These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
123Next pageLast page
 

Null Sec carebear ship spinners and their tears over High Sec

First post
Author
Sariah Kion
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#1 - 2013-02-15 21:42:02 UTC
There is immense irony in the flood of null sec tears over the perceived lack of risk/reward in high sec.

They live a life safe from the cares of the rest of Eve while they get fat and drunk drinking from the never ending passive isk fountains that permeate sov space. This boredom and apathy then leads to the making of Alts in search of conflict and pvp in, of all places, high sec.

Never would they look in the mirror and take their share of the blame for the state of this game and instead look to lump blame on the one place where they can actually find some intrigue and excitement, High Sec.

When confronted with changes to sov and null , that would benefit the game greatly, that have been floated have been met with resounding floods of tears and friction.

"Why Sariah?" you ask. "Why would they profess and desire to show concern about the well being of the game when it comes to high sec but when it comes to their painted blue care bear havens in null sec and sov to they put up so much resistance?"

The answer to your questions should be very clear my fellow citizens. Its clear as day. The long term problems facing Eve dont reside in concord reaction times or Exhumer EHP numbers, they lie in the deep seated problems and issues in null and sov space.

The water is muddied by the spin and rhetoric by the fat cats who benefit from their safe care bear havens in null sec. Change, even for the betterment of the game, will not be tolerated in their backyard as long as it messes with their status quo. There only recourse is to launch campaigns to redirect attention towards High Sec to avoid shining the bright light on the true issues facing Eve. They do this all while they play alts that have had to go looking in high sec for adventure, excitiment and fun while their mains remain comatose in their soft care bear isk factories in sov space.

As we approach the CSiM 8 choices search out a candidate that understands that along with changes to High Sec there needs to be fundamental changes to null,sov and low sec to deal with the REAL issues facing this game.

A vote for a candidate that champions the status quo in sov space and wants massive change to high sec is a vote against the better interests and well being of the game you love.

Fly safe.

-Sariah

[b]Librarian and Exotic Dancer Extraordinaire Champion of the Working Men and Women of Empire Space Anti-Null Sec Opium Den Movement President[/b] Not the woman high sec wants but the Woman high sec needs. [u]A modern girl for a modern world.[/u]

Renzo Ruderi
Doomheim
#2 - 2013-02-15 21:42:49 UTC
It'd be nice if, some day, people began realizing how stupid they sound saying "tears" all the time.
Kate stark
#3 - 2013-02-15 21:45:49 UTC
is this another "complaining about complainers" thread?

Yay, this account hasn't had its signature banned. or its account, if you're reading this.

Sariah Kion
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#4 - 2013-02-15 21:47:23 UTC
Kate stark wrote:
is this another "complaining about complainers" thread?


Of course not. Its shining a light on the cockraoches and exposing their motivations in the hopes we can all realize positive change throughout all of Eve.

[b]Librarian and Exotic Dancer Extraordinaire Champion of the Working Men and Women of Empire Space Anti-Null Sec Opium Den Movement President[/b] Not the woman high sec wants but the Woman high sec needs. [u]A modern girl for a modern world.[/u]

Nicolo da'Vicenza
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#5 - 2013-02-15 21:48:01 UTC
I agree.

Highsec is meant to be the safest of space.
But, as you say, nullsec is safer then highsec, full of "painted blue carebear havens".
The direction is clear - make stations in highsec capturable. Remove CONCORD.
GIve highsec the tools nullsec uses to make their members so safe.

I support Sariah Kion in her endeavors to make highsec safe!
Abrazzar
Vardaugas Family
#6 - 2013-02-15 21:48:46 UTC
EVE Online: Everybody cries over everything
Nicolo da'Vicenza
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#7 - 2013-02-15 21:49:05 UTC  |  Edited by: Nicolo da'Vicenza
Kate stark wrote:
is this another "complaining about complainers" thread?

These threads start getting made whenever I get on a roll.
The original thread is quietly abandoned by OP and a new thread is made attacking some sort of villain or teary bogeyman or something.
Sariah has kindly volunteered to be this month's Touval.
Kate stark
#8 - 2013-02-15 21:49:25 UTC
Sariah Kion wrote:
Kate stark wrote:
is this another "complaining about complainers" thread?


Of course not. Its shining a light on the cockraoches and exposing their motivations in the hopes we can all realize positive change throughout all of Eve.


it was rhetorical.

Yay, this account hasn't had its signature banned. or its account, if you're reading this.

Temmu Guerra
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#9 - 2013-02-15 21:53:33 UTC
Post with your main and I may give a f***
Ankles McGlashan
Doomheim
#10 - 2013-02-15 21:55:01 UTC
it's sort of amusing following because I've come to the conclusion that they both believe the same things. Neither of them want PvE and PvP on the same server and they both believe that forum tedium is a legitimate campaigning tool.
Vaeliel
Slander Acquisitions
#11 - 2013-02-15 21:56:56 UTC
The problem with Sariah's position is that she is 100% convinced that anyone who believes there needs to be a change in the direction of Highsec mechanics has at least one character in a nullsec alliance. Further, she believes that this invalidates their opinion.

Even if they agree with her that there need to be changes to the entire shebang.

I just think the change in direction should start in Highsec and continue out through low into null.
Sariah Kion
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#12 - 2013-02-15 21:57:42 UTC
Like clockwork, the most agenda driven null sec carebears come to defend and defame anyone brave enough to speak the truth.

They wait, hoarding their isk, in the hope that CCP takes a huge mistep because of the their crying and gnashing of teeth and neuters high sec to the point of driving unable pilots into their ready weapons systems.

The real issue with Eve is sov mechanics and null sec in general.

Change for a better Eve. Change for the Future.

Fight the Null Sec/Sov fat cats for that change now.

[b]Librarian and Exotic Dancer Extraordinaire Champion of the Working Men and Women of Empire Space Anti-Null Sec Opium Den Movement President[/b] Not the woman high sec wants but the Woman high sec needs. [u]A modern girl for a modern world.[/u]

LHA Tarawa
Pator Tech School
Minmatar Republic
#13 - 2013-02-15 21:59:33 UTC
Ankles McGlashan wrote:
it's sort of amusing following because I've come to the conclusion that they both believe the same things. Neither of them want PvE and PvP on the same server and they both believe that forum tedium is a legitimate campaigning tool.


I believe you are incorrect.

Those complaining about HiSec want CCP to force the carebears out of HiSec so that there will be more targets in low/null.

In reality, CCP has no ability to force carebears out of HiSec. Any attempt to do so would simply result in the carebears quitting the game.

Karl Hobb
Imperial Margarine
#14 - 2013-02-15 22:01:32 UTC
Vaeliel wrote:
The problem with Sariah's position is that she is 100% convinced that anyone who believes there needs to be a change in the direction of Highsec mechanics has at least one character in a nullsec alliance.

Confirming that my mother's second cousin's son has a friend who knows somebody with a spy alt in Goonswarm.

A professional astro-bastard was not available so they sent me.

LHA Tarawa
Pator Tech School
Minmatar Republic
#15 - 2013-02-15 22:01:47 UTC
Vaeliel wrote:
The problem with Sariah's position is that she is 100% convinced that anyone who believes there needs to be a change in the direction of Highsec mechanics has at least one character in a nullsec alliance. Further, she believes that this invalidates their opinion.

Even if they agree with her that there need to be changes to the entire shebang.

I just think the change in direction should start in Highsec and continue out through low into null.



What needs to change is the people that keep calling for change!

Play the game the way you enjoy playing it, and stop thinking you can force other people to change the way they play to match how you want them to play.
Whitehound
#16 - 2013-02-15 22:01:58 UTC  |  Edited by: Whitehound
I have been complaining about this a long time, until I got tired and began to moan. And I moaned - oh how I moaned! Little did I know that I wanted to cry. I do not know for how long I cried. I forgot about time and sometimes just whined, but in the end was I all out of tears. I was exhausted and so I started to troll...

Loss is meaningful. Therefore is the loss of meaning likewise meaningful. It is the source of all trolling.

Karl Hobb
Imperial Margarine
#17 - 2013-02-15 22:02:33 UTC
LHA Tarawa wrote:
In reality, CCP has no ability to force carebears out of HiSec. Any attempt to do so would simply result in the carebears quitting the game.

You can't make an omelet without murdering some carebears.

A professional astro-bastard was not available so they sent me.

Sariah Kion
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#18 - 2013-02-15 22:03:02 UTC
Vaeliel wrote:
The problem with Sariah's position is that she is 100% convinced that anyone who believes there needs to be a change in the direction of Highsec mechanics has at least one character in a nullsec alliance. Further, she believes that this invalidates their opinion.

Even if they agree with her that there need to be changes to the entire shebang.

I just think the change in direction should start in Highsec and continue out through low into null.


No. I am convinced that the loudest and largest ring leaders standing on a platform of "its all high sec's fault" are in fact agenda driven leaders and advocates of the status quo in sov space.

I think yourself, like me, believes that there needs to be fundamental change in sov/null along with changes to high sec. That makes you and I champions of a better Eve for all instead of champions of their own agendas and alliances interests at the expense of the game we all love.

[b]Librarian and Exotic Dancer Extraordinaire Champion of the Working Men and Women of Empire Space Anti-Null Sec Opium Den Movement President[/b] Not the woman high sec wants but the Woman high sec needs. [u]A modern girl for a modern world.[/u]

Wescro
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#19 - 2013-02-15 22:03:19 UTC
Not that your doctoral thesis on Space Psychology is wrong or anything, but as an exclusive high sec resident, I disagree with your characterization.

Also, weren't you leading the charge on "expel Kelduum from CSM" yesterday. You are all over the place lady!
Ankles McGlashan
Doomheim
#20 - 2013-02-15 22:06:58 UTC
LHA Tarawa wrote:
[quote=Ankles McGlashan]I believe you are incorrect.

Those complaining about HiSec want CCP to force the carebears out of HiSec so that there will be more targets in low/null.

In reality, CCP has no ability to force carebears out of HiSec. Any attempt to do so would simply result in the carebears quitting the game.



actuall talk of balancing seems comparatively rare to me, mostly all I see is a load of get rid of highsec and NPC corps posts. or the occasional wailing about how market trading is PvP too.

now they could be trolling, I am aware that this sort of thing goes on, or they could be sincere but very, very jaded.
123Next pageLast page