These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
123Next page
 

NEW STATIONS

First post
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Apollo Zanzibar
Duty. Joint Harvesting
Brave United
#1 - 2013-02-12 02:07:42 UTC
I think there should be available cloaked space stations..why not??
FloppieTheBanjoClown
Arcana Imperii Ltd.
#2 - 2013-02-12 02:10:47 UTC
Because the excessive graviton antiparticles built up by a sustained cloaking field large enough to shroud a station would eventually cause a polarity cascade in the nanodampners, resulting in an inversion of the quantum substrate of the fusion core of any stars within 200 AU. And everyone knows that's a bad thing.

Founding member of the Belligerent Undesirables movement.
Shamus O'Reilly
Candy Cabal
#3 - 2013-02-12 02:12:56 UTC
FloppieTheBanjoClown wrote:
Because the excessive graviton antiparticles built up by a sustained cloaking field large enough to shroud a station would eventually cause a polarity cascade in the nanodampners, resulting in an inversion of the quantum substrate of the fusion core of any stars within 200 AU. And everyone knows that's a bad thing.

That... is one of the best answers to a GD thread i've seen so far...

It also made me laugh nicely Cool

"I swear there are more people complaining over "nullsecers complaining" then actual nullsec people complaining."
CCP Complex
C C P
C C P Alliance
#4 - 2013-02-12 02:13:51 UTC
How do you know they are not already in the game?

CCP Complex ||  EVE Marketing Team || Capture Artist **|| **@CCP_Complex
Wodensun
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#5 - 2013-02-12 02:15:13 UTC
CCP Complex wrote:
How do you know they are not already in the game?


because of falcon obviously...Lol

Do not give me likes them 101 likes arent a accident...
Apollo Zanzibar
Duty. Joint Harvesting
Brave United
#6 - 2013-02-12 02:15:46 UTC
CCP Complex wrote:
How do you know they are not already in the game?

I don;t how do we find out??
Petrus Blackshell
Rifterlings
#7 - 2013-02-12 02:18:36 UTC
FloppieTheBanjoClown wrote:
Because the excessive graviton antiparticles built up by a sustained cloaking field large enough to shroud a station would eventually cause a polarity cascade in the nanodampners, resulting in an inversion of the quantum substrate of the fusion core of any stars within 200 AU. And everyone knows that's a bad thing.

But what if you use a co-positioned negatron shield for antiparticle containment, coupled with a FBF equalizer in a Fontaine configuration for disposal?

Accidentally The Whole Frigate - For-newbies blog (currently on pause)
Petrus Blackshell
Rifterlings
#8 - 2013-02-12 02:19:28 UTC
Apollo Zanzibar wrote:
CCP Complex wrote:
How do you know they are not already in the game?

I don;t how do we find out??

Get within 2 km of it to decloak it.

Accidentally The Whole Frigate - For-newbies blog (currently on pause)
FloppieTheBanjoClown
Arcana Imperii Ltd.
#9 - 2013-02-12 02:20:54 UTC
CCP Complex wrote:
How do you know they are not already in the game?

It's simple. All you have to do is look for the gravitational wave harmonics characteristic of artificial structures in space and filter that against the optical sensor data to produce a variance table. Compare that with your deep space telemetry probe results, and you can "see" the cloaked stations.

Founding member of the Belligerent Undesirables movement.
Ryuu Shi
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#10 - 2013-02-12 02:21:46 UTC
FloppieTheBanjoClown wrote:
Because the excessive graviton antiparticles built up by a sustained cloaking field large enough to shroud a station would eventually cause a polarity cascade in the nanodampners, resulting in an inversion of the quantum substrate of the fusion core of any stars within 200 AU. And everyone knows that's a bad thing.



This... is THE bestest awesome of all awesomeness answers I have every read on this site in... what? 7 years?Big smile

_**Noob **_isn't really a status, it's the online equivalent of a 5-year old calling you a poopy fart head.

  • Sun Tzu
FloppieTheBanjoClown
Arcana Imperii Ltd.
#11 - 2013-02-12 02:22:55 UTC
Petrus Blackshell wrote:
FloppieTheBanjoClown wrote:
Because the excessive graviton antiparticles built up by a sustained cloaking field large enough to shroud a station would eventually cause a polarity cascade in the nanodampners, resulting in an inversion of the quantum substrate of the fusion core of any stars within 200 AU. And everyone knows that's a bad thing.

But what if you use a co-positioned negatron shield for antiparticle containment, coupled with a FBF equalizer in a Fontaine configuration for disposal?

That would fuse your neutrino conduits. Feel free to try it, but let me know where so I can salvage your wreck.

Founding member of the Belligerent Undesirables movement.
MadMuppet
Critical Mass Inc
#12 - 2013-02-12 02:25:58 UTC
FloppieTheBanjoClown wrote:
Petrus Blackshell wrote:
FloppieTheBanjoClown wrote:
Because the excessive graviton antiparticles built up by a sustained cloaking field large enough to shroud a station would eventually cause a polarity cascade in the nanodampners, resulting in an inversion of the quantum substrate of the fusion core of any stars within 200 AU. And everyone knows that's a bad thing.

But what if you use a co-positioned negatron shield for antiparticle containment, coupled with a FBF equalizer in a Fontaine configuration for disposal?

That would fuse your neutrino conduits. Feel free to try it, but let me know where so I can salvage your wreck.


Cut to the chase... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5NhpLCBM3s4

This message brought to you by Experience(tm). When common sense fails you, experience will come to the rescue. Experience(tm) from the makers of CONCORD.

"If you are part of the problem, you will be nerfed." -MadMuppet
Petrus Blackshell
Rifterlings
#13 - 2013-02-12 02:27:59 UTC
FloppieTheBanjoClown wrote:
Petrus Blackshell wrote:
FloppieTheBanjoClown wrote:
Because the excessive graviton antiparticles built up by a sustained cloaking field large enough to shroud a station would eventually cause a polarity cascade in the nanodampners, resulting in an inversion of the quantum substrate of the fusion core of any stars within 200 AU. And everyone knows that's a bad thing.

But what if you use a co-positioned negatron shield for antiparticle containment, coupled with a FBF equalizer in a Fontaine configuration for disposal?

That would fuse your neutrino conduits. Feel free to try it, but let me know where so I can salvage your wreck.

Tried it before I saw your warning. This is a new clone.

You were right, the neutrino conduits did fuse, but the technique worked. The remains of my disintegrated vessel are cloaked. I suppose this isn't an adequate technique for building a station, but it's a starting point.

Accidentally The Whole Frigate - For-newbies blog (currently on pause)
Derpen Zoidberg
Doomheim
#14 - 2013-02-12 02:29:50 UTC
This doesn't make sense! Where's slinky?! NOOOO SLINKY..... Cry


Is this right?
Gingervitis Plague
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#15 - 2013-02-12 02:32:35 UTC
Because:

1.21 gigawatts
FloppieTheBanjoClown
Arcana Imperii Ltd.
#16 - 2013-02-12 02:36:08 UTC
Petrus Blackshell wrote:
The remains of my disintegrated vessel are cloaked.

There's a fine line between "cloaked" and "blown to bits so small they are indistinguishable from the passing solar winds."

Congratulations, you've crossed it.

Founding member of the Belligerent Undesirables movement.
Apollo Zanzibar
Duty. Joint Harvesting
Brave United
#17 - 2013-02-12 02:36:26 UTC
I also think stations should have the capability to move with out dissemble...just like ships..but maybe slower and to big to go thru gates,,need to build a new kind of gate to move a station to another system....
FloppieTheBanjoClown
Arcana Imperii Ltd.
#18 - 2013-02-12 02:38:22 UTC
And then you could put a really big gun on them and call them Titans!

Founding member of the Belligerent Undesirables movement.
Shamus O'Reilly
Candy Cabal
#19 - 2013-02-12 02:38:27 UTC
Apollo Zanzibar wrote:
I also think stations should have the capability to move with out dissemble...just like ships..but maybe slower and to big to go thru gates,,need to build a new kind of gate to move a station to another system....

Sarcasm?

"I swear there are more people complaining over "nullsecers complaining" then actual nullsec people complaining."
Sura Sadiva
Entropic Tactical Crew
#20 - 2013-02-12 03:48:57 UTC
Nobody would never undock from these cloacked station, cause everyone would think there's someone else AFK cloacked in system.
123Next page