These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Player Features and Ideas Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

New Game Mechanic / Skill: Margin Trading Specialist

Author
Korrimal Ohmiras
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#1 - 2013-02-28 21:27:05 UTC
Here is the dilemma: a scammer puts up their 25% margin for a worthless good at a stupid price and fixed quantity. They then put their stockpile of worthless items a few jumps out for 1/10th the price (still inflated compared to the market). Someone notices a potential arbitrage opportunity - buys the goods and then tries to sell at the fixed quality price only to discover the order fails because the buyer doesn't have sufficient ISK to cover their margin call.

That player is then out both what they paid for the goods they bought PLUS commission on the sales transaction because the existing game mechanics establishes a sell order at the inflated prices so the person is now out twice. The scammer however is only out the commission and I think they get their escrow funds back once the trade fails.

In real-world markets you aren't trading with other traders directly but you are using a Market Maker in the middle that is assuming the risk for any items you buy or sell regardless of whether this is done on margin or not. There are established rules in place to prevent exactly this type of trading from occurring.

As much as I would like to suggest the idea of an Eve Stock eXchange, I realize the mechanics simply don't allow for 150,000 separate exchanges which is essentially what we have currently but without the market makers in the middle. I also realise that the existing mechanics don't allow for people to go into "debt" as part of their gaming. In real-world markets however buyers and sellers leverage debt all the time and the markets account for that as part of the trading rules.

What I would like to propose however are a couple of things that I think are doable and would fit the existing mechanics without too much programming effort.

1) ESX Trading Rule Changes: Establish some new trading rules that would require trades to meet minimum criteria before being accepted. For example,

  • establish an ESX status indicator (-10 to 10) that informs people of the player's trading status and mitigates the level of trading proficiency one has has in the marketplace;

  • The ESX status indicator would be the same across all three alts allowed on a single account;

  • not being able to place margin calls that are more than xx% of your total assets ( a very reasonable restriction that all financial institutions use as the basis for how much you can margin at any given point in time ) based on your ESX status (-10 = 0%, 0 = 25%, +10 = 50%);

  • if a trade fails due to the buying party not having sufficient funds, being able to offer the goods based on a price level that is consistent with what funds the buyer does have available (including escrow).;

  • if a trade is still not possible then checking with the seller if they still want to continue placing their order on the open market;

  • penalize the player's ESX status for each NSF trade that occurs on their account;


2) New Skill: Margin Trading Specialist - the purpose of this skill would be to allow people to margin more than 50% of their total net worth. So Levels 1-5 might be (10%, 20%, 30%, 40%, 50%) which would be a guarenteed amount added to your ESX percentage even if you had an ESX of -10 and would require Margin Trading Level V as a pre-requisite.

So the calculation would look something like this for margin trades

Maximum Trade Value = Total Assets x (ESX Status % Value + Margin Trading Specialist % Value )

So if I had 10B in assets in eve, an ESX status of 0, and MST Lvl III my maximum trading limit would be

10B x (50% + 30%) = 8B

---
Korr
o/

Omnathious Deninard
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#2 - 2013-02-28 21:29:39 UTC
No, pay attention any you won't be scammed.

If you don't follow the rules, neither will I.

Katran Luftschreck
Royal Ammatar Engineering Corps
#3 - 2013-03-01 02:40:01 UTC
I find it interesting that if CCP catches someone making ISK in a way that violates the EULA (usually botting) they will not only take away all their ISK but actually put them in debt. Their wallet will have a negative balance.

Why can't this be done to margin trading scammers as well? Don't have that ten million ISK to cover your margin trading scam bill? No, you don't go to zero ISK, you now have negative ten million ISK. All further buy orders of any kind are hereby automatically cancelled by the SCC until your balance is positive again.

Problem solved.

http://youtu.be/t0q2F8NsYQ0

sabre906
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#4 - 2013-03-01 03:18:23 UTC
Katran Luftschreck wrote:
I find it interesting that if CCP catches someone making ISK in a way that violates the EULA (usually botting) they will not only take away all their ISK but actually put them in debt. Their wallet will have a negative balance.

Why can't this be done to margin trading scammers as well? Don't have that ten million ISK to cover your margin trading scam bill? No, you don't go to zero ISK, you now have negative ten million ISK. All further buy orders of any kind are hereby automatically cancelled by the SCC until your balance is positive again.

Problem solved.


^This. I don't see why negative balance would be fine in one case but not in another.
Mike Voidstar
Voidstar Free Flight Foundation
#5 - 2013-03-01 03:22:20 UTC
Because it would get used to make free isk. Simply Biomass the character with negative balance and train another one.
Katran Luftschreck
Royal Ammatar Engineering Corps
#6 - 2013-03-01 03:25:09 UTC
Then treat negative balance like a negative security rating and forbid biomassing debtor toons.

http://youtu.be/t0q2F8NsYQ0

sabre906
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#7 - 2013-03-01 03:25:37 UTC
Mike Voidstar wrote:
Because it would get used to make free isk. Simply Biomass the character with negative balance and train another one.


Exactly, works in both cases. Some free isk are better than others?Lol
Sigras
Conglomo
#8 - 2013-03-01 07:21:57 UTC  |  Edited by: Sigras
Katran Luftschreck wrote:
Then treat negative balance like a negative security rating and forbid biomassing debtor toons.

ok, so i make a dummy account, with the buddy system and use the PLEX i get to PLEX the account.

I make 3 characters named "sadasaag" "kjasdsfa" and "dfagjnsadfkjn"

I give my first character 50 billion

i train margin trading to 5 and put up a buy order in CXY-Z for 10 Metallofullerent Platings @ 5 billion each

I trade the 37.5 billion back to my main toon and on my main toon, I sell 10 Metallofullerent Platings in CXY-Z for 5 billion each

I get 50 billion on my main toon and "sadasaag" gets a 37.5 billion isk debt and 10 Metallofullerent Platings in CXY-Z

I use station trading to get my 10 Metallofullerent Platings back

I do this with "kjasdsfa" and "dfagjnsadfkjn" who cares if I cant biomass them? i can just abandon the whole account; then i can make another dummy account and do it all over again.

I just made unlimited isk . . . do i win?
Destination SkillQueue
Doomheim
#9 - 2013-03-01 08:09:25 UTC  |  Edited by: Destination SkillQueue
sabre906 wrote:
Mike Voidstar wrote:
Because it would get used to make free isk. Simply Biomass the character with negative balance and train another one.


Exactly, works in both cases. Some free isk are better than others?Lol


Because in one case you transfer the ISK, while in the other the negative wallet is a consequense of CCP deleting ISK from a wallet. Transfer of ISK means infinite free ISK for some players at the expense of dummy characters/accounts. Deleted ISK means ISK is only removed from a player and no one gains anything.
TheSkeptic
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#10 - 2013-03-01 08:09:42 UTC  |  Edited by: TheSkeptic
Mike Voidstar wrote:
Because it would get used to make free isk. Simply Biomass the character with negative balance and train another one.


Not really supporting the idea... but you could easily overcome that and make it so -ve balance characters can't be biomassed. In much the same way they cannot be traded.

Reason I don't support it is people would still exploit it, just on stupidly high level mock scams.

Give up 1 character slot on an account for a 200B+ scam?... sure!

...

Destination SkillQueue
Doomheim
#11 - 2013-03-01 08:12:08 UTC
TheSkeptic wrote:
Mike Voidstar wrote:
Because it would get used to make free isk. Simply Biomass the character with negative balance and train another one.


Not really supporting the idea... but you could easily overcome that and make it so -ve balance characters can't be biomassed. In much the same way they cannot be traded.

Wouldn't make a difference. Ability biomass is irrelevant.
Super spikinator
Hegemonous Conscripts
#12 - 2013-03-01 09:58:27 UTC
TheSkeptic wrote:
Mike Voidstar wrote:
Because it would get used to make free isk. Simply Biomass the character with negative balance and train another one.


Not really supporting the idea... but you could easily overcome that and make it so -ve balance characters can't be biomassed. In much the same way they cannot be traded.

Reason I don't support it is people would still exploit it, just on stupidly high level mock scams.

Give up 1 character slot on an account for a 200B+ scam?... sure!


On a dummy account paid for with plex? sure. If you want to play the escalation game I could set this account with a dummy email in my regional library with a friends alternative debit card. Also, it doesn't matter if I throw a months sub into a dummy account to plex it up, since the opportunity cost pay off with your napkin number (which is a little extreme I will give you) puts it in the realm where I will be able to plex my main accounts for many a year so I gain that money back per month.
Mag's
Azn Empire
#13 - 2013-03-01 10:15:39 UTC
Katran Luftschreck wrote:
I find it interesting that if CCP catches someone making ISK in a way that violates the EULA (usually botting) they will not only take away all their ISK but actually put them in debt. Their wallet will have a negative balance.

Why can't this be done to margin trading scammers as well? Don't have that ten million ISK to cover your margin trading scam bill? No, you don't go to zero ISK, you now have negative ten million ISK. All further buy orders of any kind are hereby automatically cancelled by the SCC until your balance is positive again.

Problem solved.
Because MT scams don't break any rules.

For this scam to work, the buyer needs to buy over priced items first. If they rely on the buy order pricing, as a true indication of value, then they only have themselves to blame. Why should the MT skill be blamed for their bad investment and the user punished?

Destination SkillQueue:- It's like assuming the Lions will ignore you in the Savannah, if you're small, fat and look helpless.

Akrasjel Lanate
Immemorial Coalescence Administration
Immemorial Coalescence
#14 - 2013-03-01 10:26:42 UTC
Nope

CEO of Lanate Industries

Citizen of Solitude

Azmya Nakamura
Alphahydrae
#15 - 2013-05-07 13:39:03 UTC
At least CCP could change the automatic creation of the Sell Order when the buy order cannot be executed.

This automatic sell order creation makes really no sense !

===> https://alphahydrae.fr <===

Gizznitt Malikite
Agony Unleashed
Agony Empire
#16 - 2013-05-07 14:25:04 UTC

When CCP takes isk away form someone, that person has no control over how much/what gets taken away, and the isk goes to limbo (aka leaves the game).

If a player can take isk away from another player (aka alt), then that isk isn't leaving the game, but only being transferred. Furthermore, when you can transfer yourself isk from the alt in a manner that puts the alt into a negative balance, the result is isk creation! This will be gamed like crazy to make unlimited isk to anyone willing to spend the time!

As to Margin Trading: The only way the scammer makes any isk at all from a Margin Trade Scam is if you purchase overpriced goods directly from them. If you do your research, and investigate the worth of an item before you buy it, you won't be caught buying overpriced goods. CCP has kindly impemented many market tools that allow you to investigate the value & risks associated with an item instantly from your market screen:

Look at the the market history on the item, you can see how many items sell per day, and what the min/max purchase prices have been, with an entire year worth of data. If the item has a high price swing and/or a very low sell volume, it is probably risky to buy/sell it for profit. Trade at your own risk, and accept the risk!
Danika Princip
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
#17 - 2013-05-07 20:16:15 UTC
sabre906 wrote:
Katran Luftschreck wrote:
I find it interesting that if CCP catches someone making ISK in a way that violates the EULA (usually botting) they will not only take away all their ISK but actually put them in debt. Their wallet will have a negative balance.

Why can't this be done to margin trading scammers as well? Don't have that ten million ISK to cover your margin trading scam bill? No, you don't go to zero ISK, you now have negative ten million ISK. All further buy orders of any kind are hereby automatically cancelled by the SCC until your balance is positive again.

Problem solved.


^This. I don't see why negative balance would be fine in one case but not in another.



because in one case it's an EULA violation, and in the other case it's someone being an idiot? Scams are allowed, this one is about as fresh and original as the old 'send me ISK and I will double it!' game.
Korrimal Ohmiras
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#18 - 2013-05-18 23:24:56 UTC
Here is the core issue thou --

In real-world markets you aren't trading with other traders directly but you are using a Market Maker in the middle that is assuming the risk for any items you buy or sell regardless of whether this is done on margin or not.

So I guess the real question is whether these markets should act similar to the way real equity markets do - or should they operate the way craigslist / kijiji / ebay does

Right now the market doesn't work like either of these models.

If you want to set-up an equity market then CCP needs to establish a series of market makers who take responsibility for stupid buy / sell orders that are posted and have the equity available to fulfill placed orders regardless of how ridiculous they appear. Whether that is a skill or whether CCP does it themselves I think leaves a lot of room to

If you want to set-up an ebay or an escrow type system then CCP need to fix the system such that people don't get double penalized for placing an order that can't be fulfilled because the person in question doesn't have the funds to complete the order.

In either case the system needs some work

Alvatore DiMarco
Capricious Endeavours Ltd
#19 - 2013-05-18 23:42:06 UTC
The market is here and has been here for ten years. It works pretty well, I do believe, and has worked pretty well for all of those ten years. I am confident that the market will work pretty well for another ten years to come.

There's no reason to change it.
Johan Toralen
IIIJIIIITIIII
#20 - 2013-05-19 01:59:59 UTC
Margin scams stick out like sore thumbs. I'm sorry but if you fall so easy for it you don't deserve better and it's valuable lessons learned for your future in Eve:

- don't let greed win over your common sense
- double check and double check again when doing buisness
- don't trust anyone or anything in Eve
- if it looks to good to be true it probably isn't true

There is no reason to change that. The market works fine as is.