These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
123Next pageLast page
 

Has forum discussion ever resulted in a major change in EvE's gameplay?

Author
Captain Tardbar
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#1 - 2013-02-03 04:03:57 UTC
I'm sitting here typing like mad on occasion and it dawned on me. Only a fraction of the game population uses the forums for various personal reasons and is only logical that CCP not use the forums to make drastic game changes.

And today there was a post in which I had pretty good reasons to reply to but a part of me deep down inside thought "It's not really going to make a difference. CCP isn't going to read my opponents or my post and say: WE NEED TO DO THAT ASAP!"

Can anyone point to any change in EvE that was directly caused by whining, debate, or logical thesis put forward by a forum poster?

Or are we will just verbaly abusing each other because we have a false hope that by doing so CCP will listen to us and magically come to the conclusion that we are right and everyone else is wrong and that they will make changes that will drastically affect large portions of the player base because we as a individual feel that it is right.

Where do we get off on such a world view?

I legitimately want examples so I feel that my efforts are not in vain.

Discuss.

Looking to talk on VOIP with other EVE players? Are you new and need help with EVE (welfare) or looking for advice? Looking for adversarial debate with angry people?

Captain Tardbar's Voice Discord Server

Nicolo da'Vicenza
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#2 - 2013-02-03 04:04:47 UTC
mining barge buffs
Captain Tardbar
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#3 - 2013-02-03 04:08:55 UTC
Nicolo da'Vicenza wrote:
mining barge buffs


I once cited that as an example of CCP being in favor of hi-sec lifestyle because they were afraid of sub loss, and was told by other forum posters that they were planning the changes to mining barges anyways before hulkageddon.

Looking to talk on VOIP with other EVE players? Are you new and need help with EVE (welfare) or looking for advice? Looking for adversarial debate with angry people?

Captain Tardbar's Voice Discord Server

La Nariz
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#4 - 2013-02-03 04:08:57 UTC
Nicolo da'Vicenza wrote:
mining barge buffs


Can't emphasize this enough the forum whining got mining barges their unwarranted EHP buffs.

This post was loving crafted by a member of the Official GoonWaffe recruitment team. Improve the forums, support this idea: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&find=unread&t=345133

Captain Tardbar
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#5 - 2013-02-03 04:14:44 UTC  |  Edited by: Captain Tardbar
La Nariz wrote:
Nicolo da'Vicenza wrote:
mining barge buffs


Can't emphasize this enough the forum whining got mining barges their unwarranted EHP buffs.


How do we know it was forum posts and not petitions plus the cancelation reaons people give?

Did CCP come out and say "Because of the threadnaught, we have decided to give in to your demands!" Can you post a link to that post?

If that is the case why don't they buff null-sec with all the threadnaughts created on it.

Looking to talk on VOIP with other EVE players? Are you new and need help with EVE (welfare) or looking for advice? Looking for adversarial debate with angry people?

Captain Tardbar's Voice Discord Server

Karrl Tian
Doomheim
#6 - 2013-02-03 04:18:05 UTC
La Nariz wrote:
Nicolo da'Vicenza wrote:
mining barge buffs


Can't emphasize this enough the forum whining got mining barges their unwarranted EHP buffs.


Gotta do something while you mine.
Nicolo da'Vicenza
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#7 - 2013-02-03 04:18:16 UTC
Captain Tardbar wrote:
Nicolo da'Vicenza wrote:
mining barge buffs


I once cited that as an example of CCP being in favor of hi-sec lifestyle because they were afraid of sub loss, and was told by other forum posters that they were planning the changes to mining barges anyways before hulkageddon.

oh those other forum posters were also bads
La Nariz
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#8 - 2013-02-03 04:24:41 UTC  |  Edited by: La Nariz
Captain Tardbar wrote:
La Nariz wrote:
Nicolo da'Vicenza wrote:
mining barge buffs


Can't emphasize this enough the forum whining got mining barges their unwarranted EHP buffs.


How do we know it was forum posts and not petitions plus the cancelation reaons people give?

Did CCP come out and say "Because of the threadnaught, we have decided to give in to your demands!" Can you post a link to that post?

If that is the case why don't they buff null-sec with all the threadnaughts created on it.


I do not know why CCP catered to the miner's demands but refuse to fix something that is obviously broken and has been broken for years. I assume its all with the recent trend of highsec pampering or something to do with a timetable they have set, a little information from them here would be awesome. We don't know anything about cancellations or petitions because those are not published but its awful convenient that when a bunch of threads from angry miners popped up CCP decided it was time to "rebalance" mining. It's also very suspicious that CCP decided to change their mind about mining ship EHP at the last moment in the thread discussing it, and doing it before players could provide meaningful input.

The best thing that could probably be done would be to revamp mining entirely and make it considerably less boring as well as more interactive. This would make it easier to identify bots which everyone hates while making mining much less of a newbie killing profession.

This post was loving crafted by a member of the Official GoonWaffe recruitment team. Improve the forums, support this idea: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&find=unread&t=345133

Captain Tardbar
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#9 - 2013-02-03 04:26:02 UTC  |  Edited by: Captain Tardbar
Nicolo da'Vicenza wrote:
Captain Tardbar wrote:
Nicolo da'Vicenza wrote:
mining barge buffs


I once cited that as an example of CCP being in favor of hi-sec lifestyle because they were afraid of sub loss, and was told by other forum posters that they were planning the changes to mining barges anyways before hulkageddon.

oh those other forum posters were also bads


So does that mean CCP supports hi-sec activities because it fears subscription loss?

I mean if CCP wasn't afraid of all those miners on the forums were going to quit, then there was no need to make the barge change?

And if that is true does it really mean that CCP supports the hi-sec, carebear, NPC corp lifestyle?

Obviously, if the forum rage got CCP to make the change, then the gankers obviously did not make much of a counter argument in the numbers needed to cancel out the vote so to say.

[edit]

In that respect... Would you threaten to quit if CCP made the game too carebear in hisec or would you just keep playing in low/null??

Looking to talk on VOIP with other EVE players? Are you new and need help with EVE (welfare) or looking for advice? Looking for adversarial debate with angry people?

Captain Tardbar's Voice Discord Server

Liang Nuren
No Salvation
Divine Damnation
#10 - 2013-02-03 04:28:06 UTC
The Minmatar boost a few years back was a result of forum warrioring. I think you underestimate how information spreads through Eve.

-Liang

I'm an idiot, don't mind me.

Nicolo da'Vicenza
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#11 - 2013-02-03 04:36:02 UTC  |  Edited by: Nicolo da'Vicenza
Captain Tardbar wrote:
Nicolo da'Vicenza wrote:
Captain Tardbar wrote:
Nicolo da'Vicenza wrote:
mining barge buffs


I once cited that as an example of CCP being in favor of hi-sec lifestyle because they were afraid of sub loss, and was told by other forum posters that they were planning the changes to mining barges anyways before hulkageddon.

oh those other forum posters were also bads


So does that mean CCP supports hi-sec activities because it fears subscription loss?

I mean if CCP wasn't afraid of all those miners on the forums were going to quit, then there was no need to make the barge change?

And if that is true does it really mean that CCP supports the hi-sec, carebear, NPC corp lifestyle?

Obviously, if the forum rage got CCP to make the change, then the gankers obviously did not make much of a counter argument in the numbers needed to cancel out the vote so to say.
At one point EVE was much harsher then it was at present. Endless whines by carebears have resulted in increasing safety and bad carebear-oriented expansions introduced with no corroborating boosts in subscription numbers. Likewise, forum complaints convinced CCP to needlessly buff barges in the face of 'mass unsubs' which never happened and never materialized. Clearly, forum complaints are a powerful tool because they are able to convince CCP of things that are plainly untrue, like the "carebear dollar" myth. After Incarna hit the floor, CCP had truth forced upon it and since then it has been updating PVP ships and mechanics (like bounty system, crimewatch and wardecs). The important thing is to continue to expunge the 'carebear dollar' myth from CCP's heads to keep them from being manipulated by selfish gold farmers from inadvertantly destroying EVE with their risk-adverse greed.

Quote:
In that respect... Would you threaten to quit if CCP made the game too carebear in hisec or would you just keep playing in low/null??
I leave that sort of behavior for those who would lie for self-benefit.
Hir Miriel
Elves In Space
#12 - 2013-02-03 04:39:54 UTC
Space, the final frontier, where nobody can hear you type.

Forums are the original social networks, and dang handy for those times where we are stuck with unexciting jobs like mining.

I'm a great fan of forums.

Nothing like busting out the forum-fu and getting dirty with some forum PvP.

I don't think you need specific examples to prove forums work, although no doubt they exist.

The very act of talking changes things.

For example, go shopping and say nothing, then next time chat to a few people, checkout operator and so on.

There is a difference, intangible, but still there.

Here we get to socialise, have a few laughs, explore a few ideas, bash on the bad guys for a bit (CCP) and learn things.

In other words, we have fun.





~ ~~ Thinking inside Schrodinger's sandbox. ~~ ~

Aren Madigan
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#13 - 2013-02-03 04:42:07 UTC
As the sole factor? Unlikely. Usually forums are used to get some insight on some of the views of the playerbase and they use other things to make a final determination. People like blaming whatever they can for changes they don't like or if they don't get what they want, but this really is something that's a middle ground thing.
Urgg Boolean
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#14 - 2013-02-03 04:47:22 UTC  |  Edited by: Urgg Boolean
Shooting monuments and loss of subs gets results. Forums posts - not so much.

Look at the Uni Inv issue. I screamed all over the forums that it was borked on SiSI and they published anyway. Later, they used all the complaints on the forums to fix things most complained about - but initially, the forums were ignored.
Captain Tardbar
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#15 - 2013-02-03 04:50:56 UTC  |  Edited by: Captain Tardbar
Nicolo da'Vicenza wrote:
At one point EVE was much harsher then it was at present. Endless whines by carebears have resulted in increasing safety and bad carebear-oriented expansions introduced with no corroborating boosts in subscription numbers. Likewise, forum complaints convinced CCP to needlessly buff barges in the face of 'mass unsubs' which never happened and never materialized. Clearly, forum complaints are a powerful tool because they are able to convince CCP of things that are plainly untrue, like the "carebear dollar" myth. After Incarna hit the floor, CCP had truth forced upon it and since then it has been updating PVP ships and mechanics (like bounty system, crimewatch and wardecs). The important thing is to continue to expunge the 'carebear dollar' myth from CCP's heads to keep them from being manipulated by selfish gold farmers from inadvertantly destroying EVE with their risk-adverse greed.


So do you believe if you keep posting on the forums that CCP will listen to you or do you feel doomed to be droned out the carebears in the end?

One comment I'd like to make is that it does seem that EvE is at least sustaining its subscription numbers. It has a pretty healthy 50,000 players during peak times during the weekends. Ore prices are up showing that players are churning through ships through some sort of PvP (or bad PvE). From a personal perspective I don't feel that EvE is in danger of going the way of Star Wars Galaxies anytime soon.

Looking to talk on VOIP with other EVE players? Are you new and need help with EVE (welfare) or looking for advice? Looking for adversarial debate with angry people?

Captain Tardbar's Voice Discord Server

Bane Necran
Appono Astos
#16 - 2013-02-03 05:12:03 UTC  |  Edited by: Bane Necran
Wait, nevermind.

Apparently i need to do the sleep thing.

"In the void is virtue, and no evil. Wisdom has existence, principle has existence, the Way has existence, spirit is nothingness." ~Miyamoto Musashi

Whitehound
#17 - 2013-02-03 08:57:46 UTC
No. You can now stop posting, leave the forum and never return. These are not the droids you are looking for.

*waves hand*

Loss is meaningful. Therefore is the loss of meaning likewise meaningful. It is the source of all trolling.

Mr Epeen
It's All About Me
#18 - 2013-02-03 09:02:01 UTC
Thread Title wrote:


Has forum discussion ever resulted in a major change in EvE's gameplay?


Yes

Mr Epeen Cool
Kalle Demos
Ironic Corp Name
#19 - 2013-02-03 09:06:34 UTC
CCP read the forums, whether they do anything, that ultimately depends on how many people cry for change and how many people cry agaist the proposed change.

The forums are all about tear generation, the side that produces the most tears wins
Crumplecorn
Eve Cluster Explorations
#20 - 2013-02-03 09:26:30 UTC
Captain Tardbar wrote:
Only a fraction of the game population uses the forums for various personal reasons and is only logical that CCP not use the forums to make drastic game changes.
This does not follow.

Witty Image - Stream

Not Liking this post hurts my RL feelings and will be considered harassment

123Next pageLast page