Jita Park Speakers Corner

So what you'll be piloting your ship and expect to have to randomly tank 3 catalysts worth of damage for 15 seconds?
Two step's idea is dumb, just get rid of obvious wardec evasion tactics like NPC corps (instead of pushing an entire wardec-themed expansion while leaving the simplest corphopping practices unaddressed, rendering the whole thing pointless) and let highsec PVPers gorge themselves on these AFK loot pinatas. You see we already have this thing meant to help players combat endless isk and commodity injection into the game - it's called "PVP'.

Well,

regarding NULLsec looking at ideas brought to the table ... I'm affraid that lesson from technetium was not taken,
lesson from drones was not taken aswell.

Creating areas rich in one way will brought another wave of bots.

What I also noticed most ideas will make actual aliances richer instead of bringing more ppl to NULL.

Oh, the irony. I am 100% behind the notion of the bottom-up income model, but who will it benefit the most upon release? The largest alliances currently in-game: Goons and TEST.

EDIT: It should be noted that there is little that CCP can do in terms of adjusting null-sec income potential w/o existing Sov holders reaping the benefit. Back when Tech was buffed 3+ years ago, the Northern Coalition (minus the dawt) reaped [squandered] enormous rewards while the rest of null-sec was left with devalued space and moons.

The best thing that CCP can do is to apply buffs and tweaks across all of null-sec, including -- to some extent -- in the NPC Sov regions.

Why shouldn't existing sov holders benefit from owning their space?

Follow the money. That is a method to fix financial problems. The economy is flooded with easy money from all types of sources. Change it so those players have to actively work for their income.

1) Equalize / balance all the sources of income across similar areas i.e. nulsec income for any given profession should scale based upon security level of system.

2) Correct the broken tax system. Player corps require income, but industrial taxes do not all go to player corps and the "collection" aspect is not automatic for all professions. Equalize / balance all sources of income across all payroll / job types. Anyone training any amount of skill points should be able to potentially earn the same base amount of income, excluding special cases like elite spawns. A player's time spent in any activity should earn them an equal base salary, which in-turn earns a player corporation taxes. Game mechanics should influence players to not hide in npc corps via benefits of a social, economic, or other aspect. This would require removal of any non-active mechanics for income, like planetary interaction (PI)... or just make those professions require more reactive mechanics... kind of like how if you are a miner getting ganked in highsec.

3) Make it easier for all afk activities to be advertised to local, including missions, PI, mining, etc. You want to PI or rat or mine or whatever while you are afk? Fine, but others will see your afk location placed in local after about 5 minutes and be able to come kill you. I actively mine and feel afk miners should not benefit for running a macro.

tldr: In summary, potential for earning is way out of proportion. Player corporation tax system is broken. Make afk player location advertised in local.

Personally I see no problem with bottom up income.

Yes the horror TEST and Goonswarm with their greater number of pilots will possibly get the most as they have the most pilots but even that is not a certainty as it will be he who has the most active characters wins. Which is what it should be.

Same way Sov should be done, by activity. To conquer a systems it should very much be you force the other guy out and then start using the system to remove his hold over it and then increase your own. Not shooting some structures, while your pilots try to remain awake, leaving half the planet out of it due to their TZ and making it hard for casual players to become involved.

look out xdeath goons are after your space

No actually my main objective for Null is that it should be used by players, fun and relatively profitable for them. I say relatively as I believe that dangerous space should be more profitable, my main dislike is that those who risk with POS/Outposts are not as advantage as those that just use NPC facilities.

Why haven't you?

Well if you can fly a T2 Frigate and a T1 Cruiser properly fitted, then that's the bare essentials covered IMO. I note that you've been pretty forthcoming with opinions about nullsec; wouldn't some personal observation be a stronger foundation to base them on than forum noise?