These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Rant: Creating a corp is not your god given right.

First post
Author
La Nariz
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#101 - 2013-02-20 20:22:04 UTC
Whitehound wrote:

No. They do not really want others to change, but they want to have a reason to play their game in their way, which often means to avoid playing "by the book" (meaning to follow social conventions, being morally right, etc.), but to do something new. I pitty those who take these "EVE revolutionaries" serious.


Do they really? Where do they say this? I see in "The New Halaima Code of Conduct" that they are enforcing their view which is summarized as "no afk mining allowed" by suicide ganking and bumping the offending miners. The "rebel miners" have decided that "afk mining is allowed and encouraged," they try to resist with websites and tactics. The fact it spawned some content is coincidental and great.

Do you take into consideration that in wanting to have a reason to play their game in their way that they must enforce their views on other players in order to do so?

This post was loving crafted by a member of the Official GoonWaffe recruitment team. Improve the forums, support this idea: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&find=unread&t=345133

Psychotic Monk
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#102 - 2013-02-20 20:22:48 UTC
Possibly. And that may help you when being wardecced, but what happens when I show up to your mining op as a corpie with a mega and destroy an Orca and five Hulks?

(For the record, your options include don't recruit me in the first place, start to ask questions when you see a Mega in the fleet comp window, leave as quickly as possible, have some ECM on the field, even if it's not in a dedicated overwatch ship, or have someone hold me long enough to get into combat ships and murder me.)

Also, everyone seems to have some kind of crazy aversion to hiring mercs. I don't get it. Is it because it effects the number in your wallet that you treat as a high score?
Crumplecorn
Eve Cluster Explorations
#103 - 2013-02-20 20:24:55 UTC
Whitehound wrote:
Joran Dravius wrote:
Whitehound wrote:
Crumplecorn wrote:
Ignorance isn't a playstyle. Neither is a choice made in ignorance much of a choice.
Who are you to call new players ignorant?
Someone who speaks the English language. Ignorant means you don't have knowledge about something. New players are ignorant. That's what makes them new players. When they've been playing long enough to be knowledgeable they're not new players anymore.

You are arrogant and ignorant! Do you believe a new player does not know that he is new to the game? Do you believe they need you to point this out to them? To be patronized by some wannabe leader?? Lol

Anyone who would take up on your judgement is doomed to be lead by a fool. This I doubt is not what the OP had in mind, but, hey, lead away! The more, the merrier.
I can't top "Someone who speaks the English language".

New players are by definition ignorant. Since you seem so keen to shut an undeniable fact out of your mind, I wonder which of us is actually the fool.

You seem quite caught up on the word arrogance, by the way. As if treating new players as anything other the unique and special snowflakes you think they are is some sort of crime. It isn't. New players don't know what they are doing, and without good guidance, they might never learn.

Witty Image - Stream

Not Liking this post hurts my RL feelings and will be considered harassment

LHA Tarawa
Pator Tech School
Minmatar Republic
#104 - 2013-02-20 20:26:00 UTC
I was with you up until this point here.....


Psychotic Monk wrote:

what they get told is that they can't start doing any of the actually interesting **** in eve until they have 30 million sp and 10b in their wallet. They're told that everything that puts them into direct competition with other players will cause their face and hands to turn into poisonous scorpions and that they need to mine and grind missions until they grow bored enough of this game to unsubscribe.



I don't think anyone is telling the new players this stuff.

The big established corps do have skill point limits, but that has nothing to do with ability and everything to do with weeding out spies, alts, griefers, etc.

They are told not to fly anything they can't afford to lose, but a cheap frig is like million, with a decent fit, and you get most of that back should you lose it in combat.

When I've run new player corps, I was very clear in my advertising what type of corporation I was looking to run. HIGH SEC, INDUSTRIAL CORP, looking to mine, manufacture, avoid conflict and maximize profits. So, the people I had contacting me about applying had already SELF-DECIDED that they didn't want to play this game in an aggressive, competitive manner.

I was always very clear with them that there was another whole side of the game that involved going out and trying to ruin other players' days, and that play style is perfectly legitimate play style option.


Several times I've been in corps run by others where they gathered high sec industrialists, then after they had a critical mass, started bringing in PVPers in preparation for moving to low/null. Every time, as soon as the PVPers start stirring up trouble and causing war dec, the hard core industrialists drop corp into a more peaceful corp.


PEOPLE know their own interests much more than you give them credit for, and in fact, they know themselves MUCH better than you know them.

Some people hear that EVE is a great PVP game, and when they get into the game, they go looking for a PVP training corp. Other hear that EVE has this really complex materials, research, manufacturing, player driven market, etc. When they come into the game, they go looking for a high sec, industrial corporation.


The problem comes when the PVPers think they know better what "EVE is about" and think they can dictate to others, how those others should play this game.


EVE is ABOUT, playing the game however YOU enjoy playing it.
Whitehound
#105 - 2013-02-20 20:28:59 UTC
La Nariz wrote:
Do they really? Where do they say this?

They do not need to say this for me to believe it! If it was this easy, my God, who would know what else I would believe?! Lol

Loss is meaningful. Therefore is the loss of meaning likewise meaningful. It is the source of all trolling.

Solstice Project
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#106 - 2013-02-20 20:32:27 UTC  |  Edited by: Solstice Project
La Nariz wrote:
Whitehound wrote:

No. They do not really want others to change, but they want to have a reason to play their game in their way, which often means to avoid playing "by the book" (meaning to follow social conventions, being morally right, etc.), but to do something new. I pitty those who take these "EVE revolutionaries" serious.


Do they really? Where do they say this? I see in "The New Halaima Code of Conduct" that they are enforcing their view which is summarized as "no afk mining allowed" by suicide ganking and bumping the offending miners. The "rebel miners" have decided that "afk mining is allowed and encouraged," they try to resist with websites and tactics. The fact it spawned some content is coincidental and great.

Do you take into consideration that in wanting to have a reason to play their game in their way that they must enforce their views on other players in order to do so?

Interesting.

Am i forcing people to play by "my rules" because i teach them not to be afk in space,
because else i'll blow their ******* head off ? Oh hell yes, i do. And i'm good at it too !

MANY people have stopped being afk in space or autopiloting. They are telling me ! lol
It went so far that some random who saw me paniced and warped off, just because i was around in a frig, hauling stuff.

I really don't see the issue of forcing whatever the hell i want onto anybody, as long as i keep it ingame.
Ingame. Not out of game. Only cowards try dealing with things out of game, because they could easily to it
within the virtual reality we all play in.

It's a game, it gives me the freedom to play it like a virtual reality unlike any other game out there,
so i play it to it's fullest potential. Well ... almost ... but you'd wish that will never happen.
Crumplecorn
Eve Cluster Explorations
#107 - 2013-02-20 20:34:21 UTC
LHA Tarawa wrote:
Some people hear that EVE is a great PVP game, and when they get into the game, they go looking for a PVP training corp. Other hear that EVE has this really complex materials, research, manufacturing, player driven market, etc. When they come into the game, they go looking for a high sec, industrial corporation.
Both groups are bad players.

- Glorious God Tier All Playstyle Playing Master Race


LHA Tarawa wrote:
The problem comes when the PVPers think they know better what "EVE is about" and think they can dictate to others, how those others should play this game.
Actually both groups try to dictate the other. The difference is, most PvPers actually do engage in both sides of the game to some degree, because PvP doesn't pay for itself.

Witty Image - Stream

Not Liking this post hurts my RL feelings and will be considered harassment

Psychotic Monk
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#108 - 2013-02-20 20:38:13 UTC
LHA Tarawa wrote:

I don't think anyone is telling the new players this stuff.


It is literally happening, yes. I've seen internal mails from corps I've decced to not undock anything for the entire duration of the war because if they lose something it will encourage other people to also dec them. It is a sad, ****** state of affairs.

You say industrialists don't want to play in an aggressive manner. That's fine. But there isn't an opt out of PvP button. It will find you. This is a game where one of the central pillars is competition. Encouraging bright-eyed newbies to shackle themselves in fear and ignorance is not the solution. That way just leads to defeat and people hating this game because they feel powerless.

My OP in this is my trying to tell people to stop stealing newbie's power. They could be incredibly capable if only they weren't being weighed down by poor information and poor leadership.
La Nariz
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#109 - 2013-02-20 20:41:35 UTC
Psychotic Monk wrote:
Also, everyone seems to have some kind of crazy aversion to hiring mercs. I don't get it. Is it because it effects the number in your wallet that you treat as a high score?


This is an easy one, the mercs are charging to much. I was inquiring about highsec wardec costs and most of them want way more than they are worth. It averaged 2.5 billion to go after a 50 man highsec mining corp which is ridiculous.

This post was loving crafted by a member of the Official GoonWaffe recruitment team. Improve the forums, support this idea: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&find=unread&t=345133

Whitehound
#110 - 2013-02-20 20:43:47 UTC  |  Edited by: Whitehound
Crumplecorn wrote:
New players are by definition ignorant. Since you seem so keen to shut an undeniable fact out of your mind, I wonder which of us is actually the fool.

The fool is the one who keeps arguing over what is blatantly obvious when in fact there is no argument. I did not see me disagreeing to your "undeniable fact". I sure do not want to follow you when you get lost in your own conversation.

Loss is meaningful. Therefore is the loss of meaning likewise meaningful. It is the source of all trolling.

Psychotic Monk
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#111 - 2013-02-20 20:46:58 UTC
La Nariz wrote:

This is an easy one, the mercs are charging to much. I was inquiring about highsec wardec costs and most of them want way more than they are worth. It averaged 2.5 billion to go after a 50 man highsec mining corp which is ridiculous.


Gross. I mean, I guess there's things to be said about the difference in cost between the Orphanage model when you dec **** for super cheap and get whatever you get vs. the model of deccing select targets and making their lives a personal Vietnam.

The latter should be much more expensive. Although 2.5b is nuts. 1b is much more realistic in my experience.

... anyways, end tangent. That's a discussion for a different thread.
Crumplecorn
Eve Cluster Explorations
#112 - 2013-02-20 20:49:11 UTC
Whitehound wrote:
I did not see me disagreeing to your "undeniable fact".
And you say I'm the one getting lost.

Witty Image - Stream

Not Liking this post hurts my RL feelings and will be considered harassment

Hixeppa
Shamrock Corp.
EDENCOM DEFENSIVE INITIATIVE
#113 - 2013-02-20 20:49:59 UTC
Psychotic Monk wrote:
La Nariz wrote:

This is an easy one, the mercs are charging to much. I was inquiring about highsec wardec costs and most of them want way more than they are worth. It averaged 2.5 billion to go after a 50 man highsec mining corp which is ridiculous.


Gross. I mean, I guess there's things to be said about the difference in cost between the Orphanage model when you dec **** for super cheap and get whatever you get vs. the model of deccing select targets and making their lives a personal Vietnam.

The latter should be much more expensive. Although 2.5b is nuts. 1b is much more realistic in my experience.

... anyways, end tangent. That's a discussion for a different thread.


Apparently it costs around 600 billion per week to hire Pandemic Legion...
Whitehound
#114 - 2013-02-20 20:52:36 UTC
Crumplecorn wrote:
Whitehound wrote:
I did not see me disagreeing to your "undeniable fact".
And you say I'm the one getting lost.

Do you disagree?

Loss is meaningful. Therefore is the loss of meaning likewise meaningful. It is the source of all trolling.

Montevius Williams
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#115 - 2013-02-20 20:55:06 UTC
This is a dumb post. Thisis like saying making your own business is your God given right, even though most business fail. It's your money (isk), it's your playtime. If you want to start a Corp, go ahead and do so. This post is fail.

"The American Government indoctrination system known as public education has been relentlessly churning out socialists for over 20 years". - TravisWB

Xpaulusx
Naari LLC
#116 - 2013-02-20 20:58:00 UTC
Theres this game called Eveonline, its a sandbox, that means players can do whatever they want within reason and as long as they follow the EULA. It has worked well for some 10 years and theres always people whom think they can improve it buy suggesting how people should play in said "sandbox". The reason this game has survived is because most people ignore these players and contuniue playing the way they want. Thats why the game has survived for 10 years Blink

......................................................

Montevius Williams
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#117 - 2013-02-20 21:05:42 UTC
Xpaulusx wrote:
Theres this game called Eveonline, its a sandbox, that means players can do whatever they want within reason and as long as they follow the EULA. It has worked well for some 10 years and theres always people whom think they can improve it buy suggesting how people should play in said "sandbox". The reason this game has survived is because most people ignore these players and contuniue playing the way they want. Thats why the game has survived for 10 years Blink


This!!

It's very disconcerting that so many bitter vets continually try to dictate how newer players should play.

New players, it's your 15 bucks a month, do what the frak you want to do in this game. Unless Joe Schmoo is paying your subscription fee for you, tell him or her to kick rocks (or space debris).

Im not saying dont listen to guidance, but do not feel obligated in anyway to follow what anyone is saying or telling you.

"The American Government indoctrination system known as public education has been relentlessly churning out socialists for over 20 years". - TravisWB

Psychotic Monk
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#118 - 2013-02-20 21:05:48 UTC
When you, as a terrible CEO, make a corp, you're not potentially wasting your own play time, you're actively harming those around you. So yes, your correct. It's not that you can't, it's that please don't.

And yes, you have a right to play however you like. And I do, too. And my play is to crush your play. I'm not telling you how to play so much as I'm begging you to stop harming this game by making terrible players.
FloppieTheBanjoClown
Arcana Imperii Ltd.
#119 - 2013-02-20 21:06:54 UTC
Whitehound wrote:
For Christ's sake, check OP's corp history. Roll


We refer to it as being weaponized. That thing can crash lesser clients.

What does his corp history have to do with the veracity of his statements?

Founding member of the Belligerent Undesirables movement.

Arronicus
State War Academy
Caldari State
#120 - 2013-02-20 21:08:16 UTC
Psychotic Monk wrote:
When you, as a terrible CEO, make a corp, you're not potentially wasting your own play time, you're actively harming those around you. So yes, your correct. It's not that you can't, it's that please don't.

And yes, you have a right to play however you like. And I do, too. And my play is to crush your play. I'm not telling you how to play so much as I'm begging you to stop harming this game by making terrible players.



A terrible CEO will not be able to get many people to join his corp, nor will he be able to carry momentum to continue growing the corp.