These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
Previous page123
 

Any news on clone costs?
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Arronicus
State War Academy
Caldari State
#41 - 2013-01-23 23:00:36 UTC
Just going to point out clones are 50% off if you buy them in a FW upgraded system, even if you aren't in FW. So, they're half whatever youre paying now. Just go do that, and stop bitching about it hurting to be an older player. If anything, your clone cost should be justification to fit out those cheap ships more expensively.
Sergeant Acht Scultz
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#42 - 2013-01-23 23:06:33 UTC  |  Edited by: Sergeant Acht Scultz
Arronicus wrote:
Just going to point out clones are 50% off if you buy them in a FW upgraded system, even if you aren't in FW. So, they're half whatever youre paying now. Just go do that, and stop bitching about it hurting to be an older player. If anything, your clone cost should be justification to fit out those cheap ships more expensively.



Well if idiocy deserved to make clones be more expensive, many players would pay billions for 10million sp characters...

You can't be serious can you?

removed inappropriate ASCII art signature - CCP Eterne
Zaraz Zaraz
Zontik Paraphernalia Inc
#43 - 2013-01-23 23:09:11 UTC
I thought people playing this game loved the cold harsh reality of risk vs reward and would get a huge thrill out of high SP clones being enormously expensive! What a rush, pvping and risking having to spend so much isk on a replacement! Whooosh!

or maybe not?
Herr Wilkus
Aggressive Salvage Services LLC
#44 - 2013-01-24 07:42:55 UTC
I don't get it. Couldn't you just not buy the clone?
You get one for free you know.

You'll lose a bit of SP, but it seems ISK is more precious than SP in your position....
Wrayeth
Inexorable Retribution
#45 - 2013-01-24 08:08:39 UTC
My clone costs 45 mil empty (i.e. no implants). You can buy a brand, spanking new battlecruiser for that. So yeah, cost comes into it when it starts to break the bank.

In regards to losing skillpoints, just...no. If I didn't want those skillpoints, I would've stopped training a long time ago.
Destination SkillQueue
Doomheim
#46 - 2013-01-24 08:13:00 UTC
Zaraz Zaraz wrote:
I thought people playing this game loved the cold harsh reality of risk vs reward and would get a huge thrill out of high SP clones being enormously expensive! What a rush, pvping and risking having to spend so much isk on a replacement! Whooosh!

or maybe not?

It's supposed to be a choice. Don't fly what you can't afford to lose and all that. With clone cost you'll get extra costs just because you have played longer regardless of what you fly, how you fit it or what implants you use. It turns a simple frigate loss to a potential grind to replace when replacing it should be almost effortless for everyone. Alternatively it makes people increasingly avoid fighting where there is a high risk of getting podded. This is all generally speaking. If you're space rich, you don't give a damn about clone costs, but that isn't the norm and doesn't change the pressure the mechanic puts on player behavior.

So what is this reward I'm getting for the extra cost of medical clones? It hasn't increased my income for years and I've trained almost all relevant skills to 5 too long ago, so it isn't combat performance either. It's just punishing veteran players and long time loyal customers for no particular reason. At best you could say, that I'm paying the price in order to be more versatile, but that is more of a last desperate attempt to defend the current system, then it is a solid reasoning for having the system in the first place.

I've said it long ago, that the system doesn't make much sense and causes problems, but the problem isn't acute enough to warrant a fix until enough vocal players reach those high SP levels. It'll happen at some point though, sooner or later.
Commander Spurty
#47 - 2013-01-24 14:27:50 UTC
Here's a better idea: you can't train if you're logged out or docked up or cloaked

Now I'm off to find a wall to head butt

There are good ships,

And wood ships,

And ships that sail the sea

But the best ships are Spaceships

Built by CCP
Tom Gerard
Glorious Nation of Kazakhstan
#48 - 2013-01-24 16:39:41 UTC
ElQuirko wrote:
Tom Gerard wrote:
In no way was this the subject of discussion. Your post reveals that you lack the gleam of intelligence required to be a forum troll, therefore I assume you lack the education to process the information. As friendly internet traveler I suggest you consider:

Reading Comprehension
http://www.phx.devry.edu/samplereadingcomprehensionquestions.html

DeVry will sort you out, they offer 8 week sessions and the next one is opening in only 6 weeks, so register now!


Biggest piece of sh*tposting I've ever seen. The terrible attempt at sarcastic humour could've ended after "subject of discussion". You, sir, get an award.



U MAD BRO?

Now with 100% less Troll.
Dave Stark
#49 - 2013-01-24 17:41:19 UTC
here's a controversial idea; flat rate for clones after a reasonable level of SP as not to alienate new players. after say, a year's worth of SP which is what? ~15m sp?

so keep the system as it is now, until you hit 15m sp, then after that have a flat rate for clones. still an isk sink, and it doesn't hurt your wallet if you get podded in an 8 year old character.
Demolishar
United Aggression
#50 - 2013-01-24 17:42:14 UTC
Herr Wilkus wrote:
I don't get it. Couldn't you just not buy the clone?
You get one for free you know.

You'll lose a bit of SP, but it seems ISK is more precious than SP in your position....


Pirate
Ranger 1
Ranger Corp
Vae. Victis.
#51 - 2013-01-24 18:24:35 UTC
I have to agree with Wray on this one.

While I am the first to admit that there is a certain logic to better clones costing more... and in the grand scheme of things 45mil should not be a big hurdle to an older character on top of the normal cost of a PVP loss.

However, what gets to me is that it makes it very, very difficult to justify using a cheap ship for... well anything actually. This wouldn't be that bad except that some of the most entertaining things to do in EvE are even more fun when done in a cheap T1 frigate or cruiser. It's galling to pay many, many times the cost of that ship for every (inevitable) loss.

I do it anyway, but the fact is that it is a highly annoying deterent to having otherwise inexpensive fun... and inexpensive fun should be a viable option no matter how old and experienced your character is.

Now don't get me wrong, other costly bits when you die such as the better implants, should stay as they are. They are a completely voluntary enhancement to your character. Your clone cost is not something you can control, unless you choose to give up skills that you spent perhaps months training... which I don't view as very reasonable.

I'd gladly harvest bio mass in my spare time for the option to have a BP to build my own clones (of various types) and even sell them at competetive rates on the market... although I'd prbably have to work a good Soylent Green pun into the process somehow.

View the latest EVE Online developments and other game related news and gameplay by visiting Ranger 1 Presents: Virtual Realms.
Zaraz Zaraz
Zontik Paraphernalia Inc
#52 - 2013-01-24 23:11:06 UTC
Ranger 1 wrote:
Your clone cost is not something you can control, unless you choose to give up skills that you spent perhaps months training... which I don't view as very reasonable.


But it is viewed as very reasonable to expect you to be ok with losing a ship that you spent months playing to get the ISK to buy or to manufacture.
Not Politically Correct
Doomheim
#53 - 2013-01-25 02:17:36 UTC
James Amril-Kesh wrote:
lol, the amount of ignorance in this thread is astounding.
"You started playing the game earlier than me, so **** you, deal with the clone costs."
Yeah, cause a mechanic that punishes people for staying loyal to the game and discourages PVP is a good mechanic.


Malcanis, I really wouldn't want this guy advertising for me. Big smile
Tyberius Franklin
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#54 - 2013-01-25 03:05:34 UTC
Zaraz Zaraz wrote:
Ranger 1 wrote:
Your clone cost is not something you can control, unless you choose to give up skills that you spent perhaps months training... which I don't view as very reasonable.


But it is viewed as very reasonable to expect you to be ok with losing a ship that you spent months playing to get the ISK to buy or to manufacture.

You aren't forced to carry that ship with you regardless of whatever else you may be flying. If SP loss was limited to anything in excess of that which was being used just short of podding those would be the same.
bongsmoke
Visine Red
420 Chronicles of EvE
#55 - 2013-01-25 03:08:46 UTC
I agree with the OP, reason being CCP wont change is money, specifically PLEX. Greed has taken hold and wont let go. Dont expect any changes or sympathy from CCP.
James Amril-Kesh
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#56 - 2013-01-25 08:31:08 UTC
Not Politically Correct wrote:
James Amril-Kesh wrote:
lol, the amount of ignorance in this thread is astounding.
"You started playing the game earlier than me, so **** you, deal with the clone costs."
Yeah, cause a mechanic that punishes people for staying loyal to the game and discourages PVP is a good mechanic.


Malcanis, I really wouldn't want this guy advertising for me. Big smile

What makes you think his opinion on the subject is any different?

Enjoying the rain today? ;)
Previous page123