the State? Not going to happen.


This is not for the benefit of the State, it's for the mutual benefit of the State and the Federation but more importantly, for the non-military personnel caught in the middle of this struggle. A demilitarization of Luminaire removes the "security risk" of having a Caldari Titan in orbit around Caldari Prime, thus negating the Federal concern that the Titan can be used to strike against Federation assets and citizens, it removes the possibility of invasion of Caldari Prime from the Gallente, thus negating the State's assertion that keeping the Titan in orbit for "security" is necessary.

It protects both of our people's homeworlds from one another and ensures we cannot strike at each other's hearts again.

~Malcolm Khross

Pieter Tuulinen
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#89 - 2013-03-07 17:43:35 UTC
Andreus Ixiris wrote:
Pieter Tuulinen wrote:
We MUST make it abundantly clear that any military push against the Caldari Navy would lbe utterly ruinous for the Federation

The fact is it most likely wouldn't be. Gallentean admirals chafe at the restriction of CONCORD a great deal more than their Caldari counterparts and for good reason.


With all the respect in the cluster, Andreus, that is an opinion that Federal Admirals have held in the past - to the great detriment of both the Federation and the State. Military Experts have never felt that the Caldari fleet is a poor match for the Federal one and the fact that the State has no interest in offensive operations within the Federation - outside the claiming and maintaining of Home - should not be seen in a negative light.

The truth is that we've never had a dream of expanding at the expense of our neightbours. We have so many systems that are still in need of development.

For the first time since I started the conversation, he looks me dead in the eye. In his gaze are steel jackhammers, quiet vengeance, a hundred thousand orbital bombs frozen in still life.

Simon Louvaki
Khaldari InnoTektoniks and Analytical Solutions
#90 - 2013-03-07 17:45:24 UTC  |  Edited by: Simon Louvaki
BloodBird wrote:


Hundred of billion of citizens? You do know that Black Rise is thinly populated by a few million people at most, and that many are considered non-entities in the State for not being employees of any mega, right?

Right?


It is quite possible I am mistaken about the population of Black Rise. Black Rise still remains an investment waiting to be exploited by the State, and again is simply asking too much.

BloodBird wrote:

Completely unacceptable. De-militarize one of the Federation's cultural hearts for the benefit of the State? Not going to happen.

If the Federation agrees to make the planet and the surrounding space a DMZ however you can rest assured that it will be honored. There is to much to lose and practically nothing to gain from breaking such an arrangement once made, especially if it starts another war with the State who has CONCORD's assistance. Far more likely that such a deal will never be made to start with.


Again, I ask a simple question as to why its so unacceptable? What is the benefit to the State that isn't a benefit to the Federation? It would be nice to simply have the question answered. A demilitarization of our collective cultural heartland would ensure security for all and would have no adverse affects for the Federation and would allow for a greater ease of movement by citizens of both our respective nations.

-- "The weak of mind are quick to judge with slightest tempt; Thus fools go forth to spread false word." - The Scriptures, Book of Trials 2:13 - 2:21

--"At the narrow passage, there is no brother and no friend." - Hyasyoda Proverb

Seriphyn Inhonores
Elusenian Cooperative
#91 - 2013-03-07 18:06:27 UTC
The Federation will not have the authority to demilitarize the Luminaire system, as I imagine it remains the jurisdiction of the hundreds of planetary nations found on Gallentia, Corufeu, and Astrin. They will need to be convinced as to why they should let their sovereign space be demilitarized and placed under CONCORD jurisdiction.

I don't suspect it'd be a difficult job, mind. They'd still remain Federation member states, it's just CONCORD patrolling the space, not FedNav or GalCom. Still, moving the idea of demilitarization to just the Caldari Prime planetary sphere?
BloodBird
The Crucible.
#92 - 2013-03-07 18:24:25 UTC
Rinai Vero wrote:
Simon Louvaki wrote:


Its not so much that I'm assured that it can do it as much as I'm sure that Heth would try it and the depending on the response time of Federation/CONCORD ships and the proximity of the Leviathan to the planet when it (inevitably) is destroyed would be catastrophic to those on the planet below. There is but one certainty in all this; Heth is capable of such a travesty. Hopefully the men and women of that ship are not.


If I were to speculate on the one position in the Caldari Navy that Tibus Heth would be most assured in the complete loyalty of the person holding it, the commander of that Leviathan would be at the top of my list.

There's really very little purpose in arguing about the hypothetical outcomes of a battle in Luminaire. We have the means to prevent that battle from ever happening, and we should all be putting out most fervent efforts towards that end.


I agree completely with you, but keep in mind that this requires both sides to work for the same thing - if either side aims for getting all their desires pushed through at the cost of the opposing party it will never happen. Let us hope that once Heth is gone - because he would never agree to any peace - an arrangement for mutual peace can be made that both parties can agree to.

Personally, I hold that the odds of this happening is... minimal. But I would not mind being very positively surprised.


Pieter Tuulinen wrote:
James Syagrius wrote:
The patriotic efforts of those loyal to the Federation living on Luminaire VII, both Caldari and Gallente, to oppose the State occupation, must be supported.


Oh yes, I remember the 'patriotic efforts' of the 'freedom fighters' on Caldari Prime from when they tried to kill me during a hiking holiday. I found our 'full and frank exchange of views' most refreshing.

At least have the testicular fortitude to refer to terrorism as terrorism. I'm quite disappointed to see the same man who was clamouring for peace a few short months ago supporting the efforts of hooligans and criminals.


When the State fights the Federation's forces on Caldari Prime during the first war using guerrilla tactics and ambushes, they are remembered as heroes and freedom fighters.

When Federation-loyal people on Caldari Prime oppose State forces or engage State-loyal persons they are terrorists.

Party-line. You must tow it.

As for your statements regarding Federation Marine standards, my CEO has answered this effectively. I'd say that it's unwise to judge a whole nation's military from examples of their worst quality troops, but if you want to labor under the delusion that all Federal ground forces are as bad as you think, I'm not going to stop you.

I should likely encourage you, but, I just can't be bothered.


Andreus Ixiris
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#93 - 2013-03-07 18:41:28 UTC
Pieter Tuulinen wrote:
The truth is that we've never had a dream of expanding at the expense of our neightbours. We have so many systems that are still in need of development.

The actions of the past five years speak otherwise.

Andreus Ixiris > A Civire without a chin is barely a Civire at all.

Pieter Tuulinen > He'd be Civirely disadvantaged, Andreus.

Andreus Ixiris > ...

Andreus Ixiris > This is why we're at war.

Simon Louvaki
Khaldari InnoTektoniks and Analytical Solutions
#94 - 2013-03-07 18:46:37 UTC  |  Edited by: Simon Louvaki
Seriphyn Inhonores wrote:
The Federation will not have the authority to demilitarize the Luminaire system, as I imagine it remains the jurisdiction of the hundreds of planetary nations found on Gallentia, Corufeu, and Astrin. They will need to be convinced as to why they should let their sovereign space be demilitarized and placed under CONCORD jurisdiction.

I don't suspect it'd be a difficult job, mind. They'd still remain Federation member states, it's just CONCORD patrolling the space, not FedNav or GalCom. Still, moving the idea of demilitarization to just the Caldari Prime planetary sphere?


Thank you Mr. Inhonores, I understand that there would be obstacles and appreciate your response.

[Redacted]

-- "The weak of mind are quick to judge with slightest tempt; Thus fools go forth to spread false word." - The Scriptures, Book of Trials 2:13 - 2:21

--"At the narrow passage, there is no brother and no friend." - Hyasyoda Proverb

BloodBird
The Crucible.
#95 - 2013-03-07 19:06:29 UTC
Pieter Tuulinen wrote:
James Syagrius wrote:

We are not forcing anyone to do anything, we are simply attempting to see that those who choose to resist oppression have the tools to do so effectively.

I think your expression of concern for the Federal citizens of Luminaire VII rings a bit hollow. I know how you and your ilk would like to frame the “peace”. Forgive me if I don’t share your vision.

So now you expect people born and raised in a place to simply submit to their homes being occupation by a foreign power? One wonders if you hold yourselves to the same standard . One wishes you had taken your own advice.


It takes more than gifted weapons to resist effectively. They simply die with expensive toys clutched in their hands. I wonder if they curse the libertine propaganda that led them to that fate, judged wanting by the Winds and cursed by Ancestors that know them not? Perhaps there really is no more point in discussion. Maybe we have to get your attention some other way.

We told you that we would return. You didn't beleive us. Any tragedy that befell or befalls as a result is on your head.


I would like to remind you that AFAIK, the various nation-states on Caldari Prime had armed forces. Trained, equipped, dedicated and capable people who knew how to operate their equipment to great effect. There were also a number of Federal Marine regiments on the ground and odds are great that not all of those have been silenced, a great many have likely escaped death by orbital bombardment and are helping to direct and train the resistance as we speak.

I would further like to remind you that pacifying a whole planet deep in enemy territory is.... hard work. All those people shooting at your 'skilled front-line' soldiers will not all magically be poorly trained civilians without a clue in the world, many, if not even most, will know what they are doing.

As for your little punch line, here is another:

Why was diplomacy unacceptable to killing our citizens? The blood from the people who died defending their homes from your invasion is on your head.

Pieter Tuulinen wrote:
It has already been stated that the single largest sticking point in this conflict, larger than Executor Heth, larger than the Titan and larger than the atrocities of previous centuries, is the Federation's inability to conceive of the fact that a race's RIGHT to the cradle of it's civilisation is more profound than the historical equivalent of squatter's rights.

I really don't know how to put this to you in any other way - we are ready to commit whatever resources are required to take this all the way. We have a military that can project force FAR better than yours. We have a population that is fully behind the reasons for this war.

We're prepared to bleed and sacrifice and wait - however patiently is necessary - to get our Home back. Again, this is not chest-beating, you just don't seem to be intellectually prepared to accept the truth here. If I'm using poetry, it's because polite explanation has failed and hyperbole is my last resort on the road to brute force.


And now suddenly all of them are squatters.

A whole planet with a multitude of sovereign nations and all of their citizens are squatters on a world that your people abandoned en-mass roughly two centuries ago.

Any claim any of them might have to live on a planet their ancestors have called "Home" for that extent of time, or longer in the case of all the Caldari who reside there and never actually left, is null and void. Because you said so.

And then you boast that your are ready to do anything to have your way. We cave in and give it to you or you take it anyway you can. The "truth" you speak of is subjective like everything here. Here is an objective, proven fact: You left. About two centuries ago. Billions left, millions stayed. According to many of your countrymen, the ones who stayed are not actually Caldari, because not being a State citizen is a crime.

You want back the property-rights to the land you abandoned and you are willing to do anything for that, while those who live there today are squatters and non-entities to you, you do not care for the opposing arguments and the desires of the Federation are irrelevant to you, it seems.

Those arguments will look so great on any diplomatic table, indeed.
BloodBird
The Crucible.
#96 - 2013-03-07 19:26:41 UTC
Malcolm Khross wrote:
If you support peace, then defend the areas of the warzone that you believe should be considered sovereign space for your respective nation. (Placid, Essence and Verge Vendor for the Federation/ Black Rise and THe Citadel for the State) Cease and desist all hostile entry into the opposing regions of contested space.

Force this war into an unchanging standoff, with both sides equally punishing all offenders of this stand-off and perhaps there will be the realization that this war can have an end. We are the weapons waging this war, if those weapons refuse to keep striking, then the war grinds to a halt.


Agreeable words. I have advocated this same thing in the past, and whenever I have been in the FEDEF's service, I have always focused on the defense of the Union's homelands. This has not changed.

Malcolm Khross wrote:
This was the same error made before. Black Rise is a part of the State and how the State runs itself is not up for debate or "correction" from the Federation. Black Rise is not "on the table."


I never said it was, I corrected an exaggeration in regards to how many people live in Black Rise, and that was all.

Malcolm Khross wrote:
This is not for the benefit of the State, it's for the mutual benefit of the State and the Federation but more importantly, for the non-military personnel caught in the middle of this struggle. A demilitarization of Luminaire removes the "security risk" of having a Caldari Titan in orbit around Caldari Prime, thus negating the Federal concern that the Titan can be used to strike against Federation assets and citizens, it removes the possibility of invasion of Caldari Prime from the Gallente, thus negating the State's assertion that keeping the Titan in orbit for "security" is necessary.

It protects both of our people's homeworlds from one another and ensures we cannot strike at each other's hearts again.


Seriphyn has answered this question for the most part. My personal opinion on this is irrelevant, the fact remains that there are far more planets in Luminaire than just Caldari Prime. Creating a DMZ zone around that planet is not an unreasonable request, turning the whole system over to CONCORD protected DMZ status however, is so unlikely to ever happen that i's essentially a waste of time to argue for.


Simon Louvaki wrote:
*SNIP*


Both of your points or interest have been answered, I'd think. Correct me if I am wrong.
Simon Louvaki
Khaldari InnoTektoniks and Analytical Solutions
#97 - 2013-03-07 19:59:09 UTC  |  Edited by: Simon Louvaki
BloodBird wrote:

Both of your points or interest have been answered, I'd think. Correct me if I am wrong.


Not exactly I'm afarid. Issue on how to come about it have been addressed, but not as to why its an unreasonable request that is spun in the outright favor of the State. I want to know why its unreasonable and in explicit favor of the State and disadvantageous to the Federation as you seemed to have suggested.

What does the Federation stand to lose if Luminarie, our shared home system, were to become demilitarized and protected by CONCORD. I've already mentioned how its advantageous to both of our respective nations, and have yet to see any downside. Can you please elaborate as to your opposition in such terms?

*Edit: I've noticed nothing but Federation and CONCORD vessels in the greater region of Essence and Luminarie, which is why I find it somewhat confusing as to how jurisdiction of the vacuum is divided. Is the space between stations and planets also controlled by hundreds of different nations? it seems like there would be an awful lot of red tape involved.

-- "The weak of mind are quick to judge with slightest tempt; Thus fools go forth to spread false word." - The Scriptures, Book of Trials 2:13 - 2:21

--"At the narrow passage, there is no brother and no friend." - Hyasyoda Proverb

BloodBird
The Crucible.
#98 - 2013-03-07 20:42:14 UTC
Simon Louvaki wrote:
BloodBird wrote:

Both of your points or interest have been answered, I'd think. Correct me if I am wrong.


Not exactly I'm afarid. Issue on how to come about it have been addressed, but not as to why its an unreasonable request that is spun in the outright favor of the State. I want to know why its unreasonable and in explicit favor of the State and disadvantageous to the Federation as you seemed to have suggested.

What does the Federation stand to lose if Luminarie, our shared home system, were to become demilitarized and protected by CONCORD. I've already mentioned how its advantageous to both of our respective nations, and have yet to see any downside. Can you please elaborate as to your opposition in such terms?

*Edit: I've noticed nothing but Federation and CONCORD vessels in the greater region of Essence and Luminarie, which is why I find it somewhat confusing as to how jurisdiction of the vacuum is divided. Is the space between stations and planets also controlled by hundreds of different nations? it seems like there would be an awful lot of red tape involved.


Your State and the Federation are not the only entities in this cluster. It is a well-known fact that outlawed factions like the Serpentis and Guristas have hidden pathways to get to nearly anywhere they please, Luminaire is no exception. CONCORD's protection is not sufficient to ensure total safety - pirate patrols in high-sec are found daily - and setting up a DMZ in a whole system where 99% of the actual space is controlled by the Federation ensures that the vast majority of all possible targets - including all space-born colonies and settlements such as dead-space pockets - fall under the Federation's aegis.

The Federation, the State, even the Republic and Empire and all other CONCORD signatories may and likely will respect the DMZ status. There are plenty others that won't, and none of the member-nations in Luminaire will ever tolerate sending the navy away from their sovereign space, for this and several other reasons.
Simon Louvaki
Khaldari InnoTektoniks and Analytical Solutions
#99 - 2013-03-07 22:23:49 UTC
I appreciate your even handed response, although none of those problems seem to be beyond workability nor in blatant favoritism of one side or another from my position.

-- "The weak of mind are quick to judge with slightest tempt; Thus fools go forth to spread false word." - The Scriptures, Book of Trials 2:13 - 2:21

--"At the narrow passage, there is no brother and no friend." - Hyasyoda Proverb

Rinai Vero
Blades of Liberty
#100 - 2013-03-07 22:27:42 UTC
Malcolm Khross wrote:
I urge any and all capsuleers who claim to support and desire peace to place action where you words are, to prove your merit and honor with deed and not simply voice.

Terms have been laid out, first by Oniseki-haani and echoed by Syagrius and others, terms that appear to be agreeable to most of us. However, not every aspect of those terms can be accomplished by the capsuleer community alone, for all of our power and wealth, certain things must still be handled through politics.

If you support peace, then defend the areas of the warzone that you believe should be considered sovereign space for your respective nation. (Placid, Essence and Verge Vendor for the Federation/ Black Rise and THe Citadel for the State) Cease and desist all hostile entry into the opposing regions of contested space.

Force this war into an unchanging standoff, with both sides equally punishing all offenders of this stand-off and perhaps there will be the realization that this war can have an end. We are the weapons waging this war, if those weapons refuse to keep striking, then the war grinds to a halt.

Perhaps I am merely a visionary and a delusional one at that, but this has always been my purpose and always will be. From the formation of the Wiyrkomi Honor Guard, to my individual service in the Protectorate and now as the Chief Executive of Wirykomi Tactical Response Directive. I urge others to follow suit and let us see how many of us are truly committed to peace.


I certainly fully support your call for action in addition to words, and believe your "vision" is a laudable one. This entire endeavor requires all of us to try to rise above the natural cynicism that New Eden teaches those of us who survive. My hope is that we will be able to find a solution that walks the fine line between idealism and practicality.

When one chooses an idealistic path, it is difficult to limit that idealism. I see a lot of discussion about grand notions, and I say that without irony, for broad and lasting peace. That's all well and good, but for now I urge all of you to narrow your focus. A full cease fire along any front in the Broder War between the Gallente Federation and the Caldari State will not happen in the current climate. Neither will a formal Peace Treaty or normalization of relations.

What might be possible is that our two Nations could take this first measured step towards building the trust necessary for these things to be possible in the future. We know that it would be of benefit to both the Caldari and the Federation to settle the issue of Caldari Prime. We should accomplish this first, and accomplish it before our failure to do so destroys any hope for future peace.

Again, I urge all of you to contact your Elected or Corporate representatives. Pressure them to begin the work to bring our two governments towards this settlement.