These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE Information Portal

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

EVE Online: Retribution 1.1 Feedback

First post
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Izun
Perkone
Caldari State
#221 - 2013-02-20 08:50:29 UTC
MainDrain wrote:
Izun wrote:
Nadzieijko Andrastile wrote:


I'm not following them in anyway, nothing is labelled (thank god), they link to other stars, but nothing links to the stargate I'm hitting. It's basically a map overlay on my screen. When I close my map, it's because I don't want to see it. Still looking for the option to turn this route map off as well.



Would be nice in a future patch to change the alignment of the stargates to connect them to the star we're warping to, that would add lot more reality to those (nice) lines on the screen, atm they're nothing else that something added to the backgroung (imho)


This was done a couple of expansions ago. If you look at the star gate you should see the autopilot line going straight to the target star.

Edit: - was beaten to the answer


Then i need a pair of glasses, gonna check again
Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
#222 - 2013-02-20 08:54:23 UTC  |  Edited by: Vaerah Vahrokha
Easily repeatable bug.

I warned you CCP in the pre patch thread that you would screw up the SHIFT + double click to open a second show info window. That post got the most likes in the thread.

And indeed you did. Now regardless of the options chosen, the second info window won't appear.


Steps to reproduce:

1) Open hangar with BPOs.
2) Show info on one.
3) Shift + double click on another.
4) A second info panel used to appear, like if you did show info and shift + show info, now it won't any more.
5) Going in the options won't enable the previous behavior regardless of options chosen.

EvE Online portal | EvE markets tutorials
Teezea Evotori
Red-Five
#223 - 2013-02-20 08:55:58 UTC
Google Voices wrote:
So, I actually bothered to read the patch notes, and I don't see an explanation for this.


Trying to build a Prowler in a station.....


"This product cannot be manufactured at this facility."


Well played?



Having this same issue with building a Tornado

\o/
Bubbleboylol
Militia Federation
#224 - 2013-02-20 09:08:04 UTC
Ghar Atu'ur wrote:
Personally, I think what was done to Battle Cruisers is shameful. The Battle from the name was ripped off ...only cruiser is left now.
Simply makes no sense. Battle Cruisers gained mass but lost a lot of EHP and turrets. Makes no sense at all. It seems now that with every Patch more and more ships and modules are nerfed. I personally no longer look forward to new updates because the first thing that comes to my mind is what will be nerfed instead of what new and wonderful items and improvements will be introduced. Update by update, my enjoyment of the game is lessening... I no longer am sure if I will sign up for another year.
The Summer Rebalancing of Ships fills me with dread...




go read my thread

https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=207455&find=unread


help me make a difference. We need to pressure CCP like in the past or they will just do it again.

Asking to have more then one ( Option From CCP is like asking a chicken to cook it-self. )
Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
#225 - 2013-02-20 09:14:22 UTC
Bubbleboylol wrote:
Ghar Atu'ur wrote:
Personally, I think what was done to Battle Cruisers is shameful. The Battle from the name was ripped off ...only cruiser is left now.
Simply makes no sense. Battle Cruisers gained mass but lost a lot of EHP and turrets. Makes no sense at all. It seems now that with every Patch more and more ships and modules are nerfed. I personally no longer look forward to new updates because the first thing that comes to my mind is what will be nerfed instead of what new and wonderful items and improvements will be introduced. Update by update, my enjoyment of the game is lessening... I no longer am sure if I will sign up for another year.
The Summer Rebalancing of Ships fills me with dread...




go read my thread

https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=207455&find=unread


help me make a difference. We need to pressure CCP like in the past or they will just do it again.



Lol you made that post in a forum where people intentionally put stuff they want to NEVER be read or considered.

EvE Online portal | EvE markets tutorials
Bubbleboylol
Militia Federation
#226 - 2013-02-20 09:15:06 UTC
Flag Bravo wrote:
Well we had a nice long period of CCP sensibility. Now it looks like they are drifting back into looney tunes mode.

I really hate what they have done to my BC's. To put it bluntly, it's **********g stupid.

As I see it I am left with only two options.
1- Let my subs run dry and wait until the loons leave the asylum.
2- Change my sex and become Amarr.




https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=207455&find=unread


Group up lets threaten a petition again. This is crap......

Asking to have more then one ( Option From CCP is like asking a chicken to cook it-self. )
Bubbleboylol
Militia Federation
#227 - 2013-02-20 09:16:29 UTC  |  Edited by: Bubbleboylol
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:
Bubbleboylol wrote:
Ghar Atu'ur wrote:
Personally, I think what was done to Battle Cruisers is shameful. The Battle from the name was ripped off ...only cruiser is left now.
Simply makes no sense. Battle Cruisers gained mass but lost a lot of EHP and turrets. Makes no sense at all. It seems now that with every Patch more and more ships and modules are nerfed. I personally no longer look forward to new updates because the first thing that comes to my mind is what will be nerfed instead of what new and wonderful items and improvements will be introduced. Update by update, my enjoyment of the game is lessening... I no longer am sure if I will sign up for another year.
The Summer Rebalancing of Ships fills me with dread...




go read my thread

https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=207455&find=unread


help me make a difference. We need to pressure CCP like in the past or they will just do it again.



Lol you made that post in a forum where people intentionally put stuff they want to NEVER be read or considered.




Well please make one yourself ( were you think it should go ) and get people to read and or group up threaten a petition again etc! At least i am trying... I will go to your thread and yell right along with you and help spread the word...

Asking to have more then one ( Option From CCP is like asking a chicken to cook it-self. )
Abrazzar
Vardaugas Family
#228 - 2013-02-20 09:21:07 UTC
Been trying out the new Prophecy with lvl 3 missions grinding up some standings and I must say I love the little murderous pigeon.

With three Drone Damage Amplifier IIs and a Sentry Damage Augmentor rig, I am doing so much damage, I don't even need a active tank. I just slapped in a 1600mm plate and a small rep to top off the armor should it get damaged, which is rare. Saves me slots otherwise needed for cap modules.

The new Prophecy is a beast, especially when you compare it to it's performance before the boost.

Sovereignty and Population

New Mining Mechanics
Airin Star
Perkone
Caldari State
#229 - 2013-02-20 09:24:46 UTC
that "info panel" take even more place now Evil and its still unmoveable Twisted
and that 2 control buttons their place on "taskbar-quicklaunch" oh sorry neocom panel X
Rommiee
Mercury Inc.
#230 - 2013-02-20 09:26:06 UTC  |  Edited by: Rommiee
Haifisch Zahne wrote:
CCP will propose that a workaround is to already have a capital/super-capital ship available to use its Corporate Hangar to refit with a Covert Cynosural Field to call in the capital/super-capital.


Lexxxii wrote:
Covert Cynosural Field Generators may now be fitted on any Strategic Cruiser that has the Covert Reconfiguration subsystem fitted, as well as on Blockade Runners.


Well, you had better add a highslot to the Viator, Crane & Prorator. Currently, only the Prowler will be able to fit a cloak & covert cyno.

Adding this is pointless at the moment, thus giving the Minmatar Blockade runners an advantage over all the other races. Much better to have waited.

Awesome piece of work. Nice one




Like we take caps along on our Blops raiding fleets.

That is the most dim-witted idea I have heard in a long time.
Roime
Mea Culpa.
Shadow Cartel
#231 - 2013-02-20 09:27:10 UTC
Having the autopilot settings in the new panels is blatantly awesome <3

.
Zilero
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#232 - 2013-02-20 09:28:15 UTC
While I don't really care about the new "duel system" one feature annoys me.

Whenever someone accepts a duel I get a notification right smack in the middle of my screen.

Where can I disable this?


Oh right, I can't - so what I'm asking is: Could a feature where I can disable this "feature" be added, because quite frankly I don't give a rats ass about other people's duels....
Spugg Galdon
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#233 - 2013-02-20 09:36:21 UTC
Zilero wrote:
While I don't really care about the new "duel system" one feature annoys me.

Whenever someone accepts a duel I get a notification right smack in the middle of my screen.

Where can I disable this?


Oh right, I can't - so what I'm asking is: Could a feature where I can disable this "feature" be added, because quite frankly I don't give a rats ass about other people's duels....



You can setup your client to automagically reject duel requests.
Spugg Galdon
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#234 - 2013-02-20 09:37:52 UTC  |  Edited by: Spugg Galdon
The new "Draw Autopilot Route in Space" feature is pretty damn cool.


Just one question........ How long was the "Time to Penis" with this feature cause, personally, I'm gonna draw one this afternoon when I get bored.

The drawing of a willy that's light years in size is just too much to resist. Must draw one as soon as possible.
Nevyn Auscent
Broke Sauce
#235 - 2013-02-20 10:34:53 UTC
Zilero wrote:
While I don't really care about the new "duel system" one feature annoys me.

Whenever someone accepts a duel I get a notification right smack in the middle of my screen.

Where can I disable this?


Oh right, I can't - so what I'm asking is: Could a feature where I can disable this "feature" be added, because quite frankly I don't give a rats ass about other people's duels....

Do you also get damage notifications dead centre?
Chances are this is under Notifications & Logs if so.
CCP Greyscale
C C P
C C P Alliance
#236 - 2013-02-20 11:12:18 UTC
Mysa wrote:
"New skill Armor Honeycombing has been added."

Whatever nobhead that came up whit honeyHONEYcombing needs to be namned and shamed!! What and how were has that to do anything whit the word mass?!?


That would've been me Smile

To answer your question: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Honeycomb_structure

Quote:
Man-made honeycomb structural materials are commonly made by layering a honeycomb material between two thin layers that provide strength in tension. This forms a plate-like assembly. Honeycomb materials are widely used where flat or slightly curved surfaces are needed and their high strength-to-weight ratio is valuable. They are widely used in the aerospace industry for this reason, and honeycomb materials in aluminum, fibreglass and advanced composite materials have been featured in aircraft and rockets since the 1950s. They can also be found in many other fields, from packaging materials in the form of paper-based honeycomb cardboard, to sporting goods like skis and snowboards.
Cap'n Thich
Perkone
Caldari State
#237 - 2013-02-20 11:15:07 UTC
NEONOVUS wrote:
Why, why must you torment me so CCP?
You make a game and encourage me to play it.
Then when I feel like its boring and no longer worth my time, you change it and make it interesting again!
Let me wallow in my selfdespair and pity instead of making me happy!

Also why was nanopaste chosen for the AAR instead of metal scraps?



I actually like the idea of metal scraps.....I'm expecting the price of nano paste to jump up a lot.


BTW CCP Good job on the deployment of 1.1. But I'm going to stand on my ground about disagreeing with the BC changes. We're going to see less and less BCs around eve now. They're just not worth flying anymore.
Arkon Olacar
black.listed
#238 - 2013-02-20 11:17:42 UTC
Cap'n Thich wrote:

BTW CCP Good job on the deployment of 1.1. But I'm going to stand on my ground about disagreeing with the BC changes. We're going to see less and less BCs around eve now. They're just not worth flying anymore.

Confirming that a damage buff to one of the most overpowered and overused ships in the game will result in no one using BCs.
Mourados Denver
Eagles Of Death Metal
#239 - 2013-02-20 11:24:51 UTC
Thank you for making one of the best ship in EVE unusable, and giving us some lines in place of it... Thank you
Dr Trust
League of Gentlemen
The Initiative.
#240 - 2013-02-20 11:27:44 UTC
NEONOVUS wrote:
Oh you cool people.
Missile impacts cause screenshakes now.


CCP, how do you turn this off?[/quote]
Agreed, This should have it's own option that is seperate from the rest of the missile effect options.[/quote]


just to point out camera shake has been there for ages well before this patch

and yes the shake is the missiles