These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Just want to Share Multiboxing gone mad.
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Marlona Sky
State War Academy
Caldari State
#121 - 2013-02-02 05:03:37 UTC  |  Edited by: Il Feytid
Andski wrote:
oh yeah if we're going to compare the risks in holding tech moons with the risks in hisec ice mining, let's go

if your tech moon gets reinforced, you can either give up and lose the moon when they return after the timer to siege it and drop their own tower, or you can defend it by putting your ships on the field along with triage carriers to rep it past 50% to restront - if hostiles decide to engage anyway, and are successful, you lose a bunch of triage carriers and possibly a fleet, and the only way to get that moon back is to reinforce it yourself, possibly with the need to kite it so that it comes out in a timezone favorable to you - this is not fun or effortless

if your mackinaw gets suicide ganked, you buy another one for a couple hundred mil

so yeah, tech moons are completely effortless and risk-free

Can we compare the fire power needed to take out a large tower vs. a Machinaw too?
Jason Xado
Doomheim
#122 - 2013-02-02 05:30:12 UTC  |  Edited by: Jason Xado
Impresive.

I'm only up to 12 accounts, but who knows where it goes. Like you I like to push limits and see what happens.

You sir are an inspiration :-)

Also people need to understand it doesn't really matter how many miners you multibox. It takes just as long to mine a block of ice with one miner as it does to mine two blocks of ice with two miners. Weather I'm multiboxing one account or a million it takes the same amount of mining. The only thing that doesn't scale is set up time and what not but there are ways to mitigate that.

I do have a question. What do you mean by ISBoxer can't handle more that 16 accounts on one box. What exactly happens? I was hoping to use one box to go more than 16 accounts. My box seems to handle 12 without even blinking if I turn down all the graphic settings and resolution to minimum values.

Anyway, keep up the good work. It's nice to have a hobby :-)

Oh and nice video!
Jack Miton
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#123 - 2013-02-02 05:35:07 UTC
Quote:
bots - no"

*cough*bullsh*t*cough*

at the very least you use key stroke replication.

There is no Bob.

Stuck In Here With Me:  http://sihwm.blogspot.com.au/

Down the Pipe:  http://feeds.feedburner.com/CloakyScout
Jennam Musana
Alternative Management Solutions
#124 - 2013-02-02 05:35:20 UTC  |  Edited by: Jennam Musana
When this fleet first appeared near the system that I frequently min...visit, I packed my junk and moved out immediately Shocked but now that I've been keeping a close eye on this matter I think it's a pretty awesome fleet you got there Blink

I've never seen you actually undock but the video shows it all. \o/

So next time you're about to go mining, send me a message ASAP! :>
Jason Xado
Doomheim
#125 - 2013-02-02 05:37:39 UTC
Jack Miton wrote:
Quote:
bots - no"

*cough*bullsh*t*cough*

at the very least you use key stroke replication.


If by "key stroke replication" you mean broadcasting a keystroke to multiple clients then it is not "botting" and not against the rules.
The Wis
Fise Corp
War and Pestilence
#126 - 2013-02-02 05:38:17 UTC
Jason Xado wrote:
Impresive.

I'm only up to 12 accounts, but who knows where it goes. Like you I like to push limits and see what happens.

You sir are an inspiration :-)

Also people need to understand it doesn't really matter how many miners you multibox. It takes just as long to mine a block of ice with one miner as it does to mine two blocks of ice with two miners. Weather I'm multiboxing one account or a million it takes the same amount of mining. The only thing that doesn't scale is set up time and what not but there are ways to mitigate that.

I do have a question. What do you mean by ISBoxer can't handle more that 16 accounts on one box. What exactly happens? I was hoping to use one box to go more than 16 accounts. My box seems to handle 12 without even blinking if I turn down all the graphic settings and resolution to minimum values.

Anyway, keep up the good work. It's nice to have a hobby :-)

Well for laying out the windows isboxer has no option that I have found for a 17th window. But you can use more then one computer and have 16 per computer. So that will work.
Jason Xado
Doomheim
#127 - 2013-02-02 05:39:52 UTC
The Wis wrote:

Well for laying out the windows isboxer has no option that I have found for a 17th window. But you can use more then one computer and have 16 per computer. So that will work.


Bummer I was hoping to get at least 24 on one box. Oh well, I will experiment and see what I can come up with. Thanks for the heads up :-)
The Wis
Fise Corp
War and Pestilence
#128 - 2013-02-02 05:43:59 UTC
Jack Miton wrote:
Quote:
bots - no"

*cough*bullsh*t*cough*

at the very least you use key stroke replication.

No do not use key stroke replication.. No real need.. Just do what you need on each client and go to the next..

On all 4 mining computers I will pull up all the clients each screen stacked. Use a hot key to undock and then windowskey down arrow to the next client undock repeate. Or undock computer 1 undock computer 2 then 3 then 4 back to 1 warp to belt 2 warp to belt 3 warp to belt then 4 back to 1 start mining minize undock next client computer 2 start mining minimize undoc etc. so just keep doing a circle over all 4 computers for 25 clients per computer. Takes only a few min to get all the guys out to the belt and start mining so then wait about 25 to 30 min with all the clients out. first ones that were sent out should be first ones full do dock up pretty much same thing as before just backwards.

Really not that hard and no need to use bot software.
Brooks Puuntai
Solar Nexus.
#129 - 2013-02-02 05:48:02 UTC
Logging in must be a PITA.

CCP's Motto: If it isn't broken, break it. If it is broken, ignore it. Improving NPE / Dynamic New Eden
Urgg Boolean
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#130 - 2013-02-02 05:54:08 UTC
CCP better hope that you don't decide to quit. If your number is anywhere close to accurate :: $20K/month will pay for about 2 employees + benefits.

Awesome vidz dude. I really like how you showed the same scene from different perspectives and zoomed in from different angles.

We could have made a video of the masstest yesterday using your techniques.

Good job. Good work. It was in real time.
Ohishi
Apocalypse Reign
#131 - 2013-02-02 05:55:24 UTC
Are you the guy that undocked like 30 charons from Jita?

Do not seek to follow in the footsteps of the wise. Seek what they sought.

The Wis
Fise Corp
War and Pestilence
#132 - 2013-02-02 06:12:36 UTC
Urgg Boolean wrote:
CCP better hope that you don't decide to quit. If your number is anywhere close to accurate :: $20K/month will pay for about 2 employees + benefits.

Awesome vidz dude. I really like how you showed the same scene from different perspectives and zoomed in from different angles.

We could have made a video of the masstest yesterday using your techniques.

Good job. Good work. It was in real time.

Thanks.. And it is not 20K a month but 20K a year.
The Wis
Fise Corp
War and Pestilence
#133 - 2013-02-02 06:13:28 UTC
Ohishi wrote:
Are you the guy that undocked like 30 charons from Jita?


No that was not me.
Spurty
#134 - 2013-02-02 06:40:00 UTC
Enjoy ;-)

There are good ships,

And wood ships,

And ships that sail the sea

But the best ships are Spaceships

Built by CCP
Shamus O'Reilly
Candy Cabal
#135 - 2013-02-02 07:04:52 UTC
Bagrat Skalski wrote:
Ice ice baby. Cool

I was waiting to see if someone posted this Lol

"I swear there are more people complaining over "nullsecers complaining" then actual nullsec people complaining."
Agent Akari
Absolute Order XVIII
Absolute Will
#136 - 2013-02-02 08:22:47 UTC
Could you try 100 Dominixes with sentry drones on assist at a nullsec gate? :)
RubyPorto
RubysRhymes
#137 - 2013-02-02 08:39:22 UTC
Agent Akari wrote:
Could you try 100 Dominixes with sentry drones on assist at a nullsec gate? :)


MJD Cloaky WCSed Domis. The ultimate in coward-cats.

"It's easy to speak for the silent majority. They rarely object to what you put into their mouths." -Abrazzar "the risk of having your day ruined by other people is the cornerstone with which EVE was built" -CCP Solomon
enterprisePSI
#138 - 2013-02-02 09:25:58 UTC  |  Edited by: enterprisePSI
Having the page file on the SSD, reduces the life span of the SSD.

ALso, not that impressive, i want to see that fleet destroying asteroid belts. I want to warp to the asteroid belt, and find nothing. Big smile

The tears of the many, outweigh the tears of the few. Or the one. enterprise-psi©
Super spikinator
Hegemonous Conscripts
#139 - 2013-02-02 09:43:13 UTC
The Wis wrote:
silens vesica wrote:
Shocked Holy gankbait, batman!
Somewhere, a belt is about to die.

Unsuccessful At Everything wrote:
Shows video of massive mining fleet undocking to prove hes not a botter....shows no proof of hardware beyond what is typed on screen.

I can take a vidoe of the Jita undock and type whatever I want on the video...and I guess we will all just have to believe that all of Jita is just me controlling 450+ accounts.

Heh. All true. Still an impressive freight train of barges.
James 315 must be spinning like a top.



Thanks. I am working on getting my guys ready for another one.. I want to do 140 Battleships.. Not sure if I want to do all the same or some of everyone..


You should train them all up for capitals. you could be a one man PL.

Anyway, that is very very impressive, I like it how you found what you wanted to do and did it, you make me proud to play this game. Don't worry about James315, he only goes after the bots and their aspirants, you seem to be almost code compliant (just need to pay 1B isk....)
Hir Miriel
Elves In Space
#140 - 2013-02-02 09:57:19 UTC
We are Miners. You will be assimilated.

~ ~~ Thinking inside Schrodinger's sandbox. ~~ ~