These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Crime & Punishment

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
123Next page
 

Does the new order actually believe they're helping miners?

Author
Trep Algaert
Occultum Scientia
#1 - 2013-01-26 05:27:30 UTC  |  Edited by: Trep Algaert
I get that there's plenty of irony and joking involved, and a good bit of the whole thing is just roleplay, or an excuse to gank, or whatever you want to call it, but the idea that they're helping miners is ridiculous.They talk a lot about "saving miners from themselves", but I don't see how this works... Of course, if miners were to stop AFKing so much, they might be more social and actually enjoy the game more, but that's kind of a weak argument, as it's hard for me to believe that people who deliberately choose an AFK activity in a video game want to be social, and destroying things that, in their eyes, they worked very hard for doesn't make them any more likely to join other players. Miners already have bad perceptions of pvpers as all being gankers and griefers and unpleasant people, and a lot of them assume anyone who isn't mining is looking to kill them. Reinforcing those preconceptions only exacerbates the problem.

The biggest problem I have is the argument that if people stopped afk mining minerals would be worth more, or if ccp nerfed mining ships then mining would be more profitable, or if XX happened, mining wouldn't be the worst activity in EVE. If people stop mining, then mining becomes more profitable, and therefore there's more incentive to mine more, which drives prices down, which then means isk/hour is lowered, which means more mining must be done for the same profit. Mining is a vicious cycle, but is about as stable as "careers" get in eve, which means it is the most reliable way to earn isk in the game. There's literally no way to lose isk while mining, other than losing your ship. The merits of opportunity cost calculations in this instance can be discussed, but let's be honest, anyone who is AFK mining doesn't give a **** about better things they could be doing, at least for the most part.

There are very few things that can be done to actually help miners in reality, and most of them would involve a major rethink of the entire economic basis of the game by CCP, since minerals are so pervasive in industry and economics. Essentially, they involve making it nearly impossible to afk mine by reducing the amount of time spent actually mining and increasing other aspects involved. One idea would be to vastly lower the amounts of minerals required to produce items, and reduce the amount of time spent mining, but require sites to be scanned down and difficult npcs killed, similar to wormhole grav sites, but taken to even more extremes.

tl;dr If you only read this tl;dr and think I'm a pubbie ****lord, you are clearly not a high caliber forum dweller and therefore should be charged 10 million isk to keep reading. The new order is a bunch of crap if read as a way of helping miners. If read any other way, it's hilarious and a great excuse to gank miners and get tears, and I'd consider voting James315 for CSM purely based on the hilarity of the minutes that would come out every time a summit was held.

Metagaming is really just roleplaying as an eve player

Dr Evil Cioran
#2 - 2013-01-26 05:47:16 UTC  |  Edited by: Dr Evil Cioran
Trep Algaert wrote:


Does the new order actually believe they're helping miners?


No, doh


Also just because someone is socially active and pew's allot, they could also have another 10 accounts tabbed mining ICE.

I don't think I ever looked for an excuse to suicide gank. James just gives people a common goal and a channel to post their chat logs and kill links.
Trep Algaert
Occultum Scientia
#3 - 2013-01-26 06:11:50 UTC
Alright then, if it's just a business and a way for people to socialize around ganking and bumping, then cool, I've got no problem with that, but I've seen and heard the ideas presented seriously and I think they're ridiculous.

Metagaming is really just roleplaying as an eve player

Surfin's PlunderBunny
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#4 - 2013-01-26 06:39:19 UTC
I bump miners and their ships move Big smile

"Little ginger moron" ~David Hasselhoff 

Want to see what Surf is training or how little isk Surf has?  http://eveboard.com/pilot/Surfin%27s_PlunderBunny

Wescro
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#5 - 2013-01-26 08:18:40 UTC  |  Edited by: Wescro
Reserved. (In case of lock)

EDIT

I was (and occasionally still am) a miner myself. I would have probably unsubbed EVE if I hadn't joined the New Order. The only reason I used to play EVE was to watch the number in my wallet get higher and higher, and I did this with the minimum effort possible. Part of this is CCPs fault for allowing it. I didn't love mining or anything, but it was JUST fun enough to keep me from uninstalling EVE.

Hoarding wealth for the sake of it is a highsec carebear hallmark. It really inhibits my people from taking risks and doing more fun things. I feel people take the game too seriously. When someone gets ganked they say "why did you kill me?" and not "why did you kill my ship?" It's like the pixels in the video game have become so ingrained in the identity of the high sec carebear that they feel injured personally when the imaginary numbers on their imaginary ship drop to 0.

The miner is trapped in this the worst. They are shelled up in their super safe and boring gameplay, due to a psychological inability to differentiate their self from their in game assets and wealth. They must be reformed, for both their sake and ours, as in an immersive world like EVEs the content they produce is the content I consume and vice versa.

I am willing to assume the cost of saving high sec.
George Theodore Barrack
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#6 - 2013-01-26 08:23:21 UTC
I will have something to say later.
Aria Stane
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#7 - 2013-01-26 08:23:59 UTC
I reserve the right to reserve my right to comment on this matter.
Winchester Steele
#8 - 2013-01-26 08:33:24 UTC
Trep Algaert wrote:
I get that there's plenty of irony and joking involved, and a good bit of the whole thing is just roleplay, or an excuse to gank, or whatever you want to call it, but the idea that they're helping miners is ridiculous.They talk a lot about "saving miners from themselves", but I don't see how this works... Of course, if miners were to stop AFKing so much, they might be more social and actually enjoy the game more, but that's kind of a weak argument, as it's hard for me to believe that people who deliberately choose an AFK activity in a video game want to be social, and destroying things that, in their eyes, they worked very hard for doesn't make them any more likely to join other players. Miners already have bad perceptions of pvpers as all being gankers and griefers and unpleasant people, and a lot of them assume anyone who isn't mining is looking to kill them. Reinforcing those preconceptions only exacerbates the problem.

The biggest problem I have is the argument that if people stopped afk mining minerals would be worth more, or if ccp nerfed mining ships then mining would be more profitable, or if XX happened, mining wouldn't be the worst activity in EVE. If people stop mining, then mining becomes more profitable, and therefore there's more incentive to mine more, which drives prices down, which then means isk/hour is lowered, which means more mining must be done for the same profit. Mining is a vicious cycle, but is about as stable as "careers" get in eve, which means it is the most reliable way to earn isk in the game. There's literally no way to lose isk while mining, other than losing your ship. The merits of opportunity cost calculations in this instance can be discussed, but let's be honest, anyone who is AFK mining doesn't give a **** about better things they could be doing, at least for the most part.

There are very few things that can be done to actually help miners in reality, and most of them would involve a major rethink of the entire economic basis of the game by CCP, since minerals are so pervasive in industry and economics. Essentially, they involve making it nearly impossible to afk mine by reducing the amount of time spent actually mining and increasing other aspects involved. One idea would be to vastly lower the amounts of minerals required to produce items, and reduce the amount of time spent mining, but require sites to be scanned down and difficult npcs killed, similar to wormhole grav sites, but taken to even more extremes.

tl;dr If you only read this tl;dr and think I'm a pubbie ****lord, you are clearly not a high caliber forum dweller and therefore should be charged 10 million isk to keep reading. The new order is a bunch of crap if read as a way of helping miners. If read any other way, it's hilarious and a great excuse to gank miners and get tears, and I'd consider voting James315 for CSM purely based on the hilarity of the minutes that would come out every time a summit was held.



You're wrong and you should feel terrible for posting this crap. The New Order of Hi-Sec assists miners by dispelling the belief that they are playing a single player mining simulator. In a lot of cases the miners end up learning a great deal about game mechanics and emergent gameplay. Not to mention, there is more than a few miners who were "woken" up by the boisterous hijinx of the local agents and knights and have hopped on board for the fun.

In all seriousness though, you should really educate yourself about a topic before you sperg your nonsene all over EvE-O.

Regards,

Winchester Steele

...

Vaju Enki
Secular Wisdom
#9 - 2013-01-26 09:38:09 UTC
Miners should be happy, they are for the first time experiencing emergent gameplay.

Welcome to EvE Online.

The Tears Must Flow

Estella Osoka
Cranky Bitches Who PMS
#10 - 2013-01-26 11:20:53 UTC
There aren't enough threads open about this topic already?

Confirming the OP is trolling or just screaming for attention.
admiral root
Red Galaxy
#11 - 2013-01-26 11:32:09 UTC
Trep Algaert wrote:
the idea that they're helping miners is ridiculous.They talk a lot about "saving miners from themselves", but I don't see how this works...


Of course we're helping miners - we open their eyes to the majesty that is Eve and put an end to their nightmare of being trapped in a game that is only a mining simulator. We save them from further going down the path to botterdom and we teach them about personal responsibility, a lesson that will serve them well in real life as well as in-game.

Trep Algaert wrote:
Miners already have bad perceptions of pvpers as all being gankers and griefers and unpleasant people, and a lot of them assume anyone who isn't mining is looking to kill them. Reinforcing those preconceptions only exacerbates the problem.


First of all, please stop calling it griefing. It's not, and it's been covered many, many times already, including by CCP. Secondly, ganking and being unpleasant are not merely permitted in this game, or even accepted, but actively celebrated. If miners don't want to play the same game as the rest of us they have two practical options: 1) try and play their fantasy version of Eve and add their ships to our killboards, or 2) go and play a game more suited to their pacifist nature.

Trep Algaert wrote:
The biggest problem I have is the argument that if people stopped afk mining minerals would be worth more, or if ccp nerfed mining ships then mining would be more profitable, or if XX happened, mining wouldn't be the worst activity in EVE. If people stop mining, then mining becomes more profitable, and therefore there's more incentive to mine more, which drives prices down,


We frequently see miners crying in local about how driving them out will mean no-one builds any more ships for us to pew-pew in. I do hope they're reading this.

Trep Algaert wrote:
The new order is a bunch of crap if read as a way of helping miners.


You sound bumphurt. Are you bumphurt? Of course we help miners, you just need to look at how many souls we've already saved from enternal damnation in the fires of Jita. We make a difference because highsec is worth saving.

Trep Algaert wrote:
If read any other way, it's hilarious and a great excuse to gank miners and get tears, and I'd consider voting James315 for CSM purely based on the hilarity of the minutes that would come out every time a summit was held.


At least this shows a slim hope for your redemption. James 315 is the right guy to represent highsec to the CSM, without a doubt.

No, your rights end in optimal+2*falloff

Agent Eunoli
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#12 - 2013-01-26 16:20:35 UTC  |  Edited by: Agent Eunoli
Trep Algaert wrote:
I get that there's plenty of irony and joking involved, and a good bit of the whole thing is just roleplay, or an excuse to gank, or whatever you want to call it, but the idea that they're helping miners is ridiculous.

You write that the idea is ridiculous and then you argue the opposite.

Quote:
They talk a lot about "saving miners from themselves", but I don't see how this works... Of course, if miners were to stop AFKing so much, they might be more social and actually enjoy the game more, but that's kind of a weak argument, as it's hard for me to believe that people who deliberately choose an AFK activity in a video game want to be social, and destroying things that, in their eyes, they worked very hard for doesn't make them any more likely to join other players.

Why is that a weak argument? For some people that is exactly what they are seeking to do. They join the New Order of Highsec to enhance and provide incredible content to a group of disconnected and isolated players. They bring the joy of what EVE is all about to these lost souls and then grin when they see the response.

The number of forum threads about the New Order is an indication as to how successful the Order is. The number of counter New Order of Highsec organizations proves that the New Order creates content and purpose to many individuals. What is amusing is how many of these anti-New Order organizations were created by members of the New Order of Highsec but that's another story that is still being woven.

The New Order of Highsec is the embodiment of EVE Online's promise of emergent gameplay.

This is something that was created by a player with a vision. He saw a problem in Highsec and instead of whining about it in the forums he took action. He explored ways to change self-inflicted destructive behavior and to engage miners. AFK mining really is a doom to the players that engage in it - eventually they lose interest in EVE Online because they aren't even actively playing it.

He is a visionary.

His name is James 315.

He identified the wasteland of gameplay that is AFK mining and how AFK mining enables bots to fly among us. Through his courageous actions he discovered ways to interrupt these detrimental activities and to wake up bot-aspirants. For months he struggled alone to figure out what would work and build the path to what is now the New Order of Highsec.

He codified his efforts. He created a framework and then invited others to join him. And many others have joined him in his efforts. I gladly spend my own time with the New Order of Highsec as both an Agent and a Knight. Plus I freely take the time to write posts like these.

I invite everyone to join the New Order of Highsec and to experience what the New Order is doing. This is a great group of players who are a blast to interact with and play with.

Why? Because the New Order does provide a net benefit to EVE Online as a whole. Even the players that go off the deep-end and have incredibly huge emotional responses to what the New Order is doing benefit when they try to organize to operate against the New Order.

Now they have a purpose to play (or an additional purpose for some) that wasn't there before.

He brought order and structure to where there was none. He embodies what EVE Online is all about: how one person can initiate something that winds up impacting hundreds, if not thousands, of players. James 315 is the butterfly effect.

So, yes, the New Order of Highsec believes that it is helping miners because it is.

Cinematic HD EVE Movies: http://www.youtube.com/user/EveEunoli/

Surfin's PlunderBunny
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#13 - 2013-01-26 17:18:51 UTC
Miners need to be saved from themselves, this a noble undertaking

"Little ginger moron" ~David Hasselhoff 

Want to see what Surf is training or how little isk Surf has?  http://eveboard.com/pilot/Surfin%27s_PlunderBunny

TheGunslinger42
All Web Investigations
#14 - 2013-01-26 17:42:45 UTC
Trep Algaert wrote:
I get that there's plenty of irony and joking involved, and a good bit of the whole thing is just roleplay, or an excuse to gank, or whatever you want to call it, but the idea that they're helping miners is ridiculous.They talk a lot about "saving miners from themselves", but I don't see how this works... Of course, if miners were to stop AFKing so much, they might be more social and actually enjoy the game more, but that's kind of a weak argument, as it's hard for me to believe that people who deliberately choose an AFK activity in a video game want to be social, and destroying things that, in their eyes, they worked very hard for doesn't make them any more likely to join other players. Miners already have bad perceptions of pvpers as all being gankers and griefers and unpleasant people, and a lot of them assume anyone who isn't mining is looking to kill them. Reinforcing those preconceptions only exacerbates the problem.

The biggest problem I have is the argument that if people stopped afk mining minerals would be worth more, or if ccp nerfed mining ships then mining would be more profitable, or if XX happened, mining wouldn't be the worst activity in EVE. If people stop mining, then mining becomes more profitable, and therefore there's more incentive to mine more, which drives prices down, which then means isk/hour is lowered, which means more mining must be done for the same profit. Mining is a vicious cycle, but is about as stable as "careers" get in eve, which means it is the most reliable way to earn isk in the game. There's literally no way to lose isk while mining, other than losing your ship. The merits of opportunity cost calculations in this instance can be discussed, but let's be honest, anyone who is AFK mining doesn't give a **** about better things they could be doing, at least for the most part.

There are very few things that can be done to actually help miners in reality, and most of them would involve a major rethink of the entire economic basis of the game by CCP, since minerals are so pervasive in industry and economics. Essentially, they involve making it nearly impossible to afk mine by reducing the amount of time spent actually mining and increasing other aspects involved. One idea would be to vastly lower the amounts of minerals required to produce items, and reduce the amount of time spent mining, but require sites to be scanned down and difficult npcs killed, similar to wormhole grav sites, but taken to even more extremes.

tl;dr If you only read this tl;dr and think I'm a pubbie ****lord, you are clearly not a high caliber forum dweller and therefore should be charged 10 million isk to keep reading. The new order is a bunch of crap if read as a way of helping miners. If read any other way, it's hilarious and a great excuse to gank miners and get tears, and I'd consider voting James315 for CSM purely based on the hilarity of the minutes that would come out every time a summit was held.


tl;dr

The only people the Code does not benefit are AFKers and Bots. Are you an AFKer or a Bot, sir?
Silus Morde
#15 - 2013-01-26 19:05:39 UTC
Agent Eunoli wrote:
[quote=Trep Algaert]

I invite everyone to join the New Order of Highsec and to experience what the New Order is doing. This is a great group of players who are a blast to interact with and play with.

.

If every one was to join wouldn't you be lacking in afk miners to bump/gank?

Always forgive your enemies; nothing annoys them so much.

Cannibal Kane
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#16 - 2013-01-26 20:00:04 UTC
Helping miners was never the point. I still don't get how people did not realize that.

It is an extortion racket, simple as that.

"Kane is the End Boss of Highsec." -Psychotic Monk

Surfin's PlunderBunny
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#17 - 2013-01-26 20:41:43 UTC
Cannibal Kane wrote:
Helping miners was never the point. I still don't get how people did not realize that.

It is an extortion racket, simple as that.


You're an extortion racket Straight

"Little ginger moron" ~David Hasselhoff 

Want to see what Surf is training or how little isk Surf has?  http://eveboard.com/pilot/Surfin%27s_PlunderBunny

Ginger Barbarella
#18 - 2013-01-26 21:12:25 UTC
Quote:
Does the new order actually believe they're helping miners?


Think about the first couple Hulkageddons. Same thing. Just more arrogant about it.

"Blow it all on Quafe and strippers." --- Sorlac

Surfin's PlunderBunny
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#19 - 2013-01-26 22:04:19 UTC
Ginger Barbarella wrote:
Quote:
Does the new order actually believe they're helping miners?


Think about the first couple Hulkageddons. Same thing. Just more arrogant about it.


The Hulkageddons run from the Python Cartel? The same Python Cartel where our corp slogan was "Where incompetence meets arrogance?" Cool

"Little ginger moron" ~David Hasselhoff 

Want to see what Surf is training or how little isk Surf has?  http://eveboard.com/pilot/Surfin%27s_PlunderBunny

Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
#20 - 2013-01-27 00:08:09 UTC
Of course they're helping miners, they are driving a need for ships and modules in the systems they occupy, ships and modules require minerals, which are mostly mined, by miners.

In the beginning there was nothing, which exploded.

New Player FAQ

Feyd's Survival Pack

123Next page