These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Jita Park Speakers Corner

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Suggesting James 315 as the Highsec representative for CSM 8

First post First post
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
SPIONKOP
Spaghetti Cannon
Sentinels Amongst Warriors
#121 - 2013-02-03 22:49:32 UTC
The guy is a Cyber Bully, a known scammer and extortionist who continues to scam.

I would suggest that as the The Mittani can't stand due to his very public Cyber Bully episode and ban this person will follow a similar doctrine and encourage Cyber Bullying in Eve and maybe take it to a new level.

To allow this bully to represent players in Eve would be a bad move for all players who want a balanced game.


Anyone But James, he is just a Cult. (I said C U L T, no N in here).

______________________________




Kainotomiu Ronuken
koahisquad
#122 - 2013-02-03 22:53:33 UTC
SPIONKOP wrote:
The guy is a Cyber Bully, a known scammer and extortionist who continues to scam.

I would suggest that as the The Mittani can't stand due to his very public Cyber Bully episode and ban this person will follow a similar doctrine and encourage Cyber Bullying in Eve and maybe take it to a new level.

To allow this bully to represent players in Eve would be a bad move for all players who want a balanced game.


Anyone But James, he is just a Cult. (I said C U L T, no N in here).

______________________________





Can you define 'cyber bully' and 'balanced game', please, and then tell us all how James relates to those two definitions.
Ustrello
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#123 - 2013-02-03 23:00:20 UTC
SPIONKOP wrote:
The guy is a Cyber Bully, a known scammer and extortionist who continues to scam.

I would suggest that as the The Mittani can't stand due to his very public Cyber Bully episode and ban this person will follow a similar doctrine and encourage Cyber Bullying in Eve and maybe take it to a new level.

To allow this bully to represent players in Eve would be a bad move for all players who want a balanced game.


Anyone But James, he is just a Cult. (I said C U L T, no N in here).

______________________________






Bingo pieces for the bingo throne
admiral root
Red Galaxy
#124 - 2013-02-03 23:00:45 UTC  |  Edited by: admiral root
SPIONKOP wrote:
The guy is a Cyber Bully, a known scammer and extortionist who continues to scam.


Honestly, why do you bother playing a game when the perfectly acceptable in-game actions of other players upset you so much?

SPIONKOP wrote:
I would suggest that as the The Mittani can't stand due to his very public Cyber Bully episode


While I don't claim to be a space lawyer, didn't CCP state that Mittens would be permitted to run again if he wanted? Also, saying something incredibly insensitive while drunk does not constitute bullying.

SPIONKOP wrote:
To allow this bully to represent players in Eve would be a bad move for all players who want a balanced game.


You don't want a balanced game. You want a game that is radically unbalanced in favour of your own playstyle. A game that would be not-Eve.

SPIONKOP wrote:
Anyone But James, he is just a Cult. (I said C U L T, no N in here).


One man, no matter how awesome, cannot a cult be. He's a rockstar, you just haven't accepted that you're a fan yet.

No, your rights end in optimal+2*falloff
Ricky the Rat
Ephemeral Cartography
#125 - 2013-02-04 00:13:31 UTC  |  Edited by: Ricky the Rat
SPIONKOP wrote:
To allow this bully to represent players in Eve would be a bad move for all players who want a balanced game.


But a GREAT move for those who want an unbalanced game... Equilibrium eventually decays into stagnation. Think of him as a spoon stirring up the pulp in your morning glass of ice cold orange juice, so that the final gulp doesn't clog your throat and choke you to death... Besides, one person's balance is another's handcuffs...
Lin Suizei
#126 - 2013-02-04 04:53:08 UTC
SPIONKOP wrote:
The guy is a Cyber Bully, a known scammer and extortionist who continues to scam.

I would suggest that as the The Mittani can't stand due to his very public Cyber Bully episode and ban this person will follow a similar doctrine and encourage Cyber Bullying in Eve and maybe take it to a new level.

To allow this bully to represent players in Eve would be a bad move for all players who want a balanced game.


Anyone But James, he is just a Cult. (I said C U L T, no N in here).

______________________________



A vote for James is a vote for more quality posting.

Lol I can't delete my forum sig.
TheGunslinger42
All Web Investigations
#127 - 2013-02-04 08:38:27 UTC
SPIONKOP wrote:
The guy is a Cyber Bully, a known scammer and extortionist who continues to scam.

I would suggest that as the The Mittani can't stand due to his very public Cyber Bully episode and ban this person will follow a similar doctrine and encourage Cyber Bullying in Eve and maybe take it to a new level.

To allow this bully to represent players in Eve would be a bad move for all players who want a balanced game.


Anyone But James, he is just a Cult. (I said C U L T, no N in here).

______________________________




For a start, how on earth do you consider him a "bully"? As for "extorting" money from people... so what, that's an intended, legitimate activity in game. You might as well say Candidate X shouldn't be allowed to run for CSM because they fly a drake.

Your arguments range between having no basis to being absolutely absurd.

James 315 for CSM 8!
Lovely Dumplings
My Little Pony Appreciation Corporation
#128 - 2013-02-04 10:24:42 UTC
As a miner who agrees with every part of The New Order, The Code, and James 315, I wholeheartedly support James 315's bid for CSM. I feel that nobody else understands the TRUE issues of highsec, and I shall be proud to call him MY rep!

(seriously, some you industrialists need to think EVE. The more the new order disrupts mining, the more mineral prices will go up. As long as he isn't screwing with you, his actions benefit you. If he IS screwing with you, HTFU.)

www.minerbumping.com
Kainotomiu Ronuken
koahisquad
#129 - 2013-02-04 15:57:06 UTC
Ricky the Rat wrote:
SPIONKOP wrote:
To allow this bully to represent players in Eve would be a bad move for all players who want a balanced game.

But a GREAT move for those who want an unbalanced game... Equilibrium eventually decays into stagnation. Think of him as a spoon stirring up the pulp in your morning glass of ice cold orange juice, so that the final gulp doesn't clog your throat and choke you to death... Besides, one person's balance is another's handcuffs...

I wouldn't even agree with this - the game should be balanced, but not so that nobody can affect anything that anyone else does. Rather it should be balanced so that there is an effective counter to everything, but it is opt-in and you lose something else when you choose that counter - like warp stabs are a counter for scrams, but you lose the fitting slot.
Keisha Mei Ash
Doomheim
#130 - 2013-02-04 16:10:32 UTC
I fully support the theme-parking of Eve.

Anyone but James will be getting my vote!
Kainotomiu Ronuken
koahisquad
#131 - 2013-02-04 16:12:14 UTC
Keisha Mei Ash wrote:
I fully support the theme-parking of Eve.

Anyone but James will be getting my vote!

mynnna?
admiral root
Red Galaxy
#132 - 2013-02-04 16:13:34 UTC
Keisha Mei Ash wrote:
I fully support the theme-parking of Eve.

Anyone but James will be getting my vote!


Wouldn't it be simpler to quit Eve and play one of the eleventy-one other MMOs out there? You know, the ones that are already theme parks?

No, your rights end in optimal+2*falloff
Keisha Mei Ash
Doomheim
#133 - 2013-02-04 16:22:20 UTC  |  Edited by: Keisha Mei Ash
admiral root wrote:
Keisha Mei Ash wrote:
I fully support the theme-parking of Eve.

Anyone but James will be getting my vote!


Wouldn't it be simpler to quit Eve and play one of the eleventy-one other MMOs out there? You know, the ones that are already theme parks?

Simple. Because that wouldn't get me closer to my goal of making pilots of internet spaceships as butthurt as possible. Duh.

Its time for Eve to appeal to more styles of gamers.
admiral root
Red Galaxy
#134 - 2013-02-04 16:28:39 UTC
Keisha Mei Ash wrote:
admiral root wrote:
Keisha Mei Ash wrote:
I fully support the theme-parking of Eve.

Anyone but James will be getting my vote!


Wouldn't it be simpler to quit Eve and play one of the eleventy-one other MMOs out there? You know, the ones that are already theme parks?

Simple. Because that wouldn't get me closer to my goal of making pilots of internet spaceships as butthurt as possible. Duh.


Then I commend you for realising that charity begins at home. Lol

No, your rights end in optimal+2*falloff
Keisha Mei Ash
Doomheim
#135 - 2013-02-04 16:34:32 UTC
admiral root wrote:
Keisha Mei Ash wrote:
admiral root wrote:
Keisha Mei Ash wrote:
I fully support the theme-parking of Eve.

Anyone but James will be getting my vote!


Wouldn't it be simpler to quit Eve and play one of the eleventy-one other MMOs out there? You know, the ones that are already theme parks?

Simple. Because that wouldn't get me closer to my goal of making pilots of internet spaceships as butthurt as possible. Duh.


Then I commend you for realising that charity begins at home. Lol

Um...thanks?
Vin King
State War Academy
Caldari State
#136 - 2013-02-04 18:27:59 UTC
315 4 CSM8!

Proud member of the New Order of HighSec
Llort
A Space Odyssey
#137 - 2013-02-04 18:54:00 UTC
Amazing to see people really argue about the worth of shares in the New Order, I guess it goes to show how much (or rather how little) they understand about James 315 and the New Order.

I support James315 because High Sec needs a change, keep up the current amount of botting iceminers and new players will believe that is all EVE has to offer. The sense of entitlement amongst the botters shows when they file petitions, when they go insane over being bumped and when they seriously try to find out rl data of bumpers in order to stop them.

Play anyway you want, but always keep in mind that EVE is not a single player game, people might interact with you in whatever way they want to play the game. And for the love of all that is holy, keep in mind its a game (did I just say that....) and having a laugh will be much better then going apeshit over lost pixels.
Ila Gant
Hedion University
Amarr Empire
#138 - 2013-02-04 21:43:22 UTC
Frying Doom
#139 - 2013-02-04 21:47:10 UTC
Llort wrote:
Amazing to see people really argue about the worth of shares in the New Order, I guess it goes to show how much (or rather how little) they understand about James 315 and the New Order.

I support James315 because High Sec needs a change, keep up the current amount of botting iceminers and new players will believe that is all EVE has to offer. The sense of entitlement amongst the botters shows when they file petitions, when they go insane over being bumped and when they seriously try to find out rl data of bumpers in order to stop them.

Play anyway you want, but always keep in mind that EVE is not a single player game, people might interact with you in whatever way they want to play the game. And for the love of all that is holy, keep in mind its a game (did I just say that....) and having a laugh will be much better then going apeshit over lost pixels.

I will admit it is hell funny that the people he got billions off for these "shares" are the same ones supporting him. Paying for entrance into the cowards club. Well I suppose it is better for your ego than say going to Null and getting splattered like the bugs you are.

There really is one born every minute.Lol

Any spelling, grammatical and punctuation errors are because frankly, I don't care!!
Winchester Steele
#140 - 2013-02-04 23:22:39 UTC
Frying Doom wrote:
Llort wrote:
Amazing to see people really argue about the worth of shares in the New Order, I guess it goes to show how much (or rather how little) they understand about James 315 and the New Order.

I support James315 because High Sec needs a change, keep up the current amount of botting iceminers and new players will believe that is all EVE has to offer. The sense of entitlement amongst the botters shows when they file petitions, when they go insane over being bumped and when they seriously try to find out rl data of bumpers in order to stop them.

Play anyway you want, but always keep in mind that EVE is not a single player game, people might interact with you in whatever way they want to play the game. And for the love of all that is holy, keep in mind its a game (did I just say that....) and having a laugh will be much better then going apeshit over lost pixels.

I will admit it is hell funny that the people he got billions off for these "shares" are the same ones supporting him. Paying for entrance into the cowards club. Well I suppose it is better for your ego than say going to Null and getting splattered like the bugs you are.

There really is one born every minute.Lol


Or maybe we actually believe in what James stands for. Maybe, just maybe its not a scam and James has an actual well thought out vision for Hi-Sec. If guys like you could get your head out of your ass for 10 seconds and listen to what James has to say you might understand why we as a community have heaped billions of isk and praise on his lap.

Cowards you say? The reality is that some of us live in high-sec because we like high-sec. Its casual and offers lots of short term gameplay options for those of us who are busy. This does not mean that we like our gameplay to be "perfectly safe" as some people espouse. For people like us, like me, where do we turn for representation? Malcanis is an amazing candidate and will surely get elected, but he is not a hi-sec candidate. James 315 is. And while the Supreme Protector plays with a little more flavor than some like, you might be surprised to discover that his official position is intelligent, well thought out and not all that far off from the wisdom of Malcanis.

315 4 CSM 8!!

...