These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Player Features and Ideas Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Dear CCP Fozzie: Cruiser Overview Settings

Author
Jaiimez Skor
The Infamous.
#1 - 2013-02-19 13:46:08 UTC  |  Edited by: Jaiimez Skor
Dear CCP Fozzie, is it true you are more likely to get a dev response if you write dear CCP Fozzie in the title of the thread...

http://www.reactionface.info/sites/default/files/images/1287666826226.png

Anyway the SRS BZZNSS

Pretty simple request, not sure how difficult it is t do backend, but given what you just did with battlecruisers I imagine it's nothing.

But as simple as this, split the T1 Cruisers into seperate catagory's. Since you have now made the T1 Cruisers VERY viable for regular use, i've noticed a problem as a logistics pilot, people keep flying scythes, and there is no way to add them to my logistics overview without adding EVERY other cruiser on the field too, which can be fun in cruiser gangs.

This also works both ways alot of fleets will have an overview setting for just hostile logistics, and Scythes don't show on this, it benefits both sides and works with all of the cruisers. E.G most people have a Recons overview, which if the cruiser skill is split could be adjusted to show only Recons and Electronic Warfare Cruisers. Then Logi tab for Logistics and Logi Cruisers. Then another for Combat Cruisers.

Pretty sure there is no major reason for people not to want this. Other than those who don't want their logi to be so easily found in the overview.
Jaiimez Skor
The Infamous.
#2 - 2013-02-20 11:30:39 UTC
Bump
Weasel Juice
Mayhem and Destruction
#3 - 2013-02-20 11:33:26 UTC  |  Edited by: Weasel Juice
Jaiimez Skor wrote:
Dear CCP Fozzie, is it true you are more likely to get a dev response if you write dear CCP Fozzie in the title of the thread...

http://www.reactionface.info/sites/default/files/images/1287666826226.png

Anyway the SRS BZZNSS

Pretty simple request, not sure how difficult it is t do backend, but given what you just did with battlecruisers I imagine it's nothing.

But as simple as this, split the T1 Cruisers into seperate catagory's. Since you have now made the T1 Cruisers VERY viable for regular use, i've noticed a problem as a logistics pilot, people keep flying scythes, and there is no way to add them to my logistics overview without adding EVERY other cruiser on the field too, which can be fun in cruiser gangs.

This also works both ways alot of fleets will have an overview setting for just hostile logistics, and Scythes don't show on this, it benefits both sides and works with all of the cruisers. E.G most people have a Recons overview, which if the cruiser skill is split could be adjusted to show only Recons and Electronic Warfare Cruisers. Then Logi tab for Logistics and Logi Cruisers. Then another for Combat Cruisers.

Pretty sure there is no major reason for people not to want this. Other than those who don't want their logi to be so easily found in the overview.


I endorse this product and/or service.

Since we have tiericide going on in all classes (and attack battlecruisers just got their own overview category for this exact reason), the overview should adapt accordingly as well with all T1 ships.

Simple and yet great idea. +1
Jaiimez Skor
The Infamous.
#4 - 2013-02-23 11:12:33 UTC
Weasel Juice wrote:
Jaiimez Skor wrote:
Dear CCP Fozzie, is it true you are more li....


I endorse this product and/or service.

Since we have tiericide going on in all classes (and attack battlecruisers just got their own overview category for this exact reason), the overview should adapt accordingly as well with all T1 ships.

Simple and yet great idea. +1


I approve of what this man say's, I mean erh, bump?
Khalidah Kassab
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#5 - 2013-02-23 12:03:06 UTC
I support this idea.
+1
Jaiimez Skor
The Infamous.
#6 - 2013-02-26 09:30:42 UTC
Only 2 other people supporting this idea? Bump...
Sinzor Aumer
Planetary Harvesting and Processing LLC
#7 - 2013-02-26 10:12:09 UTC
Sounds legit
Schmata Bastanold
In Boobiez We Trust
#8 - 2013-02-26 10:44:50 UTC
Ah, why the hell not...
+1

Invalid signature format

Christine Peeveepeeski
Low Sec Concepts
#9 - 2013-02-26 11:08:48 UTC
+1 and I rarely fly logi, it just makes sense!
Spugg Galdon
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#10 - 2013-02-26 11:22:31 UTC
actually makes sense. Shame it will screw all our overviews up if released all at once as we would have to manually add all the new stuff.

+1
Jaiimez Skor
The Infamous.
#11 - 2013-03-05 00:17:54 UTC
Bump some more support for this?
Jaiimez Skor
The Infamous.
#12 - 2013-03-07 13:56:06 UTC
Noone else think this is worth doing?
Jaiimez Skor
The Infamous.
#13 - 2013-03-28 22:10:58 UTC
Bump, moar support!
Greenlock Beta
24th Imperial Crusade
Amarr Empire
#14 - 2013-03-28 23:32:37 UTC
+1