These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Fix Null > Nerf Hi

First post First post
Author
Tesal
#561 - 2013-02-27 23:05:13 UTC
Malcanis wrote:
...Would you go into 0.0 if Zydrine was a billion ISK per unit?


Its difficult to give a straight answer to a hypothetical like that.
Lin Suizei
#562 - 2013-02-27 23:09:34 UTC
Yonis Kador wrote:
No amount of incentivization will prod risk-averse players to suddenly become risk-takers. This song has been sung before and we all should know the lyrics. The issue isn't the wealth - it's the security.


Isn't this fantastic? If it's not the wealth, but the security - then let's nerf highsec PvE until highsec's reward is consistent with highsec's risk. The players who absolutely refuse to leave highsec and the safety of CONCORD can stay there and do as they please, while other players who are motivated by rewards and funtimes will finally have a reason to leave CONCORD's embrace, once highsec doesn't offer a risk-reward ratio that eclipses everywhere else in New Eden.

Lol I can't delete my forum sig.

Dave Stark
#563 - 2013-02-27 23:15:42 UTC
Yonis Kador wrote:
The value of Zydrine is already 150x the value of Tritanium. It won't work.

YK


the value of one mineral in comparison to another is completely irrelevant.
Skeln Thargensen
Doomheim
#564 - 2013-02-27 23:28:03 UTC
probably would for silly money.

the problem with mining in low or null security space is that a single person in local is probably going to kill you, b2b alignment speed that can't even beat CONCORD arrival in highsec. or you've got the venture which is fast aligning but can't tank or kill rats for ****.

so basically you don;t want to do that solo.

forums.  serious business.

Nicolo da'Vicenza
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#565 - 2013-02-27 23:28:13 UTC
Yonis Kador wrote:
The value of Zydrine is already 150x the value of Tritanium. It won't work.

YK

oh man this post is just embarassing
Yonis Kador
KADORCORP
#566 - 2013-02-27 23:39:50 UTC
Oh. Well, would adding that obtaining Zydrine only requires ONE jump into low sec make it any less so?

YK
Wigglenomics
C O C A I N E
#567 - 2013-02-28 00:45:59 UTC
Lin Suizei wrote:
Yonis Kador wrote:
No amount of incentivization will prod risk-averse players to suddenly become risk-takers. This song has been sung before and we all should know the lyrics. The issue isn't the wealth - it's the security.


Isn't this fantastic? If it's not the wealth, but the security - then let's nerf highsec PvE until highsec's reward is consistent with highsec's risk. The players who absolutely refuse to leave highsec and the safety of CONCORD can stay there and do as they please, while other players who are motivated by rewards and funtimes will finally have a reason to leave CONCORD's embrace, once highsec doesn't offer a risk-reward ratio that eclipses everywhere else in New Eden.


And what motivation should nullsec miners and ratters have to leave the big blue doughnut?

which is, from my experience, safer than highsec.
EI Digin
irc.zulusquad.org
#568 - 2013-02-28 00:51:50 UTC
you forgot to include "because thousands of players are working together" in your post
James Amril-Kesh
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#569 - 2013-02-28 00:53:36 UTC
Wigglenomics wrote:
which is, from my experience, safer than highsec.

No it isn't. The only area of space more dangerous than nullsec is lowsec.

Enjoying the rain today? ;)

Buzzy Warstl
Quantum Flux Foundry
#570 - 2013-02-28 01:01:39 UTC
James Amril-Kesh wrote:
Wigglenomics wrote:
which is, from my experience, safer than highsec.

No it isn't. The only area of space more dangerous than nullsec is lowsec.

WH space would like a word with you.

http://www.mud.co.uk/richard/hcds.htm Richard Bartle: Players who suit MUDs

James Amril-Kesh
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#571 - 2013-02-28 01:06:04 UTC  |  Edited by: James Amril-Kesh
Buzzy Warstl wrote:
James Amril-Kesh wrote:
Wigglenomics wrote:
which is, from my experience, safer than highsec.

No it isn't. The only area of space more dangerous than nullsec is lowsec.

WH space would like a word with you.

The data supports what I said.

Enjoying the rain today? ;)

Nicolo da'Vicenza
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#572 - 2013-02-28 01:15:18 UTC  |  Edited by: Nicolo da'Vicenza
Yonis Kador wrote:
Oh. Well, would adding that obtaining Zydrine only requires ONE jump into low sec make it any less so?

YK

No because ore/m3 is the metric used to mining value, not the isk value per unit of mineral.

And going by that metric, we can see that the most common nullsec grav site ore, Spodumain, is worth only a third of the value of Scordite per mining cycle.

Scordite also outvalues Crokite, the main roid to go for Zydrine, for value per mining cycle.

The profits of nullsec mining measure at around +27% for the trouble (of being killable at any time, building, capturing and defending stations and opportunity cost of doing such), not 15,000% as you were asserting.
Tesal
#573 - 2013-02-28 01:17:17 UTC
Lin Suizei wrote:
Yonis Kador wrote:
No amount of incentivization will prod risk-averse players to suddenly become risk-takers. This song has been sung before and we all should know the lyrics. The issue isn't the wealth - it's the security.


Isn't this fantastic? If it's not the wealth, but the security - then let's nerf highsec PvE until highsec's reward is consistent with highsec's risk. The players who absolutely refuse to leave highsec and the safety of CONCORD can stay there and do as they please, while other players who are motivated by rewards and funtimes will finally have a reason to leave CONCORD's embrace, once highsec doesn't offer a risk-reward ratio that eclipses everywhere else in New Eden.


From the tone of your post, it sounds like you would be perfectly content to trash hi-sec industry and leave hi-sec a wasteland. I see a lot of that going around. It doesn't inspire confidence when people take that position. I don't think CCP would do something so controversial. Your protestations will go nowhere with that attitude.
Tesal
#574 - 2013-02-28 01:24:13 UTC  |  Edited by: Tesal
Nicolo da'Vicenza wrote:
...Scordite also outvalues Crokite, the main roid to go for Zydrine, for value per mining cycle.


That's because there are too many null miners and they are flooding the market with cheap zydrine. Hi-sec mining doesn't really have much impact on it because you can't get it in hi-sec. The reason hi-sec ores are so high is because there are too few hi-sec miners. If they mined more the price would go down. That should be obvious.

*edit: Scordite used to be garbage.
Nicolo da'Vicenza
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#575 - 2013-02-28 01:35:53 UTC
Tesal wrote:
Nicolo da'Vicenza wrote:
...Scordite also outvalues Crokite, the main roid to go for Zydrine, for value per mining cycle.


That's because there are too many null miners and they are flooding the market with cheap zydrine.
No that's stupid. Nullsec is a small minority of players, of which a very small minority mines ore. People complain that 'nullsec is dead and noone lives there' with one breath and that there is 'too many miners and activity' the next. The relatively miniscule amount of highends needed to buidl things however was balanced in 2003 and has nothing to do with EVE in practice. Not 'too much industry and activity'. The answer to both these problems is the introduction of superveld
Aren Madigan
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#576 - 2013-02-28 01:38:18 UTC
Yonis Kador wrote:
No amount of incentivization will prod risk-averse players to suddenly become risk-takers.

But it will push risk takers to actually go out into the risky areas. You see, one thing you gotta remember about risk takers, a lot of them take those risks because its worthwhile. However right now you have large risk taking alliances telling their members NOT to do industry in null sec. Not because of the risk, but because they're better off producing in high sec as a whole.
Tyberius Franklin
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#577 - 2013-02-28 01:39:52 UTC
Nicolo da'Vicenza wrote:
Tesal wrote:
Nicolo da'Vicenza wrote:
...Scordite also outvalues Crokite, the main roid to go for Zydrine, for value per mining cycle.


That's because there are too many null miners and they are flooding the market with cheap zydrine.
No that's stupid. Nullsec is a small minority of players, of which a very small minority mines ore. People complain that 'nullsec is dead and noone lives there' with one breath and that there is 'too many miners and activity' the next. The relatively miniscule amount of highends needed to buidl things however was balanced in 2003 and has nothing to do with EVE in practice. Not 'too much industry and activity'. The answer to both these problems is the introduction of superveld

So the answer is to devalue the mining profession again?
Aren Madigan
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#578 - 2013-02-28 01:42:31 UTC
Tyberius Franklin wrote:
Nicolo da'Vicenza wrote:
Tesal wrote:
Nicolo da'Vicenza wrote:
...Scordite also outvalues Crokite, the main roid to go for Zydrine, for value per mining cycle.


That's because there are too many null miners and they are flooding the market with cheap zydrine.
No that's stupid. Nullsec is a small minority of players, of which a very small minority mines ore. People complain that 'nullsec is dead and noone lives there' with one breath and that there is 'too many miners and activity' the next. The relatively miniscule amount of highends needed to buidl things however was balanced in 2003 and has nothing to do with EVE in practice. Not 'too much industry and activity'. The answer to both these problems is the introduction of superveld

So the answer is to devalue the mining profession again?


In theory, superveld wouldn't devalue it too much due to if enough miners are out in null sec, you'll have a loooot more pirates... so the increase would be counteracted by more destruction.
Tyberius Franklin
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#579 - 2013-02-28 01:47:49 UTC
Aren Madigan wrote:

In theory, superveld wouldn't devalue it too much due to if enough miners are out in null sec, you'll have a loooot more pirates... so the increase would be counteracted by more destruction.

I'm not as optimistic of that as you are. Superveld would have to create a massive outflux of prey in order to attract the necessary predators to make this balance work. Even then they would have to have terrible situational awareness or cause a large number of related conflicts to counter their output if superveld is balanced to be worthwhile.
Zarcan
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#580 - 2013-02-28 01:50:01 UTC
I'd like to bring up the point that Eve is a (relatively) free market economy that naturally brings high-demand materials down in price as the supply increases. It's safe to say that the longer Eve exists, the cheaper the original *rare* minerals and items will be.

This whole Zydrine discussion is odd, as everyone is discussing whether or not it would be worthwhile to leave highsec if Zydrine were more expensive, or if Null was profitable in general... it's not like the devs are going to introduce a price ceiling on anything.

The reason Null isn't insanely profitable anymore isn't because of some fault of the devs, it's because years and years of free market balancing (and massive nullsec alliances streamlining logistics of nullsec mining) have driven the prices down to the point where it's not really that different from high sec space anymore.

You yourselves are the reason null isn't as profitable as you'd like anymore. You've exhausted it. You've streamlined it, you've made it easy and decreased everything to it's lowest possible point of resistance to the point where it won't go down anymore, and then you turn around and look at hi-sec and realize you've ruined your own profits.

It's called the Invisible Hand: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Invisible_hand

Yeah we've got lots of inflation, but that's basic economics, people. That's not a problem or a fault of CPP. The only real way to keep this moving along and fun for us is to introduce new materials and components that are initially high in value, and then decrease as supply expands.

The introduction of things like Planetary Interaction materials, new materials and components in sleeper WH space is testament to the fact that CPP knows this.

I'm a high-sec player who dabbles with PI in null (because the risk is worth it, duh, CPP understands these things), but largely just enjoys his time in eve casually with an RL friend. I've been in three Nullsec alliances and hated the experience each time. I don't fancy being pushed out to the gate camps of nullsec because a few influential players don't understand the mechanisms of the free market.