These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Intergalactic Summit

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

After Action Report: Mito, YC115.01.29, circa 20:00 hours

Author
Seriphyn Inhonores
Elusenian Cooperative
#61 - 2013-01-31 21:42:49 UTC
Obey.
BloodBird
The Crucible.
#62 - 2013-01-31 22:07:48 UTC
Ohminen Sin wrote:
*worthless*


Your claims hold as much value as your life - less than nothing.

Perhaps the clear facts will be revealed to the public sometime - I am not betting on it - but the FACTS will not be revealed by the likes of you.


Solarienne wrote:
An awful lot of Jaiji see fit to discuss State activity in this thread, without realising one simple fact; We don't answer to Jaiji filth.

This is the reason we flipped off the Federation, and will continue to be the reason for every State citizen to have a duty of absolute loyalty to their mandated betters in the corporate hierarchy. The foreign menace as represented by 'do-gooder' intentions masking attempts to undermine our resolve, morale and way of life is only one form of insidious psychological warfare aimed to try and foment treason such as that the actions of IDA represent.

Stand strong citizens, capsuleer or baseliner, and listen to Jaiji words only to analyse what poison they are laden with so we may better defend ourselves against them. You who swear to protect the State, or who owe your lives to it by virtue of being born to and raised by the corporate system, remember this; IDA represent a shame worse than death. Better they had been obliterated and forgotten, than to bear the name 'Guri' into their twilight years.

Loyalty will be rewarded, dissent will not be tolerated.


My my, aren't we edgy.

Turning off your translator to let 'Jaiji' show through - we know what that means by the way - is a sad way to enforce your own brand of cultural imperialism, treating foreigners with contempt, for the 'crime' of being foreigners. This is the same kind of thing that many State Nationals have complained about for years, but apparently it's perfectly fine when applied to others.

Of course you don't answer to foreigners. But this is the IGS - the INTERGALACTIC Summit - and any Capsuleer from anywhere can speak here and offer their questions and opinions as they please. That don't mean you will like what they have to say, but that does mean you can be the better person - lay off the absurd levels of paranoia and venomous hatred - and treat them with the respect they are due, as fellow Humans.

I mean, let's be honest here, you care about your State, much like other Nationals care about theirs, but still you see fit to treat their words and opinion with rethoric like this: "foreign menace", "masked attempts to undermine your [The State's] resolve, morale and way of life", and "listen to [foreigner] words only to analyze what poison they are laden with so [the State] may better defend itself against it". At the end of the day, you are apparently a loyal State Nationalist, and I as an example consider myself a loyal Intaki and Federal, but the opinions of me and mine are apparently worthless to you by default. Very interesting, to say the least, considering that - again as an example - I reserve this kind of treatment for more deserving targets, (the Gurista scum above being an example) and not fellow Nationals.

Finally, I wonder if you honestly believe that the only thing a 'foreigner' wants is to ruin your nation's way of life by any means, public words and opinion included? If this is the case, I feel genuinely sorry for you - I remember years ago when most State Nationals - not just a specific few, like it is today - could hold a civil conversation in public and get their beliefs and views through, without this shameful behaviour.

I have a good idea about what the answer to this question is, but what in Ida's name happened to you people since that time? Where did the respectable, honorable, and reasonable State citizen go?
BloodBird
The Crucible.
#63 - 2013-01-31 22:37:18 UTC  |  Edited by: BloodBird
Veikitamo Gesakaarin wrote:
Rinai Vero wrote:

Here is my issue: Why was IDA attacked by the Caldari Providence Directorate in the first place? So they're "considered venal" and "barely tolerated" (I was finally able to bring up the appropriate corporate profile, by the way Stitcher) by the Megacorps. I get it. Their profile also clearly says "Caldari State." Since when did "happily selling" your service to the highest bidder become a practice worthy of extrajudicial attack within the State?


Would you be able to link me to the full and total disclosures of all operations conducted by the Special Department of Internal Investigations of the Federal Intelligence Office or at the very least tell me if it is in fact possible for a Federal citizen to file a Freedom of Information request about an organization that operates outside the scope of the law and is beholden only it seems to President Roden?

No?

Perhaps one must often accept that relevant authorities can and will withhold information regarding their operations if they deem it necessary and in the national interest.

No need to throw stones when you're in the glasshouse as they say.


Pot and kettle argument. Honestly, the topic at hand for the person you responded to was "where was the justification for the actions commited by the CPD, we can't seem to find it" and you counter argue with pointing out the shady nature of the SDII.

We are not discussing the SDII in here. If you wish to do so, feel free to start a new topic about them. In here however, you can answer the questions regarding the actions of the CPD, instead of trying to deflect the issue with an easily-transparent tactic.
Desiderya
Blue Canary
Watch This
#64 - 2013-01-31 22:50:01 UTC
That is cultural imperialism?
Guess you never stop learning.

The point you're missing in all of this is that this is a matter of the State and only of it. When foreigners come asking for explaining that needs to be done then I'm whole-heartedly laughing. When federation loyalists are using this to stage the next outrage I'm slightly amused, since they have nothing to gain in all of this with the exception of generating and spreading propaganda in such an obvious way that I'm wondering why I'm wasting my time to reply in the first place.

In the end we've got a situation where the sovereign conducts an operation - police or military - within its own borders that is suddenly creating an outrage first and foremost from traitors, foreigners, enemies of the State and other questionable persons.

In its essence your response isn't better than the one made by the Guristas representative earlier today.

Ruthlessness is the kindness of the wise.

Solarienne
Hrimdraugar
#65 - 2013-01-31 22:59:10 UTC  |  Edited by: Solarienne
BloodBird wrote:

Pot and kettle argument. Honestly, the topic at hand for the person you responded to was "where was the justification for the actions commited by the CPD, we can't seem to find it" and you counter argue with pointing out the shady nature of the SDII.

We are not discussing the SDII in here. If you wish to do so, feel free to start a new topic about them. In here however, you can answer the questions regarding the actions of the CPD, instead of trying to deflect the issue with an easily-transparent tactic.


The CPD can answer for itself, we are not at liberty to make statements on the part of organisations outside ourselves, only make observations. Not that your kind of people have any right demanding answers from rightful State authorities.

For someone wise enough to acknowledge that their words are worthless to me, you still spent a lot of them. I guess if I were easily impressed I'd be flattered.

PY-RE Combat Pilot

BloodBird
The Crucible.
#66 - 2013-02-01 02:15:23 UTC
Desiderya wrote:
That is cultural imperialism?


Indeed, though I would prefer not to go in debt on the topic here, in an effort to prevent derailment.

Desiderya wrote:
The point you're missing in all of this is that this is a matter of the State and only of it. When foreigners come asking for explaining that needs to be done then I'm whole-heartedly laughing. When federation loyalists are using this to stage the next outrage I'm slightly amused,


I am not missing that point at all, I even pointed out to your co-worker that the Caldari State don't answer to anyone but themselves. The point I was making, that you seem to have ignored entirely, was completely different.

When people who are not State nationals question the State's conduct they are all exercising their freedom of speech. Their inquiry may not be respected, it may even be laughed at, especially Federals who inquire - they are after all not even people as far as many State nationals are concerned - but nothing prevents you to simply deny their requests, and ignore any further attempts to ask. That is, after all, in your right. By now you should be used to Federals getting involved where they have little to no business getting involved, and should also know how to ignore or counter such moves.

Desiderya wrote:
since they have nothing to gain in all of this with the exception of generating and spreading propaganda in such an obvious way that I'm wondering why I'm wasting my time to reply in the first place.


So now you are an authority to declare what anyone outside the State have to gain by asking your State what the green hell is going on inside your borders at this time, and are using this authority to declare that "the only thing they gain is generating and spreading propaganda" in an "obvious" way.

/sarcasm
Yes, it's quite obvious, indeed.
/sarcasm

I think you need to see the bigger picture here:

The Caldari State had a nation-wide mobilization of their military rivaling the level seen during the One Day War. THAT is in fact cause for some alarm, or did you honestly think the whole of the Federation - one of your neighbors and a faction you happen to be at war with at this time - would just sit on their hands and do nothing while you act? Perhaps you were indeed that arrogant, but we did not. Following this mobilization you started shelling several locations inside your own nation and in one operation, a Caldari corporation supposedly saw fit to accept an offer of help from the Guristas, of all things. That brings a load of questions, regarding this IDA group, the actions of the CPD, and several other things.

That Federals would ask these questions and get involved is to be expected 100%, and for my part I fully expected that any request from your end would be ignored or answered with nothing at all.

Desiderya wrote:
In the end we've got a situation where the sovereign conducts an operation - police or military - within its own borders that is suddenly creating an outrage first and foremost from traitors, foreigners, enemies of the State and other questionable persons.


See my reply above. When your self-proclaimed enemy who started a war with you for their own gain suddenly start mobilizing their military you have cause for concern, you have the right to ask questions, especially you have the right to wonder what is going on when said enemy suddenly start bombing their own land and one of the results seen so far is driving a part of their own nation right into the hands of the Gurista - an entity that, I might add, is considered an enemy of the Federation.

You can't expect said enemy to share any info with you, of course, but you can still ask, futile though it may be. I have learned what to expect from the State over the years, but many other may not have gained that kind of insight yet. They will learn. Speaking of what I have come to learn over the years...

Desiderya wrote:
In its essence your response isn't better than the one made by the Guristas representative earlier today.


Rather needlessly insulting. Let me repeat the points I were making to your co-worker, Solarienne:

First of all, this is the IGS. Non-Capsuleers can pay to view the Summit and billions do, and Capsuleers can view it and contribute for free, sharing any statement, news, claims, questions or argument they please.

Stitcher saw fit to share an After Action Report regarding an incident in the State and this made the whole affair rather public. In the public, things tend to be talked about and questioned.

Apparently this was unacceptable to your co-worker, Solarinne, who saw fit to inform everyone of how shamelessly low some Caldari have managed to sink. I felt it was time to point out to her that, seeing as though most Caldari consider themselves better than their peers in other nations, it would be a good idea to demonstrate this by actually behaving better than all the non-Caldari, "Jaiji filth" she addressed.

So again, I must ask: Where did all the honorable conduct go? Where did the reasonable behavior, the intelligent arguments, the respectful but firm ability to hold a civilized conversation regardless of differing opinions, go?

I recall a Caldari State that was very different. I recall a State where people could answer questions with reasonable responses, a simple "no" or "You are not privy to this information" would usually follow sticking one's nose where it did not belong, and most other questions or arguments or debates could expect similarly well-placed responses, when applicable.

So what part of making this kind of observation deserves a response along the lines of "Your response is no better than that of a Gurista", Desiderya? Do I deserve ridicule for asking why one of your co-workers can't find it in her heart to behave in a civilized manner when responding to a highly public topic?
BloodBird
The Crucible.
#67 - 2013-02-01 02:20:21 UTC
Solarienne wrote:


The CPD can answer for itself, we are not at liberty to make statements on the part of organisations outside ourselves, only make observations. Not that your kind of people have any right demanding answers from rightful State authorities.

For someone wise enough to acknowledge that their words are worthless to me, you still spent a lot of them. I guess if I were easily impressed I'd be flattered.


Can you hear that, Solarinne? That is the sound of my point flying right over your head.

You missed it. Gather your dishonorable, edgy attitude up and re-read what I adressed to you specifically, then answer me.

If you can. You see, someone like me have asked someone like you a question that do indeed concern you and most other Caldari here and it would be in your best interest not to ignore my questions out of hand.


Scherezad
Revenent Defence Corperation
Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive
#68 - 2013-02-01 05:19:05 UTC
BloodBird wrote:
A lot of words


Hello sir. We haven't had the pleasure of meeting so far. I'm pleased to make your acquaintance. I must apologize for my question, below. I am a poor politician and worse philosopher.

I have read your message over a few times, the longer one specifically, and I admit, I'm rather mystified. You say that it is to be expected that the Gallente would ask questions about Caldari mobilization and actions within their own borders, and that the Caldari would likely refuse to answer these questions. These are both true facts, and have both happened in this thread.

It leaves me to ask myself, what was the point of your letter? The only thing I can imagine you might be saying is that you dislike being insulted, claiming the tone of my esteemed colleagues comments were hurtful. Yet you deigned to call them dishonourable, and used literal sarcasm, in the same posts. I don't therefore imagine this was your point - no doubt such behaviour is beneath a man of your caliber and standing, and you would be aware of such depths of hypocrisy. Could you clarify what you had meant in your post?
BloodBird
The Crucible.
#69 - 2013-02-01 06:34:49 UTC
Scherezad wrote:
BloodBird wrote:
A lot of words


Hello sir. We haven't had the pleasure of meeting so far. I'm pleased to make your acquaintance. I must apologize for my question, below. I am a poor politician and worse philosopher.

I have read your message over a few times, the longer one specifically, and I admit, I'm rather mystified. You say that it is to be expected that the Gallente would ask questions about Caldari mobilization and actions within their own borders, and that the Caldari would likely refuse to answer these questions. These are both true facts, and have both happened in this thread.

It leaves me to ask myself, what was the point of your letter? The only thing I can imagine you might be saying is that you dislike being insulted, claiming the tone of my esteemed colleagues comments were hurtful. Yet you deigned to call them dishonorable, and used literal sarcasm, in the same posts. I don't therefore imagine this was your point - no doubt such behavior is beneath a man of your caliber and standing, and you would be aware of such depths of hypocrisy. Could you clarify what you had meant in your post?


Hello Scherazad. Glad to see your reply here.

I am not sure if your politeness is literally ironic in regards to the topic at hand (it is after all at the core of my argument here, in a way) or if it's your normal mode of address. I am assuming the latter for now.

I am not trying to be political or philosophical, I am simply asking questions regarding conduct and mannerisms. Allow me to elaborate a little.

I have been around for a while. I've read the IGS since before I became a Capsuleer in 107. I have worked with plenty of Caldari of nearly every stripe and held employ with Caldari-centric and majority-Caldari organizations. Over the years I have come to understand some things about the Caldari State's culture in general and know a few things one can expect from most Caldari.

I'm used to a far higher standard of conduct than what has been shown in here. That is at it's core what I'm asking: "Why are your behavior sub-par to my expectations?"

Solarienne flat-out claimed that to her any and all who are not State Nationals are "filthy foreigners" - effectively stating that any non-Caldari (you have to be Caldari to be a citizen in the State) are worthless and that as such, their opinions are as well. This was her basis for writing off any inquiry into this topic from any non-Caldari source as worthless and a waste of time.

From my experience, this is out-right unacceptable. In the State, a basic manner of respect is not only expected - it is enforced. Those who fail to maintain a minimum of "public Face" effectively lose face. I'm sure you are familiar with this concept.

I don't care what you, Solarienne, Desiderya, Stitcher or anyone else really think about me - I am an Intaki and a Federal and thus not only a non-Caldari - worse, I am effectively an 'enemy' - I care about how you behave. I don't expect you to tell me to my face what you really think of me unless we know each other well, there is a level of mutual trust, and you really feel like letting me know. Beyond that I can only imagine what any of you think of me in the comfort and privacy of your homes. However negative that opinion may or may not be, I do not expect to hear of it in a place this public.

Solarienne's conduct is thus Dishonorable - she behaves rudely and with open spite and malice in full view of the public, when instead she could have deflected any inquiry with simple, short and effective deterrents and then further ignored new inquiries or refereed them to the old replies. This would have been exactly as expected, from a Caldari, who are deflecting inquiries into Caldari affairs, by non-Caldari.

This is why I made it clear that I would expect non-compliance and a mixture of silence and deflection from the Caldari present when a few Federal came by to ask questions - just as it is to be expected from the nature of most Federals (and obviously I am generalizing here) to ask about these things, and that they have a right to ask, and that their questions would be either ignored, deflected or answered with what amounts to "We can't and won't tell you anything, stop asking."

So in the end, I wonder where the Caldari mannerisms I am used to have gone, if Solarienne's reply is the new standard to be expected from the State's citizens, and if so, how this came to be.

Desiderya's reply to my original post here was a little puzzling as well - The gurista post offered earlier is a sad attempt to justify the actions of the IDA people who defected to their enemies, and Desiderya literally claimed that my post was "no better" than the one the Gurista made. This is also insulting, because to hear a Caldari equal your words with those of a Gurista - literally a "bad person" - is a heavy-handed way to write my words of as having no value and contributing nothing. No attempt was made by either Solarienne or Desiderya to even reply to my words, they were simply brushed off out of hand.

If I were to refer to either of your esteemed colleagues as dishonorable or use literal sarcasm out of hand, it would indeed be hypocritical of me to draw attention to any faults in their public posting. However both of those were used out of need.

If you have further inquiries ask me. I am out of time right now but I will be available at a later time, and I don't feel that my reply here is entirely sufficient, but it will have to make do for now.
Korsavius
Revenent Defence Corperation
#70 - 2013-02-01 08:24:58 UTC  |  Edited by: Korsavius
BloodBird wrote:
I'm used to a far higher standard of conduct than what has been shown in here. That is at it's core what I'm asking: "Why are your behavior sub-par to my expectations?"

With all due respect, no one is required to behave to your expectations, including my fellow kirjuun.


That said,
BloodBird wrote:
So in the end, I wonder where the Caldari mannerisms I am used to have gone, if Solarienne's reply is the new standard to be expected from the State's citizens, and if so, how this came to be.

Sometimes the brightest flowers aren't always the most pleasant smelling. That doesn't mean, however, that pleasant smelling flowers do not exist.

Cold Wind's Blade || Follow the I-RED Newsfeed & visit the I-RED GalNet site!

Simon Coal
Comstock Daze
#71 - 2013-02-01 08:30:40 UTC
If we seem nosy, it is because we were informed that this action involved something that could threaten the entire cluster. The State may well have that under control, but I do not think it overly forthright of us to think 'pay no mind, but this might kill you all' is, in fact, worth paying a little mind to.

Progressing in that vein, do we know just what this Intara entity was doing that warranted such a statement?
Solarienne
Hrimdraugar
#72 - 2013-02-01 09:04:30 UTC
BloodBird wrote:
Solarienne wrote:


The CPD can answer for itself, we are not at liberty to make statements on the part of organisations outside ourselves, only make observations. Not that your kind of people have any right demanding answers from rightful State authorities.

For someone wise enough to acknowledge that their words are worthless to me, you still spent a lot of them. I guess if I were easily impressed I'd be flattered.


Can you hear that, Solarinne? That is the sound of my point flying right over your head.

You missed it. Gather your dishonorable, edgy attitude up and re-read what I adressed to you specifically, then answer me.

If you can. You see, someone like me have asked someone like you a question that do indeed concern you and most other Caldari here and it would be in your best interest not to ignore my questions out of hand.





You give yourself too much credit. I didn't even bother to glance up from my duties as you threw it out there. If you consider patriotism and the pursuit of cultural integrity to be 'edgy', your nation is closer to hedonistic collapse than even I had assumed. Duty and saying what must be said is a burden and an honour, not a fad.

By the way, you really do talk too much.

PY-RE Combat Pilot

Rinai Vero
Blades of Liberty
#73 - 2013-02-01 09:19:55 UTC
Solarienne wrote:



You give yourself too much credit. I didn't even bother to glance up from my duties as you threw it out there. If you consider patriotism and the pursuit of cultural integrity to be 'edgy', your nation is closer to hedonistic collapse than even I had assumed. Duty and saying what must be said is a burden and an honour, not a fad.

By the way, you really do talk too much.


I guess if I were easily intimidated, I'd be scared.
Solarienne
Hrimdraugar
#74 - 2013-02-01 09:31:31 UTC
Rinai Vero wrote:
Solarienne wrote:



You give yourself too much credit. I didn't even bother to glance up from my duties as you threw it out there. If you consider patriotism and the pursuit of cultural integrity to be 'edgy', your nation is closer to hedonistic collapse than even I had assumed. Duty and saying what must be said is a burden and an honour, not a fad.

By the way, you really do talk too much.


I guess if I were easily intimidated, I'd be scared.


I like you, you've got the right attitude. Shame you're on the wrong side of the fence.

PY-RE Combat Pilot

Alizabeth Vea
Doomheim
#75 - 2013-02-01 10:14:52 UTC
Solarienne wrote:
Rinai Vero wrote:
Solarienne wrote:



You give yourself too much credit. I didn't even bother to glance up from my duties as you threw it out there. If you consider patriotism and the pursuit of cultural integrity to be 'edgy', your nation is closer to hedonistic collapse than even I had assumed. Duty and saying what must be said is a burden and an honour, not a fad.

By the way, you really do talk too much.


I guess if I were easily intimidated, I'd be scared.


I like you, you've got the right attitude. Shame you're on the wrong side of the fence.


Didn't the Gallente Navy just strike a medal for their Militia Pilots? Seems like she's on the right-winning-side of the fence.

Retainer of Lady Newelle and House Sarum.

"Those who step into the light shall be redeemed, the sins of their past cleansed, so that they may know salvation." -Empress Jamyl Sarum I

Virtue. Valor. Victory.

Desiderya
Blue Canary
Watch This
#76 - 2013-02-01 10:18:16 UTC
BloodBird,

Stop wallowing in self-loathing and self-importance. It is starting to get disgusting. If you are feeling that hurt please suffer in quiescence.

Your line of questioning was in no way aimed at the mobilization and pondering whether it was a thread to the federation but instead it was a bout of propaganda generating, much like the Guristas did. Hence my comparison. The very outrage - entirely focused on how direct actions against innocents could be done - was the dominating theme from your fellow compatriots earlier, hence the direct and honest response from Ishenko-haani.

If you take offense by that - tough luck. It's the IGS, I guess you have to cope with opinions different than your own.

Ruthlessness is the kindness of the wise.

Solarienne
Hrimdraugar
#77 - 2013-02-01 10:19:11 UTC  |  Edited by: Solarienne
And a medal got struck for the Caldari a few years ago. Your point?

By the way I'll tell Jurou his aim needs work, I was momentarily surprised to see you walking about. Soft cloning's a ***** ain't it?

PY-RE Combat Pilot

Stitcher
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#78 - 2013-02-01 11:12:27 UTC  |  Edited by: Stitcher
You're being unprofessional, Solarienne.

So what if foreigners are asking questions? It's for us to decide what questions need to asked (if any), and it's for us to represent our people with dignity and honour. Taunting somebody over getting shot is neither dignified nor honourable.

This squabbling is childish and reflects poorly on the State. If you can't respond to foreign commentary with calmness and professionalism, then for the Winds' sake learn how to endure it in silence instead.

AKA Hambone

Author of The Deathworlders

Solarienne
Hrimdraugar
#79 - 2013-02-01 11:16:44 UTC
Stitcher wrote:
You're being unprofessional, Solarienne.

So what if foreigners are asking questions? It's for us to decide what questions need to asked (if any), and it's for us to represent our people with dignity and honour. Taunting somebody over getting shot is neither dignified nor honourable.

This squabbling is childish and reflects poorly on the State. If you can't respond to foreign commentary with calmness and professionalism, then for the Winds' sake learn how to endure it in silence instead.


You give them too much leeway, Hakatain, but it's your thread. As you wish.

PY-RE Combat Pilot

Veikitamo Gesakaarin
Doomheim
#80 - 2013-02-01 11:36:03 UTC  |  Edited by: Veikitamo Gesakaarin
Rinai Vero wrote:
Now, however, you know that at least one target was a Caldari State Corporation.


Ms. Vero,

In recent memory, there was a rather public series of incidents (In hindsight likely conducted by PMC deniable assets resources such as Intara Directive Action by both sides) between Lai Dai and Sukuuvestaa which almost lead to full-scale corporate conflict mitigated only by CBT intervention in the matter. To current matter at hand, the incident can be used to illustrate the fact that in the Caldari State there exists eight separate Megacorporate legal systems in addition to the independent legal bodies sanctioned by the Chief Executive Panel such as the Caldari Business Tribunal and the Caldari Providence Directorate whom exist solely by the unanimous consensus of CEP member Megacorporations as a collective entity. The laws of the State are derived solely from the CEP member Megacorporations either individually over the corporate territories they own or collectively via the CEP.

The CBT would have been within its rights to request, within its mandate, for retributive action to be taken by other CEP Megacorporations or the Caldari Navy against both Lai Dai and Sukuuvestaa if the parties involved had failed to comply with its directives. Corporate sovereignty cuts both ways, and just as a corporation and Megacorporation in particular enjoys a great deal of independence and freedom to pursue their interests as they see fit, this also means that other sovereign Megacorporations collectively, through the CEP, can and will enforce the laws of the CEP and its agencies upon entities that do not comply with issued directives -- up to and including the use of force.

The CPD and Caldari Navy as lawful agencies of the CEP were acting within their mandates in conducting strikes against Intara Directive Action in the defence of the national security of the Caldari State. As no formal complaint has been filed to the CBT by a CEP member Megacorporation it can be safely assumed that these strikes were well within the laws set out by the CEP and had its approval. Additionally, Intara Directive Action is not a member of the CEP or a subsidiary element of a Megacorporation thereof, and does not enjoy the same degree of corporate rights as a full member of the CEP.

This was not attack against Caldari civilians as some have suggested, but rather an attack against a Caldari corporation that did not meet compliance with the CEP and its regulatory bodies and was a legitimate use of force by the CEP in defence of the interests and security of the Caldari State.


BloodBird wrote:
Pot and kettle argument. Honestly, the topic at hand for the person you responded to was "where was the justification for the actions commited by the CPD, we can't seem to find it" and you counter argue with pointing out the shady nature of the SDII.

We are not discussing the SDII in here. If you wish to do so, feel free to start a new topic about them. In here however, you can answer the questions regarding the actions of the CPD, instead of trying to deflect the issue with an easily-transparent tactic.


BloodBird-jaijii

The commentary made by myself was on the topic of extralegal or extrajudicial action brought up by Mlle. Vero. The SDII were provided as an example of an extralegal entity who operate outside the scope of the law of their nation (A fact not denied). The CPD however are not an extralegal entity in this instance since:

a) They have not breached the laws or sovereignty of a CEP member corporation.

b) They are a CEP approved agency no different to the CBT or Caldari Navy who were fulfilling their mandate on behalf of the CEP in the defence of the national security of the Caldari State.

Kurilaivonen|Concern