These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Wormholes

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
Previous page12
 

A Question for the Candidates
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Malception
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#21 - 2013-02-21 21:35:03 UTC
Seriously. Hells yes!

RENGAS ALT FOR CSM.
Carla Messer
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#22 - 2013-02-22 11:31:02 UTC
I'm more of a light poodle fan
Mister Tuggles
Heretic Army
Sedition.
#23 - 2013-02-22 17:21:01 UTC  |  Edited by: Mister Tuggles
You pointed out the main problem for the CSM candidates for all regions. They are part of the huge alliances that are trying to push their agenda to make the game easier for themselves at the expense of the majority of Eve players. The large alliances are the minority, but they have the loudest voice.

All of the CSM candidates for the WHs are going to push an agenda that basically puts lower class WHs into open season for them. Hell, Two Step was pushing to have large towers be banned from anything lower than a c4 or 5 for ease of removal for the longest time.

It is like American politics, all the candidates are ****-tastic, you just have to choose the lesser of the evils. Either way you are going to get bent over at some point if you aren't on their side.

Here's to hoping that CCP continues their trend of not listening to their customers, and the CSM. This is the only hope us little guys have.
chris elliot
Treasury Department
Plug N Play
#24 - 2013-02-22 21:04:30 UTC
You seem to forget that both Cipreh and Nathans alliance's are almost exclusively in sub c5 wormholes. They each have at least one c5 but there is not much beyond that.

To say they only care about c5+ space for purposes of bashing sub c5 space would be disingenuous to their own alliances at best and a gross mischaracterization at worst.
Winthorp
#25 - 2013-02-22 21:15:40 UTC
chris elliot wrote:
You seem to forget that both Cipreh and Nathans alliance's are almost exclusively in sub c5 wormholes. They each have at least one c5 but there is not much beyond that.

To say they only care about c5+ space for purposes of bashing sub c5 space would be disingenuous to their own alliances at best and a gross mischaracterization at worst.


LOL and you seem to forget your alliance and Cipreh's are the most proficient at evicting people from low class WH's.
Bane Nucleus
Dark Venture Corporation
Kitchen Sinkhole
#26 - 2013-02-22 21:44:36 UTC
Winthorp wrote:


LOL and you seem to forget your alliance and Cipreh's are the most proficient at evicting people from low class WH's.


This bullshit lie will not go unanswered. We aren't more proficient. We just suffer from a bad case of boredom P

No trolling please
Sassums
Dark Venture Corporation
Kitchen Sinkhole
#27 - 2013-02-22 22:02:40 UTC
Mister Tuggles wrote:
You pointed out the main problem for the CSM candidates for all regions. They are part of the huge alliances that are trying to push their agenda to make the game easier for themselves at the expense of the majority of Eve players. The large alliances are the minority, but they have the loudest voice.

All of the CSM candidates for the WHs are going to push an agenda that basically puts lower class WHs into open season for them. Hell, Two Step was pushing to have large towers be banned from anything lower than a c4 or 5 for ease of removal for the longest time.

It is like American politics, all the candidates are ****-tastic, you just have to choose the lesser of the evils. Either way you are going to get bent over at some point if you aren't on their side.

Here's to hoping that CCP continues their trend of not listening to their customers, and the CSM. This is the only hope us little guys have.


Disagree here - Cipreh spoke with our Alliance Leaders about the CSM and what changes need to be implemented.

While the idea of the new POS system is great, if CCP proves to be dragging their feed on a modulated POS system then at the bare minimum the POS Permissions and Security need to be overhauled.

Simply adding the "hangers" we see in CHA's to SMA's would be a good start. It would add another entire level of security.
Nathan Jameson
Grumpy Bastards
#28 - 2013-02-22 23:23:50 UTC
Winthorp wrote:
LOL and you seem to forget your alliance and Cipreh's are the most proficient at evicting people from low class WH's.


Actually, when was the last time we evicted someone from a lower-class wormhole?

July, 2012.

Your facts...not so hot, actually.

http://www.wormholes.info
Previous page12