These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Jita Park Speakers Corner

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Suggesting James 315 as the Highsec representative for CSM 8

First post First post
Author
Karl Hobb
Imperial Margarine
#161 - 2013-02-21 15:45:08 UTC
Amyclas Amatin wrote:
I can respect the new order using force to "Fix" high-sec into what it thinks it should be, but politicking CCP is just low.

How is that low? High-sec is badly in need of balancing. James 315 certainly can't dictate to CCP how things should be done but he would serve as an effective sounding board able to point out bad ideas that would further the current, nearly intolerable imbalance.

Amyclas Amatin wrote:
Will the game really be better with players being pushed out of high-sec? With high-sec players outnumbering the rest, it probably won't happen.

I can't see where people get this idea that anybody is pushing them around. Even if high-sec were nerfed into oblivion nothing would prevent you from staying there.

A professional astro-bastard was not available so they sent me.

John E Normus
New Order Logistics
CODE.
#162 - 2013-02-21 17:46:02 UTC
Malcanis wrote:
IIRC, no one who has been banned for an EULA violation can run for CSM. Does James actually qualify?


Why don't you petition it.

Between Ignorance and Wisdom

Karl Hobb
Imperial Margarine
#163 - 2013-02-21 17:49:05 UTC
John E Normus wrote:
Malcanis wrote:
IIRC, no one who has been banned for an EULA violation can run for CSM. Does James actually qualify?


Why don't you petition it.

I'm detecting sarcasm, but I should also note that the candidate application period hasn't started yet. We'll know for sure when James 315 sends in his application.

A professional astro-bastard was not available so they sent me.

Cyprus Black
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#164 - 2013-02-21 18:16:50 UTC
Lapine Davion wrote:
Cyprus Black wrote:
After hearing him on the Crossing Zebras podcast, I can say for sure that the guy is a moron and has no clue how this game works, both in player interaction and actual game mechanics. I would sooner vote for a newbie still on his trail account for CSM than James 315. The newbie at least has the balls to admit he doesn't know how the game works.


A Heath Major alt? I think it could be!

Nobody puts Cyprus in the alt corner!

Summary of EvEs last four expansions: http://imgur.com/ZL5SM33

Malcanis
Vanishing Point.
The Initiative.
#165 - 2013-02-21 18:26:12 UTC
John E Normus wrote:
Malcanis wrote:
IIRC, no one who has been banned for an EULA violation can run for CSM. Does James actually qualify?


Why don't you petition it.


I'm just curious. I disagree with James on some important issues, but I respect his passion for his vision of EVE. However his passion is moot if he's not qualified to run.

"Just remember later that I warned against any change to jump ranges or fatigue. You earned whats coming."

Grath Telkin, 11.10.2016

John XIII
The Carnifex Corp
#166 - 2013-02-21 21:59:54 UTC
Malcanis wrote:
John E Normus wrote:
Malcanis wrote:
IIRC, no one who has been banned for an EULA violation can run for CSM. Does James actually qualify?


Why don't you petition it.


I'm just curious. I disagree with James on some important issues, but I respect his passion for his vision of EVE. However his passion is moot if he's not qualified to run.


I'm curious what important issues do you disagree with James 315 on? Since you mention it.

I think this will be a helpful exercise.

:allears:

Between Ignorance and Wisdom

John E Normus
New Order Logistics
CODE.
#167 - 2013-02-21 23:26:34 UTC
John E Normus wrote:
Malcanis wrote:
IIRC, no one who has been banned for an EULA violation can run for CSM. Does James actually qualify?


Why don't you petition it.


No "?" jeez, I suck Oops

I'd like to thank the EvE community for not busting my chops for that mistake.

Between Ignorance and Wisdom

Bantara
Dolmite Cornerstone
#168 - 2013-02-25 20:25:38 UTC
Kainotomiu Ronuken wrote:
Bantara wrote:

Kainotomiu Ronuken wrote:
  • Are there any other reasons[to not vote for James]?

  • Kainotomiu Ronuken wrote:
  • James has an undeniable and varied knowledge of game mechanics. He spent several years in nullsec, has pulled off one of the largest scams in EVE's history (at the time)...
  • I'm flattered to see that you feel the need to reiterate my own points, but did you have anything to add?

    Is your sarcasim a passive-aggressive way of disagreeing with my obvious-even-if-indirect point?

    Let me point it out for you if you missed it, though I don't actually think you did...
    Kainotomiu Ronuken wrote:
  • James...has pulled off one of the largest scams in EVE's history (at the time)...
  • You asked the question, I provided the answer that you yourself listed.
    Kainotomiu Ronuken
    koahisquad
    #169 - 2013-02-25 20:55:28 UTC
    Bantara wrote:
    Let me point it out for you if you missed it, though I don't actually think you did...
    Kainotomiu Ronuken wrote:
  • James...has pulled off one of the largest scams in EVE's history (at the time)...
  • You asked the question, I provided the answer that you yourself listed.

    Hardly a reason not to vote for James. Firstly, there's nothing wrong with scamming. It shows that the scammer is in touch with all areas of the game - scamming is a legitimate playstyle too! Secondly, The Mittani is known to have scammed several supercaps, amounting to at least tens of billions of ISK, and he is the exec of probably the alliance with the greatest scamming history in the game. He was hands-down the most effective chairman the CSM has ever had.
    Vin King
    State War Academy
    Caldari State
    #170 - 2013-02-25 21:14:27 UTC
    James' scam was done to highlight the EXACT nature of EIB, and in the end, James was absolutely correct. This highlights that while the man has had his doubters and detractors, he always ends up being shown as right in the end, and is known for maintaining his cool throughout!

    315 4 CSM 8!

    Proud member of the New Order of HighSec

    Bantara
    Dolmite Cornerstone
    #171 - 2013-02-25 21:56:00 UTC
    Kainotomiu Ronuken wrote:
    Firstly, there's nothing wrong with scamming.

    And thus why I laughed.
    Do not confuse legality with morality.
    Kainotomiu Ronuken
    koahisquad
    #172 - 2013-02-25 22:06:06 UTC
    Bantara wrote:
    Kainotomiu Ronuken wrote:
    Firstly, there's nothing wrong with scamming.

    And thus why I laughed.
    Do not confuse legality with morality.

    You should watch out for confusing actions in a vidya game with morality, too.
    IbanezLaney
    The Church of Awesome
    #173 - 2013-02-25 22:07:54 UTC
    I spend my days mining away in my asteroid eating carebear suit in Hykanima.

    Why hasn't James315 come to bump me?

    It seems they are not serious about their bumping business which is a good indicator James315 will not be any good at CSM.
    No point voting for him if he can't deliver on his own services.




    Bantara
    Dolmite Cornerstone
    #174 - 2013-02-25 22:09:27 UTC
    Kainotomiu Ronuken wrote:
    You should watch out for confusing actions in a vidya game with morality, too.

    You are a human being.
    I am a human being.
    Morality is involved.

    You don't have to agree. But there it is.
    Vin King
    State War Academy
    Caldari State
    #175 - 2013-02-25 22:17:13 UTC
    Bantara wrote:

    You are a human being.
    I am a human being.
    Morality is involved.

    You don't have to agree. But there it is.


    So do I need to turn myself into the police for all the times I played Modern Warfare online and shot other people to death while laughing manically? Or the times I played Counter Strike and planted bombs as a terrorist? Should I repent for all the times I played Left 4 Dead and took glee in the malicious murder of other players? All the team killing I've done? All the jumpkick spam I did in FEAR? Am I to be judged by a jury of my peers for the thousands upon thousands of deaths I've inflicted in a mere day of playing StarCraft?

    Thank goodness I'm not to blame for all the griefing I did in Team Fortress 2 against the other team of human beings when I deployed a sentry, though, as the sentry did all that. That would have been too much for me to bear.

    Proud member of the New Order of HighSec

    Kainotomiu Ronuken
    koahisquad
    #176 - 2013-02-25 22:45:18 UTC
    Bantara wrote:
    You are a human being.
    I am a human being.
    Morality is involved.

    You don't have to agree. But there it is.

    You signed up for a game in the full knowledge that someone could and would try to steal your space pixels. I stole your space pixels, as part of the game.

    That's like saying I'm an evil person because I asked for my rent in Monopoly.
    Bantara
    Dolmite Cornerstone
    #177 - 2013-02-25 23:14:14 UTC
    You guys are taking that too far, that wasn't my point.

    Some people are pvp pilots and run on "pvp" platforms. Others live in sov space and run on 0.0 sovereignty platforms. Others are hi-sec dwellers and run on that platform. Others are pirates and run on pirate platforms.
    You're comfortable with scamming. You find it to be an interesting and unique element of Eve. To you, this is a point in James's favor. But not everyone thinks the same way. What for you is a pro, to another is a con. It's not like you only said, "James has excellent knowledge of how Eve works," something I would hope all players would approve of. You said, "look, James has pulled off huge scams!" and then asked "why wouldn't one want to vote for him?"

    It's comical how Eve-culturally-centric and narrow-minded that is. Thus, I laughed.

    Anyways, no need to continue this further. Either you get it, or you don't, and James has an official thread which should be bumped more than this one.
    Alonzo Harris
    Feminist Vegan Riot Squad
    #178 - 2013-02-26 01:13:14 UTC
    and thus, the circlejerk continues...

    Power to the People! http://freehighsec.wordpress.com/

    Nathalie LaPorte
    Native Freshfood
    Minmatar Republic
    #179 - 2013-03-01 00:30:03 UTC
    Bantara wrote:


    It's comical how Eve-culturally-centric and narrow-minded that is. Thus, I laughed.


    Eve-centrism on the EVE-O forums? Outrageous!

    Thus, I laughed.

    Quote:
    Anyways, no need to continue this further. Either you get it, or you don't, and James has an official thread which should be bumped more than this one.


    Where?
    Kainotomiu Ronuken
    koahisquad
    #180 - 2013-03-01 12:01:05 UTC
    Bantara wrote:
    It's comical how Eve-culturally-centric and narrow-minded that is. Thus, I laughed.

    That's like saying that someone running for Chinese president should focus on Ukrainian cultural ideas. Hello, this is an EVE election. It seems fair that we focus on elements of EVE's culture.

    Bantara wrote:
    Anyways, no need to continue this further. Either you get it, or you don't, and James has an official thread which should be bumped more than this one.

    Actually he doesn't.