These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Intergalactic Summit

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
Previous page123Next page
 

They just had to pick my home system for this noise.

Author
Henry Montclaire
Guild of Independent Pilots
DammFam
#21 - 2013-02-22 19:49:15 UTC
False equivalency and fear mongering is in vogue it seems.

So heartening that my people have set another trend now being followed by the rest of the galaxy.
BloodBird
The Crucible.
#22 - 2013-02-22 20:41:13 UTC
Herzog Wolfhammer wrote:
SDII Rally in Villore 2-21


Sounds nice, all that talk about "freedom and justice" and all that. Gotta hand it to the Federation at least to have such aspirations.

But it's a little contradictory for the Black Eagles to be involved, no?

This is like having a gun pointed at your head and the person holding it tell you how protected you should feel.


All empires are a scam.

Maybe I'll stick around for the entertainment.



And I assume you have great arguments to share with us for holding such views and making these claims, pilot?

I especially want to hear your smashing arguments for this wonderfully empty line "All empires are a scam." that you saw fit to share with us.

To be honest, freedom of speech is free and all, but if you hate it this much, the road to unregulated, null space is not hard to find. And if you like it enough to stick around and live in Villore, of all places, you might want to change your tone a little bit - the Federation don't work on a "love us unquestioningly or GTFO" stance, you can find some middle ground between blind devotion (never a good thing) and abandoning the nation all-together.

Anabella Rella wrote:
This will not end well.


Oh, it ended quite well, actually. It was pleasantly surprising, if I may say that myself.

Anslo wrote:
Just don't have an anti-Blaque concert nearby, they might raid it.


Pure slander. None of us know why that concert was raided, indeed I have not even heard who was playing or what the lyrics were, or of any specific people that was there. Claiming that it was raided by special forces soldiers because the message was considered bad is an empty claim, as well as the same as saying that the SDII are actively opposing freedom of expression and free speech.

You don't get to make such claims with credibility without some evidence, Anslo. Do you have anything for us all that we have not seen yet, regarding this event?

Zsaryna Adrelana wrote:
Herzog Wolfhammer wrote:
My point is that a truly free federation does not need this pageantry and hoorah crap.

By day's end, I have a hard time figuring out if there are any good guys in the conflict, but I suspect that the war continues to keep the populations down and capsuleers busy while special interests get rich selling ammo to all sides.


You're still wondering if there are good guys?


This. Wolfhammer, this naiveté does not suit you. The Federation has never been perfect, despite the hard work from our various citizens aiming for that goal. It's an endless road of constant progress.

War however can shift one's priorities around. Sadly, as much as you, me or anyone else may not like the SDII or their actions, right now they are a needed entity in the Federation. If you are angry about that, direct it at the guilty party that created this situation to begin with.

Speaking of the guilty party...
BloodBird
The Crucible.
#23 - 2013-02-22 20:41:47 UTC
Pieter Tuulinen wrote:
Fascinating to see the New Federation at work. I must say that I do admire the changes that they're making.

I may visit, it looks like I'd feel right at home.



Hello Provist. I hope you enjoyed the show; a symptom of the condition your people saw fit to inflict on us.

I would like to remind you that this is not the "New Federation" it is in fact the same as 5 years ago, running on war-mode. The Federation thrives in peace-times. It has the ability to reach it's greatest highs so long as peace reigns. Now that we are at war, the focus lies on survival and preserving what we have so far achieved, as opposed to improving the nation overall.

It is after all, hard to improve something while outside parties seek to destroy it entirely, so now the focus lies on silencing the outsider danger and guarding against it's influence. If you don't like that, or the way this war goes, you know where you may direct your complaints.

Anabella Rella wrote:
James Syagrius wrote:

I second Andreus's sentiment. The perpetuation of our Federal Union compels us to temper our pursuit of individual liberty with the practicality of or collective self preservation. Let us then recall, "Extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice."


Extremism is still extremism no matter the circumstances.


And extremism, though tempered by careful application and focus, is at times required for survival. Your own people know this very well. It is shameful indeed, but at times that's what necessity calls for, regardless of if anyone of us like it or not.

This is why I hate intra-Empire wars.

Henry Montclaire wrote:
False equivalency and fear mongering is in vogue it seems.

So heartening that my people have set another trend now being followed by the rest of the galaxy.


And lastly, as true as this is, once again one must take into account why this is even happening. I doubt even the Black Eagles like the situation we are all in, but for now we all have little choice but to suck it up and deal with it.

Tiberious Thessalonia
True Slave Foundations
#24 - 2013-02-22 20:46:49 UTC
My lord, Bloodbird, I just realized that I have never once seen you actually refer to someone by a name or callsign. You always just assign a title based on their allegiance, thereby allowing you to disavow any semblance of humanity in your ideological opponents.

It is no wonder I have never seen you argue in good faith, you've actively dehumanized everyone you disagree with!
BloodBird
The Crucible.
#25 - 2013-02-22 20:59:18 UTC
Tiberious Thessalonia wrote:
My lord, Bloodbird, I just realized that I have never once seen you actually refer to someone by a name or callsign. You always just assign a title based on their allegiance, thereby allowing you to disavow any semblance of humanity in your ideological opponents.

It is no wonder I have never seen you argue in good faith, you've actively dehumanized everyone you disagree with!


Not entierly true, Sansha.

I have a fondness for titles indeed, but I only actively dehumanize those who deserve such.

Like you.

People like, say, Pieter Tuulinen I merely disagree with - in this case here. Tomorrow perhaps there will be a topic I can get involved with in a more positive way than merely arguing and making counters to statements.

Tiberious Thessalonia
True Slave Foundations
#26 - 2013-02-22 21:04:44 UTC
BloodBird wrote:
Tiberious Thessalonia wrote:
My lord, Bloodbird, I just realized that I have never once seen you actually refer to someone by a name or callsign. You always just assign a title based on their allegiance, thereby allowing you to disavow any semblance of humanity in your ideological opponents.

It is no wonder I have never seen you argue in good faith, you've actively dehumanized everyone you disagree with!


Not entierly true, Sansha.

I have a fondness for titles indeed, but I only actively dehumanize those who deserve such.

Like you.

People like, say, Pieter Tuulinen I merely disagree with - in this case here. Tomorrow perhaps there will be a topic I can get involved with in a more positive way than merely arguing and making counters to statements.



You merely disagree with him, yet you refer to him as a Provist.

I am not even sure that's true. I wonder if you even know from provists.
Scherezad
Revenent Defence Corperation
Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive
#27 - 2013-02-22 21:05:42 UTC
BloodBird wrote:
Hello Provist. I hope you enjoyed the show; a symptom of the condition your people saw fit to inflict on us.


I'm afraid I'm somewhat lost, sir. Our conflict is restricted to the CEPWA Zone, and we have interest only in our homeworld of the space you possess.

Can you tell me how we threaten your Federation's way of life? Thank you.
Herzog Wolfhammer
Sigma Special Tactics Group
#28 - 2013-02-23 11:14:22 UTC  |  Edited by: Herzog Wolfhammer
BloodBird wrote:

...some kind of statist dribble....



My you make a lot of noise.

As surely as you have the right to do so, I have the right to ignore you. I didn't bother to read it.

Until someone tries to put a gun to my head, I will keep doing whatever I please. Real liberty is not needing permission and acceptance, and unlike your perception, does not require fealty.

Bring back DEEEEP Space!

Seriphyn Inhonores
Elusenian Cooperative
#29 - 2013-02-23 13:26:10 UTC
Scherezad wrote:
I'm afraid I'm somewhat lost, sir. Our conflict is restricted to the CEPWA Zone, and we have interest only in our homeworld of the space you possess.

Can you tell me how we threaten your Federation's way of life? Thank you.


I believe the State has interest in the entire Gallentean side of the warzone. The annexation of Placid and adjacent territories, for example. Moreover, declaring unilateral rights over all persons and property in those areas is a significant subversion of the Federation's way of life, as is those regime changes imposed. Secondly, while the threats to level Luminaire has only been inferred by Caldari authorities, it has been supported by State loyalist capsuleers.

I think most are confident that if the Provist administration and Patriots had their way, the eradication of the Federation as an entity would be a desirable outcome. That is unlikely for however long CONCORD are around with their leashes, though.
BloodBird
The Crucible.
#30 - 2013-02-23 14:38:02 UTC  |  Edited by: BloodBird
Tiberious Thessalonia wrote:


You merely disagree with him, yet you refer to him as a Provist.

I am not even sure that's true. I wonder if you even know from provists.


I owe you a small thanks, Sansha - my intel was out-dated and Pilot Tuulinen is not enrolled in the State Protectorate anymore, thus he is not a Provist, unless he is officially a member of the CPD. I will have to check up on that at a later time.

So thank you, Sansha. When the Empires burn down your "Nation" once more, I will have to see if we can't spare you.

For last.

Scherezad wrote:
BloodBird wrote:
Hello Provist. I hope you enjoyed the show; a symptom of the condition your people saw fit to inflict on us.


I'm afraid I'm somewhat lost, sir. Our conflict is restricted to the CEPWA Zone, and we have interest only in our homeworld of the space you possess.

Can you tell me how we threaten your Federation's way of life? Thank you.


Your State saw fit to start a war. This forced the Federation onto the war-path, and as you can likely see, a Federation at war is a very different entity than one at peace. The Presidency of Jacus Roden, the creation of the SDII, the suffering across the lenght and breath of Placid and Black Rise, among other places, none of these would have taken place if your people had stayed at home and left us be.

Citizens protest needed means enacted to protect them and curtail enemy movement and internal corruption. They have a right to be angry, and I have a right to tell them where that anger belongs - yelling at the symptom does not help when the cause still exists, and that cause is the State's war with us. In short, your people have directly altered and, in the views of many citizens, threaten our way of life.

Herzog Wolfhammer wrote:
BloodBird wrote:

...some kind of statist dribble....



My you make a lot of noise.

As surely as you have the right to do so, I have the right to ignore you. I didn't bother to read it.

Until someone tries to put a gun to my head, I will keep doing whatever I please. Real liberty is not needing permission and acceptance, and unlike your perception, does not require fealty.


I have not "required fealty" of you, and indeed, you do not need my permission to voice any argument you wish. I have however, asked you to explain why you see fit to make sweeping arguments against the Federation and all the other empires by, among other things, calling them all scams - I have asked you this because I do not see where such a belief comes from.

You see, where I am from people don't make such accusations without having though their arguments through at least a little, so I foolishly assumed you could back up your claims and view-points with something solid, like good arguments for why you make such claims.

But by all means Pilot Wolfhammer, ignore me. Ignore any other arguments against your claims and keep saying whatever you want about anything and anyone. I'll simply have a conversation with someone else, someone who can educate me about the basis for the beliefs they hold and the arguments they make.
Natalcya Katla
Astropolitan Front
#31 - 2013-02-23 15:42:42 UTC
BloodBird wrote:
But by all means Pilot Wolfhammer, ignore me.

I have to say, BloodBird - this is the best piece of advice I've ever seen you give anyone.

Credit where it's due.
Scherezad
Revenent Defence Corperation
Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive
#32 - 2013-02-23 17:56:36 UTC
BloodBird wrote:
Your State saw fit to start a war. This forced the Federation onto the war-path, and as you can likely see, a Federation at war is a very different entity than one at peace. The Presidency of Jacus Roden, the creation of the SDII, the suffering across the lenght and breath of Placid and Black Rise, among other places, none of these would have taken place if your people had stayed at home and left us be.

Citizens protest needed means enacted to protect them and curtail enemy movement and internal corruption. They have a right to be angry, and I have a right to tell them where that anger belongs - yelling at the symptom does not help when the cause still exists, and that cause is the State's war with us. In short, your people have directly altered and, in the views of many citizens, threaten our way of life.


I understand sir, thank you. How long do you imagine your people will prosecute the defense of your homes against us, and at what point do you imagine that concessions will become a viable option to pursue that peace?
Nicolas Merovech
Doomheim
#33 - 2013-02-24 01:08:30 UTC
Me and Blaque do not often see eye-to-eye, but he recognizes that the SDII has only as much power as it is given by the citizens of the Federation. But I think there's more to this little PR stunt than meets the eye.

Dr. Nicolas A. Merovech, Ph. D, M.D.

BloodBird
The Crucible.
#34 - 2013-02-24 01:55:38 UTC
Natalcya Katla wrote:
BloodBird wrote:
But by all means Pilot Wolfhammer, ignore me.

I have to say, BloodBird - this is the best piece of advice I've ever seen you give anyone.

Credit where it's due.


Indeed. I do my best to ignore your worthless self as well, if possible.

Scherezad wrote:
BloodBird wrote:
Your State saw fit to start a war. This forced the Federation onto the war-path, and as you can likely see, a Federation at war is a very different entity than one at peace. The Presidency of Jacus Roden, the creation of the SDII, the suffering across the lenght and breath of Placid and Black Rise, among other places, none of these would have taken place if your people had stayed at home and left us be.

Citizens protest needed means enacted to protect them and curtail enemy movement and internal corruption. They have a right to be angry, and I have a right to tell them where that anger belongs - yelling at the symptom does not help when the cause still exists, and that cause is the State's war with us. In short, your people have directly altered and, in the views of many citizens, threaten our way of life.


I understand sir, thank you. How long do you imagine your people will prosecute the defense of your homes against us, and at what point do you imagine that concessions will become a viable option to pursue that peace?


I do not honestly know. If I did I would tell you, Scherazad.

It depends on a large number of variables, many of them what transpires in the State in the days, weeks months and years to come, and many depends on factors internal to the Federated Union, such as Presidential policy, the actions of the SDII, the reactions of the citizenry, and much else, as well as many factors external to both Federation and State, such as the Empire's involvement.

While one can hope for a resolution in mutual favor sooner rather than later, I am, sadly for myself, more of a realist. I suspect it will be several years more at least before we see even a hint of an end, one way or another.

Scherezad
Revenent Defence Corperation
Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive
#35 - 2013-02-24 17:02:37 UTC
BloodBird wrote:
I do not honestly know. If I did I would tell you, Scherazad.

It depends on a large number of variables, many of them what transpires in the State in the days, weeks months and years to come, and many depends on factors internal to the Federated Union, such as Presidential policy, the actions of the SDII, the reactions of the citizenry, and much else, as well as many factors external to both Federation and State, such as the Empire's involvement.

While one can hope for a resolution in mutual favor sooner rather than later, I am, sadly for myself, more of a realist. I suspect it will be several years more at least before we see even a hint of an end, one way or another.


Thank you for your candor, sir, and your level-headed replies. Such attitudes are crucial in any productive conversation.

May I gently suggest that your inability to visualize how the conflict can end is indicative of a deeper problem in your position towards it? I myself can see very clearly what would bring the State to want peace with the Federation; were these goals met I am sure we would have great incentive to end the conflict.
Seriphyn Inhonores
Elusenian Cooperative
#36 - 2013-02-24 17:34:58 UTC
It is worth noting that five out of eight State megacorporations do not support the occupation of Caldari Prime.
Simon Louvaki
Khaldari InnoTektoniks and Analytical Solutions
#37 - 2013-02-24 18:02:52 UTC
Seriphyn Inhonores wrote:
It is worth noting that five out of eight State megacorporations do not support the occupation of Caldari Prime.


No doubt, the occupation is a war time logistical nightmare. That however doesn't mean they don't support the return of Home to Caldari hands. One could assume that once the war ends there will be no need for major military expenditures on keeping and maintaining a fleet,Titan and massive occupation force with such long supply lines deep in enemy territory.

-- "The weak of mind are quick to judge with slightest tempt; Thus fools go forth to spread false word." - The Scriptures, Book of Trials 2:13 - 2:21

--"At the narrow passage, there is no brother and no friend." - Hyasyoda Proverb

James Syagrius
Luminaire Sovereign Solutions
#38 - 2013-02-24 21:07:43 UTC  |  Edited by: James Syagrius
Simon Louvaki wrote:
Seriphyn Inhonores wrote:
It is worth noting that five out of eight State megacorporations do not support the occupation of Caldari Prime.


No doubt, the occupation is a war time logistical nightmare. That however doesn't mean they don't support the return of Home to Caldari hands. One could assume that once the war ends there will be no need for major military expenditures on keeping and maintaining a fleet,Titan and massive occupation force with such long supply lines deep in enemy territory.

It has been a long day so forgive me if I sound a bit cross, and forgive my ignorance but "supply lines" to Caldari Prime? What supply lines?

I would also like to know why, as most Caldari alive were born elsewhere, you continue collectively to call Caldari Prime "Home".

Now I know it makes for good press, and burnishes the shine on your ever so polished victim-hood, but please.
Simon Louvaki
Khaldari InnoTektoniks and Analytical Solutions
#39 - 2013-02-24 22:05:43 UTC  |  Edited by: Simon Louvaki
James Syagrius wrote:

It has been a long day so forgive me if I sound a bit cross, and forgive my ignorance but "supply lines" to Caldari Prime? What supply lines?


Not cross at all James, please allow me to explain.

There is a Titan and support fleet in orbit around Caldari Prime with no fueling stations or friendly entities until you cross the Border Zone and hit Caldari Space, which means that the State must constantly send fuel, food and resources needed to sustain a fleet and occupation force all the way from Caldari Space. In a nominal wartime operation, much of that could be taken from conquered territories and assets, but the State only occupies Caldari Prime. The State is thus forced into supplying an operation that is, essentially, 'behind enemy lines' for lack of a better term.

Almost everything State forces need has to be imported, which costs the Megas billions of ISK to transport and produce. Those are the supply lines I speak of.

James Syagrius wrote:

I would also like to know why, as most Caldari alive were born elsewhere, you continue collectively to call Caldari Prime "Home".


If I might quote Khross-haan in a post I've seen elsewhere...

"(We are) a very traditional people, (our) traditions and ancestry give (us) identity and purpose. Caldari Prime is the beacon of where (our) civilization began, starting with the raging wars between the Deteis and the Civire and eventually their union, then to their advancement as a people and their eventual taking to the stars (which yes, the Federation helped there).

If we consider the sheer amount of time the Caldari spent on Caldari Prime, it's a huge amount of time. We get attached to our homes even after just a few years - imagine centuries or even millenia. The traditions and identity borne from that time is what the Caldari are fighting to uphold and if they stop fighting, they lose it. Caldari Prime is a symbol of everything (we) fight for. "

Caldari Prime is the womb of the Caldari people and our culture. Collectively, it is our home, even if we or our children never set foot there. I consider the house I inherited from my father upon his passing my home, even when I left it to build my own, and he his fathers and so on and so forth. The Ancestral home of our people will forever be remembered as ours as long as the Caldari remain Caldari.

James Syagrius wrote:

Now I know it makes for good press, and burnishes the shine on your ever so polished victim-hood, but please.


I can't deny that some people may use the term to that affect, but collectively this is not the case.

-- "The weak of mind are quick to judge with slightest tempt; Thus fools go forth to spread false word." - The Scriptures, Book of Trials 2:13 - 2:21

--"At the narrow passage, there is no brother and no friend." - Hyasyoda Proverb

Katran Luftschreck
Royal Ammatar Engineering Corps
#40 - 2013-02-25 09:18:04 UTC
BloodBird wrote:
Hello Provist. I hope you enjoyed the show; a symptom of the condition your people saw fit to inflict on us.


Drink less quafe-aid, read more history.

Peaceful and freedom loving my ass.

"It all started when a Gallente exploration ship happened upon one of the hidden Caldari colonies. When the Federation Senate learned of this they demanded a full-scale investigation into the matter and that all hidden Caldari colonies should immediately been put under Federation authority."

You started the whole conflict with the Caldari ... and now you're blaming them for winning. Boo hoo.

"Those within the Federation believing that peace talks should be initiated instead of an invasion didn’t dare speak up for fear of being branded cowards or, worse, traitors; the Gallente war machine grinded into gear."

Amazing how little has changed even after two centuries. Oh wait, I guess something have changed... they no longer get "branded cowards" ... now they just ... "disappear."

http://youtu.be/t0q2F8NsYQ0

Previous page123Next page