These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Jita Park Speakers Corner

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

The Future of Highsec - New CSM Candidates?

First post
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Galaxy Pig
New Order Logistics
CODE.
#41 - 2013-02-04 02:42:30 UTC
Tarvos Telesto wrote:
Ustrello wrote:
Tarvos Telesto wrote:
Wescro wrote:
Tarvos Telesto wrote:
James 315 broke eula rules long time ago, wonder he still here, things like " pay me virtual goods or you wont be able to play eve" is harresment and action against eula, ofc is my opinion.

Ps.Im not miners defender and im not against idea to make miners life in eve harder etc, hovewer i think his behavoir broke meny eula points, as you see you can avoid eula if CCP decide to give you VIP status ;)


It's your opinion that asking for ISK in exchange for not ganking is against the EULA? How is that an opinion? Do you know what an opinion is?

That's like me saying it's my opinion that the Earth is flat...

Moreover, if you think asking payment in return for safety is harassment, I'd love to hear what you have to say about straight up ganking, no negotiations involved. =)


Kamikaze atacks are ok, they are part of game and part of risk, while harrasing people by forcing them to pay isk because i do x thing to you are totaly against eula, stalking and harassment are agains eula.

Here we go with eula.

Read point 1 and 4, where you can see that (James 315 "role-playing" playing cant be used as excuse)
http://community.eveonline.com/pnp/terms.asp


Well seeing how ccp said miner bumping is ok and have not acted on hundreds of petitions pretty sure it isn't againt the eula. But try harder


Miners bumping is ok because EvE is santbox where people can do what they want, end even harassmen is against eula CCP alow this kind of harassment, because lack of definition what is good or what is bad, hovewer like you mention here for sure hundreds of petitions form people who feel that somone harrasing them.

I can compare "Give me isk or you wont be able to play EvE" to give me isk or i spam your mailbox everyday and every day i will spam your private message window, Thank God it never happens because of block mechanic which protect people from idiots.



I challenge you to provide one example of James 315 or the New Order ever preventing someone from playing EVE. We've stopped a lot of miners from mining, but never interfered with their right to sit in station and spin their ship.

On the contrary, many Highsec dwellers played EVE for their very first time due to James 315 and the New Order.

James 315 for CSM 8!

Highsec is owned by players now. Systems 0.5-1.0 are New Order Territory. All miners and other residents of Highsec must obey The Code. Mining without a permit is dangerous and harmful to the EVE community. See www.MinerBumping.com
Hannah Flex
#42 - 2013-02-04 02:55:11 UTC
How much isk/hr would i make by voting and can it be done AFK??
Christopher Caldaris
Caldaris Enterprises LLC
#43 - 2013-02-04 03:00:05 UTC
This is quite possibly the worst idea in the history of bad ideas.
Karrl Tian
Doomheim
#44 - 2013-02-04 03:34:32 UTC  |  Edited by: Karrl Tian
There was a CSM rep from highsec, "Ankdrivesamini" or something like that. If I recall right, she, wanted to see pirates lose SP, sec status loss be permanent and then got booted off the council for breaking a NDA.

Anyway, Highsec doesn't need a rep, they vote with their wallets. P.
Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe
#45 - 2013-02-04 03:40:05 UTC
Galaxy Pig wrote:
I challenge you to provide one example of James 315 or the New Order ever preventing someone from playing EVE. We've stopped a lot of miners from mining, but never interfered with their right to sit in station and spin their ship.

On the contrary, many Highsec dwellers played EVE for their very first time due to James 315 and the New Order.

James 315 for CSM 8!

Exactly, James 315 actually was making them play EVE. Left alone they would not have played EVE, instead being afk.

James 315, the candidate highsec needs.

Triggered by: Wars of Sovless Agression, Bending the Knee, Twisting the Knife, Eating Sov Wheaties, Bombless Bombers, Fizzlesov, Interceptor Fleets, Running Away, GhostTime Vuln, Renters, Bombs, Bubbles ?
Vin King
State War Academy
Caldari State
#46 - 2013-02-04 04:06:10 UTC
315 4 CSM8.

I can't think of a better candidate. James has taken so much of his free time to make sure that the miners of HiSec have a chance to be welcomed, meet new friends, and feel like part of something. The New Order is a gracious group of people, willing to help new players out, and go out of their way to spread friendship throughout all of HiSec.

HiSec is a better place for having who cares so much about the people in it. Seeing the democratically elected Savior of HiSec in the CSM is one of the best things that could happen to this community.

Proud member of the New Order of HighSec
Peter Raptor
Galactic Hawks
#47 - 2013-02-04 04:28:15 UTC
Vin King wrote:
315 4 CSM8.

I can't think of a better candidate. James has taken so much of his free time to make sure that the miners of HiSec have a chance to be welcomed, meet new friends, and feel like part of something. The New Order is a gracious group of people, willing to help new players out, and go out of their way to spread friendship throughout all of HiSec.

HiSec is a better place for having who cares so much about the people in it. Seeing the democratically elected Savior of HiSec in the CSM is one of the best things that could happen to this community.


I think Im gonna puke Lol

Evelopedia; 

The Amarr Empire, is known for its omnipresent religion  †  
Karl Hobb
Imperial Margarine
#48 - 2013-02-04 05:34:57 UTC
Do I have time to sub a few more accounts to vote for James 315? As it stands, I'm torn on this. As a shareholder, I feel it is my duty to vote for James 315 and a better high-sec. As a non-AFK player of the game, I feel my votes are best spent on Malcanis and a better high-sec.

Decisions...

A professional astro-bastard was not available so they sent me.
Mallak Azaria
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#49 - 2013-02-04 07:12:41 UTC
Karl Hobb wrote:
Do I have time to sub a few more accounts to vote for James 315? As it stands, I'm torn on this. As a shareholder, I feel it is my duty to vote for James 315 and a better high-sec. As a non-AFK player of the game, I feel my votes are best spent on Malcanis and a better high-sec.

Decisions...


Go half & half. Malcanis & James 315 are both great candidates.

This post was lovingly crafted by a member of the Goonwaffe Posting Cabal, proud member of the popular gay hookup site somethingawful.com, Spelling Bee, Grammar Gestapo & #1 Official Gevlon Goblin Fanclub member.
Benny Ohu
Royal Amarr Institute
Amarr Empire
#50 - 2013-02-04 08:24:44 UTC
Yeah, unless someone pretty bloody amazing begins campaigning I'll be voting for James and Malcanis, too.

I've been reading James' writing since Manifesto Two. When he announced his taking of the Halaima system I didn't think much of it - who could have imagined his New Order thing would catch on and become as powerful as it is today? I want to vote for him because I love his blog and I think voting for him would be funny, but I also believe he could do a great job if he wanted to. James believes in the highsec and emergent gameplay I want to see in EVE. He's intelligent and capable.

Although I'm still not sure how seriously he'd take the CSM if he was voted up, which is a bit of a worry vOv
Ghazu
#51 - 2013-02-04 09:39:56 UTC
DeMichael Crimson wrote:
Agent Eunoli wrote:


James 315 stands for making Highsec an enjoyable and interactive region of space for all players. A place where players don't feel that to "play" the game they "have" to go AFK. James 315 will bring a vision of Highsec that is clearly articulated and important for the game at its current state of development.

Now is the time for us, the players of EVE, to start looking at the various CSM candidates and to start making some noise about what we are looking for. The future of the game is impacted by the CSM and, in theory, the CSM are chosen by the players to represent the players.


Shocked

James 315 is nothing more than a Barracuda.

James 315 has promoted a lot of Heartless actions towards high security citizens.

James 315 would have been dusted a long time ago If Looks Could Kill.

James 315 is gonna have to Even It Up a lot before he get's high security votes.

Roll



DMC

idgi

http://www.minerbumping.com/ lol what the christ https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=2299984#post2299984
Akrasjel Lanate
Immemorial Coalescence Administration
Immemorial Coalescence
#52 - 2013-02-04 11:20:12 UTC
Hahaha Lol
Nice troll Roll

CEO of Lanate Industries

Citizen of Solitude
Kainotomiu Ronuken
koahisquad
#53 - 2013-02-04 11:22:27 UTC
Akrasjel Lanate wrote:
Hahaha Lol
Nice troll Roll

I'm at a loss as to your reasoning. Why is this a troll?
Malcanis
Vanishing Point.
The Initiative.
#54 - 2013-02-04 11:53:42 UTC
Karl Hobb wrote:
Do I have time to sub a few more accounts to vote for James 315? As it stands, I'm torn on this. As a shareholder, I feel it is my duty to vote for James 315 and a better high-sec. As a non-AFK player of the game, I feel my votes are best spent on Malcanis and a better high-sec.

Decisions...


Why not defer your decision until the man himself announces he's running...?

"Just remember later that I warned against any change to jump ranges or fatigue. You earned whats coming."

Grath Telkin, 11.10.2016
Benny Ohu
Royal Amarr Institute
Amarr Empire
#55 - 2013-02-04 11:59:50 UTC
You mean James? He has.
Singular Snowflake
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#56 - 2013-02-04 11:59:54 UTC  |  Edited by: Singular Snowflake
Malcanis wrote:
Karl Hobb wrote:
Do I have time to sub a few more accounts to vote for James 315? As it stands, I'm torn on this. As a shareholder, I feel it is my duty to vote for James 315 and a better high-sec. As a non-AFK player of the game, I feel my votes are best spent on Malcanis and a better high-sec.

Decisions...


Why not defer your decision until the man himself announces he's running...?

http://www.minerbumping.com/2013/02/james-315-for-csm-campaign-opens-with.html
Edit: I have been beaten Oops
Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
#57 - 2013-02-04 14:08:38 UTC  |  Edited by: Jonah Gravenstein
Looks like we're getting some decent candidates for CSM this year, as a single account holder I'm somewhat torn between Malcanis and James 315.

Looks like we're living in interesting times.

In the beginning there was nothing, which exploded.

New Player FAQ

Feyd's Survival Pack
Karl Hobb
Imperial Margarine
#58 - 2013-02-04 15:23:03 UTC
Malcanis wrote:
Karl Hobb wrote:
Do I have time to sub a few more accounts to vote for James 315? As it stands, I'm torn on this. As a shareholder, I feel it is my duty to vote for James 315 and a better high-sec. As a non-AFK player of the game, I feel my votes are best spent on Malcanis and a better high-sec.

Decisions...

Why not defer your decision until the man himself announces he's running...?

Whether James gets my second vote really comes down to how serious he is about his candidacy, so I'll be voting pretty late. Besides, I may just make a deal with a friend to resub his two accounts for a month and not have to worry about this.

A professional astro-bastard was not available so they sent me.
Kainotomiu Ronuken
koahisquad
#59 - 2013-02-04 15:31:08 UTC
Karl Hobb wrote:
Malcanis wrote:
Karl Hobb wrote:
Do I have time to sub a few more accounts to vote for James 315? As it stands, I'm torn on this. As a shareholder, I feel it is my duty to vote for James 315 and a better high-sec. As a non-AFK player of the game, I feel my votes are best spent on Malcanis and a better high-sec.

Decisions...

Why not defer your decision until the man himself announces he's running...?

Whether James gets my second vote really comes down to how serious he is about his candidacy, so I'll be voting pretty late. Besides, I may just make a deal with a friend to resub his two accounts for a month and not have to worry about this.

You don't make a speech in front of a crowd of several hundred capsuleers to announce your candidacy unless you're actually serious about running.
Karl Hobb
Imperial Margarine
#60 - 2013-02-04 15:55:13 UTC
Kainotomiu Ronuken wrote:
Karl Hobb wrote:
Whether James gets my second vote really comes down to how serious he is about his candidacy, so I'll be voting pretty late. Besides, I may just make a deal with a friend to resub his two accounts for a month and not have to worry about this.

You don't make a speech in front of a crowd of several hundred capsuleers to announce your candidacy unless you're actually serious about running.

I quite agree. Perhaps I should have said "how serious he is about his possible CSM seat." Unlike a lot of "casual" players, I take the CSM seriously because I see real value in it. No insults meant here, I am just as serious about a James vote.

A professional astro-bastard was not available so they sent me.