These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Null Sec carebear ship spinners and their tears over High Sec

First post
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Malcanis
Vanishing Point.
The Initiative.
#141 - 2013-02-17 15:08:37 UTC
Takseen wrote:
James Amril-Kesh wrote:

It has nothing to do with the way you play, at all. It has everything to do with what the game hands you on a silver ******* platter for staying in the safest area of space.


Null has better payouts and facilities for everything bar industry.

And apparently it has too much ABC and not enough Trit.


Tell me about how 0.0 is better for invention. And mining. And trading.

"Just remember later that I warned against any change to jump ranges or fatigue. You earned whats coming."

Grath Telkin, 11.10.2016
Ankles McGlashan
Doomheim
#142 - 2013-02-17 15:23:03 UTC
James Amril-Kesh wrote:
Nerfing highsec mission income while buffing nullsec income would be good for the game as a whole.
Removing local would not.


it really doesn't matter where ISK is being generated as long as demand in the economy is healthy. High sec being profitable generates a large part of that demand through ever greater e-peen fits for faster mission F1ing. anything that reduces demand will impact anyone earning ISK through LP or loot drops as they have to monetise that income through the market.

the best way to stimulate that demand and increase nullsec income is to scan them down and gank their balls off.
Andski
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#143 - 2013-02-17 15:39:02 UTC
Nicolo da'Vicenza wrote:
ITT: EVE-UNI and NPC corp posters think BPCs valued by players at 900M a piece are a regular and plentiful source of income


i'd really like to see them keep sounding off with their hilarious ideas on how nullsec works

"a friend of a guy i met in an incursion gang once got an 80m tick ratting in nullsec in a drake"

Twitter: @EVEAndski

"It's easy to speak for the silent majority. They rarely object to what you put into their mouths."    - Abrazzar
Andski
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#144 - 2013-02-17 15:44:14 UTC
hisec wretches will always make hilarious attempts to speak authoritatively on things relating to space they've never set foot in, basing their opinions entirely on hyperbolic hearsay based on more hyperbolic hearsay

for example, many of those hisec wretches believe that moons are mined with special moon mining ships equipped with strip moon miners, as part of "goo harvesting ops"

Twitter: @EVEAndski

"It's easy to speak for the silent majority. They rarely object to what you put into their mouths."    - Abrazzar
Kate stark
#145 - 2013-02-17 15:57:33 UTC
Andski wrote:
hisec wretches will always make hilarious attempts to speak authoritatively on things relating to space they've never set foot in, basing their opinions entirely on hyperbolic hearsay based on more hyperbolic hearsay

for example, many of those hisec wretches believe that moons are mined with special moon mining ships equipped with strip moon miners, as part of "goo harvesting ops"


you mean... that doesn't happen? :(

Yay, this account hasn't had its signature banned. or its account, if you're reading this.
Ankles McGlashan
Doomheim
#146 - 2013-02-17 16:10:26 UTC
Funnily enough, knowing basic facts about high-sec is enough to school these learned vets.

like, you can do stuff up here too, geniuses. Roll

Go and find some slots.
Andski
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#147 - 2013-02-17 16:18:53 UTC
other examples of outrageous ideas accepted as fact by these types:

anchoring a tower under another alliance's sovereignty is impossible
nullsec alliances routinely cynojam ratting systems
alliances keep supercapital caches on holding characters, or god forbid, in CSMAs
officer spawns are common, and so are officer spawns that drop things other than tags and ammo
rare, expensive faction battleship bpcs drop routinely
local allows people to go afk and autopilot freighters through nullsec

it is unnecessary to point out where these outrageous ideas have been stated, but these are the things that npc alts and other hisec wretches will hear and take as the truth

when they state such things as fact, it is amazing that anyone listens to them when they come forward with their ideas about the "big blue donut"

Twitter: @EVEAndski

"It's easy to speak for the silent majority. They rarely object to what you put into their mouths."    - Abrazzar
Josef Djugashvilis
#148 - 2013-02-17 16:28:51 UTC
Andski wrote:
other examples of outrageous ideas accepted as fact by these types:

anchoring a tower under another alliance's sovereignty is impossible
nullsec alliances routinely cynojam ratting systems
alliances keep supercapital caches on holding characters, or god forbid, in CSMAs
officer spawns are common, and so are officer spawns that drop things other than tags and ammo
rare, expensive faction battleship bpcs drop routinely
local allows people to go afk and autopilot freighters through nullsec

it is unnecessary to point out where these outrageous ideas have been stated, but these are the things that npc alts and other hisec wretches will hear and take as the truth

when they state such things as fact, it is amazing that anyone listens to them when they come forward with their ideas about the "big blue donut"


Is 'wretches' your new buzz-word for the month to replace words such as, 'pubbies, abloobloobloo' etc?

Do you have to come up with your own buzz-words, or do you have a range of words provided by your corp, and you just select from it?

If you are aged about 13 or so, forgive me if I seem to be picking on you for being young.

This is not a signature.
MatrixSkye Mk2
Republic University
Minmatar Republic
#149 - 2013-02-17 16:51:04 UTC  |  Edited by: MatrixSkye Mk2
Andski wrote:
hisec wretches will always make hilarious attempts to speak authoritatively on things relating to space they've never set foot in, basing their opinions entirely on hyperbolic hearsay based on more hyperbolic hearsay

for example, many of those hisec wretches believe that moons are mined with special moon mining ships equipped with strip moon miners, as part of "goo harvesting ops"

"It is unnecessary to point out where these outrageous ideas have been stated" because they're coming out of your behind.

And what's with "wretches"? Is that the new cool kid's word of the month? Is "pubbies" officially out then?

Edit: Beat to it.

Successfully doinitwrong™ since 2006.
Andski
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#150 - 2013-02-17 17:03:31 UTC
i refer to them as wretches because i hold them in contempt and as such i support the destruction of their mining bots and freighters, as a punishment for their deplorable destruction of this game

Twitter: @EVEAndski

"It's easy to speak for the silent majority. They rarely object to what you put into their mouths."    - Abrazzar
Josef Djugashvilis
#151 - 2013-02-17 18:38:27 UTC
Andski wrote:
i refer to them as wretches because i hold them in contempt and as such i support the destruction of their mining bots and freighters, as a punishment for their deplorable destruction of this game


I am a hi-sec player.

I do not bot, nor do I know anyone who does in any way shape or form.

I fully accept that I can be ganked every time I leave a station.

I do not always like the changes CCP make, (drone AI has made heavy drones useless for missions) but I just feel sorry for myself for a short while, then get on with it. Hence my shift to exploration.

I have mined, albeit some months ago, (corp op, which was most enjoyable).

The annual subs I pay to Eve, (two of them) are just as worthwhile to CCP as anyone else's.

In fact I pretty much fit the profile of the vast majority of hi-sec players.

Oh, and I do think null-sec needs to be improved, so that the likes of me can go there for something more interesting than seeing how many jumps I can make before I get ganked, and the folk who live there all the time can have a better and more varied Eve gaming experience.

See, us hi-sec folk are not that bad really.

This is not a signature.
Kate stark
#152 - 2013-02-17 18:41:14 UTC
Josef Djugashvilis wrote:
us hi-sec folk are not that bad really.


yes we are.

Yay, this account hasn't had its signature banned. or its account, if you're reading this.
Dante Uisen
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#153 - 2013-02-17 18:55:34 UTC
Andski wrote:
i refer to them as wretches because i hold them in contempt and as such i support the destruction of their mining bots and freighters, as a punishment for their deplorable destruction of this game


Are you talking about hi-sec or null?
Andski
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#154 - 2013-02-17 19:43:20 UTC
Dante Uisen wrote:
Andski wrote:
i refer to them as wretches because i hold them in contempt and as such i support the destruction of their mining bots and freighters, as a punishment for their deplorable destruction of this game


Are you talking about hi-sec or null?


perhaps if you attempted to look for context it'd be obvious that i was referring to the botlands, hisec

Twitter: @EVEAndski

"It's easy to speak for the silent majority. They rarely object to what you put into their mouths."    - Abrazzar
Nicolo da'Vicenza
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#155 - 2013-02-17 19:52:59 UTC
Ankles McGlashan wrote:
James Amril-Kesh wrote:
Nerfing highsec mission income while buffing nullsec income would be good for the game as a whole.
Removing local would not.


it really doesn't matter where ISK is being generated as long as demand in the economy is healthy. High sec being profitable generates a large part of that demand through ever greater e-peen fits for faster mission F1ing. anything that reduces demand will impact anyone earning ISK through LP or loot drops as they have to monetise that income through the market.

the best way to stimulate that demand and increase nullsec income is to scan them down and gank their balls off.

The EVE economy is fueled by ships and modules being blown up and requiring replacement, and nullsec consumes more ships, and therefore has greater economic relevance, then all other regions combined. It's no exaggeration to say that highsec's main reason for existence is to cheaply take raw materials and turn them into finished product for nullsec wars. The best way of upping ship consumption in other regions would be to remove NPC corps and fix wardec evasion and corphopping, while fixing industry around each secstatus' resource consumption needs.
Nicolo da'Vicenza
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#156 - 2013-02-17 20:04:00 UTC  |  Edited by: Nicolo da'Vicenza
Sariah Kion
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#157 - 2013-02-17 20:08:17 UTC
Nicolo da'Vicenza wrote:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pf-GrMbNWE8


Pretty sure you and your null sec opium sated friends are the ones running all through the forums shedding tears about High Sec.

Pro Tip: Its not a secret that you and your are doing the crying on the forums.

For you, my friend

[b]Librarian and Exotic Dancer Extraordinaire Champion of the Working Men and Women of Empire Space Anti-Null Sec Opium Den Movement President[/b] Not the woman high sec wants but the Woman high sec needs. [u]A modern girl for a modern world.[/u]
Nicolo da'Vicenza
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#158 - 2013-02-17 20:19:03 UTC
I find them useful as filler for threads I've claimed and the meltdowns i trigger (like this thread) are useful platforms to launch educational reforms on eve-gd
Sariah Kion
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#159 - 2013-02-17 20:20:36 UTC
Nicolo da'Vicenza wrote:
I find them useful as filler for threads I've claimed and the meltdowns i trigger (like this thread) are useful platforms to launch educational reforms on eve-gd


That is cute.

All you blue'd up alliances now fighting the good fight against high sec....

[b]Librarian and Exotic Dancer Extraordinaire Champion of the Working Men and Women of Empire Space Anti-Null Sec Opium Den Movement President[/b] Not the woman high sec wants but the Woman high sec needs. [u]A modern girl for a modern world.[/u]
Malcanis
Vanishing Point.
The Initiative.
#160 - 2013-02-17 20:29:42 UTC
Sariah Kion wrote:
Nicolo da'Vicenza wrote:
I find them useful as filler for threads I've claimed and the meltdowns i trigger (like this thread) are useful platforms to launch educational reforms on eve-gd


That is cute.

All you blue'd up alliances now fighting the good fight against high sec....


Since I want to see hi-sec radically buffed, I trust I will have your vote next month?

"Just remember later that I warned against any change to jump ranges or fatigue. You earned whats coming."

Grath Telkin, 11.10.2016