These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
Previous page123Next page
 

A reason for improving mission loot.

Author
James Amril-Kesh
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#21 - 2013-03-04 16:23:15 UTC
I thought increasing the drop rate on rare mods would be a good idea. At least until I realized that increasing the drop rate would cause the price to go down and we'd be right back where we started.

Enjoying the rain today? ;)

Fearghaz Tiwas
Perkone
Caldari State
#22 - 2013-03-04 16:38:45 UTC
Level 4 missions pay out plenty for the amount of effort/risk involved.

A decent missioning ship and a salvaging alt and you can make a lot of isk very quckly, especially if you get a good run of decent missions/no drones.

The reason missions got a nerf (which I think I recall happening) was because it was making mining defucnt partially because mission runners just reprocess most of the loot (along with the drone poo).

It only takes a tanked badger 2 to haul like 250M worth of loot about, 1 trip once every couple of days or so is not a lot, specially if you can use your salvaging alt to do so. Better yet, work out what you can sell where you mission at higher prices, hauling everything to a hub is not always the best (though it is often the quickest way to get your isk)

I used to not really like the idea of having an alt, but since I have, it really has speeded up my isk making and made it more fun/efficient to make isk.

PVP in cruisers or frigs til you get a bigger isk buffer.
Mortimer Civeri
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#23 - 2013-03-04 17:33:46 UTC
Gee, in four hours of missioning, and mining I can have close to twenty frigates built and fitted for PvP, and that is not even using L4 agents. If I did just two hours a day missioning and mining I could make and fit out three to four crusiers in a week, heck I could salvage all the wrecks in the missions/belts and probably rig two or three of them as well.

"I don't know which is worse, ...that everyone has his price, or that the price is always so low." Calvin

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#24 - 2013-03-04 17:35:54 UTC
Your problem is that you're trying to make money from something that takes time away from making money, OP.

Ignore the loot — you'll earn more ISK that way.
Solstice Project
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#25 - 2013-03-04 17:44:54 UTC
What a load of bull ...
Mara Pahrdi
The Order of Anoyia
#26 - 2013-03-04 17:47:38 UTC
Solstice Project wrote:
What a load of bull ...

Remove standings and insurance.

Princess Saskia
Hyperfleet Industries
#27 - 2013-03-04 17:48:58 UTC
Lets find a solution to this problem that ALOT of people seem to be having.

Claim to be a casual player... Wonder why you can't afford stuff.

I'm coming to the realization that I don't think there is something wrong with the game atall?

TLDR: Complaining about not being able to compete, Is a casual player.

Go play the new call of duty when it comes out. I heard they have awesome weapon skins.

 ♥ 

Solstice Project
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#28 - 2013-03-04 17:59:21 UTC
Princess Saskia wrote:
Lets find a solution to this problem that ALOT of people seem to be having.

Claim to be a casual player... Wonder why you can't afford stuff.

I'm coming to the realization that I don't think there is something wrong with the game atall?

TLDR: Complaining about not being able to compete, Is a casual player.

Go play the new call of duty when it comes out. I heard they have awesome weapon skins.
James Amril-Kesh
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#29 - 2013-03-05 00:21:08 UTC
James Amril-Kesh wrote:
I thought increasing the drop rate on rare mods would be a good idea. At least until I realized that increasing the drop rate would cause the price to go down and we'd be right back where we started.

I should clarify it's not missions that made me believe this, but going through my fifth or sixth Dread Guristas spawn in a row that dropped nothing but tags and ammo and T1 mods.

Enjoying the rain today? ;)

Calathorn Virpio
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#30 - 2013-03-05 00:24:10 UTC
Alice Saki wrote:
Get out of HighSec
Make Isk Elsewhere
Sleepers
Level 5's.
Plexes ETC ETC ETC ETC



for a new player

no
no
no
no, and no no no no

BRING BACK THE JUKEBOX

I attended the School of Hard Nocks, the only place you will ever learn anything of value, sadly most Americans never meet the requirments to attend

Katran Luftschreck
Royal Ammatar Engineering Corps
#31 - 2013-03-05 01:29:38 UTC
Abrazzar wrote:
Actually, the opposite should happen. Meta modules should only drop components that act as BPCs which will manufacture the meta module with the T1 module and possibly other materials.

This means more demand for minerals, more demand for T1 items and thus greater income through mining and manufacturing. The increased need for manufacturing lines will also lead to longer queues in highsec and the possibility of people going to lowsec for lower volume meta manufacturing.


This... is brilliant! Turn meta into thing that wedges between the ease of T1 production and the nightmare of T2 production! I love it! Let's expand on this...

Would metas have BPOs (could be too easy) or only BPCs like T2 (not worth it). I am thinking that a BPO could be converted, through science skills and research, into a meta BPO. Halfway between the two: It's still a BPO, so it's infinite, but it has to be researched like a T2... but only once. The meta level achieved during research would depend on chance & science skills, sort of like T2 BPC production values are now. Not high enough for you? Research it again, see if it goes up a notch.

And of course all would require T1 basic stuff to build from, increasing demand as you said.

http://youtu.be/t0q2F8NsYQ0

Frostys Virpio
State War Academy
Caldari State
#32 - 2013-03-05 02:24:47 UTC
Calathorn Virpio wrote:
Alice Saki wrote:
Get out of HighSec
Make Isk Elsewhere
Sleepers
Level 5's.
Plexes ETC ETC ETC ETC



for a new player

no
no
no
no, and no no no no


New player totally need to make bajillions of ISKs.

Yep.
Mara Rinn
Cosmic Goo Convertor
#33 - 2013-03-05 03:27:46 UTC
Three comments on this topic:

  1. Read the Making ISK guide.
  2. Enjoy the power and beauty of your frigate.
  3. Buffing mission income will simply increase everyone's income, leading to increased prices, leading to the same conversion rate of hours-of-play to number-of-ships-I-can-lose.


P.S.: If you wonder what I'm on about with the frigate thing, just ask Rixx Javix or any other member of the Tuskers (or Rifter Drifters if they're still around). Frigate PvP is the best PvP.
Alara IonStorm
#34 - 2013-03-05 03:40:37 UTC
Mara Rinn wrote:

P.S.: If you wonder what I'm on about with the frigate thing, just ask Rixx Javix or any other member of the Tuskers (or Rifter Drifters if they're still around). Frigate PvP is the best PvP.

The swarm consumes the lone mighty elephant in a mere moment. By the time its herd lumbers upon the corpse is already stripped bare and bugs are a dark cloud on the horizon looking for their next unfortunate victim.

That is the way of EVE.
Jensaro Koraka
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#35 - 2013-03-05 05:43:56 UTC  |  Edited by: Jensaro Koraka
Pookie McPook wrote:
improving mission loot

No, it should be nerfed. High sec is already way too profitable for the negligible risk it has.

Pookie McPook wrote:
My opinion is that the barrier for most casual players to leave high sec and go looking for trouble is cost.

You can get started in a T1 frig so still no.

"Every normal man must be tempted, at times, to spit on his hands, hoist the black flag, and begin slitting throats." -H.L. Mencken

Steve Spooner
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#36 - 2013-03-05 05:46:08 UTC  |  Edited by: Steve Spooner
Takes me half a hour to finish a level 4 because I'm using a ass raven and I average 15 mill in loot salvaging with a indi ult in a noctis, totaling about 40 mill ISK including bounty, reward , and LP. Not as much as FW or incursions but when I don't feel like getting my ass blown up and watching The Walking Dead while I pewpew, I mission.
Josef Djugashvilis
#37 - 2013-03-05 06:02:19 UTC
Alice Saki wrote:
Get out of HighSec
Make Isk Elsewhere
Sleepers
Level 5's.
Plexes ETC ETC ETC ETC


Hmm, not keen on the PLEX bit.

A form of 'pay to not actually need to do anything to earn isk' in Eve.

In fact it is the lazy player's version of the much despised, afk ice mining really.

This is not a signature.

Caitlyn Tufy
Perkone
Caldari State
#38 - 2013-03-05 06:41:30 UTC  |  Edited by: Caitlyn Tufy
Pookie McPook wrote:
This is addressing the issue of casual high sec players who don't want to take their valuable pve boats out of high sec. They exist deal with it.


You can't expect a better reward without risking a little. Deal with it.

P.S.: Josef, Plexing, not PLEXing. As in - doing complexes (exploration, faction warfare, etc.)
Vince Snetterton
#39 - 2013-03-05 08:37:11 UTC
OP, you have come to the wrong place to get support for your idea.
In fact, the new CSM will be making it a priority to ruin missions even further, at least high sec ones.

They will be focused on accelerating the process of turning high sec into a wasteland.

Read the CSM platforms, or listen to the Zebra Crossings podcasts, or simply read these forums, and put it all together.
The new voting system ensures complete dominance of the CSM by null sec.
CCP has already stated they want the CSM more closely involved in the direction of the game, as a "stakeholder", and null sec is going to make every effort to control the CSM and the direction of the game.

The null sec power blocs are a patient bunch, and not stupid. They realize that CCP will put up quite a lot of resistance to wiping out high sec in one go, so they will ask for "small rebalances", and maintain the pressure over the coming years. They have been at it for a couple now, with noticeable results on reducing high sec income.

My best guess, their ultimate wish list to CCP will include:

Mission loot/bounties cut in half
Incursions cut by 50-75% (though a goon rep said he wants them left alone, so that one is iffy),
Refining efficiency maxed at 90% in high sec.
Oh, but that refining efficiency won't mean much since null sec is whining, and will get, new rocks that pump out huge quantities of trit and pyerite. Wanna guess what that does to high sec mining income?
Oh, and for the industrialist, odds are quite high that you can kiss goodbye T2 mfg in high sec.

And this is not conjecture. These are all various items posted on numerous platforms of null sec candidates, or in forum posts by the null sec propaganda teams over the last 6 months. Given that the null sec power blocs are looking to control at least 10 of the 14 seats, maybe 12, they will be pushing hard for this to happen.

I have been focusing on cleaning out my hangars of all meta 1 and meta 2 stuff, refining, and then selling the low end minerals before the mining changes are announced and trit, pyerite, and the other low end min prices crater. I also figure that meta3 and meta4 items will rise dramatically when T2 item production is handed to the null sec oligarchs.

But, as I said, these guys are a patient bunch. They recognize it is a long long haul to wipe out high sec, they won't get all they ask for in this CSM. But they will maintain the pressure, and sooner, rather than later, no one will be able to make a decent income in high sec.
James Amril-Kesh
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#40 - 2013-03-05 08:42:37 UTC
Vince Snetterton wrote:
OP, you have come to the wrong place to get support for your idea.
In fact, the new CSM will be making it a priority to ruin missions even further, at least high sec ones.

They will be focused on accelerating the process of turning high sec into a wasteland.

Read the CSM platforms, or listen to the Zebra Crossings podcasts, or simply read these forums, and put it all together.
The new voting system ensures complete dominance of the CSM by null sec.
CCP has already stated they want the CSM more closely involved in the direction of the game, as a "stakeholder", and null sec is going to make every effort to control the CSM and the direction of the game.

The null sec power blocs are a patient bunch, and not stupid. They realize that CCP will put up quite a lot of resistance to wiping out high sec in one go, so they will ask for "small rebalances", and maintain the pressure over the coming years. They have been at it for a couple now, with noticeable results on reducing high sec income.

My best guess, their ultimate wish list to CCP will include:

Mission loot/bounties cut in half
Incursions cut by 50-75% (though a goon rep said he wants them left alone, so that one is iffy),
Refining efficiency maxed at 90% in high sec.
Oh, but that refining efficiency won't mean much since null sec is whining, and will get, new rocks that pump out huge quantities of trit and pyerite. Wanna guess what that does to high sec mining income?
Oh, and for the industrialist, odds are quite high that you can kiss goodbye T2 mfg in high sec.

And this is not conjecture. These are all various items posted on numerous platforms of null sec candidates, or in forum posts by the null sec propaganda teams over the last 6 months. Given that the null sec power blocs are looking to control at least 10 of the 14 seats, maybe 12, they will be pushing hard for this to happen.

I have been focusing on cleaning out my hangars of all meta 1 and meta 2 stuff, refining, and then selling the low end minerals before the mining changes are announced and trit, pyerite, and the other low end min prices crater. I also figure that meta3 and meta4 items will rise dramatically when T2 item production is handed to the null sec oligarchs.

But, as I said, these guys are a patient bunch. They recognize it is a long long haul to wipe out high sec, they won't get all they ask for in this CSM. But they will maintain the pressure, and sooner, rather than later, no one will be able to make a decent income in high sec.

WTS TINFOIL AND ASSEMBLED TINFOIL HATS

Enjoying the rain today? ;)

Previous page123Next page