These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Intergalactic Summit

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

The chains you choose to wear.

Author
Tiberious Thessalonia
True Slave Foundations
#81 - 2013-02-12 19:49:10 UTC
Scherezad wrote:
Natalcya Katla wrote:
The only sane way to affix any kind of objective (or at least shared subjective) truth to questions of political and social reality is through formal and binding law.


Today I enact a decree to all employees beneath my auspices. The sun has passed behind Kakakela VI, and we shall never see it again.

I anticipate a lovely star-rise tomorrow.


Whilst I understand what you are going for here, Scherezad, the term "Political and social reality" applies to make the motion of the stars and other such objective truths free from the binding strictures of formal and binding law.
Scherezad
Revenent Defence Corperation
Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive
#82 - 2013-02-12 19:57:24 UTC
Tiberious Thessalonia wrote:
Scherezad wrote:
Natalcya Katla wrote:
The only sane way to affix any kind of objective (or at least shared subjective) truth to questions of political and social reality is through formal and binding law.


Today I enact a decree to all employees beneath my auspices. The sun has passed behind Kakakela VI, and we shall never see it again.

I anticipate a lovely star-rise tomorrow.


Whilst I understand what you are going for here, Scherezad, the term "Political and social reality" applies to make the motion of the stars and other such objective truths free from the binding strictures of formal and binding law.


Political and social realities are as objectively true as starlight, Tiberius, and care for legal motions about as much. Of all people, you surely know this.

I am curious, though. What conditions for peace and an end to the Incursions does Nation entertain?
Sepherim
Imperial Shipment
Amarr Empire
#83 - 2013-02-12 20:01:59 UTC
Tiberious Thessalonia wrote:
I am going to be brief and succinct here. This is not a war about vengeance. Revenge is a very small emotional taint floating around in some of the network.
This war is about the continued safety of our Nation, which we now know we will never have as long as the CONCORD signatories are on an equal footing with us in terms of power. Would that war not be necessary, but your side of this war has already proven to us that winning this war is the only method we will have to continue our way of life against unbridled aggression.


And how is this a defense of your safety... when the Nation has moved beyond wormholes the rest of us can't follow you through? You could as easily close those wormholes and leave in eternal united peace on the other side, and leave the rest of us alone on this side. Peace for you, peace for us. Isn't that what you and captain Pohlevia were claiming before? The search for peace, unity and all that? Believe me, if you just vanished from this side of the cluster, no one would go looking for you, the empires and forces already have more than enough to fight against between themselves in order to seek for enemies that no longer mean them ill.

Quote:
Want proof? Look at some of the responses to Evi in this thread.


If I took all the ramblings and stupidities written on the IGS as proof of anything, I'd have to ask the Empress to declare war on the whole of humanity. Fortunately, half of what is written in this forum is just utter nonsense, a quarter is completely biased and ignorant of the truth even though it tries to be rational, half of the remaining quarter are reasonable even if they are not right, and only about that remaining eighth has some degree of truth into their words.

Thus, the ramblings of any pod pilot, mine included, prove nothing.

Sepherim Catillah Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris Liuteneant Ex-Imperial Navy Imperator Commander

Tiberious Thessalonia
True Slave Foundations
#84 - 2013-02-12 20:06:57 UTC
Scherezad wrote:
Tiberious Thessalonia wrote:
Scherezad wrote:
Natalcya Katla wrote:
The only sane way to affix any kind of objective (or at least shared subjective) truth to questions of political and social reality is through formal and binding law.


Today I enact a decree to all employees beneath my auspices. The sun has passed behind Kakakela VI, and we shall never see it again.

I anticipate a lovely star-rise tomorrow.


Whilst I understand what you are going for here, Scherezad, the term "Political and social reality" applies to make the motion of the stars and other such objective truths free from the binding strictures of formal and binding law.


Political and social realities are as objectively true as starlight, Tiberius, and care for legal motions about as much. Of all people, you surely know this.

I am curious, though. What conditions for peace and an end to the Incursions does Nation entertain?


Political and social realities are as malleable as the human mind, and respond to the same conditions. Starlight acts the same way no matter what we have tried to do to it so far.

Anyways, as regards the rest, there are two main schools of thought. I won't bore you with the details and history of each school, but the fact that there is more than one shines light on the idea that people have that thought we are a Unity we are only one mind, that of the Masters.

The first school of thought is that we have to eradicate all that is not Nation in order to be safe. There is some merit to this idea, for in a sense we will never truly be safe until all of humanity is under our guiding hand.

The other school of thought, and this is where I hold myself after much consideration, is that we only need to be more powerful. Power here, is defined as "our ability to do what we need to do", and our ability to stop people from eradicating us. Once we are in this position we can then, with reasonable safety, go about our business while leaving you to yours.

But, hey, then again people keep talking about how gleeful they will be that one day they might get to glass even more Nation planets, so maybe the first guys have a point.
Evi Polevhia
Phoenix Naval Operations
Phoenix Naval Systems
#85 - 2013-02-12 20:09:13 UTC
Sepherim wrote:

Thus, the ramblings of any pod pilot, mine included, prove nothing.


It proves the mental state of those with the power to end world civilizations.
Tiberious Thessalonia
True Slave Foundations
#86 - 2013-02-12 20:10:31 UTC  |  Edited by: Tiberious Thessalonia
Sepherim wrote:


And how is this a defense of your safety...


You really don't think that capsuleers are one day going to unlock these secrets themselves and then destroy whatever they find on the other side? I think you need to look at the history of humanity a bit more closely.

No, Captain, the only thing we can do to ensure our own safety is to take an active role in keeping your power in check. We can't just cross our fingers and hope. That is what we did last time, and it didn't work.

Sepherim wrote:

If I took all the ramblings and stupidities written on the IGS as proof of anything,...
Thus, the ramblings of any pod pilot, mine included, prove nothing.



The ramblings you see here are backed with nuclear weapons, and you wonder why I am afraid of you?
Sepherim
Imperial Shipment
Amarr Empire
#87 - 2013-02-12 20:13:28 UTC
Tiberious Thessalonia wrote:
If there is such a division, Captain, why is the mind so easily overwritten by simply changing around a few neuropeptides? The mind is just another part of your body. There is nothing unique or special about it. The reason you consider us so alien to you is because we have accepted this, and you have not.


If there is the division between the sky and the earth, why is it so easy to destroy with a space elevator? The fact that technology can modify both brain and body does nothing to defend the inexistance of the difference, nor the fact that they both are interrelated and interact with eachother. And that human will raises precisely from that interaction.

Quote:
Your chain of thinking at the bottom of your post is incorrect. You rebel against controls because you are a biological being that has evolved in a certain way, and natural evolution is a surprisingly conservative method of change. It's only natural that the animal part of you wants to maintain divisions and its illusion of free will, but this does not make it something that actually exists. There is no free will to start the chain, no choice, and choice is not an essential element of humanity.


Can I rebel against the idea? Yes. Then there is the degree of will that proves conscience exists beyond their bodily conditionants and social constrictions. I'm not saying total free will exists, far from it, that would only be a treason to everything that matters for freedom can only exist while being alone. But that doesn't mean it doesn't exist at all either, that's the reason responsability exists, duty and many other concepts.

Sepherim Catillah Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris Liuteneant Ex-Imperial Navy Imperator Commander

Tiberious Thessalonia
True Slave Foundations
#88 - 2013-02-12 20:15:02 UTC
Sepherim wrote:
Tiberious Thessalonia wrote:
If there is such a division, Captain, why is the mind so easily overwritten by simply changing around a few neuropeptides? The mind is just another part of your body. There is nothing unique or special about it. The reason you consider us so alien to you is because we have accepted this, and you have not.


If there is the division between the sky and the earth, why is it so easy to destroy with a space elevator? The fact that technology can modify both brain and body does nothing to defend the inexistance of the difference, nor the fact that they both are interrelated and interact with eachother. And that human will raises precisely from that interaction.

Quote:
Your chain of thinking at the bottom of your post is incorrect. You rebel against controls because you are a biological being that has evolved in a certain way, and natural evolution is a surprisingly conservative method of change. It's only natural that the animal part of you wants to maintain divisions and its illusion of free will, but this does not make it something that actually exists. There is no free will to start the chain, no choice, and choice is not an essential element of humanity.


Can I rebel against the idea? Yes. Then there is the degree of will that proves conscience exists beyond their bodily conditionants and social constrictions. I'm not saying total free will exists, far from it, that would only be a treason to everything that matters for freedom can only exist while being alone. But that doesn't mean it doesn't exist at all either, that's the reason responsability exists, duty and many other concepts.


You wish to bet your life against those? Okay.

I'm going to go with a method of enforcement that is a little more secure.
Sepherim
Imperial Shipment
Amarr Empire
#89 - 2013-02-12 20:24:52 UTC
Tiberious Thessalonia wrote:
You really don't think that capsuleers are one day going to unlock these secrets themselves and then destroy whatever they find on the other side? I think you need to look at the history of humanity a bit more closely.

No, Captain, the only thing we can do to ensure our own safety is to take an active role in keeping your power in check. We can't just cross our fingers and hope. That is what we did last time, and it didn't work.


Very well, let's check history. The Amarr has invaded the Bleak Lands after the Blood Raiders, invaded Minmatarr space to Reclaim them. The Republic has invaded the Empire to free their "brethren". The Caldari have invaded the Gallente to free Caldari Prime. The Serpentis and Guristas have invaded both Gallente and Caldari space. The Gallente are now invading the Caldari. CONCORD proved to be useless in keeping peace and the empires united even if external threats exist. The 0.0 alliances continue to invade and fight eachother in nullsec.

And this is only in the last ten years. I clearly fail to see where the power to threaten you lies anymore. We are divided in internal fighting and bickering, to remove an opponent/enemy from the scene would probably be most welcome by most.

Evi Polevhia wrote:
It proves the mental state of those with the power to end world civilizations.

Tiberius Thessalonia wrote:
The ramblings you see here are backed with nuclear weapons, and you wonder why I am afraid of you?


You both give capsuleers too much credit. Capsuleers aren't so important in the lives of humanity in general, nor do they wield such tremendous power if compared to that of the empires or CONCORD, nor do they have the skill and capacity of to work together on the massive scale invading Sansha space would require. You can check the petitions of captain Vea in this regard to check how "decided pod pilots and empires are to exterminate you", if you really value the words of pilots here in IGS.

Sepherim Catillah Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris Liuteneant Ex-Imperial Navy Imperator Commander

Sepherim
Imperial Shipment
Amarr Empire
#90 - 2013-02-12 20:27:22 UTC
Tiberious Thessalonia wrote:
You wish to bet your life against those? Okay.
I'm going to go with a method of enforcement that is a little more secure.


Are you threatening me, captain Thessalonia? I've already been through death once, two days ago, in the service of my duty to the Empire. I didn't like the experience, and will try to avoid it completely. But I won't let my death stand in the way of my duty, so if you wish to see me dead, look for me in the Bleak Lands. You can even ask me and I'll tell you when I am there if you wish to come for a fight.

Or have I missunderstood you?

Sepherim Catillah Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris Liuteneant Ex-Imperial Navy Imperator Commander

Tiberious Thessalonia
True Slave Foundations
#91 - 2013-02-12 20:31:31 UTC
I am not willing to leave that up to chance, Captain Sepherim, nor are my brothers and sisters. History and living memory have taught us that if we cross our fingers, take a passive role, and live and let live, our reward will be nuclear winter, the deaths of many, many, many people on a permanent basis, the destruction of our facilities, and the setting up of task forces to eradicate us whenever we raise our heads again.

Did you know that previous to the Incursions, individuals who spoke up in favor of Sansha's Nation were often taken and beaten to death? Do you find this as horrifying as I do? If you do, then you should also share my disgust at the fact that a number of the people reading this comment's reaction will be to say to themselves, "good".

No, Captain, we cannot take a peaceful stance, as much as we might want it. We cannot take a peaceful stance because you will not allow it. We must be aggressive in the protection of our way of life, or else we will lose it and so much more.
Sepherim
Imperial Shipment
Amarr Empire
#92 - 2013-02-12 20:47:32 UTC
I respect agression, I believe in it, I believe in Reclaiming. Just don't say it's for self-defense, or that the Nation wants peace. Accept you want war for your own reasons, and are willing to impose them on the rest, and such is your duty and I'll understand it. Just don't claim you do it because of any other reason that because you can and because you want to (or at least Sansha Kuvakei wants to).

Sepherim Catillah Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris Liuteneant Ex-Imperial Navy Imperator Commander

Tiberious Thessalonia
True Slave Foundations
#93 - 2013-02-12 20:52:29 UTC
Sepherim wrote:
I respect agression, I believe in it, I believe in Reclaiming. Just don't say it's for self-defense, or that the Nation wants peace. Accept you want war for your own reasons, and are willing to impose them on the rest, and such is your duty and I'll understand it. Just don't claim you do it because of any other reason that because you can and because you want to (or at least Sansha Kuvakei wants to).


That would be factually incorrect though. We want peace so badly in aches in ways you cannot even know. We will impose peace on you on our terms, because so far the CONCORD signatories have proven singularly unable to impose peace on theirs, even amongst themselves.

We do not do this thing because we can, Captain Sepherim.

We do this thing because no one else has proven willing to do what needs to be done.
Tiberious Thessalonia
True Slave Foundations
#94 - 2013-02-12 20:54:37 UTC
Sepherim wrote:
Tiberious Thessalonia wrote:
You wish to bet your life against those? Okay.
I'm going to go with a method of enforcement that is a little more secure.


Are you threatening me, captain Thessalonia? I've already been through death once, two days ago, in the service of my duty to the Empire. I didn't like the experience, and will try to avoid it completely. But I won't let my death stand in the way of my duty, so if you wish to see me dead, look for me in the Bleak Lands. You can even ask me and I'll tell you when I am there if you wish to come for a fight.

Or have I missunderstood you?


You misunderstood me.

You are betting your life (your actual life, not just this current incarnation of your infomorph) on your fellow humans ability to 'willingly' follow dictates of honor, duty, etc while piloting giant machines of death and destruction.

This has proven inadequate in the past.
Takrow Matoris
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#95 - 2013-02-12 22:41:11 UTC  |  Edited by: Takrow Matoris
Tiberious Thessalonia wrote:
Sepherim wrote:
I respect agression, I believe in it, I believe in Reclaiming. Just don't say it's for self-defense, or that the Nation wants peace. Accept you want war for your own reasons, and are willing to impose them on the rest, and such is your duty and I'll understand it. Just don't claim you do it because of any other reason that because you can and because you want to (or at least Sansha Kuvakei wants to).


That would be factually incorrect though. We want peace so badly in aches in ways you cannot even know. We will impose peace on you on our terms, because so far the CONCORD signatories have proven singularly unable to impose peace on theirs, even amongst themselves.

We do not do this thing because we can, Captain Sepherim.

We do this thing because no one else has proven willing to do what needs to be done.



So this justifies invading the empires and forcing your will upon them? How does this make you any better then the rest of the galaxy? Besides, who ask you to even try and save us? I know I didn't, and I know many others didn't either. If you really want peace then your people would have come with out weapons and would have used the proper channels. Instead you chose war. You may sprout the words for peace, but we all know you really have a knife waiting for us when we turn our backs to you and your Nation. So you're going to have to excuse me for not believing in your talk for peace.
Tiberious Thessalonia
True Slave Foundations
#96 - 2013-02-12 23:00:23 UTC
Takrow Matoris wrote:
Tiberious Thessalonia wrote:
Sepherim wrote:
I respect agression, I believe in it, I believe in Reclaiming. Just don't say it's for self-defense, or that the Nation wants peace. Accept you want war for your own reasons, and are willing to impose them on the rest, and such is your duty and I'll understand it. Just don't claim you do it because of any other reason that because you can and because you want to (or at least Sansha Kuvakei wants to).


That would be factually incorrect though. We want peace so badly in aches in ways you cannot even know. We will impose peace on you on our terms, because so far the CONCORD signatories have proven singularly unable to impose peace on theirs, even amongst themselves.

We do not do this thing because we can, Captain Sepherim.

We do this thing because no one else has proven willing to do what needs to be done.



So this justifies invading the empires and forcing your will upon them? How does this make you any better then the rest of the galaxy? Besides, who ask you to even try and save us? I know I didn't, and I know many others didn't either. If you really want peace then your people would have come with out weapons and would have used the proper channels. Instead you chose war. You may sprout the words for peace, but we all know you really have a knife waiting for us when we turn our backs to you and your Nation. So you're going to have to excuse me for not believing in your talk for peace.


I do believe you've read nothing of what I said. You looked at my corporate affiliation and went "Nope, don't need to listen to him".

This is why you should not have a say in whether you get peace or not.
Natalcya Katla
Astropolitan Front
#97 - 2013-02-12 23:25:44 UTC
Sepherim wrote:
Then, which law is the one that is objective? Amarrian law? CONCORD law? Caldari law? Or maybe the Republic's? Or is it the Federation's, the Kingdom's or the Mandate's? Or is it the law that reigns over any 0.0 space controlled by any corporation, be it pod-pilot based or those of the Angels, Blood Raiders or any other such particular faction? Or maybe the law that is the collective will of Sansha Kuvakei over all his denizens?

This depends entirely, of course, on whose jurisdiction one happens to be under. This is usually dependent on one's physical location at any given moment, and sometimes dependent on formal agreements between sovereign political entities.

There are places which are essentially lawless or close to it, such as segments of 0.0 space, where the only real checks on people's behavior are the ones enforced by their alliance leaders, or the strength of their self-preservation drive. There is also a very real possibility of two jurisdictions coming into conflict with each other where the lines between them blur. Obviously, this is a bad situation.

Given these flaws in what is quite correctly observed a patchwork of multiple jurisdictions, you would be perfectly within your rights to ask: "Why put one's faith in such a messy and contradictory set of rules? Why not scrap all of it in favor of one universal law, applied equally and with absolute rigidity to all of humanity, everywhere, forever?"

With this line of reasoning, I would quite agree.
Sepherim
Imperial Shipment
Amarr Empire
#98 - 2013-02-12 23:35:56 UTC
Tiberious Thessalonia wrote:
That would be factually incorrect though. We want peace so badly in aches in ways you cannot even know. We will impose peace on you on our terms, because so far the CONCORD signatories have proven singularly unable to impose peace on theirs, even amongst themselves.

We do not do this thing because we can, Captain Sepherim.

We do this thing because no one else has proven willing to do what needs to be done.


Yes, there has been such attempts, we like to call them Reclaiming. But we don't go talking about peace all around. Peace will inevitably come when the time has come for it, but we don't invade for peace, that's an impossible, like ******* in the name of virginity. We invade to Reclaim, and you invade to enslave. Peace will be an aftermath of either of these dreams coming true, but it's not what lies behind every specific war until the process is complete.

Quote:
You misunderstood me.

You are betting your life (your actual life, not just this current incarnation of your infomorph) on your fellow humans ability to 'willingly' follow dictates of honor, duty, etc while piloting giant machines of death and destruction.

This has proven inadequate in the past.


I see what you say, but disagree. I'm betting my life on my skill and power to control those who may threaten the security of what I care for, and the trust in my brothers in arms in the Praetoria and elsewhere among the loyalists, and my devotion amongst those in the amarrian institutions. And that is a trust that's never wrongly placed, even if specific pilots may fall from grace from time to time.

Natalcya Katla wrote:
Given these flaws in what is quite correctly observed a patchwork of multiple jurisdictions, you would be perfectly within your rights to ask: "Why put one's faith in such a messy and contradictory set of rules? Why not scrap all of it in favor of one universal law, applied equally and with absolute rigidity to all of humanity, everywhere, forever?"

With this line of reasoning, I would quite agree.


If laws depend on jurisdiction and the accord of those that write it, they're not objective but inter-subjective. Not the same thing.

As for one only set of laws, I certainly favor that. I usually only obey imperial law wherever I may be, the rest are of little concern to me.

Sepherim Catillah Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris Liuteneant Ex-Imperial Navy Imperator Commander

Natalcya Katla
Astropolitan Front
#99 - 2013-02-13 00:07:26 UTC
Scherezad wrote:
Today I enact a decree to all employees beneath my auspices. The sun has passed behind Kakakela VI, and we shall never see it again.

I anticipate a lovely star-rise tomorrow.

Tiberious addressed some good points here, but I will allow that your argument, laden with sarcasm though it may be, is indicative of a truth.

Although your decree obviously does nothing to alter physical reality, what it potentially does is set a formal and codified standard for the behavior and possibly even worldview of your employees. The sun is legally gone, and any counter-claim by any of your employees can be considered a crime, or even an act of rebellion. This assumes, of course, that you are able and willing to successfuly claim legal jurisdiction over your employees (actually not that hard, for a capsuleer), and to enforce adherence to your decree in an efficient and consistent way.

I will give an example of my own:

My name is Natalcya Katla. I was born approximately 32 standard years and 9 months ago, aboard a cruiser belonging to the Federal Navy, in a safespot in Vivanier.

I am almost entirely certain there is not a single molecule in my body that was actually part of my body at birth. It is not physically the same body - far from it. I have been podded and cloned a number of times. I have an artificial skeleton and a number of synthetic body modifications. My brain has been restructured time and again. Even my genes are different than the ones I was born with.

Even so, I know, with full certainty, that I am that same person who was born 32 standard years and 9 months ago in Vivanier. How can I know this?

Because CONCORD law, under whose jurisdiction I am as a capsuleer, clearly and unequivocally states that I am.

Even so, what is legally true today is not necessarily true tomorrow. If CONCORD decides to change their laws, or lose jurisdiction over capsuleers to another political entity successfully able to claim it, I may one day wake up to discover that I am not Natalcya Katla anymore, but somebody else, or nobody at all.

That is the power of law.
Gwen Ikiryo
Alexylva Paradox
#100 - 2013-02-13 00:09:51 UTC
Natalcya Katla wrote:
Sepherim wrote:
Then, which law is the one that is objective? Amarrian law? CONCORD law? Caldari law? Or maybe the Republic's? Or is it the Federation's, the Kingdom's or the Mandate's? Or is it the law that reigns over any 0.0 space controlled by any corporation, be it pod-pilot based or those of the Angels, Blood Raiders or any other such particular faction? Or maybe the law that is the collective will of Sansha Kuvakei over all his denizens?

This depends entirely, of course, on whose jurisdiction one happens to be under. This is usually dependent on one's physical location at any given moment, and sometimes dependent on formal agreements between sovereign political entities.

There are places which are essentially lawless or close to it, such as segments of 0.0 space, where the only real checks on people's behavior are the ones enforced by their alliance leaders, or the strength of their self-preservation drive. There is also a very real possibility of two jurisdictions coming into conflict with each other where the lines between them blur. Obviously, this is a bad situation.

Given these flaws in what is quite correctly observed a patchwork of multiple jurisdictions, you would be perfectly within your rights to ask: "Why put one's faith in such a messy and contradictory set of rules? Why not scrap all of it in favor of one universal law, applied equally and with absolute rigidity to all of humanity, everywhere, forever?"

With this line of reasoning, I would quite agree.


If you do not mind me saying so, I think I would have to disagree with your train of logic, here. A few points...

Firstly, it is useful to a society - in my opinion - to have others of atleast partially comparable strength nearby, so that they might learn and react to eachothers mistakes and successes, as well as being advancing at a better pace due to a desire to "compete." One that is not tends to become hyperinvested in the context of, well, itself, and it's capacity for objective improvement is diminished. Think of it in a similar vein to how it is much easier for a pair of people to make rational decisions then an individual, albeit on a far more tremendous scale.

Secondly, as long as even a small modicum of individuality is maintained amongst the populace (Which I understand to be true in Sansha's Nation), there will always be a small minority of people who, for whatever reason, cannot or will not function within the context of the system of laws and values you have created. This has remained true since we were hunter gatherers beating eachother over the head with sharp rocks, and will likely stay so unless we, as I said, become universally literal drones. These people will either be inclined to divorce themselves from society altogether, or to establish a new, competing one.

Finally, the end goal - The law being applied to "all of humanity, everywhere, forever" - seems more or less fundementally unachieveable. To be frank, humanity is now spread so thinly over the known cluster and frontier space, and often in such secluded pockets, that it would be almost certainly functionally impossible to unite it in any fashion, no matter how effective or direct the means of doing so are. It will always, to a point, be patchwork. And if that is the case, why does it matter if your paticular patch is the largest?