These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
12Next page
 

EVE's summer expansion better not focus on sovereignty

First post
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Gerard Hareka
Native Freshfood
Minmatar Republic
#1 - 2013-01-26 22:42:11 UTC
Who cares about another half a year/year/two more years of stagnant blue 0.0 , badly redistributed technetium moons which by designed supposed to be worth fighting over ( while i reality are worth NAP-ping over ) , invincible instant travel blobs of super caps with no upkeep cost.

Who cares ???

Nexus Day
Lustrevik Trade and Travel Bureau
#2 - 2013-01-26 22:45:02 UTC
Point.

Counter-point.

Who could have predicted this thread?
Dave Stark
#3 - 2013-01-26 22:58:06 UTC
based on the logic of "nobody uses poses, let's ignore them" i think it's safe to say they might actually look at sov mechanics in the summer.

then again, another logic might be "more people are in high sec so let's look at high sec and ignore null sec sov".

then again, ccp might shake the magic 8 ball and realise they should really be focusing on making more things for space barbies.
Romvex
TURN LEFT
#4 - 2013-01-26 23:04:17 UTC
You just pointed out exactly why sov needs rebalancing. congrats, you just argued against yourself and won
Felicity Love
Doomheim
#5 - 2013-01-26 23:05:18 UTC  |  Edited by: Felicity Love
I'd be a happy camper and cheerfully **** away all my hard-earned ISKies IF stations and outposts that had strip clubs... just saying.

"EVE is dying." -- The Four Forum Trolls of the Apocalypse.   ( Pick four, any four. They all smell.  )
Commander Spurty
#6 - 2013-01-26 23:10:40 UTC
Remove external standings (You're blue to your alliance and that's it) and sov will solve itself.

No reds, no light blues, just ([blue], [green], [purple]) or [grey]


There are good ships,

And wood ships,

And ships that sail the sea

But the best ships are Spaceships

Built by CCP
Malcanis
Vanishing Point.
The Initiative.
#7 - 2013-01-26 23:13:45 UTC
Gerard Hareka wrote:
Who cares about another half a year/year/two more years of stagnant blue 0.0 , badly redistributed technetium moons which by designed supposed to be worth fighting over ( while i reality are worth NAP-ping over ) , invincible instant travel blobs of super caps with no upkeep cost.

Who cares ???



well played easily 7/10

"Just remember later that I warned against any change to jump ranges or fatigue. You earned whats coming."

Grath Telkin, 11.10.2016
Falin Whalen
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#8 - 2013-01-26 23:19:25 UTC
Dave Stark wrote:
based on the logic of "nobody uses poses, let's ignore them" i think it's safe to say they might actually look at sov mechanics in the summer.

then again, another logic might be "more people are in high sec so let's look at high sec and ignore null sec sov".

then again, ccp might shake the magic 8 ball and realise they should really be focusing on making more things for space barbies.

No, no, no, it's all about themes now. You got to have a theme.

"it's only because of their stupidity that they're able to be so sure of themselves." The Trial - Franz Kafka 
Abrazzar
Vardaugas Family
#9 - 2013-01-26 23:19:42 UTC
No no no! They should drop any work right now and focus on planetary flight.

I just flew along a water planet and though how awesome it would be to take a flight over the oceans and that's why I want it implement right now!

Sovereignty and Population

New Mining Mechanics
Zagdul
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#10 - 2013-01-26 23:23:10 UTC
Spurty wrote:
Remove external standings (You're blue to your alliance and that's it) and sov will solve itself.

No reds, no light blues, just ([blue], [green], [purple]) or [grey]





We'd find a way around this pretty easily.

Dual Pane idea: Click!

CCP Please Implement
Dave Stark
#11 - 2013-01-26 23:24:32 UTC
Zagdul wrote:
Spurty wrote:
Remove external standings (You're blue to your alliance and that's it) and sov will solve itself.

No reds, no light blues, just ([blue], [green], [purple]) or [grey]





We'd find a way around this pretty easily.



blue everyone?
El Cymech
Garoun Investment Bank
Gallente Federation
#12 - 2013-01-26 23:53:29 UTC  |  Edited by: El Cymech
Gerard Hareka wrote:
Who cares about another half a year/year/two more years of stagnant blue 0.0
Who cares ???



I don't care, there is plenty of action in DUST 514. I am just going to use my EVE toon to buy my DUST 514 character toys. Let the Uber old farts rot out in O.O blue.
Cowboy Nuggets
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#13 - 2013-01-26 23:55:17 UTC
Well played indeed 8/10
Nicolo da'Vicenza
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#14 - 2013-01-26 23:58:15 UTC
Spurty wrote:
Remove external standings (You're blue to your alliance and that's it) and sov will solve itself.

No reds, no light blues, just ([blue], [green], [purple]) or [grey]

"we share the same objectives but i dont see a blue tag on the overview arrggh, how can this be beat?
i know the FC is broadcasting this guy BUT I HAVE TO SHOOT EVERYTHING"

hahahaha
Frostys Virpio
State War Academy
Caldari State
#15 - 2013-01-27 00:20:47 UTC
Dave Stark wrote:
Zagdul wrote:
Spurty wrote:
Remove external standings (You're blue to your alliance and that's it) and sov will solve itself.

No reds, no light blues, just ([blue], [green], [purple]) or [grey]





We'd find a way around this pretty easily.



blue everyone?


Everybody always in a fleet would work. The 1st player to enter a system create a fleet available to anyone in the alliance. Anyone who jump from said alliance join that fleet effectively putting them purple on overview. Then you apply the rule of not purp shoot on sight.
Bane Necran
Appono Astos
#16 - 2013-01-27 00:23:19 UTC  |  Edited by: Bane Necran
I think they should refocus on what really matters: fonts.

Or TiS (Typing in Space) if you prefer.

"In the void is virtue, and no evil. Wisdom has existence, principle has existence, the Way has existence, spirit is nothingness." ~Miyamoto Musashi
Sergeant Acht Scultz
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#17 - 2013-01-27 00:25:16 UTC
Op you silly or just drunk?

Simple question cause even drunk I can't be that bad at...

removed inappropriate ASCII art signature - CCP Eterne
terzho
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#18 - 2013-01-27 01:12:28 UTC
post with your main >.>
James Amril-Kesh
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#19 - 2013-01-27 01:17:11 UTC
Gerard Hareka wrote:
Who cares about another half a year/year/two more years of stagnant blue 0.0 , badly redistributed technetium moons which by designed supposed to be worth fighting over ( while i reality are worth NAP-ping over ) , invincible instant travel blobs of super caps with no upkeep cost.

Who cares ???


Congratulations, you just defeated your own argument.

Enjoying the rain today? ;)
Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe
#20 - 2013-01-27 01:23:51 UTC
Romvex wrote:
You just pointed out exactly why sov needs rebalancing. congrats, you just argued against yourself and won

Opps, accidentally the discussion.

Triggered by: Wars of Sovless Agression, Bending the Knee, Twisting the Knife, Eating Sov Wheaties, Bombless Bombers, Fizzlesov, Interceptor Fleets, Running Away, GhostTime Vuln, Renters, Bombs, Bubbles ?
12Next page