These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Player Features and Ideas Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
Previous page123
 

Another look on stealth (cloak-using) ships mechanic

Author
Daichi Yamato
Jabbersnarks and Wonderglass
#41 - 2013-01-29 18:35:35 UTC
Random Majere wrote:
Daichi Yamato wrote:
anti-cloaking patrols to protect border systems and rapid response teams on standby.



LOL


sup?

gate camps with anti cloaks mods and PvP'ers ready to cyno.

loltastically brilliant perhaps

EVE FAQ "7.2 CAN I AVOID PVP COMPLETELY? No; there are no systems or locations in New Eden where PvP may be completely avoided"

Daichi Yamato's version of structure based decs

Nikk Narrel
Moonlit Bonsai
#42 - 2013-01-29 18:35:59 UTC
Random Majere wrote:
Daichi Yamato wrote:
anti-cloaking patrols to protect border systems and rapid response teams on standby.



LOL

And you expect to need no effort to defend yourself?

Perhaps high sec is for you, Concord will cover you then.
Daichi Yamato
Jabbersnarks and Wonderglass
#43 - 2013-01-29 18:40:02 UTC
Nikk Narrel wrote:
Random Majere wrote:
Daichi Yamato wrote:
anti-cloaking patrols to protect border systems and rapid response teams on standby.



LOL

And you expect to need no effort to defend yourself?

Perhaps high sec is for you, Concord will cover you then.


i hear concord have camps at every gate, great anti-cloaking pulses and a maximum response time of 20 seconds. no wonder so many ppl chose hi-sec

EVE FAQ "7.2 CAN I AVOID PVP COMPLETELY? No; there are no systems or locations in New Eden where PvP may be completely avoided"

Daichi Yamato's version of structure based decs

Mag's
Azn Empire
#44 - 2013-01-29 18:43:33 UTC
NERF CONCORD

oops wrong thread..... carry on Oops

Destination SkillQueue:- It's like assuming the Lions will ignore you in the Savannah, if you're small, fat and look helpless.

XxRTEKxX
256th Shadow Wing
#45 - 2013-01-29 18:56:16 UTC
I think if you are cloaked, especially if you entered system by any means other than a gate, that the cloaked pilot should not appearin local chat. The problem with afk cloaking is local chat channel showing all members in a system.

We dont need new cloaking mechanics. We need new local chat mechanics. If I enter a system via a wormhole, I should not be appearing in local, especially if I am in one of the various covert ships. The point of being cover is to remain undetected. Local channel makes that task FUBAR. "New guy in local, we cant find him on dscan or with probes, he must be cloaked" . Pilots should have to work for their intel, not look at a chat chennel and see who all is present in the system.

I love wormhole space because I have no rules, and no one appears in local unless they present themselves in the channel. I can be sneaky, and my avoidance of detection is measured by my ability to remain undetected. Pilots in j-space rely on dscan, and scouts to aquire their intel and spot the enemy.

Local channel is my biggest reason for avoiding lowsec and nullsec. It ruins the fun of being covert when everyone knows I am thete because of the local channel. If CCP delays local like it is in wormhole space, then I will find myself venturing out there far more often.
Random Majere
Rogue Fleet
#46 - 2013-01-29 19:05:13 UTC
Daichi Yamato wrote:
Random Majere wrote:
Daichi Yamato wrote:
anti-cloaking patrols to protect border systems and rapid response teams on standby.



LOL


sup?

gate camps with anti cloaks mods and PvP'ers ready to cyno.

loltastically brilliant perhaps


So you actually camp g8s with anti cloack mods with cyno bodies...waiting for a cloacked ship to come through a g8....all that to defend your rating budies?

you do this often?
Random Majere
Rogue Fleet
#47 - 2013-01-29 19:26:22 UTC
Nikk Narrel wrote:
Random Majere wrote:
Daichi Yamato wrote:
anti-cloaking patrols to protect border systems and rapid response teams on standby.



LOL

And you expect to need no effort to defend yourself?

Perhaps high sec is for you, Concord will cover you then.


Perhaps you should come to null sec (im currently staged in Insmother near the I-1 system) so you can show me how you can defend yourself ...oh mighty warrior.
Nikk Narrel
Moonlit Bonsai
#48 - 2013-01-29 19:40:04 UTC
Random Majere wrote:
Nikk Narrel wrote:
Random Majere wrote:
Daichi Yamato wrote:
anti-cloaking patrols to protect border systems and rapid response teams on standby.



LOL

And you expect to need no effort to defend yourself?

Perhaps high sec is for you, Concord will cover you then.


Perhaps you should come to null sec (im currently staged in Insmother near the I-1 system) so you can show me how you can defend yourself ...oh mighty warrior.

Just LOL.

Happy Piloting
XxRTEKxX
256th Shadow Wing
#49 - 2013-01-29 19:41:01 UTC  |  Edited by: XxRTEKxX
If the majority of lowsec/nullsec wants to keep their local channel mechanic as is, thats fine with me, but cloaks should not be nerfed for the rest of us who dont care to go to low/null. Cloaks are a valuable tool for us in wormhole space. A cloak with a cool down time and limited use is not something I want in wormhole space. Which is why i was saying above that local chat channel is the problem, not the cloaks themselves.

If a change is to happen to the cloaks, then CCP, I beg you to leave their current mechanics in place when they are used in wormhole space. Dont ruin cloaks for everyone to fix an "afk cloaking" problem in space where everyone shows up in local chat.
Nikk Narrel
Moonlit Bonsai
#50 - 2013-01-29 19:49:29 UTC
XxRTEKxX wrote:
If the majority of lowsec/nullsec wants to keep their local channel mechanic as is, thats fine with me, but cloaks should not be nerfed for the rest of us who dont care to go to low/null. Cloaks are a valuable tool for us in wormhole space. A cloak with a cool down time and limited use is not something I want in wormhole space. Which is why i was saying above that local chat channel is the problem, not the cloaks themselves.

If a change is to happen to the cloaks, then CCP, I beg you to leave their current mechanics in place when they are used in wormhole space. Dont ruin cloaks for everyone to fix an "afk cloaking" problem in space where everyone shows up in local chat.

I won't try to predict what CCP will or will not do, but nerfing cloaks exclusively would not make sense.

These complaint threads simply demonstrate frustration from pilots using one accepted tactic, being effectively countered by pilots using another tactic, which is equally accepted.

Perfectly balanced.

Broken as all heck on both sides, but still balanced.

To change anything, and keep it balanced, CCP would need to sell the idea that Local needs to change. And that all the pilots using it to operate outside of high sec who would not adapt... well, losing them would be a risk.
They have egos, and noone wants to tell them they can't keep playing that way.
Daichi Yamato
Jabbersnarks and Wonderglass
#51 - 2013-01-29 20:09:37 UTC  |  Edited by: Daichi Yamato
Random Majere wrote:
Daichi Yamato wrote:
Random Majere wrote:
Daichi Yamato wrote:
anti-cloaking patrols to protect border systems and rapid response teams on standby.



LOL


sup?

gate camps with anti cloaks mods and PvP'ers ready to cyno.

loltastically brilliant perhaps


So you actually camp g8s with anti cloack mods with cyno bodies...waiting for a cloacked ship to come through a g8....all that to defend your rating budies?

you do this often?


-Do i gate camp? yes
-Do others gate camp? yes

-If there was an anti cloaking mod would i use them in gate camps? yes
-If there was an anti cloaking mod would other ppl use them in gate camps? if they didnt then ppl would continue to slip by them with cloaks. their choice really.

-Would i do this to defend ratting buddies? i have done this in WH's and if there was a need to defend ppl in null i'd do it there too. but with the current system they dnt need babysitters, they just need local.
-Would other ppl do this to defend ratting buddies? its their choice, but if they don't they are leaving their primary money making system exposed.

-Do i sometimes log on and have my PvP toon ready to fleet in a moments notice, even when we arent expecting a fight? yes
-Are other ppl sometimes logged on not really doing much and/or are ready to drop what they are doing to fleet up in a moments notice? yes

EVE FAQ "7.2 CAN I AVOID PVP COMPLETELY? No; there are no systems or locations in New Eden where PvP may be completely avoided"

Daichi Yamato's version of structure based decs

Ildryn
IDLE INTENTIONS
#52 - 2013-01-30 11:45:37 UTC  |  Edited by: Ildryn
Mag's wrote:
Ildryn wrote:
The devs have already stated they don't like how people can afk-cloak while at work and then attack when they come home.
Have they? May we have a link to that?


Sure if you look it up.
It was years ago.

They posted and thought it was overpowered and wanted ideas on how we thought it should be fixed.
I don't know how to search Dev only posts more than 3 years old. If you know be my guest.
Nikk Narrel
Moonlit Bonsai
#53 - 2013-01-30 15:15:18 UTC
Ildryn wrote:
Mag's wrote:
Ildryn wrote:
The devs have already stated they don't like how people can afk-cloak while at work and then attack when they come home.
Have they? May we have a link to that?


Sure if you look it up.
It was years ago.

They posted and thought it was overpowered and wanted ideas on how we thought it should be fixed.
I don't know how to search Dev only posts more than 3 years old. If you know be my guest.

After this much time has passed, it can be taken for granted that this was not a stand alone change.

It would not be surprising if the devs wanted to keep the game balanced, and simply saw no clear and obvious solution due to the fact that AFK cloaking is distinctly tied to the way local chat is used.
Astroniomix
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#54 - 2013-01-30 15:47:15 UTC
Ildryn wrote:
Mag's wrote:
Ildryn wrote:
The devs have already stated they don't like how people can afk-cloak while at work and then attack when they come home.
Have they? May we have a link to that?


Sure if you look it up.
It was years ago.

They posted and thought it was overpowered and wanted ideas on how we thought it should be fixed.
I don't know how to search Dev only posts more than 3 years old. If you know be my guest.

No such post exists.
Mag's
Azn Empire
#55 - 2013-01-30 15:58:28 UTC
Ildryn wrote:
Mag's wrote:
Ildryn wrote:
The devs have already stated they don't like how people can afk-cloak while at work and then attack when they come home.
Have they? May we have a link to that?


Sure if you look it up.
It was years ago.

They posted and thought it was overpowered and wanted ideas on how we thought it should be fixed.
I don't know how to search Dev only posts more than 3 years old. If you know be my guest.
It never happened then, but thanks anyway.

Destination SkillQueue:- It's like assuming the Lions will ignore you in the Savannah, if you're small, fat and look helpless.

Cron Moonvexor
Halloween Mining Party
#56 - 2013-01-30 19:51:04 UTC
Nikk Narrel wrote:
I shall try to explain a few details that are usually glossed over crudely, but hold the truth.

Thank you for detailed answer.

Mag's wrote:
So again, what mechanic are they using to interact with you whilst they may be AFK?

ok, at least, I tried: Smile
2way interaction mechanics:
- local chat (not chatting, just face lookout)
1way inter. mech-s:
- probe-scan
- direct scan
- direct visual lookout (if in the same grid)
Mag's
Azn Empire
#57 - 2013-01-30 20:30:22 UTC
Cron Moonvexor wrote:
Mag's wrote:
So again, what mechanic are they using to interact with you whilst they may be AFK?

ok, at least, I tried: Smile
I must have missed it.

Cron Moonvexor wrote:
2way interaction mechanics:
- local chat (not chatting, just face lookout)
Yep, that's the one being used for AFK psychological warfare.

Destination SkillQueue:- It's like assuming the Lions will ignore you in the Savannah, if you're small, fat and look helpless.

Nikk Narrel
Moonlit Bonsai
#58 - 2013-01-30 20:35:46 UTC
Mag's wrote:
Cron Moonvexor wrote:
2way interaction mechanics:
- local chat (not chatting, just face lookout)
Yep, that's the one being used for AFK psychological warfare.

Local chat is, to use an analogy: A double edged sword that cuts in both directions.

Some use it to mine or rat in relative safety, others use it to verify that targets are present for PvP.

AFK Cloaking / Lamps are an expression of the latter.
Previous page123