These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Ships & Modules

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
12Next page
 

Do you think that CCP will eventually bring all Minmatar ships' appearance in line?

Author
Provence Tristram
Doomheim
#1 - 2013-02-06 08:16:45 UTC  |  Edited by: Provence Tristram
There has been high praise (that I have seen) for the recent light remodeling and reskinning done on ships like the Stabber and the Tempest, and I'm wondering if this is indicative of an across-the-board aesthetic shift regarding the Minmatar as a race?

I understand that the Minmatar were intended to be this kind of rough-and-tumble faction notorious for fielding lightly-built starships with somewhat questionable or untested (or at least unconventional) designs. However, it's clear from these new models that CCP appears to have backed off from that position in a mild and (I believe) appropriate way. The Stabber, for instance, still looks like a very light, tough ship built not to win beauty contests but to win wars. But gone is the gangly or 'snaggletooth' appearance. It's a vessel that now appears fully spaceworthy, and not like it's going to buckle after a couple of damaging hits. It now looks as technologically advanced as any other race's ship.

Do you think that this trend will continue with other vessels in the Minamatar pool? And which do you think should be the top candidates for mild reevaluation and redesign?
Garviel Tarrant
Beyond Divinity Inc
Shadow Cartel
#2 - 2013-02-06 09:12:33 UTC
Provence Tristram wrote:
There has been high praise (that I have seen) for the recent light remodeling and reskinning done on ships like the Stabber and the Tempest, and I'm wondering if this is indicative of an across-the-board aesthetic shift regarding the Minmatar as a race?

I understand that the Minmatar were intended to be this kind of rough-and-tumble faction notorious for fielding lightly-built starships with somewhat questionable or untested (or at least unconventional) designs. However, it's clear from these new models that CCP appears to have backed off from that position in a mild and (I believe) appropriate way. The Stabber, for instance, still looks like a very light, tough ship built not to win beauty contests but to win wars. But gone is the gangly or 'snaggletooth' appearance. It's a vessel that now appears fully spaceworthy, and not like it's going to buckle after a couple of damaging hits. It now looks as technologically advanced as any other race's ship.

Do you think that this trend will continue with other vessels in the Minamatar pool? And which do you think should be the top candidates for mild reevaluation and redesign?



The burst could use some love..

BYDI recruitment closed-ish

Yavax Zavro
Republic University
Minmatar Republic
#3 - 2013-02-06 09:16:28 UTC
Talwar definitely. I don't know who designed this ship, he should be fired immediately.
Provence Tristram
Doomheim
#4 - 2013-02-06 09:21:24 UTC  |  Edited by: Provence Tristram
Yavax Zavro wrote:
Talwar definitely. I don't know who designed this ship, he should be fired immediately.


Yeah, I cringe every time I look at it. For some reason, it reminds me of like a... space plow... you know... they get heavy snowfall in the Domain region and then the Minmatar dispatch the Talwar to clear the space lanes and make sure accidents are kept at a minimum? You don't want to see a Iteron Mk V jack knifing as it comes at you from out of warp.
Yavax Zavro
Republic University
Minmatar Republic
#5 - 2013-02-06 09:31:47 UTC  |  Edited by: Yavax Zavro
All I see is someone's lazyness. All new destroyers look good, like someone spended few hours working on them. When I look at Talwar I can almost hear designers thoughts
"Ok, let's place big, cubic hull, and now... we need glass plow! Great! 20 minutes of work and it's done!"
Caitlyn Tufy
Perkone
Caldari State
#6 - 2013-02-06 09:53:27 UTC
Provence Tristram wrote:
There has been high praise (that I have seen) for the recent light remodeling and reskinning done on ships like the Stabber and the Tempest


Bolded the essential part for giggles :p


Personally, I'm a HUGE fan of the new Stabby and Vargur. However I honestly believe that general Minmatar looks are fine. Reaper, Thrasher, Cyclone, Hurricane, Talwar and similar are all ok. However, I do agree that there are minmatar ships that need major redesigns / updates. Take for instance Rupture, Typhoon, Burst and place them next to their sexier counterparts - their texture and model quality is far worse. The same goes for their industrials - all three look like someone threw together a bunch of cardboxes, tied them together with wire and painted it all with rust. They need an update. Perhaps not Stabber level update, but at least talwarification :)
ITTigerClawIK
Galactic Rangers
#7 - 2013-02-06 10:01:44 UTC
i have to agree the typhoon could do with a makeover in the style of the pest , however i actually ok with the rupture, burst however... yea that needs saving , i also think the scythe and bellicouse need work also.
Vilnius Zar
SDC Multi Ten
#8 - 2013-02-06 10:27:28 UTC  |  Edited by: Vilnius Zar
Yavax Zavro wrote:
All I see is someone's lazyness. All new destroyers look good, like someone spended few hours working on them. When I look at Talwar I can almost hear designers thoughts
"Ok, let's place big, cubic hull, and now... we need glass plow! Great! 20 minutes of work and it's done!"


*cough* Dragoon also looks crap, or at least lazy design as it's so similar to the Coercer.

And yes the Vargur looks amazing now but I'm kinda hesitant to let designers loose on the ship hulls, CCP hasn't shown a lot of care in the past when it comes to design language.
Provence Tristram
Doomheim
#9 - 2013-02-06 10:37:29 UTC  |  Edited by: Provence Tristram
Vilnius Zar wrote:
Yavax Zavro wrote:
All I see is someone's lazyness. All new destroyers look good, like someone spended few hours working on them. When I look at Talwar I can almost hear designers thoughts
"Ok, let's place big, cubic hull, and now... we need glass plow! Great! 20 minutes of work and it's done!"


*cough* Dragoon also looks crap, or at least lazy design as it's so similar to the Coercer.

And yes the Vargur looks amazing now but I'm kinda hesitant to let designers loose on the ship hulls, CCP hasn't shown a lot of care in the past when it comes to design language.


I actually find the Dragoon somewhat stylish. Granted, it looks like something ripped off from the original Star Tours -- http://www.talknerdytomelover.com/storage/startours3.jpg?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1281865002336 -- but the front is pretty decent, and I at least like the mounting locations for the lasers/launchers. My biggest problem with the Dragoon is its strange, mixed armament. It would be nice if it was all lasers.
Caitlyn Tufy
Perkone
Caldari State
#10 - 2013-02-06 11:29:06 UTC  |  Edited by: Caitlyn Tufy
Vilnius Zar wrote:
*cough* Dragoon also looks crap, or at least lazy design as it's so similar to the Coercer.


I see this said quite a bit, but I just don't see it. True, they both have frontal extensions arching downwards and they're both elongated horizontal designs, but that's where similarities end.

If you'll look at the Coercer, you'll see that the ship has two hulls on port and starboard side, joined by middle structure. At no point do the two hulls merge into a single section, nor is there any prevaling central structure - in fact, the mid section is separated along the way, leaving a gaping hole half way through the ship. Even the engines are separately carried by the left and the right hull, while the connecting section has none.

Dragoon is far boxier. The primary middle section carries engines and extends into the front, then the extended golden armor is added on top. If you'll look at this armor, you'll notice that unlike on Coercer, the frontal top armor joins about half way and then runs half way through the ship length, where it merges with the aft (engine) section. Point of balance is decisively lower than on the Coercer, which also translates into different engine placement due to different thrust requirements.

All in all, I really don't think they're any more similar than, say, Hoarder and Mammoth or Kestrel and Manticore.

Quote:
My biggest problem with the Dragoon is its strange, mixed armament. It would be nice if it was all lasers.


Don't look at it as "mixed armament" - it's not. They're alternatives, either one or the other, because you're ment to use neuts in the rest of the slots. If you'll look at the Amarr T1 drone ships, they all carry this characteristic - Inquisitor, Dragoon, Arbitrator and soon Prophecy all have alternate weapon types. I guess this is done to tie in the Khanid missile ships without giving Amarr a dedicated T1 missile line.
Makavelia
National Industries
#11 - 2013-02-06 11:57:51 UTC
I personaly think most mini ships were based off animals.

Maelstrom directly from the front looks like a racoon with the lights being eyes.

The cane looks like some shell back sea creature.

Thrasher looks like a cod or some sort of fish like so.

Talwar looks like some kinde clawed insect.


Cyclone on the other hand. It looks like a torch that works from sun solar panels, sound's genious till you think about it.

Typhoon looks like a cave, and it's serounding mounatin.. floating through space.





Darius Brinn
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#12 - 2013-02-06 12:11:15 UTC
Since the update, I find the Tempest/Vargur bearable to witness.

And the Vagabond has become a personal favourite of mine, and I fly it all the time. I could never force myself to buy the old model at all Lol

I hope some other terrible Minmatar designs get the same treatment.

Specially the Rupture, easily the hull I hate the most in all of EvE.
Vilnius Zar
SDC Multi Ten
#13 - 2013-02-06 12:21:33 UTC  |  Edited by: Vilnius Zar
Caitlyn Tufy wrote:
If you'll look at the Coercer, you'll see that the ship has two hulls on port and starboard side, joined by middle structure. At no point do the two hulls merge into a single section, nor is there any prevaling central structure - in fact, the mid section is separated along the way, leaving a gaping hole half way through the ship. Even the engines are separately carried by the left and the right hull, while the connecting section has none.

Dragoon is far boxier. The primary middle section carries engines and extends into the front, then the extended golden armor is added on top. If you'll look at this armor, you'll notice that unlike on Coercer, the frontal top armor joins about half way and then runs half way through the ship length, where it merges with the aft (engine) section. Point of balance is decisively lower than on the Coercer, which also translates into different engine placement due to different thrust requirements.

All in all, I really don't think they're any more similar than, say, Hoarder and Mammoth or Kestrel and Manticore.


Top down it looks like this, it's just weighted wrong and has the same basic design as the Coercer, the fact that it's missing some stuff or added some other doesn't change that.

If you now look at the Corax you'll see an amazing design with really cool colours and textures going on, if you check the Algos that thing is a beauty and even though I'm no fan of the Talwar at least it's different from the thrasher. The Dragoon was just "easy mode editing and be done for lunch" and while the Talwar looks crap they had to put their thinking cap on to make it. Dragoon is just a lazy design and, but that's personal opinion ofcourse, not a good one.
Adaahh Gee
Dark Venture Corporation
Kitchen Sinkhole
#14 - 2013-02-06 12:21:59 UTC
I seem to be the only one that misses the old style Stabber and Vagabond. Sad

New ones look too slick and styled, Minmitar ships are supposed to be ramshackle and loosly bolted together.

Dragoon looks like a Coercer that got fat.

I like the Talwar, looks like some sort of amazon rainforest fish that swims up your Pee-hole and lodges itself there.


For nostalga's sake, the old Stabber and Vagabond.

Stabber 2048

Vagabond 2048
Darius Brinn
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#15 - 2013-02-06 13:27:40 UTC
Adaahh Gee wrote:
I seem to be the only one that misses the old style Stabber and Vagabond. Sad

New ones look too slick and styled, Minmitar ships are supposed to be ramshackle and loosly bolted together.


I disagree. IIRC, it's been MORE THAN A CENTURY since the Matari broke free from the Amarrians. Time enough for their engineers to catch up.

Also, CCP has done a MAGNIFICENT job with the Minmatar restylings. The new Stabber/Tempest looks new and flashy, but it retains a definite Matari "feel". It's clearly not Amarr, Gallente or Caldari. It's their own style, and it looks GOOD.

Adaahh Gee wrote:
For nostalga's sake, the old Stabber and Vagabond.

Stabber 2048

Vagabond 2048


Horrible, bland and uninspired compard to the new ones.

You are complaining that they turned this mess:

http://www.ravestats.com/public/fen/minmatar-vagabond-3.jpg

into this:

http://2ndanomalyfromtheleft.files.wordpress.com/2012/11/vagabond-1.jpg

As I have said before, the improvement is SO VAST in all possible ways that it breaks the barrier of subjectivity and allows me to say that you are wrong.

Yes, we're talking about personal tastes and opinions, and yet you wrong. Really.



Aokigahara Midori
Doomheim
#16 - 2013-02-06 13:30:45 UTC
Darius Brinn wrote:
Adaahh Gee wrote:
I seem to be the only one that misses the old style Stabber and Vagabond. Sad

New ones look too slick and styled, Minmitar ships are supposed to be ramshackle and loosly bolted together.


I disagree. IIRC, it's been MORE THAN A CENTURY since the Matari broke free from the Amarrians. Time enough for their engineers to catch up.

Also, CCP has done a MAGNIFICENT job with the Minmatar restylings. The new Stabber/Tempest looks new and flashy, but it retains a definite Matari "feel". It's clearly not Amarr, Gallente or Caldari. It's their own style, and it looks GOOD.

Adaahh Gee wrote:
For nostalga's sake, the old Stabber and Vagabond.

Stabber 2048

Vagabond 2048


Horrible, bland and uninspired compard to the new ones.

You are complaining that they turned this mess:

http://www.ravestats.com/public/fen/minmatar-vagabond-3.jpg

into this:

http://2ndanomalyfromtheleft.files.wordpress.com/2012/11/vagabond-1.jpg

As I have said before, the improvement is SO VAST in all possible ways that it breaks the barrier of subjectivity and allows me to say that you are wrong.

Yes, we're talking about personal tastes and opinions, and yet you wrong. Really.





Hah. I'm sold.
Hakaimono
Native Freshfood
Minmatar Republic
#17 - 2013-02-06 15:16:58 UTC
Redesigning the Rupture would be pretty sweet. Although I do kinda like the submarine look of the Typhoon. It actually looks like its suppose to fire torpedoes
W0lf Crendraven
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#18 - 2013-02-06 15:23:08 UTC
Darius Brinn wrote:
Adaahh Gee wrote:
I seem to be the only one that misses the old style Stabber and Vagabond. Sad

New ones look too slick and styled, Minmitar ships are supposed to be ramshackle and loosly bolted together.


I disagree. IIRC, it's been MORE THAN A CENTURY since the Matari broke free from the Amarrians. Time enough for their engineers to catch up.

Also, CCP has done a MAGNIFICENT job with the Minmatar restylings. The new Stabber/Tempest looks new and flashy, but it retains a definite Matari "feel". It's clearly not Amarr, Gallente or Caldari. It's their own style, and it looks GOOD.

Adaahh Gee wrote:
For nostalga's sake, the old Stabber and Vagabond.

Stabber 2048

Vagabond 2048


Horrible, bland and uninspired compard to the new ones.

You are complaining that they turned this mess:

http://www.ravestats.com/public/fen/minmatar-vagabond-3.jpg

into this:

http://2ndanomalyfromtheleft.files.wordpress.com/2012/11/vagabond-1.jpg

As I have said before, the improvement is SO VAST in all possible ways that it breaks the barrier of subjectivity and allows me to say that you are wrong.

Yes, we're talking about personal tastes and opinions, and yet you wrong. Really.





Old ones looks way more minmatarish, space mexicans could never have build the new vaga.
Mister Tuggles
Heretic Army
Sedition.
#19 - 2013-02-06 18:24:40 UTC
Yavax Zavro wrote:
Talwar definitely. I don't know who designed this ship, he should be fired immediately.



I really didn't like any of the new dessies appearance. They basically all look like they used the same base dildo'ish model and branched off it.
Aeril Malkyre
Knights of the Ouroboros
#20 - 2013-02-06 19:21:32 UTC
I believe they will probably rerun a few of the Minmatar line as the ships themselves get updated during the rebalance. But I doubt there will be as many major changes to most of them as there was to the Stabber and Vaga.

Ships I think DO need a major structural rework:

  • Bellicose: Looks like it has stilts with ice skates on them. Also: RAM EM WITH THE COCKPIT.
  • Scythe: Looks almost the same as the Belli, with randomer panels. Also: RAM EM WITH THE COCKPIT.
  • Burst: I love the hodge-podge, but with a new role (logi) should come some sort of... design intent.
  • Typhoon: The cylinders welded to each other works for me. Except for: RAM EM WITH THE SENSOR MASTS.
12Next page