These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

I'm Sick and Tired

First post
Author
Lady Areola Fappington
#41 - 2013-02-25 13:36:08 UTC
Aren Madigan wrote:
Wonder if I should start asking how much miners will pay an hour for a sniping battleship escort, baiting some New Order thugs in and watch as I spend all day saving miners. Sounds like it'd be good fun with how often this subject pops up.


I'm feeling generous, and, waiting on my EVE computer to get fixed, so, some tips!

That kinda won't work, just due to the tactics used. We tend to bring a whole fleet of suicide ships, land directly on top of the target from a handy warp-in, then melt them within 3-4 seconds with antimatter. Might get a secondary depending on DPS brought, then we just hang about, get concorded, and escape our pods.

You're thinking EUNI combat, where people fly around and do the ECM and linger. New Order combat is direct and fast. -5, you either warping, shooting, or podding back home.

The ways to beat new Order have been mentioned already..and I'll add another one. Make friends. We get entirely too many warp-ins/intel from other miners ratting out targets in belts.

7.2 CAN I AVOID PVP COMPLETELY? No; there are no systems or locations in New Eden where PvP may be completely avoided. --Eve New Player Guide

CMD Ishikawa
New Eden Public Security Section 9
#42 - 2013-02-25 13:36:24 UTC
May I ask What are you talking about? ... Who are those guys?
Krixtal Icefluxor
INLAND EMPIRE Galactic
#43 - 2013-02-25 13:37:33 UTC
Agent Eunoli wrote:

Victory for the New Order - that's exactly what the goal is. To make Highsec a more interesting and interactive place. To get people back to their keyboards and to begin interacting with one another.



Extortion is interesting ?

"He has mounted his hind-legs, and blown crass vapidities through the bowel of his neck."  - Ambrose Bierce on Oscar Wilde's Lecture in San Francisco 1882

Krixtal Icefluxor
INLAND EMPIRE Galactic
#44 - 2013-02-25 13:38:38 UTC
Darek Castigatus wrote:
Dante Uisen wrote:

If i was a hi-sec miner i would also quit, fighting back is just not worth it, and there are other games where you can "mine" without having to pvp.


Then frankly thats your issue for being too goddamn lazy to defend yourselves, which in all honesty is ******* pathetic.



Exactly. Even leaving the area is defending oneself.

"He has mounted his hind-legs, and blown crass vapidities through the bowel of his neck."  - Ambrose Bierce on Oscar Wilde's Lecture in San Francisco 1882

Dante Uisen
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#45 - 2013-02-25 13:42:32 UTC  |  Edited by: Dante Uisen
Darek Castigatus wrote:
Dante Uisen wrote:
Darek Castigatus wrote:
Or heres a newsflash, try getting organised and working out a decent plan of action, you know like the people attacking you did.


Do you really think that someone who wants to mine all day, is going to go through the all trouble of organizing a defense?. The amount of work involved in organizing the defense, compared to offense, is not really favoring the defenders. In the end the reward is to be able to mine in relative peace, hardly seems worth it.

If i was a hi-sec miner i would also quit, fighting back is just not worth it, and there are other games where you can "mine" without having to pvp.


Then frankly thats your issue for being too goddamn lazy to defend yourselves, which in all honesty is ******* pathetic.


It's no secret that eve is not for everyone, and some people just don't want to pvp. In the end there is no way to avoid being forced into a pvp situation, some people don't realize this before they are in the middle of it.

Once you realize there is no way you can avoid pvp, which is one of the consequences of playing a game the support non-consensual PvP, you are left with two options: PvP or quit.

The problem with choosing to PvP, is you can't win, there is no way you can force someone not to fight you. If all you want to do is sit alone in a belt and mine, there is no way it's going to happen... which makes the quit option so much more logical.

Eve is just not designed to be played by all, and it was nothing to do with people being pathetic or lazy.
Ruskarn Andedare
Lion Investments
#46 - 2013-02-25 13:44:16 UTC
Solstice Project wrote:
Aren Madigan wrote:
Wonder if I should start asking how much miners will pay an hour for a sniping battleship escort, baiting some New Order thugs in and watch as I spend all day saving miners. Sounds like it'd be good fun with how often this subject pops up.
Hilarious, considering that the only thing miners have to do is NOT MINE AFK !

You guys are either mad, or stupid.
But probably both.

and lol eveuni


Except the rules seem to have changed, or at least blurred lately.

Miners sometimes get ganked by the Order (or at least by people claiming to be from the order) when not AFK, sometimes when they've already paid for a 'pass', sometimes when they have 'James 315 for CSM' in their bio, sometimes when they're a new player.

There seemed to be a lot of confusion out there this weekend.
baltec1
Bat Country
Pandemic Horde
#47 - 2013-02-25 13:45:57 UTC
I think we have all learned that miners are the most useless pilots in EVE over the last year.
Lady Areola Fappington
#48 - 2013-02-25 13:49:08 UTC
Krixtal Icefluxor wrote:

Extortion is interesting ?


We've covered this before. 10million, 5 billion, 0.01ISK, it doesn't matter. Buying a permit is acknowledging that you are playing a multiplayer game with others, who can impact and influence your activity. 10mil ISK is nothing at all really, we could make more...doing anything.

For us, it's about making highsec fun, interesting, and a little less-safe, not for getting wallet blinkies. Tis why we encourage resistance groups, offer them tips on how we do things, and basically give away every bit if intel on the forums and blogs.

The EVE Industrialist gets us. They go "What can I do to surmount this problem?" Carebears don't. They go "Someone else needs to fix this problem for me!" I want more Industrialists, and less Carebears.

7.2 CAN I AVOID PVP COMPLETELY? No; there are no systems or locations in New Eden where PvP may be completely avoided. --Eve New Player Guide

stoicfaux
#49 - 2013-02-25 13:49:42 UTC
Wait, I'm confused. Are people still refusing to fly a Procurer/Skiff AFK?


Pon Farr Memorial: once every 7 years, all the carebears in high-sec must PvP or they will be temp-banned.

Jenn aSide
Soul Machines
The Initiative.
#50 - 2013-02-25 13:56:34 UTC
Lady Areola Fappington wrote:

The EVE Industrialist gets us. They go "What can I do to surmount this problem?" Carebears don't. They go "Someone else needs to fix this problem for me!" I want more Industrialists, and less Carebears.


Thus the hate for the "Bears".

Every time there is a "why u hate high sec" thread i say the same thing. While I think High Sec (which is at best a necessary evil) could use some tweaking, i don't "hate" it, i play there and everywhere else in EVE. I don't even hate people who live exclusively in high sec, play solo, mostly pve (like me) or avoid PVP as usually do. Not participating in pvp doesn't make you a carebear imo.

No, it's the Welfare Queens/Entitlement "I pay 15 bucks so everyhting should be sunshine and light for me" people that I and people like me dislike. The people who run to daddy (ccp) when a bully shows up rather than punch that bully in the nose. Because if Daddy does it they won't have to risk getting hurt.

TL:DR , it ain't high sec we hate, it's YOU Mr Carebear.
Lady Areola Fappington
#51 - 2013-02-25 13:57:56 UTC
Ruskarn Andedare wrote:

Except the rules seem to have changed, or at least blurred lately.

Miners sometimes get ganked by the Order (or at least by people claiming to be from the order) when not AFK, sometimes when they've already paid for a 'pass', sometimes when they have 'James 315 for CSM' in their bio, sometimes when they're a new player.

There seemed to be a lot of confusion out there this weekend.


Lemme clarify for you, and the rest of the EVE community. A permit doesn't allow you to violate The Code. Part of The Code is being attentive and ATK while mining.

Goofus buys a permit, then cries when he gets ganked while AFK mining

Gallant....doesn't have to do anything. He warped out when he saw a scout cuddling his barge, and the Knights found Goofus.

7.2 CAN I AVOID PVP COMPLETELY? No; there are no systems or locations in New Eden where PvP may be completely avoided. --Eve New Player Guide

Krixtal Icefluxor
INLAND EMPIRE Galactic
#52 - 2013-02-25 13:57:58 UTC
Lady Areola Fappington wrote:


The EVE Industrialist gets us. They go "What can I do to surmount this problem?" Carebears don't. They go "Someone else needs to fix this problem for me!" I want more Industrialists, and less Carebears.



Yup. This is why we need a new word for those like me who are not exactly Carebears.

Besides, using the available mechanics and strategies to avoid ganking and all that is a legitimate form of gameplay in itself.

Continuing to sit and mine where there is trouble and doing nothing about it is just.......I don't know what to call it. It certainly is not interacting within the game at all.

"He has mounted his hind-legs, and blown crass vapidities through the bowel of his neck."  - Ambrose Bierce on Oscar Wilde's Lecture in San Francisco 1882

Whitehound
#53 - 2013-02-25 14:02:02 UTC
Agent Eunoli wrote:
Whitehound wrote:
Someone has got to be responsible for players unsubscribing. One cannot just leave the task to anyone.

There are a fair number of new accounts that are subscribing just because of the New Order of Highsec. Heck, there are even brand new players to EVE Online because of the New Order of Highsec.

I don't know which has caused more of a change to the number of EVE subscribers: those theoretical miners unsubscribing or the New Order players subscribing new accounts.

When one does not have any facts then the best way to go is to keep having no facts and not to wake anyone who does.

Loss is meaningful. Therefore is the loss of meaning likewise meaningful. It is the source of all trolling.

Agent Eunoli
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#54 - 2013-02-25 14:08:23 UTC
Whitehound wrote:

When one does not have any facts then the best way to go is to keep having no facts and not to wake anyone who does.

I know for a fact that multiple accounts have been started because of the New Order of Highsec.

I have no idea how many (if any) accounts have unsubscribed due to the New Order of Highsec.

I'd love to see information about that made available. I have my doubts that the rate of cancellation is significantly higher than the normal rate for EVE players.

As such, it is my biased belief that the New Order of Highsec generates more net accounts for EVE Online since I know of many that were started and subscribed to because of the New Order.

Cinematic HD EVE Movies: http://www.youtube.com/user/EveEunoli/

Krixtal Icefluxor
INLAND EMPIRE Galactic
#55 - 2013-02-25 14:10:45 UTC
Agent Eunoli wrote:

As such, it is my biased belief that the New Order of Highsec generates more net accounts for EVE Online since I know of many that were started and subscribed to because of the New Order.




You mean there was a built-in, ready to go playerbase for bumping Internet Spaceships around ?

"He has mounted his hind-legs, and blown crass vapidities through the bowel of his neck."  - Ambrose Bierce on Oscar Wilde's Lecture in San Francisco 1882

Dave Stark
#56 - 2013-02-25 14:15:32 UTC
baltec1 wrote:
I think we have all learned that miners are the most useless pilots in EVE over the last year.


that hurts :(
Primary Me
Native Freshfood
Minmatar Republic
#57 - 2013-02-25 14:46:06 UTC
Krixtal Icefluxor wrote:
This is why we need a new word for those like me who are not exactly Carebears.

'Werebears'?
La Nariz
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#58 - 2013-02-25 14:48:50 UTC
baltec1 wrote:
I think we have all learned that miners are the most useless pilots in EVE over the last year.


And ~*~highsec intellectuals~*~. Don't forget those.

This post was loving crafted by a member of the Official GoonWaffe recruitment team. Improve the forums, support this idea: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&find=unread&t=345133

Krixtal Icefluxor
INLAND EMPIRE Galactic
#59 - 2013-02-25 15:18:09 UTC
Primary Me wrote:
Krixtal Icefluxor wrote:
This is why we need a new word for those like me who are not exactly Carebears.

'Werebears'?


"Where bear ?"

"There Bear."

Big smile

(yes, it's a Film reference)

"He has mounted his hind-legs, and blown crass vapidities through the bowel of his neck."  - Ambrose Bierce on Oscar Wilde's Lecture in San Francisco 1882

Ruskarn Andedare
Lion Investments
#60 - 2013-02-25 15:37:37 UTC
Lady Areola Fappington wrote:
Ruskarn Andedare wrote:

Except the rules seem to have changed, or at least blurred lately.

Miners sometimes get ganked by the Order (or at least by people claiming to be from the order) when not AFK, sometimes when they've already paid for a 'pass', sometimes when they have 'James 315 for CSM' in their bio, sometimes when they're a new player.

There seemed to be a lot of confusion out there this weekend.


Lemme clarify for you, and the rest of the EVE community. A permit doesn't allow you to violate The Code. Part of The Code is being attentive and ATK while mining.

Goofus buys a permit, then cries when he gets ganked while AFK mining

Gallant....doesn't have to do anything. He warped out when he saw a scout cuddling his barge, and the Knights found Goofus.


That was my understanding of the issue from discussions in various locals, but seen a couple of whines this weekend implying otherwise activity.

Meh, most likely Goofus tears as you say.