These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Pod kill after a duel?

First post
Author
RubyPorto
RubysRhymes
#61 - 2013-02-27 17:19:08 UTC
GM Karidor wrote:
Hello everyone.

We noticed this particular bit of incorrect information on the Retribution feature page for dueling a few days ago and have taken steps to correct it back then, but unfortunately this isn't quite an immediate process for various reasons. However, by the time I am posting this the feature page has been corrected for all language versions of the page to reflect the correct situation (see http://www.eveonline.com/retribution/dueling/).


Thank you.

"It's easy to speak for the silent majority. They rarely object to what you put into their mouths." -Abrazzar "the risk of having your day ruined by other people is the cornerstone with which EVE was built" -CCP Solomon

De'Veldrin
Republic University
Minmatar Republic
#62 - 2013-02-27 17:20:48 UTC
Ranger 1 wrote:


Complaining about the new system (other than this quirk that needs to be ironed out) is simply posturing... and you're better than that. Smile


No they're not.

They should be - but they're not. They'd ***** if CCP gave out free Titans every day for a week.

De'Veldrin's Corollary (to Malcanis' Law): Any idea that seeks to limit the ability of a large nullsec bloc to do something in the name of allowing more small groups into sov null will inevitably make it that much harder for small groups to enter sov null.

James Amril-Kesh
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#63 - 2013-02-27 18:08:10 UTC
Ginger Barbarella wrote:
Once again, what's the friggin' point of a "duel"? You want peeveepee, go get it. You don't want to get podded, go RvB and hope the other guy abides by the rules.

You want weenie fights where you both shake hands after someone yields? Play Aeon.

Pandora's Box has already been opened.

Enjoying the rain today? ;)

DeMichael Crimson
Republic University
Minmatar Republic
#64 - 2013-02-27 18:37:48 UTC
Well, seems CCP really needs to be a lot more selective when choosing specific words to describe something. Using the term 'Limited Engagement' is very misleading to say the least, just like the term 'High Security'.

Limited basically means restricted or confined whereas unlimited means no restriction or confinement. If it was indeed limited, then it would stop with the destruction of a players ship and not their pod, especially in high security. Shouldn't it be called 'Unlimited Engagement' since it basically ends with a pod killing?

Anyway, CCP has made it abundantly clear (in writing) that pod killing is allowed in high security when engaged in a 'Limited Engagement' duel. No Concord action or loss of security status will be incurred.

Of course this brings up another question :
Is there a warning / message box in game that states this information when players in high security request or accept a duel?

For example :
Quote:
WARNING - This action may result in pod loss.
Continue : Cancel


I guess the same question could also apply to players who intend to initiate an attack on a suspect or criminal in high security. They're also entering into a 'Limited Engagement', correct?


Just thought I'd bring that up due to the fact that not everyone in-game browses the forums or reads the Evelopedia. At the very least it should help lower the amount of petitions being filed..


DMC
Tiberious Thessalonia
True Slave Foundations
#65 - 2013-02-27 18:47:50 UTC
They really don't. CCP gets to define the terms. People may then feel free to point to a dictionary or some assumption they made about the words CCP chose to use, in which case CCP either gets to say "You know, that's right, its a bit confusing" or, more often, they will point and laugh and circle your petition around the office to snicker at behind your back.
DeMichael Crimson
Republic University
Minmatar Republic
#66 - 2013-02-27 19:50:57 UTC  |  Edited by: DeMichael Crimson
Tiberious Thessalonia wrote:
They really don't. CCP gets to define the terms. People may then feel free to point to a dictionary or some assumption they made about the words CCP chose to use, in which case CCP either gets to say "You know, that's right, its a bit confusing" or, more often, they will point and laugh and circle your petition around the office to snicker at behind your back.
Actually they should and in the past have changed names and or text pertaining to in-game aspects. But hey, seems like you're saying that logic and plain English is just too complicated to comprehend.

Probably the reason for calling it 'Limited Engagement' is due to it's time factor. That terminology could also be used to portray the personal aspect of the encounter. I think that's highly doubtful since lot's of people can easily become involved. When I see the term 'Limited Engagement', that leads me to think there's restrictions in place with a set of rules to govern the engagement..not 'Anything Goes' for a set amount of time.

That's like using the word 'Bad' to describe something good, most would take it at face value and not actually perceive it as being 'Good'. The point is not everyone is 'Down wit slang, ya know'. Not to mention there's different types of slang and different meanings as well.

Don't know where this came from - "they will point and laugh and circle your petition around the office to snicker at behind your back" - but since you seem to have a direct connection with Dev's in Iceland, maybe you can ask them to clarify why they deliberately pick misleading words to describe various in-game aspects.


DMC
Beekeeper Bob
Beekeepers Anonymous
#67 - 2013-02-27 20:01:15 UTC
Krixtal Icefluxor wrote:
Orlacc wrote:


OP never said whether there was a Concord response.



That is exactly the problem here.



Why do you keep bringing this up? Any type of limited engagement, the pod is FREE.......No Concord, no nada...
If you have a suspect flag, criminal flag, or security status under -5 your pod is a free kill by anyone who decides to pull the trigger.
You can even leave your safety on, that alone tells you it a non-concord kill.


Signature removed - CCP Eterne

Vincent R'lyeh
Screaming Hayabusa
#68 - 2013-02-27 20:27:21 UTC

Well played CCP, well played indeed & here was me thinking you were dumbing down the game & allowing carebear pillow fights when what you were actually doing was stealth introducing a mechanic to fuel our spaceships with yet moar tears.

Ave CCP, Nos morituri te salutant velit o7

Pirate

I have deliberately developed an air of cynicism that I originally intended to make me appear somewhat louche and caddish but actually comes across as irritable hostility combined with the unspoken threat of sudden violence.....

Milan Nantucket
Doomheim
#69 - 2013-02-27 20:27:38 UTC  |  Edited by: Milan Nantucket
A pod is a ship

The term limited engagement is relativly easy to understand.... when a battle report is written and it says "limited engagement" with the enemy it does not mean a timeout was called to discuss roe or when to tap out... mean they briefly fought each other and disengaged.
auraofblade
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#70 - 2013-02-27 20:30:32 UTC
Ah yes, I got podded in my first duel. Flying a crapfit Ferox against a Rupture who clearly knew what he was doing.

I'm not entirely surprised I got podded though. Just miffed that I forgot docking requests had a longass delay. Then again, I had like 10mil in my head and the guy ransomed my Ferox for 50mil (the fits was only like 40mil cumulative), so I declined his offer and he exploded me.

Then I remembered that you're supposed to warp to a nearby something. Oh well. Although I will say that the podding animation is really bad because at first I thought I survived and got into the station.
Vincent R'lyeh
Screaming Hayabusa
#71 - 2013-02-27 20:47:40 UTC
auraofblade wrote:
Although I will say that the podding animation is really bad because at first I thought I survived and got into the station.


Well technically you DID survive and get into the station............

I have deliberately developed an air of cynicism that I originally intended to make me appear somewhat louche and caddish but actually comes across as irritable hostility combined with the unspoken threat of sudden violence.....

KIller Wabbit
MEME Thoughts
#72 - 2013-02-27 21:09:05 UTC
I bet a lot of high SP players just flushed this feature. I thought this was going to be a casual fun thing to do, didn't know it was going to be a stealth null sec training scenario...
Azami Nevinyrall
172.0.0.1
#73 - 2013-02-27 21:11:38 UTC
Fun fact #475936-6q

After you gank someone, if their drones engaged you, you can POD them without taking another sec hit.

...

Kane the Black
Doomheim
#74 - 2013-02-27 21:15:26 UTC
*Grabs more popcorn* Pirate

Combat Boosters for sale - http://combatboosters.blogspot.com/

Kathern Aurilen
#75 - 2013-02-27 21:48:22 UTC
Lady Areola Fappington wrote:
I like the way CCP implemented duels into EVE. They don't even really matter, per se.

It's even more fun when people swear to you that starting a duel prevents other people from interfering, stops at the pod, and (best so far) ends at 1 struct.

This is EVE. E-bushido is out the window. If i can convince you to restrict yourself to some silly rules like "1v1", I'm bringing 5 bros to explod you.
LOL I'm not surprised a bit... It never stopped yall before

No cuts, no butts, no coconuts!

Forum alt, unskilled in the ways of pewpew!

DeMichael Crimson
Republic University
Minmatar Republic
#76 - 2013-02-27 22:19:58 UTC
Milan Nantucket wrote:
A pod is a ship

The term limited engagement is relativly easy to understand.... when a battle report is written and it says "limited engagement" with the enemy it does not mean a timeout was called to discuss roe or when to tap out... mean they briefly fought each other and disengaged.
Yeah, OK.

That's like saying firing a Nuclear Missile is just a 'Limited Engagement' since it can be done very quickly. I will admit it would definitely make the engagement 'Brief'. I wouldn't use the term 'Limited Engagement' to describe it though.

'Limited Engagement' means that one party or all parties involved have placed limits and or restrictions in the engagement, ie, using conventional weapons instead of using Nuclear / Chemical weapons, etc.

Anyway, this topic is now a dead horse.

KIller Wabbit wrote:
I bet a lot of high SP players just flushed this feature. I thought this was going to be a casual fun thing to do, didn't know it was going to be a stealth null sec training scenario...
I agree.

This could have been a very good isk sink as well as a way to interest or coax PvE players into doing some PvP combat. Since it's a new mechanic just added to the game, the dueling option will probably get used for a while. However, due to getting podded enough times, players will just end up going back to can flipping to do their ship dueling.

Anyway, I'm done with this thread. Good luck to everyone participating in the so called 'Limited Engagement' high security combat.


DMC
Sobaan Tali
Caldari Quick Reaction Force
#77 - 2013-02-27 22:47:19 UTC
OK, so you can be podded during a duel, sad panda and all that. CCP, just rewrite the line so we can move the freak on.

"Tomahawks?"

"----in' A, right?"

"Trouble is, those things cost like a million and a half each."

"----, you pay me half that and I'll hump in some c4 and blow the ---- out of it my own damn self."

Velarra
#78 - 2013-02-27 23:23:06 UTC
The podding feature included in "dueling" was available for testing on Singularity.
James Amril-Kesh
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#79 - 2013-02-28 00:39:01 UTC
auraofblade wrote:
Ah yes, I got podded in my first duel. Flying a crapfit Ferox against a Rupture who clearly knew what he was doing.

I'm not entirely surprised I got podded though. Just miffed that I forgot docking requests had a longass delay. Then again, I had like 10mil in my head and the guy ransomed my Ferox for 50mil (the fits was only like 40mil cumulative), so I declined his offer and he exploded me.

Then I remembered that you're supposed to warp to a nearby something. Oh well. Although I will say that the podding animation is really bad because at first I thought I survived and got into the station.

There's no docking delay, what you experienced was the session change timer. That's why you couldn't dock immediately after losing your ship.

I was in Jita once in an empty frigate and some dude in a Thrasher suicide ganked me for no reason. Even though i was reasonably sure he couldn't legally pod me, I still warped out immediately after my ship blew up.

Enjoying the rain today? ;)

Ranger 1
Ranger Corp
Vae. Victis.
#80 - 2013-02-28 03:02:58 UTC
DeMichael Crimson wrote:
Milan Nantucket wrote:
A pod is a ship

The term limited engagement is relativly easy to understand.... when a battle report is written and it says "limited engagement" with the enemy it does not mean a timeout was called to discuss roe or when to tap out... mean they briefly fought each other and disengaged.
Yeah, OK.

That's like saying firing a Nuclear Missile is just a 'Limited Engagement' since it can be done very quickly. I will admit it would definitely make the engagement 'Brief'. I wouldn't use the term 'Limited Engagement' to describe it though.

'Limited Engagement' means that one party or all parties involved have placed limits and or restrictions in the engagement, ie, using conventional weapons instead of using Nuclear / Chemical weapons, etc.

Anyway, this topic is now a dead horse.

KIller Wabbit wrote:
I bet a lot of high SP players just flushed this feature. I thought this was going to be a casual fun thing to do, didn't know it was going to be a stealth null sec training scenario...
I agree.

This could have been a very good isk sink as well as a way to interest or coax PvE players into doing some PvP combat. Since it's a new mechanic just added to the game, the dueling option will probably get used for a while. However, due to getting podded enough times, players will just end up going back to can flipping to do their ship dueling.

Anyway, I'm done with this thread. Good luck to everyone participating in the so called 'Limited Engagement' high security combat.


DMC

I wasn't aware that the old can trick to legally start a fight kept people from podding each other.

View the latest EVE Online developments and other game related news and gameplay by visiting Ranger 1 Presents: Virtual Realms.