These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
Previous page123Next page
 

Eve with twice its current membership?

Author
Malcanis
Vanishing Point.
The Initiative.
#21 - 2013-03-03 21:33:08 UTC
Imawuss wrote:
The opposite of your normal Eve is dyeing thread.

What would happen to Eve if its current subscription base doubled?

Is the server technology out there to handle the load the Eve servers would be put under? Right now there is basically a que to get into Jita, Tidi fights are already the norm. What woud happen to the quality of life so to speak for the game experience if Eve population spiked?


I vaguely recall CCP saying in 2010 or 2009 even when they last upgraded TQ that they planned for 100k PCU (roughly double what we have now)

"Just remember later that I warned against any change to jump ranges or fatigue. You earned whats coming."

Grath Telkin, 11.10.2016

Takseen
Federal Defense Union
Gallente Federation
#22 - 2013-03-03 21:33:42 UTC
Highsec space will be extremely strained by any pop increase. Barring another hardware upgrade, market hubs would have to go regional. Hopefully CCP would take the opportunity to make low and null more attractive to highsec residents who don't mind a bit more risk in exchange for more rewards. Any highsec activity other than mission running and trading would become more difficult and less lucrative.

And hopefully with the extra money from the extra subs, we'd get more shinies. What kind of shinies depends on what the new customers are interested in.
Sariah Kion
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#23 - 2013-03-03 21:37:06 UTC
Jonah Gravenstein wrote:




I'm not denying that multiple accounts warp subscription figures, the reason I brought up WoW is that it is seen by many as the benchmark MMO, it's certainly one of the most popular if you go by their "subscription" numbers even if they do fluctuate all over the place. Please explain how multi boxing in WoW is different in principle than multi boxing in Eve, both are done to gain an advantage over others, for example using a second account as a healer in WoW is analogous to using a second account as a logi in Eve.


Its not about "in principle" its about the motivation for doing so in Eve when compared to WoW. Please try and argue there are equal percentages of "alt accounts" in WoW as there is in Eve. CCP actively advertises and has specials directly related to current subscribers making alt accounts.

You keep on trying to muddy the waters and Im just gonna ignore you.

[b]Librarian and Exotic Dancer Extraordinaire Champion of the Working Men and Women of Empire Space Anti-Null Sec Opium Den Movement President[/b] Not the woman high sec wants but the Woman high sec needs. [u]A modern girl for a modern world.[/u]

Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
#24 - 2013-03-03 21:50:35 UTC  |  Edited by: Jonah Gravenstein
Sariah Kion wrote:


You keep on trying to muddy the waters and Im just gonna ignore you.


You seem to do the ignoring bit quite well, especially when people don't agree with you, you come across as a petulant child in that respect. I'm not muddying the waters per se, I'm merely trying to understand your point of view and maybe spark some debate.

I never said that the percentage of alt accounts in WoW was as high as it is in Eve, I merely pointed out that people have multiple accounts in both games. With reference to CCP advertising special deals on alt accounts, they do that because they know that Eve is a niche game and that its appeal is limited to a subsection of gamers, hence their development of Dust 514 and the World of Darkness franchise to appeal to a wider audience.

Eve caters to those gamers that like an MMO to have consequences, where our actions can have an influence on the entire universe and where we are the content, there's very few MMOs out there that can offer the same level of freeform play that Eve does.

In the beginning there was nothing, which exploded.

New Player FAQ

Feyd's Survival Pack

Skorpynekomimi
#25 - 2013-03-03 22:03:09 UTC
Whitehound wrote:
Imawuss wrote:
What would happen to Eve if its current subscription base doubled?

Quite simple: CCP's profit would double and then take a guess what they will do with the extra money ...


Lutefisk and hookers, of course!
And some of the finest fermented shark money can buy.

Economic PVP

Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
#26 - 2013-03-03 22:15:11 UTC
Skorpynekomimi wrote:
Whitehound wrote:
Imawuss wrote:
What would happen to Eve if its current subscription base doubled?

Quite simple: CCP's profit would double and then take a guess what they will do with the extra money ...


Lutefisk and hookers, of course!
And some of the finest fermented shark money can buy.


You forgot the Brennivin and Vodka, I'm sure they only drink the damn stuff because antifreeze is poisonous.

In the beginning there was nothing, which exploded.

New Player FAQ

Feyd's Survival Pack

Sentamon
Imperial Academy
Amarr Empire
#27 - 2013-03-03 23:16:37 UTC
Sariah Kion wrote:


Its not about "in principle" its about the motivation for doing so in Eve when compared to WoW. Please try and argue there are equal percentages of "alt accounts" in WoW as there is in Eve. CCP actively advertises and has specials directly related to current subscribers making alt accounts.

You keep on trying to muddy the waters and Im just gonna ignore you.


Yes there are, IsBoxer has a huge WoW community. Since WoW is party based with support classes you have even more alt accounts. WoW also has a large "china farmer" rmt community... much larger then any other game.

Your alt argument isn't a very good one. Lineage 2 which held the crown for most subs for a long time has a massive amount of alts. People would run full 9 man parties all over the place and just about everyone had an alt buffer.

~ Professional Forum Alt  ~

Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
#28 - 2013-03-03 23:31:11 UTC
Sentamon wrote:
Sariah Kion wrote:


Its not about "in principle" its about the motivation for doing so in Eve when compared to WoW. Please try and argue there are equal percentages of "alt accounts" in WoW as there is in Eve. CCP actively advertises and has specials directly related to current subscribers making alt accounts.

You keep on trying to muddy the waters and Im just gonna ignore you.


Yes there are, IsBoxer has a huge WoW community. Since WoW is party based with support classes you have even more alt accounts. WoW also has a large "china farmer" rmt community... much larger then any other game.

Your alt argument isn't a very good one. Lineage 2 which held the crown for most subs for a long time has a massive amount of alts. People would run full 9 man parties all over the place and just about everyone had an alt buffer.


Thanks for the clarification, I've never played WoW, so could only compare healers with logi from what I've been told by friends that do. It's good to know that I'm not a total ignoramus Lol

In the beginning there was nothing, which exploded.

New Player FAQ

Feyd's Survival Pack

Josef Djugashvilis
#29 - 2013-03-03 23:40:05 UTC
If player numbers on-line, were to show a massive increase, would TiDi persuade more folk to move out of overcrowded hi-sec into null and lo?

I see folk are already complaining about TiDi in Jita.

This is not a signature.

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe
#30 - 2013-03-04 04:46:09 UTC
Josef Djugashvilis wrote:
If player numbers on-line, were to show a massive increase, would TiDi persuade more folk to move out of overcrowded hi-sec into null and lo?

I see folk are already complaining about TiDi in Jita.

TiDi in Jita can't really get worse, there's the cap.

We'd see more threads about people spamming the gates into Jita, making it all the more important for HARDCORE EVE ONLINE JITA PLAYERS to log into Jita as fast as possible after downtime and never log out.

Triggered by: Wars of Sovless Agression, Bending the Knee, Twisting the Knife, Eating Sov Wheaties, Bombless Bombers, Fizzlesov, Interceptor Fleets, Running Away, GhostTime Vuln, Renters, Bombs, Bubbles ?

Ranger 1
Ranger Corp
Vae. Victis.
#31 - 2013-03-04 06:41:39 UTC
Encouraging the use and development of other trade hubs besides Jita would only serve to strengthen the game as a whole.

View the latest EVE Online developments and other game related news and gameplay by visiting Ranger 1 Presents: Virtual Realms.

Ranger 1
Ranger Corp
Vae. Victis.
#32 - 2013-03-04 06:46:23 UTC  |  Edited by: Ranger 1
Sariah Kion wrote:
Jonah Gravenstein wrote:




I'm not denying that multiple accounts warp subscription figures, the reason I brought up WoW is that it is seen by many as the benchmark MMO, it's certainly one of the most popular if you go by their "subscription" numbers even if they do fluctuate all over the place. Please explain how multi boxing in WoW is different in principle than multi boxing in Eve, both are done to gain an advantage over others, for example using a second account as a healer in WoW is analogous to using a second account as a logi in Eve.


Its not about "in principle" its about the motivation for doing so in Eve when compared to WoW. Please try and argue there are equal percentages of "alt accounts" in WoW as there is in Eve. CCP actively advertises and has specials directly related to current subscribers making alt accounts.

You keep on trying to muddy the waters and Im just gonna ignore you.

Your original point was that the number of subscriptions was not an accurate indicator of the health of the game due to people having alts. It was simply pointed out other MMO's have the same issue as well, which is undeniably true.

The best analysis we can come up with STILL indicates that the number of active players is going up as a direct proportion of the number of new subscriptions... even taking into account that a certain percentage of those accounts are alt accounts.

While this detracts nothing from the well being of the parent company (after all, a paid account is a paid account) it also bodes well for the overall health of the game.

I'd say the waters are pretty much crystal clear.

Edit: You know, it's funny. It doesn't matter if the subscription numbers go down, stay the same, or go up... somebody will always try to show how it proves that EvE is (still, 10 years running) dying. Smile

View the latest EVE Online developments and other game related news and gameplay by visiting Ranger 1 Presents: Virtual Realms.

Calathorn Virpio
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#33 - 2013-03-04 06:47:36 UTC
Jonah Gravenstein wrote:
Sariah Kion wrote:
Jonah Gravenstein wrote:
Sariah Kion wrote:
The "subscriber" numbers for this game are a joke. There are nowhere near 500,000 unique individuals playing this game. The level of alt accounts in that number is staggering. Its one of the biggest frauds in the MMO genre.

I would bet there are less than 200k unique players subscribed.



Subscriptions relate to the number of paying accounts, not the number of paying individuals. It's also quite common for individuals to have multiple subscriptions to MMOs, for example I don't play WoW, never have, never will, but I know of several people that have multiple WoW accounts.


Im sorry but thats apples and oranges.

WoW and EVE have a different progression mechanic.



I accept that the progression mechanics may well be different, but that's not the point you originally brought up. The point you originally made is that multiple accounts can warp the subscription numbers and stated that it was fraud. I merely pointed out the fact that people can and do have multiple accounts in both Eve and WoW, normally so that they can multi-box to gain an advantage. Thus making Blizzard and probably every other MMO developer guilty of the same fraud, namely using distorted subscription figures to promote their products success.



Quote:
Eve in a nutshell, it's you vs the universe, and every machiavellian space bastard in it.




i'm stealing this Big smile

BRING BACK THE JUKEBOX

I attended the School of Hard Nocks, the only place you will ever learn anything of value, sadly most Americans never meet the requirments to attend

Ranger 1
Ranger Corp
Vae. Victis.
#34 - 2013-03-04 06:49:50 UTC
Machiavellian Space Bastards.

MSB.

Good alliance name.

View the latest EVE Online developments and other game related news and gameplay by visiting Ranger 1 Presents: Virtual Realms.

Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
#35 - 2013-03-04 07:34:53 UTC  |  Edited by: Jonah Gravenstein
Calathorn Virpio wrote:
Jonah Gravenstein wrote:

Eve in a nutshell, it's you vs the universe, and every machiavellian space bastard in it.

i'm stealing this Big smile


In that case, I must give credit where it's due, I stole machiavellian space bastards from a PCGamer article

In the beginning there was nothing, which exploded.

New Player FAQ

Feyd's Survival Pack

Ai Shun
#36 - 2013-03-04 08:01:28 UTC
Sariah Kion wrote:
Underneath though, one person quits and that number goes down by two sometimes more. Im surprised some of you cant see these things.


And another joins and you get another two, sometimes more. There is a reason that EVE has shown positive growth over the last decade and that reason has little to do with conspiracy theories.
Hae Sung
#37 - 2013-03-04 08:41:29 UTC
Sariah Kion wrote:
1. The continuing flood of alts will have an eventual tipping point in the economy and with game play. Once it reaches critical mass, where everyone can do everything things will unravel quickly.


I would love for you to substantiate in a meaningful way what you think would happen at this far-off future time when "everyone can do everything" and we reach the "tipping point in the economy".

I'm very interested in your theories of doomsaying, please share. I find it interesting that all of us "fail to see" what's going to happen and only you have this unique insight into the future.
Altrue
Exploration Frontier inc
Tactical-Retreat
#38 - 2013-03-04 09:53:11 UTC  |  Edited by: Altrue
Hae Sung wrote:
Sariah Kion wrote:
1. The continuing flood of alts will have an eventual tipping point in the economy and with game play. Once it reaches critical mass, where everyone can do everything things will unravel quickly.


I would love for you to substantiate in a meaningful way what you think would happen at this far-off future time when "everyone can do everything" and we reach the "tipping point in the economy".

I'm very interested in your theories of doomsaying, please share. I find it interesting that all of us "fail to see" what's going to happen and only you have this unique insight into the future.


Very funny how you can apply some real-life observations into Eve concerning doomsaying. ^^


Also, even if the subject of subscriptions and alts can easily generate a lot of hype, if you start looking at the numbers for your corporation or the corporations around you, you may find a lot of people with multiple account, but a majority is running a single account.

So I would better expect a subscriber count around 350-400k. Which is, anyway, not that relevant.

Signature Tanking Best Tanking

[Ex-F] CEO - Eve-guides.fr

Ultimate Citadel Guide - 2016 EVE Career Chart

Yeep
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#39 - 2013-03-04 10:49:48 UTC
Ranger 1 wrote:
Encouraging the use and development of other trade hubs besides Jita would only serve to strengthen the game as a whole.


The only way this will ever happen is if CCP removes the highsec lanes between empires
Liafcipe9000
Critically Preposterous
#40 - 2013-03-04 10:58:26 UTC
moar regions?
Previous page123Next page