These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Crime & Punishment

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Collective front launched against the New Order, James315 and miner bumping.

First post First post
Author
Estella Osoka
Cranky Bitches Who PMS
#801 - 2013-02-17 18:37:27 UTC
I'd personally want the "We Brake For Nobody" bumper sticker.
Alana Charen-Teng
Garoun Investment Bank
Gallente Federation
#802 - 2013-02-17 22:12:20 UTC
Lin Suizei
#803 - 2013-02-17 23:18:44 UTC
Katran Luftschreck wrote:
Valderath wrote:
All the 'united front' need to do is change tactics. Those that pay James, are killed. You wear the tag in your bio saying you have paid, you are killed.

Once the 'order' has little credibility left, since those that pay are killed anyhow... then Jame's cause is nullified. No one will pay or pay attention to his jabbering. Insurgency against his order is pretty much perfect, since you don't need to kill his 'knights' just kill the source of his support.

Goes for his donor list too. Be fun to see some shadowy peeps start killing his donors and assets for the 'lols'.

Perhaps miners that pay and accept a mining pass can be termed 'scabs' by the Inter-Galatic Miners Union and shot accordingly. Just an idea.


I'd throw some chips into this pile if anyone wanted to actually get it up and running.


From the very first day of miner bumping, you have always been free to attack our bumping ships, but you haven't, because you and your fellow rebel miscreants are cowards and weaklings. Fight if you can find the courage to do so - if you can't, then maybe put some bounty on New Order Logistics so you can pretend you made a difference.

Lol I can't delete my forum sig.

Kesian Quinn
State War Academy
Caldari State
#804 - 2013-02-18 00:06:25 UTC
I am mostly curious how the Order justifies blowing up ships of miners who are talking in local and not afk. This tells me they are not after change, only after extortion money. It all sounded reasonable until they started targetting non afk ships. I'm just curious.
Aracimia Wolfe
Imperial Academy
Amarr Empire
#805 - 2013-02-18 01:07:29 UTC
Kesian Quinn wrote:
I am mostly curious how the Order justifies blowing up ships of miners who are talking in local and not afk. This tells me they are not after change, only after extortion money. It all sounded reasonable until they started targetting non afk ships. I'm just curious.


As I understand it they've taken a with us or against us stance. Pay the permit get left alone. Don't pay the permit you're anti-code. Or Just not a miner.

Also I think it follows on with the fact that they HAVE to charge 10mill otherwise it's just harrassment. A genius move actually when you think about it, that pittance "extortion" is what validates the whole thing.

Kill it with Fire!

Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
#806 - 2013-02-18 01:07:51 UTC
Kesian Quinn wrote:
I am mostly curious how the Order justifies blowing up ships of miners who are talking in local and not afk. This tells me they are not after change, only after extortion money. It all sounded reasonable until they started targetting non afk ships. I'm just curious.


Two Words

Mining Permit.

In the beginning there was nothing, which exploded.

New Player FAQ

Feyd's Survival Pack

Agent Eunoli
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#807 - 2013-02-18 01:09:26 UTC  |  Edited by: Agent Eunoli
Kesian Quinn wrote:
I am mostly curious how the Order justifies blowing up ships of miners who are talking in local and not afk. This tells me they are not after change, only after extortion money. It all sounded reasonable until they started targetting non afk ships. I'm just curious.

The Code.

While mining and chatting in /local are commendable unto themselves that activity needs to be paired with a mining permit.

The reality for the family of the New Order is that when our scouts are out in the belts they are checking each miner's mining permit status. Sometimes the scouts are not paying attention to local but are involved in fleet discussions or are in the super-secret-New-Order channel.

As such, the only real tank against the New Order of Highsec is to have a mining permit.

The ISK generated from mining permits is insignificant compared to other activities that members of the New Order of Highsec could be doing.

If one is at the keyboard and mining then one should be fully aware that the New Order is operating in the region and it only makes sense to buy a mining permit to support the good works of the New Order for the benefit of all active miners in Highsec.

Edited to add a note about the reasoning for the 10 million ISK - it is there as a token amount to signify the support for the New Order of Highsec. The amount is nominal and easily affordable. The payment of the ISK is a show of support for the New Order and nothing more. Basically, it is a procedural mechanism in the process flow of the governance of mining activity in Highsec.

Cinematic HD EVE Movies: http://www.youtube.com/user/EveEunoli/

Sienna Washburne
Doomheim
#808 - 2013-02-18 03:17:24 UTC
The solution to all of this seems rather simple to me.

1) Don't mine AFK
2) Mine aligned to a station or celestial
3) If the minerbumpers show up in your system, don't pay the extortion fee
4) If they invade the belt you're in...move
5) Profit

For crying out loud, miners. They have a map posted on their website.

/facepalm
John E Normus
New Order Logistics
CODE.
#809 - 2013-02-18 04:07:11 UTC
Sienna Washburne wrote:
The solution to all of this seems rather simple to me.

1) Don't mine AFK
2) Mine aligned to a station or celestial
3) If the minerbumpers show up in your system, don't pay the extortion fee
4) If they invade the belt you're in...move
5) Profit

For crying out loud, miners. They have a map posted on their website.

/facepalm


You probably wouldn't believe it if I told that we used to give the same advice to miners. Unfortunately, the afk/bot types don't read local and the emo-rager-non-compliants really want us to kill them IMO. There are some strange people out in those belts.

Between Ignorance and Wisdom

Emperor Crash Zues
Guns N'Ore
#810 - 2013-02-18 05:11:50 UTC
Or better yet come to null mining is great out here
Alana Charen-Teng
Garoun Investment Bank
Gallente Federation
#811 - 2013-02-18 05:13:53 UTC  |  Edited by: Alana Charen-Teng
My heart was filled with joy when I stumbled across these killmails...

Kill: Orca
Kill: Capsule

Ironically, the brutix had lowest damage. I guess my talos will have to wait for next time. Congratulations to our hard-working Knights, whose courage serve as a bright torch against the dark night of non-compliant highsec!

GLORIOUS VICTORY!!!

*dances*
Wescro2
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#812 - 2013-02-18 05:52:03 UTC
Alana Charen-Teng wrote:
My heart was filled with joy when I stumbled across these killmails...

Kill: Orca
Kill: Capsule

The pod was terrifyingly anemic. Ironically, the brutix had lowest damage. I guess my talos will have to wait for next time.

GLORIOUS VICTORY!!!

*dances*


Brutix didn't align as fast and arrived late to the party. I had client issues and arrived even later (hence I'm not on the killmail sadly). But even without full fleet dps, the good guys won. =)

I think at this point all the reasonable human miners have bought permits. What we are left with are special snowflakes and bots. This guy was of the former variety. He locked the scout with his big bad unarmed Orca, even when it innocently continued to mine. He was aligned out, but didn't bother to move. If he had the right size of mwd he might have been able to warp out when 14 reds just jumped into system, but I doubt he was paying attention to local. The gank itself would have surely failed, considering my client crash and Trasks Brutix align delay, if the Orca hadn't equpped two cargohold expanders, which dropped its EHP by a whopping 15,000.
Alana Charen-Teng
Garoun Investment Bank
Gallente Federation
#813 - 2013-02-18 10:59:43 UTC
Wescro2 wrote:
He was aligned out, but didn't bother to move. If he had the right size of mwd he might have been able to warp out when 14 reds just jumped into system, but I doubt he was paying attention to local. The gank itself would have surely failed, considering my client crash and Trasks Brutix align delay, if the Orca hadn't equpped two cargohold expanders, which dropped its EHP by a whopping 15,000.

When a ship is completely stationary, it effectively has no orientation. It doesn't matter what direction the ship model appears to be pointing - it will still take the same time to warp away.
OldWolf69
EVE-RO
Goonswarm Federation
#814 - 2013-02-18 11:26:07 UTC
Kesian Quinn wrote:
I am mostly curious how the Order justifies blowing up ships of miners who are talking in local and not afk. This tells me they are not after change, only after extortion money. It all sounded reasonable until they started targetting non afk ships. I'm just curious.

Christ, m8. This is EvE. Who da*uque ever tought it was about the AFK targets, for real?Big smileBig smileBig smile
Haedonism Bot
People for the Ethical Treatment of Rogue Drones
#815 - 2013-02-18 14:21:06 UTC
Whatever happened to the Tolero Guard or whatever it was called? 41 pages ago some guy said he was starting a movement against the New Order. I wished him good luck and joined his mailing list, so I could hear the news about all the miner bumpers he was blowing up. In all that time I have only gotten one mail from him (he wrote an article saying AFK mining was goodRoll) and then I haven't heard from him since.

While I admire the good works of James315 and the New Order, I keep hoping somebody will actually try and take meaningful action against them. This whole story would be more interesting if there was some actual conflict, as opposed to fun stuff happening on the one side while the other side moans and cries.

www.everevolutionaryfront.blogspot.com

Vote Sabriz Adoudel and Tora Bushido for CSMX. Keep the Evil in EVE!

Manny Moons
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#816 - 2013-02-18 18:46:40 UTC
Haedonism Bot wrote:
...While I admire the good works of James315 and the New Order, I keep hoping somebody will actually try and take meaningful action against them. This whole story would be more interesting if there was some actual conflict, as opposed to fun stuff happening on the one side while the other side moans and cries.


Most of us in the New Order feel the same way. In the beginning I thought it would be a difficult battle with stiff opposition. That just hasn't happened. Our "opposition" mainly consists of spectators. Station campers who watch our Catalysts leave and then watch our pods come home. Belt campers, many of whom are paid to be there, who watch exhumers destroyed by Catalysts, and Catalysts destroyed by CONCORD. Occasionally they will manage to "help" CONCORD punish us, and get a kill mail of dubious value. Every now and then they manage to pop one of our pods after the gank, getting us back to station more quickly. Only rarely have they ever saved a miner's ship. We do have a couple of bold enemies willing to suicide themselves to gank New Order scouts, and I salute them, even though the cost of the gank almost always exceeds the value of the target.

The newest idea from the opposition seems to be targeting miners who have purchased New Order mining permits. Since targeting New Order assets was not proving productive, apparently the idea is now to punish the pragmatic permit-holders - miners who seek only to mine in peace - and, I suppose, to dissuade others from becoming Code-compliant. This makes little sense to me, since (a) the New Order is so well funded by its shareholders that any potential disruption in permit sales would have zero affect on New Order oeprations, and (b) ganking miners to oppose the ganking of miners? Huh? At any rate, I see no reason to think this effort will be any more organized than the past failures.

I am encouraged by the changes in behavior I have seen, and not only that of Code-compliant miners. Each time our actions cause a miner to improve his tank, or switch to a Skiff, or become more vigilant, or take up arms against us, or even just to actively argue with us in local, I feel we have succeeded.
Kainotomiu Ronuken
koahisquad
#817 - 2013-02-18 19:17:01 UTC
Haedonism Bot wrote:
Whatever happened to the Tolero Guard or whatever it was called? 41 pages ago some guy said he was starting a movement against the New Order. I wished him good luck and joined his mailing list, so I could hear the news about all the miner bumpers he was blowing up. In all that time I have only gotten one mail from him (he wrote an article saying AFK mining was goodRoll) and then I haven't heard from him since.

While I admire the good works of James315 and the New Order, I keep hoping somebody will actually try and take meaningful action against them. This whole story would be more interesting if there was some actual conflict, as opposed to fun stuff happening on the one side while the other side moans and cries.

Unfortunately the Tolero Guard disbanded (can a one-man organisation disband) when the Torarjan Collective surrendered the the Order. The only other notable resistance movement has been the Proveldtariat, but it hasn't been active in a while now, since Anslo is busy with IRL things.
Alana Charen-Teng
Garoun Investment Bank
Gallente Federation
#818 - 2013-02-19 02:10:40 UTC  |  Edited by: Alana Charen-Teng
The Supreme Protector's CSM8 Election Interview with Xander Phoena - check it out!

Xander Phoena wrote:
Look, go to James' blog (minerbumping.com) and have a look around. Take a good hard look at the likes of the About page. Did I have preconceptions of what James was based on the research I had done on him? You're damned right I did. And it would appear an awful lot of others felt the same way from the emails I received regarding James 315 before I did this interview. As for him not stating he hates highsec? Well he says he doesn't but all of his actions state otherwise. For me, actions speak louder than words.

...What makes me pleased is the vast majority of people, including James himself and the rest of the [New Order] camp, appear to have appreciated the tough questioning which allowed James to clear the air regarding the troll thing and his platform.


Xander Phoena wrote:
I think the fact that he was able to answer so well despite my very tough questioning actually paints him in an even stronger light than had I went easier on him. I'm guessing that's why he is so pleased with how it went in the end.


Karl Hobb wrote:
tbh that was probably my biggest concern about his campaign, and I'm a shareholder. Now that we know he's serious (thank you Xander, great work on the interview!) I think it's safe to vote for the guy. James 315 did a great job representing himself and his platform.


Xander Phoena wrote:
I could have perhaps pushed him more on his platform and his positions but to be honest, I don't know how much more information I could have got from him. He went into his platform in a LOT of detail - far more than I (or anyone else I'd imagine) would have expected.

One man's satire is another man's troll. The line is very fine and often comes down to personal perspective. I don't apologise for clarifying his position here. It seems like people like Karl above were unsure and now they are actually going to vote for him. From James' perspective, mission accomplished.
Sienna Washburne
Doomheim
#819 - 2013-02-19 02:47:56 UTC
Are we still caring about this?
Mallak Azaria
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#820 - 2013-02-19 03:21:41 UTC


Interview guy was a little touchy, maybe he makes money in highsec. This is worthy of further research.

This post was lovingly crafted by a member of the Goonwaffe Posting Cabal, proud member of the popular gay hookup site somethingawful.com, Spelling Bee, Grammar Gestapo & #1 Official Gevlon Goblin Fanclub member.