These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

How EVE Became Obsolete (And why CCP hasn’t noticed)

First post
Author
Arronicus
State War Academy
Caldari State
#421 - 2013-02-05 07:08:38 UTC
Ageck Kalenia wrote:

Those who do choose a traditional PC may find Windows taking a backseat to Ubuntu and other platforms. What’s troubling is that, to date, CCP has offered almost no interest beyond traditional PCs. They pulled official support for Linux in 2009, citing low usage.


Only thing in this entire post worth reading.


Ageck Kalenia wrote:

CCP has time to pull it together, but it’s understandably harder and less interesting than designing new battlecruisers or tweaking mining yields. Bringing internet spaceships to a new generation of devices demands a complete interface overhaul, perhaps even a full-scale client rewrite. But in EVE’s greatest challenge lies also its greatest opportunity.


CCP has put off redoing a small portion of the code for POS'es for god knows how many years now. Even with multiple threadnaughts, massive player support on the forums, and at fanfest, in addition to heavy CSM support, this (relatively) small task is declared by CCP to be too much effort.
Provence Tristram
Doomheim
#422 - 2013-02-05 09:17:55 UTC
Ageck Kalenia wrote:
outdated subscription model.


Stopped reading right there.

Is $15 too much for you a month? Then you have no business playing MMORPGs. Go get a job.
ashley Eoner
#423 - 2013-02-05 20:42:21 UTC  |  Edited by: ashley Eoner
HAHA people actually think that linux is going to overtake windows? Wow talk about some delusions of grandeur going on. While windows 8 is meh it's nothing like VIsta or even worse BOB...


Linux has been trying to unseat dos/windows for decades now and has failed for a variety of reasons (lack of compatibility, hardware support, usability etc). Just to give you an idea of how far fetched your dreams are. Windows right now accounts for about 86% of systems out there while Linux is used on about 1%. This is why there is no Linux version of this game because it's just not worth it financially for ccp. Now Blizzard is the kind of company that is willing to throw money around in the hopes that some will come back so I wouldn't be surprised to see them try.


Don't get me wrong. I used to have a Linux install on my secondary machine (media server game server etc) as part of a multiboot solution. I eventually removed both Linux and the iOS install because in the end I rarely used either install because windows could do it fine. I do still have a Linux install on my heavily modified Xbox but I only boot it up when showing off..
Ageck Kalenia
Development Holdings
#424 - 2013-02-06 04:20:11 UTC
Frankly, I'm sick of the same tired arguments coming up again and again.

1. I'm not interested in discussing whether the subscription model for EVE is outdated. CCP can take Rai Stones in payment for all I care. I merely noted Forbes commented on the matter. Way to stay on topic.

2. Linux was already gaining ground in traditional desktop environments BEFORE Windows 8. I fully expect my current PC to be the last Windows PC I will ever own, and possibly last PC I will ever own. Linux is ALREADY the world's most ubiquitous operating system, running on everything from servers to consoles to Android phones. Linux didn't need to conquer the desktop to conquer the world; the world simply found something better, and it happened to use Linux - or at least its kernel.

3. Given the dismay with which gamers and developers alike greeted Windows 8, it's already safe to bet we'll see more PC titles released for Linux in the coming years. The stability, customization, and spectacular performance of Linux is something the PC gaming community sorely needs, and now seems prepared to accept.

4. No, the PC will never go away - just as shortwave radio never went away. But they will no longer be "personal computers". They will simply be full-sized computers, often hand-built by hobbyists, gamers, and power users - those with the money, knowledge, and enthusiasm for expensive and exotic components.

5. "Normal" people will embrace the burgeoning power, capacity, and flexibility of mobile devices. These devices will satisfy the needs of average users, adapting, connecting, and updating seamlessly as they move from place to place and task to task. How exactly they adapt to replace PCs is less relevant than the fact that they are doing it. Average users of the future will have no more need for a full-size PC than they have need for a phone book today.

6. This transforming digital landscape offers no room for a game like EVE-Online, at least in its current form. EVE will become a relic of the last decade, treasured by enthusiasts and elitists, but generally ignored by the mainstream gaming market. The time to address and plan for this future is now, but CCP seems more content to play with criminal flags and hand out donut holders. What's wrong with this picture?
Mr Ignitious
Lifeline Industries
#425 - 2013-02-06 04:30:29 UTC
Remiel Pollard wrote:
All of that motion and touch screen and stuff like that - it's a gimmick. I won't be using it. Why would I want touch screen? It just makes the screen filthy. And why would I want to wave my arms around to fly a spaceship? Screw that, EVE has no need to evolve for the "next generation" of hardware, because traditional hardware will always be used by a majority of people.

EVE is not obsolete.



It's not a gimmick as far as the general populace is concerned. I think it is highly likely that all personal and maybe business computing could move to touch inputs. However, the real issue with the op's over sight is that gaming on tablets (and we're talking about actual games, not just stupid ass angry birds) will be on dedicated machines for some time to come. Examples should include platforms. PS3 and xbox main incomes come from their FPS market, even though they have supported gesture recognition for a while now.

If someone wants to play an actual game they aren't going to look to a tablet to get it - they are going to get a PS3, xbox, or a pc depending on preference. In time there will probably be some clever way to make tablet computers functional for highly detailed games but that time is a long way off and won't effect EVE or COD or any other AAA title out there for such a long time that the developers will have plenty of time to adapt to the market.

To drive my point home I challenge the op and anyone like minded to him with this: What game genre can you imagine that would be involved and detailed enough to compare itself to EVE or WoW or COD that would be pleasant to play on a tablet? For a tablet app to be interacted with the button area takes up a large portion of screen space and your interaction device (ie: your hands/finger) block vision even more. For any multiplayer game to be competitive these issues need to be addressed, and that is a long way off.
ashley Eoner
#426 - 2013-02-06 05:42:35 UTC
Ageck Kalenia wrote:
2. Linux was already gaining ground in traditional desktop environments BEFORE Windows 8. I fully expect my current PC to be the last Windows PC I will ever own, and possibly last PC I will ever own. Linux is ALREADY the world's most ubiquitous operating system, running on everything from servers to consoles to Android phones. Linux didn't need to conquer the desktop to conquer the world; the world simply found something better, and it happened to use Linux - or at least its kernel.


2. Linux is a tiny player in the mobile environment. Android and even iOS is utterly curb stomping Linux when it comes to the mobile market.Yes we're aware that ANdroid is based on the linux kernal but following that logic you would say that OSX and iOS are linux too (they use highly modified Unix kernals). The only place that Linux itself has a large userbase is with servers.


Quote:
3. Given the dismay with which gamers and developers alike greeted Windows 8, it's already safe to bet we'll see more PC titles released for Linux in the coming years. The stability, customization, and spectacular performance of Linux is something the PC gaming community sorely needs, and now seems prepared to accept.

3. That's always been a safe bet as so few games are released for linux that it's inevitable that the numbers should climb some. You're barking up the wrong tree if you think you can run a PR campaign to make win 8 out to be a horrible OS. Win XP has only recently dropped below 40% market share. Windows 7 of course is the OS that replaced XP as the majority choice of flavor for windows. Even if win 8 is the worst thing since microsoft bob you're not going to make all those win 7 installs disappear.


Quote:
4. No, the PC will never go away - just as shortwave radio never went away. But they will no longer be "personal computers". They will simply be full-sized computers, often hand-built by hobbyists, gamers, and power users - those with the money, knowledge, and enthusiasm for expensive and exotic components.

4.We can agree here as the definition of a personal computer is always shifting as technology advances.

Quote:

5. "Normal" people will embrace the burgeoning power, capacity, and flexibility of mobile devices. These devices will satisfy the needs of average users, adapting, connecting, and updating seamlessly as they move from place to place and task to task. How exactly they adapt to replace PCs is less relevant than the fact that they are doing it. Average users of the future will have no more need for a full-size PC than they have need for a phone book today.


5. Well our definition of a full sized PC has shifted over the years..
Quote:

6. This transforming digital landscape offers no room for a game like EVE-Online, at least in its current form. EVE will become a relic of the last decade, treasured by enthusiasts and elitists, but generally ignored by the mainstream gaming market. The time to address and plan for this future is now, but CCP seems more content to play with criminal flags and hand out donut holders. What's wrong with this picture?


6. HAHA now you sound like the people proclaiming the death of the video game industry in the 80s....
Ai Shun
#427 - 2013-02-06 05:53:33 UTC
Ageck Kalenia wrote:
2. Linux was already gaining ground in traditional desktop environments BEFORE Windows 8. I fully expect my current PC to be the last Windows PC I will ever own, and possibly last PC I will ever own. Linux is ALREADY the world's most ubiquitous operating system, running on everything from servers to consoles to Android phones. Linux didn't need to conquer the desktop to conquer the world; the world simply found something better, and it happened to use Linux - or at least its kernel.


Uhm. Windows runs on Servers, consoles, mobile phones, embedded systems, tablets - you name it. Linux is not exactly the "most ubiquitous operating system" in the world, now is it?
Merin Ryskin
Peregrine Industries
#428 - 2013-02-06 06:32:11 UTC
Ageck Kalenia wrote:
3. Given the dismay with which gamers and developers alike greeted Windows 8, it's already safe to bet we'll see more PC titles released for Linux in the coming years.


You mean we'll see more titles released for windows 7, just like how gamers hated vista and kept their XP systems instead of changing to linux. You know that upgrades aren't mandatory, right?

Quote:
4. No, the PC will never go away - just as shortwave radio never went away. But they will no longer be "personal computers". They will simply be full-sized computers, often hand-built by hobbyists, gamers, and power users - those with the money, knowledge, and enthusiasm for expensive and exotic components.


And business. People who have to use a PC for work aren't going to switch to iWhatevers any time in the foreseeable future. So when you combine the people who have a computer for work and the people who want a PC for other reasons (including complete dominance of the gaming market outside of solitaire and facebook games) you have plenty of market to support the PC industry.

Quote:
5. "Normal" people will embrace the burgeoning power, capacity, and flexibility of mobile devices.


You mean by connecting a keyboard/mouse/monitor/speakers/etc to their mobile device and turning it into a PC with low-end hardware? The simple fact is that a mobile device is worthless for doing anything but checking your email and playing facebook games, it's a nice replacement for your old phone but it's never going to do any serious work or gaming. So for the foreseeable future we're going to have PCs, or things that are functionally equivalent to PCs.


PS: a PC is not defined by "that big box that sits under your desk". If you use a sensible definition (IOW based on its function, not how it looks) a PC is defined by its interface, operating system, hardware capabilities, etc. So a "mobile device" running windows that comes with a keyboard/mouse/monitor and has decent hardware specs is going to run EVE just like a current PC. Merely changing the name from "PC" to "iThing" is irrelevant.

Quote:
6. This transforming digital landscape offers no room for a game like EVE-Online, at least in its current form. EVE will become a relic of the last decade, treasured by enthusiasts and elitists, but generally ignored by the mainstream gaming market. The time to address and plan for this future is now, but CCP seems more content to play with criminal flags and hand out donut holders. What's wrong with this picture?


Blah blah blah more marketing nonsense. It's very easy to write grammatically correct but information-free sentences about "the transforming digital landscape" but it's a lot harder to say WHY things are going to change. So far all you've done is confuse "I can play solitaire on the bus" with "I found my new gaming system to replace EVE".
Provence Tristram
Doomheim
#429 - 2013-02-06 06:43:50 UTC  |  Edited by: Provence Tristram
Ageck Kalenia wrote:
5. "Normal" people will embrace the burgeoning power, capacity, and flexibility of mobile devices. These devices will satisfy the needs of average users, adapting, connecting, and updating seamlessly as they move from place to place and task to task. How exactly they adapt to replace PCs is less relevant than the fact that they are doing it. Average users of the future will have no more need for a full-size PC than they have need for a phone book today.


Guess I'm not 'normal' then, since myself and everyone I know still views the people who cannot be away from their iPhone for more than 30 seconds as delinquent hipsters. I want nothing to do with those people, and I will never become one. I will also never move on from the desktop PC. And while Windows 8 may be bad, people were saying the same damned thing about 7 when it debuted. They cleaned things up relatively well with that OS, and I have no doubts they will clean things up with this one.

The Linux crowd is in many ways worse than the Apple crowd, because where the Apple people have at least erected themselves a spartan-but-dingy little fortress from which they can shout hurl at the glittering palaces of PCdom, Linux people are like the dirty, penniless vagabond clawing at the door and begging for alms. You speak of 'your time' fast approaching, yet for the past two decades the status quo has remained rigidly entrenched. I see no reason to believe these lunatic claims about the end of the PC now.

Go back to your highway with your cardboard sign, scribbled with the words 'the end is nigh -- will expose myself for a meal.'
Eija-Riitta Veitonen
State War Academy
Caldari State
#430 - 2013-02-06 08:17:38 UTC
Ageck Kalenia wrote:
3. Given the dismay with which gamers and developers alike greeted Windows 8, it's already safe to bet we'll see more PC titles released for Linux in the coming years. The stability, customization, and spectacular performance of Linux is something the PC gaming community sorely needs, and now seems prepared to accept.

You're forgetting the little fact that releasing Win8 doesn't make the older versions to automagically disappear into thin air. People will be using older version until a suitable replacement is found. This has already happened, at least twice - in 2000 when Windows ME was released, people stayed with the Win98SE, and in 2007 with Windows Vista, when people clung on to their XP installations, and some even still do to date. Markets didn't change much back then, why should they do now? As far as i can see, the only thing that can actually rip the PC dominance from windows is an utter ****-up on microsoft's part and a new strong opponent OS that has the compatibility with existant windows-platform software. And so far i doubt any of those are going to happen in the foreseeable future.

Ageck Kalenia wrote:
4. No, the PC will never go away - just as shortwave radio never went away. But they will no longer be "personal computers". They will simply be full-sized computers, often hand-built by hobbyists, gamers, and power users - those with the money, knowledge, and enthusiasm for expensive and exotic components.

Ofcourse PC will never go away. There will always be requirements for certain business activities that require a stationary workplace with high processing power, familiar and comfortable interfaces, something that PC does very well. Yes, mobile technologies will grow in power and prolification, will most likely creep in on the traditional PC segment, just like Laptops/Notebooks did in the last few decades, yet even those closest competitors did not kill the PC, so i certainly doubt more mobile devices, like tablets, phones, you name it, will.
The shape of the PC as we know will change over time, adopting new technologies, shedding off the old ones (floppies, anyone?), they even may not hold the title of a PC any longer, but all-in-all, the PC as we know it is here to stay. And so is the PC gaming. Because if you own a powerful hardware station you work on, why wouldn't you play games on it in the spare time?
And, by the way, you know the reason why PC sales look to be smaller than those of laptops? Because people usually buy them complete, but there is no proven techhnique to trace the number of sold PCs, because they are sold in many different ways: people are buying separate parts to build their own, buy on-site built pcs from local stores and only a few are actually buying the complete OEM-made systems. And only the latter category actually can be properly traced and quantified, unless you want to run around all of the local stores and ask about how many own-built PCs they have sold.

Ageck Kalenia wrote:
5. "Normal" people will embrace the burgeoning power, capacity, and flexibility of mobile devices. These devices will satisfy the needs of average users, adapting, connecting, and updating seamlessly as they move from place to place and task to task. How exactly they adapt to replace PCs is less relevant than the fact that they are doing it. Average users of the future will have no more need for a full-size PC than they have need for a phone book today.

There is no such thing as a "normal" person. Sure, we can try and pigeonhole everyone into categories, but the whole definition of "normality" changes with time, and in fact does so very rapidly. What is considered "normal" nowadays could have been considered outlandish just a few decades ago. Multi-purpose devices are on the rise nowadays, but there can never be a device that can do everything. Sure, mobile devices and mobile gaming is on the rise now, but it does so mostly at no or minimal impact on the other ones, as users are not restricted to one platform specifically.
Leper ofBacon
HELP GRANDMA SMASH HER LEGS IN
#431 - 2013-02-06 09:55:07 UTC  |  Edited by: Leper ofBacon
Strongly disagree with the OP on the issue of hardware.

For me the issue with gaming platforms almost 100% of the time is at what level of precisions I can interact with games, and therefore how complicated a simulation I can take part in. This comparison also extends to casual gaming/ more engaging gaming for me. For example I can play games on the most advanced tablets on the market but they will never give me the level of control you can have the PC, connected to which I have a full sized keyboard and mouse and a large screen.

That for me is why there will be a market for complex games that require serious hardware. Aside from eve I would cite the popularity of DayZ, another game which attempts risk vs reward style realism and has recently been very popular.

Also, eve's gameplay is so unique that if they can continue to corner this particular market and update the graphics continually then who's to say it will become a relic. I've just come back now after years because there is NOTHING that offers what eve does.
Ziranda Hakuli
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#432 - 2013-02-06 10:26:40 UTC
I keep wondering what the OP is smoking are what got into his head. the Desk Top PC will be around for a very very long time. it will see many changes in the future. for tablets and the like its an awesome. they possess many uses. it is clearly obvious you are tablet fanboy. what color is your tablet? Pink?

Seriously. There is so much going on in the industry for advancing computer technology whther it be a desktop, laptop, tablet. the technology is advancing to a point where CCP possibly has been working on new code and arch layout for Eve that would make implementing new expansions and or patches which would require EVERYONE to down load the version of Eve where the path toy will not work.

So Mr loser Op. nifty things your saying. funny how a Desktop has a better life span then your silly laptop or tablet. yeah quick blowing smoke.

CCP does as CCP does. For those who have been here for ages and were beta babies you know this is true. we do not hold our breath and many of you cry like babies cause Billy took your ball away and kicked sand in your face.

have fun kids
Hrothgar Nilsson
#433 - 2013-02-06 11:01:10 UTC  |  Edited by: Hrothgar Nilsson
Ageck Kalenia wrote:
Frankly, I'm sick of the same tired arguments coming up again and again.

If people debating your suppositions in an informed, intelligent, and reasoned way makes you 'sick', perhaps you ought not to be posting them in the first place.

You can have whatever opinion you'd like, but you're not entitled to be free of criticism and debate when you publish them.

If I may be frank, you come across as a teenager in that phase when they think they know it all.
Ageck Kalenia
Development Holdings
#434 - 2013-02-06 21:19:45 UTC
I see now it was a fallacious waste of effort to post this discussion on a forum inhabited overwhelmingly by Windows PC diehards. It's kind of like going to a convention of wheelwrights and predicting the end of the horse and buggy. I love PCs as much as anyone, but I can also look ahead and see the future of computing lies elsewhere.
Lysanne Reqetta
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#435 - 2013-02-06 21:26:26 UTC
OP seems suspiciously sure of his predictions.

Tell me, o mighty and intelligent Future Man, what stocks should I buy to best capitalize on the invention of the time machine?

Blatant alt posting? In my EVE? It's more likely than you think.

NEVER FORGET - NOVEMBER 2013 - THE GREAT SIGNATURE MASSACRE

Unsuccessful At Everything
The Troll Bridge
#436 - 2013-02-06 21:40:34 UTC
Ageck Kalenia wrote:
I see now it was a fallacious waste of effort to post this discussion on a forum inhabited overwhelmingly by Windows PC diehards. It's kind of like going to a convention of wheelwrights and predicting the end of the horse and buggy. I love PCs as much as anyone, but I can also look ahead and see the future of computing lies elsewhere.


Welcome to the forums. If you cant handle people disagreeing with you, you may want to find another outlet for your manifesto.

Since the cessation of their usefulness is imminent, may I appropriate your belongings?

Merin Ryskin
Peregrine Industries
#437 - 2013-02-06 23:20:01 UTC
Ageck Kalenia wrote:
I see now it was a fallacious waste of effort to post this discussion on a forum inhabited overwhelmingly by Windows PC diehards. It's kind of like going to a convention of wheelwrights and predicting the end of the horse and buggy. I love PCs as much as anyone, but I can also look ahead and see the future of computing lies elsewhere.


It was a waste of time to post an endless supply of zero-content marketing nonsense. It has nothing to do with "PC diehards", you just utterly failed to offer any kind of support for your theory besides "OMG THE NEW IPHONE IS SO COOL!!!!!!". But feel free to tell yourself you "won" and blame everything besides your own failure to do any research beyond reading an iWhatever advertisement.
Hrothgar Nilsson
#438 - 2013-02-07 00:03:06 UTC
Ageck Kalenia wrote:
I see now it was a fallacious waste of effort to post this discussion on a forum inhabited overwhelmingly by Windows PC diehards. It's kind of like going to a convention of wheelwrights and predicting the end of the horse and buggy. I love PCs as much as anyone, but I can also look ahead and see the future of computing lies elsewhere.

It seems you weren't interested in discussion at all, but rather expected people to accept your suppositions uncritically without question.

Speaking of fallacies, rather glaringly one stuck out in particular - lauding the 122 million number without context. Absent was any mention that these tablets/smartphones are discarded at nearly same rate they are purchased.

Or implying smartphones (probably about 80%+ of these ARM sales) are somehow a substitute good for a PC, when really only a tablet is, and only for those with rather basic/limited needs.
Christopher Caldaris
Caldaris Enterprises LLC
#439 - 2013-02-07 01:04:11 UTC
If you think the PC is becoming obsolete you are about 30 years too far ahead.

If you spent $4000 on a gaming PC you overspent by $3500.

I feel sorry for you OP.
Eija-Riitta Veitonen
State War Academy
Caldari State
#440 - 2013-02-07 05:20:57 UTC  |  Edited by: Eija-Riitta Veitonen
OP seems to be one of the bunch that predicted an end of the world on Dec 21st 2012. Now, since that didn't happen, he's on to predicting the end of PCs...