These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Player Features and Ideas Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
123Next pageLast page
 

No Local

First post
Author
Zanar Noud
Ministry of War
Amarr Empire
#1 - 2013-02-13 15:49:39 UTC  |  Edited by: Zanar Noud
I see the social benefit of having local and i even enjoy it sometimes, however, it is not very logical. No other game tells you who is near them at any given time, especially when you go into PVP zones. My suggestion is to keep the local channel but only show people in local who decide to chat in said channel. That way people can make themselves known if desired or stay under the radar. This would cause players who are operating in low security systems to play more dynamically. Miners would need to actually have support ships instead of just warping off every time a scary face jumps into the system. Also scanning would become more common to keep an eye on the system. Maybe only implement this for the low security systems. Don't know if CCP has addressed this, they probably have, but I still feel it should be changed.
colera deldios
#2 - 2013-02-13 18:26:49 UTC
Another one lol. All I'm haring "Zanar Noud: I fail at pvp so so much. CCP Please change a perfectly working and non biest mechanic into my advantage so i can get free kills without effort.".

They wont change this, if you don't want the local move out of k-space to wh space where all agree on no-local. In lowsec/nullsec this would only benefit one set of people, so it's biest only to people who are mainly interested in PVP. These threads are so pathetic it's becomming more and more sad to se how fail you people are at pvp that you suggest nerfing local to your benefit or nerfing afk cloacking to your benefit.

The point is you have space that offers no-local so there is no point to change lowsec/nullsec. Any player that has even tiny bit of skill will be able to catch any carebare with splitsecond perfect intel or pos.

If you want effortless kills go and join RVB. The end point is local is perfect as it is and people have proved that over and over again in the last 10 years. Every hour theres houndreds of carebare deaths in lowsec/nullsec which means the mechanic is perfect and you just fail at pvp.

Why would you want to be feed effortless free kills, whats the point of playing then. This game is not built only for us who prefere PVP.
Gizznitt Malikite
Agony Unleashed
Agony Empire
#3 - 2013-02-13 18:55:09 UTC

Local provide a lot of benefits....

It helps you find targets... It helps you find fights... It provides lots of very useful intel in a fairly balanced manner...

At the same time... I think some minor tweaks would be appropriate...

Best option... Create an actual intel system... The system should be mostly automated and balanced for all parties... This is what I'd like to see....

Other than that... a minor tweak, like a 10-15 second delay between entering local and appearing on the list would work too.... It biases the system... a little... but I think it would be manageable and encourage roaming again...

No local on easily accessible systems is problematic.... and would break the game by swinging the pendulum too far towards predators...
colera deldios
#4 - 2013-02-13 18:57:27 UTC
You guys keep providing suggestions to change a perfect no biest system instead of actually learning to pvp : P
Gizznitt Malikite
Agony Unleashed
Agony Empire
#5 - 2013-02-13 19:17:05 UTC
colera deldios wrote:
You guys keep providing suggestions to change a perfect no biest system instead of actually learning to pvp : P


If you read my thread, you'd see it is not Biased like you suggest...

The delay on local is biased... but that's because perfect intel is biased towards the defender...
colera deldios
#6 - 2013-02-13 19:29:26 UTC  |  Edited by: colera deldios
Gizznitt Malikite wrote:
colera deldios wrote:
You guys keep providing suggestions to change a perfect no biest system instead of actually learning to pvp : P


If you read my thread, you'd see it is not Biased like you suggest...

The delay on local is biased... but that's because perfect intel is biased towards the defender...


Not really intel channels are bullshit and people have been proving that for 10 years every hour. Therefore Local channel in kspace is perfect and unbiest. And what you are looking for is effortless kills, you want to be serves easy kills against people who are not fit to fight you.

In anycase if you suggest delays, removal of local or changes to local channel you are making a biest change towards pvpers only. Not to mention you are prooving that you fail so much at pvp that you get outsmarted by a carebare. We have killed so many people despited their split second perfect intel channels with such ease.

I mean it is so so easy to catch any carebare regardless of channel so so easy. And when you suggest changes to local channel you are doing the same thing as carebares that cry about afk cloacking.

Welcome to EVE it's hard, so put in some effort and you will be rewarded by good fights and kills.

A change to local channel would benefit pvp set of players so much they would need to make it so that when you jump in to a system you are decloacked and immobile for 5min with no shield or armor and unable to activate any modules to balance it out.

Again these are pointles requests because everything you are requesting is already provided:
1) No local, go to WH spaec
2) Effortlress kills, join RVB or a similar corp
Zanar Noud
Ministry of War
Amarr Empire
#7 - 2013-02-13 20:03:39 UTC
colera deldios wrote:
Another one lol. All I'm haring "Zanar Noud: I fail at pvp so so much. CCP Please change a perfectly working and non biest mechanic into my advantage so i can get free kills without effort.".

They wont change this, if you don't want the local move out of k-space to wh space where all agree on no-local. In lowsec/nullsec this would only benefit one set of people, so it's biest only to people who are mainly interested in PVP. These threads are so pathetic it's becomming more and more sad to se how fail you people are at pvp that you suggest nerfing local to your benefit or nerfing afk cloacking to your benefit.

The point is you have space that offers no-local so there is no point to change lowsec/nullsec. Any player that has even tiny bit of skill will be able to catch any carebare with splitsecond perfect intel or pos.

If you want effortless kills go and join RVB. The end point is local is perfect as it is and people have proved that over and over again in the last 10 years. Every hour theres houndreds of carebare deaths in lowsec/nullsec which means the mechanic is perfect and you just fail at pvp.

Why would you want to be feed effortless free kills, whats the point of playing then. This game is not built only for us who prefere PVP.


I'm posting this because it needs to be done, not from a PVP standpoint like you assumed, but from a logical and role playing perspective. I could be a pirate just as easily as I could be a miner and I would still be saying the same thing. I want it to add more of an adventurous feel when entering low sec systems on both fronts. You should try looking at things from different perspectives before you assume and look like an a$$. Not to mention if this were to happen getting kills would actually become more difficult since players would rarely venture out alone and would be better fitted for a PVP encounter if they did.
Gizznitt Malikite
Agony Unleashed
Agony Empire
#8 - 2013-02-13 20:05:22 UTC  |  Edited by: Gizznitt Malikite
1.) Is spelled: Unbiased.... not unbiest....

2.) I'm a very competent skirmisher, competent PvPer, and don't just prey on "helpless nullbears".

You want proof there's a problem with Nullsec carebearing??

Look at the ship you nullbear in!!

Nullbears typically PvE in combat inept ships... They don't operate in groups, they don't bother trying to get safe until there's a hostile in local, and they use lots of faction bling to sit back and make more bling...

This is just broken... but I don't fault the nullbears for this.... It's an issue with CCP's mechanics....

There are no targets that you need to defend from a casual gang...
most null PvE is solo material....
and intel is sooo perfect you can rat in a carrier and not bother trying to get safe until a hostile enters system...
Nariya Kentaya
Ministry of War
Amarr Empire
#9 - 2013-02-13 20:12:51 UTC
colera deldios wrote:
You guys keep providing suggestions to change a perfect no biest system instead of actually learning to pvp : P

No way in HELL is it unbiased.

a player appears in local before he even laods grid, which means any ******* who wants to carebear his heart away in low/null has all the time in the world to warp to a POS/Station, completely negating ANY roaming gang's ability to get pvp that isnt concentual (hint hint, in null that emans i would have to wait 3 hours for you and you 499 friends to fleet up and come after my 10 man cruiser gang).

its not unbiased at all, in fact, local is SO biased in favor of defenders and carebears its ridiculous, which is why i live in wormholes, no local to prevent fights.
colera deldios
#10 - 2013-02-14 00:15:13 UTC
All i'm hearing is you fail at pvp so much you want free feed effortless kills it's pathetic.
Zanar Noud
Ministry of War
Amarr Empire
#11 - 2013-02-14 00:22:14 UTC
colera deldios wrote:
All i'm hearing is you fail at pvp so much you want free feed effortless kills it's pathetic.



Seems like you rely on local intel too much
Nariya Kentaya
Ministry of War
Amarr Empire
#12 - 2013-02-14 04:18:58 UTC
colera deldios wrote:
All i'm hearing is you fail at pvp so much you want free feed effortless kills it's pathetic.

No, if local was gone, neither Hunter nor Hunted would see eachother in system, equal ignorance.

They can both use D-scan to discover a new ship in system. should the carebear see a new ship on d-scan, he may warp off before ebing caught. if the hunter is cloaked, then the carebear can still see his combat probes on d-scan, and warp off.

or better yet, pve-ers can man up in low/null and have buddies/mercs sit with them to guard (but wait, that woudl cut into their isk/hour and that would be MEAN)

fact is, there is already a MULTITUDE of intel tools for both predator and prey, local on top of it is OP for defender awareness, since its the ONLY intel that defenders will eb able to see before the attacker (since he ahs to load grid after jumping gate).

face it, how it is now defenders have the advantage, and only a braindead moron or horri-bad bot will ever be caught in null/low.
CCP Eterne
C C P
C C P Alliance
#13 - 2013-02-14 10:37:47 UTC
I've removed a personal attack from this thread.

EVE Online/DUST 514 Community Representative ※ EVE Illuminati ※ Fiction Adept

@CCP_Eterne ※ @EVE_LiveEvents

ITTigerClawIK
Galactic Rangers
#14 - 2013-02-14 11:01:22 UTC
in a nut shell, a chat channel should NOT be an instant intell tool,
colera deldios
#15 - 2013-02-14 11:19:27 UTC  |  Edited by: colera deldios
ITTigerClawIK wrote:
in a nut shell, a chat channel should NOT be an instant intell tool,


==
Quote:

ITTigerClawIK : Please CCP i suck so much at pvp please remove or change local. I so fail at pvp i cant go pvp against another pvper so please CCP change local so i can get some free effortless kills. Please change local to my advantage.


@Nariya Kentaya

No you are pretty wrong Inteal channel does nothing it helps nobody. And it's stupid to suggest it does because carebares have been dying hour after hour for 10 years in a row. It's you, you fail at pvp and you want local changed to your benefits so you can get free and effortless kills.

It's pathetic

Also since you guys are so fail at pvp and think intel helps so much let me provide some proof at how fail and wrong you are, im both carebare and pvper and i have never had a problem of catching either neither has the majority in 10 years:

TEST has superb intel channel, he even warped to a POS a lot of good that did for him, we
were in their space for 3h killing things:
http://eve-kill.net/?a=kill_detail&kll_id=15663648

Intel channel and his corpmates couldnt help him either when he tried runing for the pos and this is a cloacky
transport:
http://eve-kill.net/?a=kill_detail&kll_id=15662579

So much good did the intel channel and bubles on all gates do for this guy:
http://eve-kill.net/?a=kill_detail&kll_id=15714950

And oh let's not forget the top piece of the cacke:
http://eve-kill.net/?a=kill_detail&kll_id=16278677


And we have split second perfect intel channels and these guys without much effort and basic pvp skill managed to catch me despite me being fully aligned. Hat's off to them i have been using caps on all my toons for over 2.5 years and never lost one congrats to these guys.

I could list so so many because it's just so so easy to catch anyone in nullsec despite everything you listed.

Anyhow me and the rest of eve with basic pvp skills are living and solid proof that intel channels are bullshit and that if you have the basic skills in pvp you can catch anyone and i mean anyone, anywhere, anytime with any amount of perfect voice and chat intel.
Sedstr
#16 - 2013-02-14 12:49:16 UTC  |  Edited by: Sedstr
remove local.
if you can't dscan and use probes, learn how...

...

Zanar Noud
Ministry of War
Amarr Empire
#17 - 2013-02-14 14:27:31 UTC

*sigh* Learn to read man. I'm not arguing from the pvp perspective. Im arguing for the simple fact that it doesnt make any sense for local to be there in the first place. As for unbalancing the game that might be the dumbest thing i have heard. A change like that effects everyone equally carebear or no. As for skill in pvp, like i said before, it has the potential to make pvp slightly more challenging if anything. No local would probably mean less solo miners out there for pirates to gank and ratters would have stronger setups. All it would do is create another, slightly more realistic, dynamic that i think EVE needs. You have said pretty much the same thing every time you post so please argue from a different point and stop saying I need effortless kills when pvp is not even the basis of my argument.
TheSkeptic
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#18 - 2013-02-14 14:43:26 UTC
Gizznitt Malikite wrote:

It helps you find targets... It helps you find fights... It provides lots of very useful intel in a fairly balanced manner...


Can't say I agree with any of these statements.

Dudes looking for targets are going to be roaming around anyway, jumping into systems and dscanning. If there is a target, they're going to find it the same way. And before you say 'but they can see right away if a system is empty', it doesn't matter, they'll warp to their tactical at the next gate and scan on the way.

Doesn't help get fights, it helps people avoid fights. Gangs can instantly see if they're out numbered and flee, same with ratters/miners and people running plexes. They just safe up when someone enters local.

It provides useful intel only for people who want to avoid PVP, in the main areas of the game designed for PVP.

...

Nikk Narrel
Moonlit Bonsai
#19 - 2013-02-14 15:10:30 UTC
Gizznitt Malikite wrote:
1.) Is spelled: Unbiased.... not unbiest....

2.) I'm a very competent skirmisher, competent PvPer, and don't just prey on "helpless nullbears".

You want proof there's a problem with Nullsec carebearing??

Look at the ship you nullbear in!!

Nullbears typically PvE in combat inept ships... They don't operate in groups, they don't bother trying to get safe until there's a hostile in local, and they use lots of faction bling to sit back and make more bling...

This is just broken... but I don't fault the nullbears for this.... It's an issue with CCP's mechanics....

There are no targets that you need to defend from a casual gang...
most null PvE is solo material....
and intel is sooo perfect you can rat in a carrier and not bother trying to get safe until a hostile enters system...

This.

Gizznitt has nailed some very key points as to why Amazing Intel™ is overpowered. His linked idea has some really strong points too.
In case you did not notice, by using this Amazing Intel™ you do NOT need to protect or prepare your ship in any other way against hostile intervention.

They can never attack you, unless you stop paying attention and ignore them coming into system after you.
You have the ability to avoid them 100% of the time.

This also screws up mining, and ratting. Ever notice the rewards in high sec are comparable to null and low? Sure, null and low are higher reward, but not by enough to lure out those in high doing a cost / benefit analysis.

I want to mine and rat, and be at risk as defined by my efforts in a contest against the efforts of my counterparts. Whether they are trying to duplicate my efforts in another area, or flying a PvP ship to blow my ship out of the skies.
I am sick of being force fed intel that dumbs down my efforts to excel, and as a result dumbs down the rewards for my efforts.
It's like we are in some sad kind of daycare for toddlers.

Now, my idea was to do something along the lines of adding passive / active sensor items to the overview. Active reflecting more effort, and using an evolved version of D-Scan similar to what we have now.
Details here:
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=112964&find=unread

Awareness of your environment does not favor offense or defense. It only creates opportunities to prepare or fail at preparing.
If you need intel fed to you, with zero effort as the current system has it, then we know how you would come out.
ITTigerClawIK
Galactic Rangers
#20 - 2013-02-14 15:12:54 UTC
colera deldios wrote:
ITTigerClawIK wrote:
in a nut shell, a chat channel should NOT be an instant intell tool,


==
Quote:

ITTigerClawIK : Please CCP i suck so much at pvp please remove or change local. I so fail at pvp i cant go pvp against another pvper so please CCP change local so i can get some free effortless kills. Please change local to my advantage.


@Nariya Kentaya

No you are pretty wrong Inteal channel does nothing it helps nobody. And it's stupid to suggest it does because carebares have been dying hour after hour for 10 years in a row. It's you, you fail at pvp and you want local changed to your benefits so you can get free and effortless kills.

It's pathetic

Also since you guys are so fail at pvp and think intel helps so much let me provide some proof at how fail and wrong you are, im both carebare and pvper and i have never had a problem of catching either neither has the majority in 10 years:

TEST has superb intel channel, he even warped to a POS a lot of good that did for him, we
were in their space for 3h killing things:
http://eve-kill.net/?a=kill_detail&kll_id=15663648

Intel channel and his corpmates couldnt help him either when he tried runing for the pos and this is a cloacky
transport:
http://eve-kill.net/?a=kill_detail&kll_id=15662579

So much good did the intel channel and bubles on all gates do for this guy:
http://eve-kill.net/?a=kill_detail&kll_id=15714950

And oh let's not forget the top piece of the cacke:
http://eve-kill.net/?a=kill_detail&kll_id=16278677


And we have split second perfect intel channels and these guys without much effort and basic pvp skill managed to catch me despite me being fully aligned. Hat's off to them i have been using caps on all my toons for over 2.5 years and never lost one congrats to these guys.

I could list so so many because it's just so so easy to catch anyone in nullsec despite everything you listed.

Anyhow me and the rest of eve with basic pvp skills are living and solid proof that intel channels are bullshit and that if you have the basic skills in pvp you can catch anyone and i mean anyone, anywhere, anytime with any amount of perfect voice and chat intel.



i dont think you realise that local GIVES me effortless kills lol, also your post remind me of a certain EMO TJ who used to post a while back :-P
123Next pageLast page