These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
123Next pageLast page
 

Carriers/Dreadnoughts rebalancing on the horizon?

Author
Sexy Cakes
Have A Seat
#1 - 2013-02-06 13:43:19 UTC
So after CCP is done rebalancing battleships and command ships ( http://community.eveonline.com/devblog.asp?a=blog&nbid=73530 ) are carriers and dreadnoughts next?

Here are my opinions on the carriers/dreadnoughts.

Archon - Good for armor PvP
Chimera - Good for shield PvP?
Thanatos - Good for PvE/Decent for PvP
Nidhoggur - Not so Good

Revelation - Good (Low ammo usage)
Phoenix - Terrible
Moros - Great for tracking setups
Naglfar - Not so good

The lack of a tanking bonus seems to put Thanatos/Nidhoggur at a disadvatage, but the fighter damage bonus seems to make up for it on the thanatos.

Maybe capital missles are the problem with dreadnoughts. Split weapon systems seem to be a valid concern on the Naglfar.

Maybe some of the more experienced capital pilots have some insight as to whats good/bad with the carriers and dreadnoughts?

Not today spaghetti.

Mizhir
Devara Biotech
#2 - 2013-02-06 13:44:24 UTC  |  Edited by: Mizhir
mmmmh Cakes

on topic: they will get there eventually. But I think they will overhaul t2 ships before moving to caps.

❤️️💛💚💙💜

Alice Saki
Nocturnal Romance
Cynosural Field Theory.
#3 - 2013-02-06 13:45:29 UTC  |  Edited by: Alice Saki
Moros.

Also Cake Lol

FREEZE! Drop the LIKES AND WALK AWAY! - Currenly rebuilding gaming machine, I will Return.

Sexy Cakes
Have A Seat
#4 - 2013-02-06 13:47:26 UTC
Alice Saki wrote:
Moros.

Also Cake Lol



I thank you for your in depth views and opinions on the subject and wish you a wonderful day.

Not today spaghetti.

Jake Warbird
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#5 - 2013-02-06 13:48:45 UTC  |  Edited by: Jake Warbird
Missiles cruise/torps and upwards first.

Cake for me too...

e: James sums it up quite eloquently in the post below. I was just here for cake.
James Amril-Kesh
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#6 - 2013-02-06 13:55:24 UTC
Due to how utterly terrible capital missiles are, I doubt there's anything they could do to the phoenix to make it more viable for anything but structure bashing. The only thing I'd do as far as the structure bashing goes is to change the kinetic bonus to a straight damage bonus to all missiles so that it becomes a selectable damage type (better for POS bashes).

Enjoying the rain today? ;)

Jassmin Joy
Pulling The Plug
PURPLE HELMETED WARRIORS
#7 - 2013-02-06 14:14:42 UTC  |  Edited by: Jassmin Joy
Every dread is sub-par to the moros. even a moros pilot with not so great skills can out dps fully skilled naglfar (whats the plural to naglfar out of interest, naglfai?) And the revelation. The phoenix doesnt even compare to either, unless what you're shooting at has the signature radius of a small sun, or is incapable of movement it's useless, which is a shame because it's got great potential.

As for carriers. The Archon and chimera both have roles, they have something they're very good at and personally i see no issues with either, although cap managment vs shield boost can be a huge problem with shield caps that armour don't have to deal with. My issue with the other two carriers is that they lack a purpose or a role. The nid has the best rep out of all carriers but also one of the worst tanks, can't rep when it's dead. and the thanatos is some sort of out dated dps-carrier, for the amount they cost i'll just field a vindi if i need dps. The latter two these days are just glorified pos reps thanks to the mixed bonus.

Just my insight/moneys worth.
Ptraci
3 R Corporation
#8 - 2013-02-06 14:19:38 UTC
Dread re-balancing? Hey yeah - I know - give dreads the ability to use drones. Wait, what?

These ships have already been "rebalanced" lately.
killorbekilled TBE
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#9 - 2013-02-06 14:24:39 UTC
they are working as intended which is shooting super structures and other capitals

overall capitals should and always be a low priority on CCP schedule

:)

Wacktopia
Fleet-Up.com
Keep It Simple Software Group
#10 - 2013-02-06 14:25:43 UTC
Jassmin Joy wrote:
(whats the plural to naglfar out of interest, naglfai?)


Naglf'ra ?

Reference

Kitchen sink? Seriousy, get your ship together -  Fleet-Up.com

Danny John-Peter
The Congregation
RAPID HEAVY ROPERS
#11 - 2013-02-06 14:28:12 UTC  |  Edited by: Danny John-Peter
Its probably worth pointing out that the Chimera is also pretty terrible, the Nidhoggur is actually a better shield Triage boat than it, the Thanny has a pretty useless bonus for a carrier and none of the carriers come anywhere near the Archon.

Also, the Rev is good, the Moros is probably a little OP.
Christopher AET
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#12 - 2013-02-06 14:33:23 UTC
Missile explosion velocity. Give capital missiles the ability to do more damage to targets of a smaller sig radius and it will go someway to fixing the problem.

I drain ducks of their moisture for sustenance.

Wacktopia
Fleet-Up.com
Keep It Simple Software Group
#13 - 2013-02-06 14:35:52 UTC
Personally I would just like a Carrier model that...

- Actually looks alrge enough to carry other ships around
- Has a much hight text / poly map

Kitchen sink? Seriousy, get your ship together -  Fleet-Up.com

Gillia Winddancer
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#14 - 2013-02-06 14:46:52 UTC
Give all capital ships an extra array of small and medium turret or missile slots and specialize main weapons even more as compensation.

That's 1 step forward towards becoming PROPER capital ships.

ITTigerClawIK
Galactic Rangers
#15 - 2013-02-06 14:51:26 UTC
Wacktopia wrote:
Personally I would just like a Carrier model that...

- Actually looks alrge enough to carry other ships around
- Has a much hight text / poly map


which also begs the question.... shouldnt the Caps be up for V'3'ing next?

i mean cap pilots are the ones that are gunna be staring at there caps for the longest time, may as well give them somethng pretty to look at rather than the strethced textured monstrositys they are starting to look like compared to the rest of the game now... witht he exception of station interiors... they are in pretty desperate need of a new look.
Sexy Cakes
Have A Seat
#16 - 2013-02-06 14:52:19 UTC
Ptraci wrote:
Dread re-balancing? Hey yeah - I know - give dreads the ability to use drones. Wait, what?

These ships have already been "rebalanced" lately.


How have they been "rebalanced' lately?

Not today spaghetti.

Sexy Cakes
Have A Seat
#17 - 2013-02-06 14:54:01 UTC
Wacktopia wrote:
Jassmin Joy wrote:
(whats the plural to naglfar out of interest, naglfai?)


Naglf'ra ?

Reference


Naglfarses precious.

Not today spaghetti.

TheBlueMonkey
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#18 - 2013-02-06 15:00:13 UTC
I'd like to see a bonus to the thanny for cap transfer tbh

beyond that, egh, capitals.
Ptraci
3 R Corporation
#19 - 2013-02-06 16:52:30 UTC
Sexy Cakes wrote:
Ptraci wrote:
Dread re-balancing? Hey yeah - I know - give dreads the ability to use drones. Wait, what?

These ships have already been "rebalanced" lately.


How have they been "rebalanced' lately?


Lately as in 2 years ago. Google knows.
Spurty
#20 - 2013-02-06 17:22:07 UTC
Caps are a bit of a quantum leap from battleships.

Leave them alone and create that missing content that bridges the gap between the two classes.

There are good ships,

And wood ships,

And ships that sail the sea

But the best ships are Spaceships

Built by CCP

123Next pageLast page