These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Player Features and Ideas Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
Previous page123
 

Allowing two characters to train on one account via second payment

First post
Author
Zan Shiro
Doomheim
#41 - 2013-02-17 17:47:51 UTC
Mag's wrote:
Katran Luftschreck wrote:
Basic Account: $15/month, train 1 toon at a time.
Silver Account: $25/month, train 2 toons at a time.
Gold Account: $30/month, train 3 toons at a time.

I've suggested this many times before, but I suspect CCP is just too plain greedy and wants to see everyone paying $15 per toon, even if they have no interest in multi-boxing. In the end this greed only costs them money, because the people who would take Silver & Gold accounts end up looking at the current system and saying "Screw it, they're getting nothing extra from me."
You must be kidding me? Too greedy?

You mean industry standard pricing and in fact cheaper than industry standard, when you take a years sub?

Eve pricing as of now.
Europe:
1-month-plan € 14.95 € 14.95
3-month-plan € 12.95 € 38.85
6-month-plan € 11.95 € 71.70
12-month-plan € 10.95 € 131.40

UK:
1-month-plan £ 9.99 £ 9.99
3-month-plan £ 9.33 £ 27.99
6-month-plan £ 8.33 £ 49.99
12-month-plan £ 7.50 £ 89.99

Outside Europe:
1-month-plan $ 14.95 $ 14.95
3-month-plan $ 12.95 $ 38.85
6-month-plan $ 11.95 $ 71.70
12-month-plan $ 10.95 $ 131.40

So 3 x $10.95 is $32.85. That's a whole $2.85 more for full access to all three characters and of course the 6 alts.
Then let's not forget CCP gave us the Plex. So people with more time than cash, can trade ISK for gametime.

But hey, don't let facts get in the way of a good old whine.



this...


and well unless an idiot generally you train those 2nd, 3rd, etc accounts to maximixe your potential in game. If you alt it smartly, that alt greatly increases your isk intake. to the point where even with todays inftaltion you plex all/most accounts quite readily. Its not ccp being greedy, its ccp knowing unless a baddie or your rl sucks ass 1 year into this game there are very few things stopping your from plexing to play this game for free at least on 1 account. Done right you pay ccp's salaries for like 9 months then its free and some noobs take over this task. For a monthly pay MMO you potentially play for years, this is a very fair arrangement.

Like in my case where work and family have ganged up to say you don't need to play these silly games as much as you'd like, some months I ring up $30 on the cc, some months $15 and some months woohoo full plexing. With ole boys pay scheme, ccp loses $5. CCP knows full well they have a strong multibox/account population and therefore know how many for sure shots of $5 a month they will lose to train even 2 accounts.

And the whole manage a 2nd account, lots of ways to make this low/0 effort. Protip: train leadership skills, plant them on p-m, profit. Until ogb fixed, lazy bonuses a plenty. If/when ogb fixed, well the put them in a tanky ship to draw aggro. Works wonders even now. For some odd reason rats love my alt in tengu boosting and frig/cruiser killing on grid. They completely ignore the golem I am trying again even with it spamming tp's and massive alpha strikes of doom.




StarStryder
Zero-Hour
#42 - 2013-02-17 19:18:21 UTC
I think the OP implementation detail is poor. However, I like the idea of a single account for all of my characters. It has many benefits such as a single payment, single api key screen and single forum logon.

I think the implementation should be along these lines:

1) A single account
2) Paid for training queues.
3) Total active character count = training queues x 3
4) If you reduce queues then you select which chars become unavailable to bring active chars inside #3.
5) The client allows any number of logins up to the training queue count.

This results in no difference from CCPs financial point of view. They have the same income, the same character limits per monthly payment. I am ignoring the marketing aspect of account numbers because only CCP can really know how much they matter so debating it here is pointless.

Multiple accounts will still be necessary for those who use the corp thief or spy play styles. However, for most of us, having a single account would be much much simpler.
Katran Luftschreck
Royal Ammatar Engineering Corps
#43 - 2013-02-17 21:38:37 UTC
Mag's wrote:
You must be kidding me? Too greedy?

You mean industry standard pricing and in fact cheaper than industry standard, when you take a years sub?


No, I'm not kidding you, and not everyone buys year long subscriptions. Believe it or not, some people actually just pay month to month. I'm sure this lack of fanaticism may shock and offend you, but it's the truth. People really do this.

If you want to know, I personally would love to take a Gold plan to train up two alts at once. I could make one into a dedicated freighter pilot and make the other a PI specialist. Things that I would like to have but can't really be bothered to use my main for, and things that I wouldn't want to spend the entire day logged in doing.

As it stands now, though, that would cost me $45 and I'd still only be using 1 character 90% of the time. That isn't worth it to me. But for $30... yeah, it would be worth it, at least until I got those alts trained to where I want them, and then I could go back to Basic.

Now this is where you chime in "But then CCP isn't making as much money" - and that's true. But here is my retort and main point to begin with: Right now they're not making anything extra off me. They're getting their $15 and not a dime more. Not $45, not even $30. Just $15. Their greed for that $45 is the reason they're only making $15 instead of $30. So yes, it's costing them potential revenues, and not just from me but from everyone with these same sentiments.

http://youtu.be/t0q2F8NsYQ0

Mag's
Azn Empire
#44 - 2013-02-18 09:19:21 UTC
Katran Luftschreck wrote:
Mag's wrote:
You must be kidding me? Too greedy?

You mean industry standard pricing and in fact cheaper than industry standard, when you take a years sub?


No, I'm not kidding you, and not everyone buys year long subscriptions. Believe it or not, some people actually just pay month to month. I'm sure this lack of fanaticism may shock and offend you, but it's the truth. People really do this.
You mean $14.95, which just so happens to be industry standard pricing? Yea still not seeing the greed part.

But here it is, because you can try and spin your request as much as you like. The reason for my lack of faith in anything you have to say. This may shock and offend you, but it is the truth:

It's you, that is being greedy here plain and simple. You're expecting more for less and crying over not getting it.

CCP have given everyone options on how to pay, including trading in game money for gametime. Some of those options mean you get 3 accounts with full access for $32.85 a month. Yea, how horrid are CCP, for allowing players those options. Roll

Destination SkillQueue:- It's like assuming the Lions will ignore you in the Savannah, if you're small, fat and look helpless.

Sinigr Shadowsong
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#45 - 2013-02-18 09:29:12 UTC
I see how this may be good for older players that want to use small-sized ships but don't like to pay a lot for a clone and don't wan't to keep subscription for another account. Pay for a few months, train yourself a frigate player, thah stop paying. Now you got specialised pilot with a cheap clone but don't have to keep 2 subscriptions.
Katran Luftschreck
Royal Ammatar Engineering Corps
#46 - 2013-02-19 01:28:08 UTC
Sinigr Shadowsong wrote:
I see how this may be good for older players that want to use small-sized ships but don't like to pay a lot for a clone and don't wan't to keep subscription for another account. Pay for a few months, train yourself a frigate player, thah stop paying. Now you got specialised pilot with a cheap clone but don't have to keep 2 subscriptions.


Or a dedicated PI alt... or a freighter alt... or a T2 invention alt... or a mining-only alt... the possibilities are vast.

http://youtu.be/t0q2F8NsYQ0

Lucas Peterson
Tribal Liberation Force
Minmatar Republic
#47 - 2013-02-19 18:08:47 UTC
The fact this thread turned into an argument over money is just not my intention.

I don't want reduced prices per character.

15 bucks a month per extra character. Even if you pay the yearly subscription for the account to save money. 15 bucks a month per character. Get over it. Thats all I was asking for. We don't need to make it an argument over freakin economics.
Feyd Rautha Harkonnen
Doomheim
#48 - 2013-02-19 19:48:40 UTC
Actually, with the inherent reality that somewhere between six months and a year of EVE play you realize you simply MUST have multiple accounts to compete, there is a huge monetary bias in the game against less wealthy (or single box) players.

My issue is this is inherently baked into the game. You simply can't be successful without a neutral alt, and/or mining/industry alt -- to feed and support your pvp main, its just not feasible IMHO.

Now I know the 'fly with corpmates' blah blah mantra, but I think most vets will agree that just isn't workable all the time, every time you are on and need to 'do something'. We all need alt's as we progress in EVE.

So, we should be able to train multiple toons on a single account.

If this means re-balancing fees to increase a single account by $2-$5 dollars to train a second toon in parallel to a first, then so be it. Whatever that amount is, the key is to find a balance between a single account fees, training multiple toons and recognizing you simply cannot play this game long term with a single account.

p.s.
The 'power of two' specials are still too expensive IMHO, as again there is an inherent need to have multiple accounts in this game and that should be do-able with a single account. Good game design should honor the fact that someone can do *most* of the games facets long term with a single account, training multiple toons in parallel -- without having to buy secondary accounts.


Lucas Peterson
Tribal Liberation Force
Minmatar Republic
#49 - 2013-02-22 17:38:44 UTC
I can't say I agree on the need to have an alt, but yes we do need a second trainable toon on one account. However asking for the ability to train a second toon at a cheaper price instead of just asking for the ability to train it for another $15 means that CCP won't even listen.

If we want the chance to train a second toon on one account, pretty much the only way CCP would even consider that is if we pretty much pay full price. CCP won't even look at the concept if we ask for cheap second character training slots.


Either way, I do hope CCP takes a peek at this and considers it. Second training slot for 15 bucks a month.

'Murica and stuff.
VegasMirage
Blank-Space
Northern Coalition.
#50 - 2013-02-25 05:45:43 UTC  |  Edited by: VegasMirage
Lucas Peterson wrote:
I can't say I agree on the need to have an alt, but yes we do need a second trainable toon on one account. However asking for the ability to train a second toon at a cheaper price instead of just asking for the ability to train it for another $15 means that CCP won't even listen.

If we want the chance to train a second toon on one account, pretty much the only way CCP would even consider that is if we pretty much pay full price. CCP won't even look at the concept if we ask for cheap second character training slots.


Either way, I do hope CCP takes a peek at this and considers it. Second training slot for 15 bucks a month.

'Murica and stuff.


what you're asking isn't a loss in income for CCP

the alternative is training your 2nd slot char and still playing on 1 account

your proposal ACTUALLY makes more money for CCP, since you pay twice while training 2 chars on same account

All the mad Scientist, enterprise business analysts and self-proclaimed mathematicians your thread brought out are just wrong.

Oh, and can't forget the 5th grade grammur teachers.

no more games... it's real this time!!!

Seranova Farreach
Biomass Negative
#51 - 2013-02-25 08:24:48 UTC
Mag's wrote:
The thing is, this idea is pointless from the start. No one in their right mind, would pay the same to get less.

As paying less is also a no no, how about you simply get a second account?

Sorted. Big smile



i think i like the idea he proposed. as id love to train my 3 toons at the same time but dont want a second account nor have no desire to multi-log /multibox

the idea of 15 a month normal fee for 1 charater training. for 2 maybe 25 a month. (+10 a month for second) and then 30 a month for 3 charaters (+5 for 3rd and final toon)

[u]___________________ http://i.imgur.com/d9Ee2ik.jpg[/u]

Banana1x
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#52 - 2013-02-25 08:33:31 UTC
I would pay for this.

I have 2 accounts, with pairs of toons for doing things while dual boxing. I have 2 indy's, 2 for RvB and 1 main char going into nullsec (and I'll be making a scout toon to match him).

I dont want to run several accounts, I just want 2. I think if $15 is the norm, I'd happily pay $25 for a 'Gold' account to train all 3 per account at the same time.

Sinzor Aumer
Planetary Harvesting and Processing LLC
#53 - 2013-02-25 10:37:51 UTC  |  Edited by: Sinzor Aumer
Sounds legit.
I'm ready to buy it as well.
My case: I have 3 toons on one acount, two alt are trained some basic skills. I want to extend the skills on those alts for about a month-worth of training each, but dont want to pause on main for that long period.

EDIT: Dont want any discounts, they are exploitable.
VegasMirage
Blank-Space
Northern Coalition.
#54 - 2013-02-27 07:56:42 UTC
Mag's wrote:
Katran Luftschreck wrote:
Mag's wrote:
You must be kidding me? Too greedy?

You mean industry standard pricing and in fact cheaper than industry standard, when you take a years sub?


No, I'm not kidding you, and not everyone buys year long subscriptions. Believe it or not, some people actually just pay month to month. I'm sure this lack of fanaticism may shock and offend you, but it's the truth. People really do this.
You mean $14.95, which just so happens to be industry standard pricing? Yea still not seeing the greed part.

But here it is, because you can try and spin your request as much as you like. The reason for my lack of faith in anything you have to say. This may shock and offend you, but it is the truth:

It's you, that is being greedy here plain and simple. You're expecting more for less and crying over not getting it.

CCP have given everyone options on how to pay, including trading in game money for gametime. Some of those options mean you get 3 accounts with full access for $32.85 a month. Yea, how horrid are CCP, for allowing players those options. Roll


get some sun.

no more games... it's real this time!!!

Mag's
Azn Empire
#55 - 2013-02-27 10:17:03 UTC
VegasMirage wrote:
Mag's wrote:
Katran Luftschreck wrote:
Mag's wrote:
You must be kidding me? Too greedy?

You mean industry standard pricing and in fact cheaper than industry standard, when you take a years sub?


No, I'm not kidding you, and not everyone buys year long subscriptions. Believe it or not, some people actually just pay month to month. I'm sure this lack of fanaticism may shock and offend you, but it's the truth. People really do this.
You mean $14.95, which just so happens to be industry standard pricing? Yea still not seeing the greed part.

But here it is, because you can try and spin your request as much as you like. The reason for my lack of faith in anything you have to say. This may shock and offend you, but it is the truth:

It's you, that is being greedy here plain and simple. You're expecting more for less and crying over not getting it.

CCP have given everyone options on how to pay, including trading in game money for gametime. Some of those options mean you get 3 accounts with full access for $32.85 a month. Yea, how horrid are CCP, for allowing players those options. Roll


get some sun.
Irony.

Oh, find an argument. Blink

Destination SkillQueue:- It's like assuming the Lions will ignore you in the Savannah, if you're small, fat and look helpless.

Allus Nova
#56 - 2013-02-28 02:40:19 UTC
Katran Luftschreck wrote:
Mag's wrote:
You must be kidding me? Too greedy?

You mean industry standard pricing and in fact cheaper than industry standard, when you take a years sub?


No, I'm not kidding you, and not everyone buys year long subscriptions. Believe it or not, some people actually just pay month to month. I'm sure this lack of fanaticism may shock and offend you, but it's the truth. People really do this.

If you want to know, I personally would love to take a Gold plan to train up two alts at once. I could make one into a dedicated freighter pilot and make the other a PI specialist. Things that I would like to have but can't really be bothered to use my main for, and things that I wouldn't want to spend the entire day logged in doing.

As it stands now, though, that would cost me $45 and I'd still only be using 1 character 90% of the time. That isn't worth it to me. But for $30... yeah, it would be worth it, at least until I got those alts trained to where I want them, and then I could go back to Basic.

Now this is where you chime in "But then CCP isn't making as much money" - and that's true. But here is my retort and main point to begin with: Right now they're not making anything extra off me. They're getting their $15 and not a dime more. Not $45, not even $30. Just $15. Their greed for that $45 is the reason they're only making $15 instead of $30. So yes, it's costing them potential revenues, and not just from me but from everyone with these same sentiments.



I fall into the same boat here, I would like to train a pair of alts, perhaps one to haul stuff around high sec, and another to do some market-fu but I am not up for paying 45 bucks a month to do this (I'm a monthly sub too). I would happily pay 30 a month for all 3 slots trainable, but only one able to be in space at once. It would get more money from me for CCP, it would make i so if I wanted to dual box like so many people, they would still need multiple accounts, and in all honestly for those people who have 4+ accounts, those accounts would probably be 2-3 character accounts as well.
Savira Terrant
Native Freshfood
Minmatar Republic
#57 - 2013-02-28 03:45:48 UTC  |  Edited by: Savira Terrant
Sorry for just reading the first few sites of this thread, but:

Gosh, everyone please understand the difference between subscriptions, accounts and characters!

Characters: Entitiy to connect to the gameworld.

Account: Accumulation of the above (3 in EVE's case).

Subscription: Recurring payment to have benefits for the two above.


If we add "training time for one or even a two additional characters" for $ or Plex it will just add a number to the active subscriptions CCP can advertise on (although, I really ask myself how anyone could ever assume that this is actual players). It is a win-win situation for all.

But that does not go far enough. First enable me to log into a single account, manage all my (however many) characters I own - including skilltraining - from the character selection screen. When I pay my subscription, let me choose a character set of 3 (character set = 3 chars from old account version). These 3 chars cannot log in simultaniously by default. One char may train.

If I use two subscriptions (or however many bitter vets deem appropriate... I do not care) at the same time on the same set, I may train 3 chars but may only login one from the set at any time.
If I want to have chars to login simultaniously I have to pay subscription for a new set. etc...

Give us the option of using a security token within the login process. (Screegs, where are you anyway?!)

Let us login to our account without any active subscription, but do not let us login with any char in that case obviously. Remove the account management from the unsafe environment of a web browser and add it to character selection part of the client.

Edit: Change characters without leaving the game past the character selection (be it the launcher or in the actual DX environment) I obviously missed.

.

VegasMirage
Blank-Space
Northern Coalition.
#58 - 2013-03-06 17:15:27 UTC
Mag's wrote:
VegasMirage wrote:
Mag's wrote:
Katran Luftschreck wrote:
Mag's wrote:
You must be kidding me? Too greedy?

You mean industry standard pricing and in fact cheaper than industry standard, when you take a years sub?


No, I'm not kidding you, and not everyone buys year long subscriptions. Believe it or not, some people actually just pay month to month. I'm sure this lack of fanaticism may shock and offend you, but it's the truth. People really do this.
You mean $14.95, which just so happens to be industry standard pricing? Yea still not seeing the greed part.

But here it is, because you can try and spin your request as much as you like. The reason for my lack of faith in anything you have to say. This may shock and offend you, but it is the truth:

It's you, that is being greedy here plain and simple. You're expecting more for less and crying over not getting it.

CCP have given everyone options on how to pay, including trading in game money for gametime. Some of those options mean you get 3 accounts with full access for $32.85 a month. Yea, how horrid are CCP, for allowing players those options. Roll


get some sun.
Irony.

Oh, find an argument. Blink


I clearly and logically explained why you were wrong, you continue to peen pump thinking you're the smartest guy in the room. Try reading what others post and integrate that into your discussions. You flap your pie hole way too much. ::funnyface::

no more games... it's real this time!!!

VegasMirage
Blank-Space
Northern Coalition.
#59 - 2013-05-21 21:51:52 UTC  |  Edited by: VegasMirage
Mag's wrote:
The thing is, this idea is pointless from the start. No one in their right mind, would pay the same to get less.

As paying less is also a no no, how about you simply get a second account?

Sorted. Big smile


I have NO idea how you got 14,000 likes but you should have them all removed for your inability to see the mutual beneficial nature of the feature IMPLEMENTED today... the same feature you said should NEVER happen.

Ignorance is bliss. This thread may now be closed.

no more games... it's real this time!!!

Mag's
Azn Empire
#60 - 2013-05-22 13:32:39 UTC
VegasMirage wrote:
I clearly and logically explained why you were wrong, you continue to peen pump thinking you're the smartest guy in the room. Try reading what others post and integrate that into your discussions. You flap your pie hole way too much. ::funnyface::
Your argument to me was "get some sun."

VegasMirage wrote:
Mag's wrote:
The thing is, this idea is pointless from the start. No one in their right mind, would pay the same to get less.

As paying less is also a no no, how about you simply get a second account?

Sorted. Big smile


I have NO idea how you got 14,000 likes but you should have them all removed for your inability to see the mutual beneficial nature of the feature IMPLEMENTED today... the same feature you said should NEVER happen.

Ignorance is bliss. This thread may now be closed.
You seem very angry. Big smile

I didn't say it should NEVER happen. You should brush up on your reading and comprehension a little. I merely pointed out that you're paying the same for less. Which you are.
I can see it fits a very small niche for certain players. It's financial viability ends at 3 months per char and that's without considering the usability factor. Anything past that and a second account is better in every respect. I said no one in their right mind, would want to pay the same for less. As it seems you would, I'll say no more.

The issue I raised regarding sub numbers is also a viable one. If those numbers didn't matter, they wouldn't shout about them so much. So they either decided they could live with it, or more likely they found a way of including the new system into those figures.

My main argument throughout this thread, was against paying LESS for such a service. I knew there would be many suggesting they should pay less. Guess what, I was right. Blink

Destination SkillQueue:- It's like assuming the Lions will ignore you in the Savannah, if you're small, fat and look helpless.

Previous page123