These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Player Features and Ideas Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

an idea to solve pvp

First post First post
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Whitehound
#21 - 2013-01-22 11:32:54 UTC
StarReign wrote:
america may have "won" the war in iraq,pillaged their country and killed osama bin laden but they lost $1.3 trillion taxpayers' dollars in the process.I find that to be a little comforting to know a bunch of terrorist losers with ak47s could accomplish so much.

You are forgetting the oil. It was all about the black goo.

Loss is meaningful. Therefore is the loss of meaning likewise meaningful. It is the source of all trolling.
StarReign
#22 - 2013-01-22 11:34:23 UTC
non consensual pvp?

Tippia wrote:
Solve what?
Alice Saki
Nocturnal Romance
Cynosural Field Theory.
#23 - 2013-01-22 11:35:18 UTC
Why is this thread still open xD

FREEZE! Drop the LIKES AND WALK AWAY! - Currenly rebuilding gaming machine, I will Return.
Barrogh Habalu
Imperial Shipment
Amarr Empire
#24 - 2013-01-22 11:36:10 UTC
"CCP, make my repairs cost more, I will PvP all day long!"
That part sounds legit.

Other than that, nice to see you mentioning those strategy games and using words "war" and "casualties", then suddenly applying all that to 1v1 scenario. Get into alliance logistics and fleet fights or something, I dunno...

P.S. Inb4 EVE econmy experts bombing this thread with "Moar ISK sinks!" comments.

Future of T3 cruisers - multi-tool they aspired to be instead of sledgehammer they have become
Mallak Azaria
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#25 - 2013-01-22 11:36:11 UTC
StarReign wrote:
non consensual pvp?

Tippia wrote:
Solve what?



You consent to pvp when you undock.

This post was lovingly crafted by a member of the Goonwaffe Posting Cabal, proud member of the popular gay hookup site somethingawful.com, Spelling Bee, Grammar Gestapo & #1 Official Gevlon Goblin Fanclub member.
Solstice Project
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#26 - 2013-01-22 11:36:18 UTC
Alice Saki wrote:
Oh He Mad.

On this Doll Show me where the Pirate touched you.
Would you be my doll ? ^_^
Kryss Darkdust
The Skulls
#27 - 2013-01-22 11:38:26 UTC
Alice Saki wrote:
Oh He Mad.

On this Doll Show me where the Pirate touched you.


You made me shoot coffee out of my nose... The Imagry!... Arrrrgh...

Seriously. PvP does not need fixing, its a work of art in Eve. What needs fixing is people's approach and I could write a book about all the things people do wrong both philosophically as they approach the game and physically as they play it with a sequal that covers all the ways I got owned learning about them.

If there is any issue with PvP, its that so many people choose not to participate resulting in considerably less action than one might hope for if you love it.

The reality of Eve is that, if you don't love it like it is today, you should probobly go ahead and unsub. 
Solstice Project
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#28 - 2013-01-22 11:38:28 UTC
I suggest wardeccing his corp.
StarReign
#29 - 2013-01-22 11:44:07 UTC  |  Edited by: StarReign
in that case people dont undock much from all the whining i hear about "null sec is a wasteland!!!" "consensual pvp must be fixed!!" "WE WAN ARENAs!!" "PVP IS PHYSICALLY IMPOSSIBLE!!!" "I FLEW HOURS IN NULL TODAY AND IM BORED OUT OF MY FARKING MIND!!!" threads in GD.

u know it doesnt matter.....



Mallak Azaria wrote:
StarReign wrote:
non consensual pvp?

Tippia wrote:
Solve what?



You consent to pvp when you undock.
Rebecha Pucontis
Doomheim
#30 - 2013-01-22 12:01:30 UTC  |  Edited by: Rebecha Pucontis
StarReign wrote:
america may have "won" the war in iraq,pillaged their country and killed osama bin laden but they lost $1.3 trillion taxpayers' dollars in the process.I find that to be a little comforting to know a bunch of terrorist losers with ak47s could accomplish so much.


Why would you find it comforting to know that terrorists with AK47s caused the US to lose a trillion dollars of US tax payers money? Are you an islamic militant or something?
StarReign
#31 - 2013-01-22 12:04:26 UTC
even if i am so what?u have something against islam?

Rebecha Pucontis wrote:
StarReign wrote:
america may have "won" the war in iraq,pillaged their country and killed osama bin laden but they lost $1.3 trillion taxpayers' dollars in the process.I find that to be a little comforting to know a bunch of terrorist losers with ak47s could accomplish so much.


Why would you find it comforting to know that terrorists with AK47s caused the US to lose a trillion dollars of US tax payers money? Are you an islamic militant or something?
Solstice Project
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#32 - 2013-01-22 12:06:13 UTC  |  Edited by: Solstice Project
StarReign wrote:
even if i am so what?u have something against islam?

Rebecha Pucontis wrote:
StarReign wrote:
america may have "won" the war in iraq,pillaged their country and killed osama bin laden but they lost $1.3 trillion taxpayers' dollars in the process.I find that to be a little comforting to know a bunch of terrorist losers with ak47s could accomplish so much.


Why would you find it comforting to know that terrorists with AK47s caused the US to lose a trillion dollars of US tax payers money? Are you an islamic militant or something?

If she had something against islam, i'd wonder why she's not using it.
Rebecha Pucontis
Doomheim
#33 - 2013-01-22 12:07:21 UTC
StarReign wrote:
even if i am so what?u have something against islam?


Did I say anything about Islam.. No, I said Islamic militants, or can you not differentiate between the two?
Whitehound
#34 - 2013-01-22 12:07:57 UTC
StarReign wrote:
even if i am so what?u have something against islam?

This thread has reached ground level. Everyone exit!

Loss is meaningful. Therefore is the loss of meaning likewise meaningful. It is the source of all trolling.
Irya Boone
The Scope
#35 - 2013-01-22 12:11:36 UTC
PvP is fine the only problem With it is


people considering vaporizing easy prey is some kind of PvP
if all these so called pvper get ALL to null sec to fight there will not be any issue here

But they always have a good excuse to not go search for people who want to pvp
>> I don't like Blob
>> I prefer Solo Pvp , solo has balls
>> Big fleet = No skills I have skills i don't want to go with other noobs.
>>High sec is too safe need to harass indus

there are a lot of these sh..ty excuses to not go PvP with people Who want to PvP

CCP it's time to remove Off Grid Boost and Put Them on Killmail too, add Logi on killmails .... Open that damn door !!

you shall all bow and pray BoB
StarReign
#36 - 2013-01-22 12:12:05 UTC
apparently a country that blew 1.3 trillion cant either.

Rebecha Pucontis wrote:
StarReign wrote:
even if i am so what?u have something against islam?


Did I say anything about Islam.. No, I said Islamic militants, or can you not differentiate between the two?
Danks
Fat Angry Toe Tappin Inbreds
#37 - 2013-01-22 12:17:16 UTC
I like the cut of this jib.
Solstice Project
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#38 - 2013-01-22 12:18:42 UTC  |  Edited by: Solstice Project
Irya Boone wrote:
PvP is fine the only problem With it is


people considering vaporizing easy prey is some kind of PvP
if all these so called pvper get ALL to null sec to fight there will not be any issue here

But they always have a good excuse to not go search for people who want to pvp
>> I don't like Blob
>> I prefer Solo Pvp , solo has balls
>> Big fleet = No skills I have skills i don't want to go with other noobs.
>>High sec is too safe need to harass indus

there are a lot of these sh..ty excuses to not go PvP with people Who want to PvP

That, too, is a way to display a narrow mind, that you believe in "zones" and can't distinguish between PvP and combat.
Congratulations.
Kristopher Rocancourt
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#39 - 2013-01-22 12:19:22 UTC
StarReign wrote:
well its kinda simple really,something occured to me while being stalked by pirates today....

why is it in the game of EVE,the loser loses everything but the winner gains everything?

just by the virtue that ur ship lasted slightly longer than ur opponent that he has to bear the cost of pvp(which is often great) while u get away without a mere scratch(except the occasional repair bill which is a drop compared to losing ur entire ship and fittings)?

when u look at games like Starcraft,Command and conquer,Earth 2025,Civilisation,Ogame and even boardgames like RIsk,u noticed that whenever u engage the enemy for profit or gain or simply to be a douchebag,theres is always a price to pay,regardless of who emerges the victor.IN WAR EVERYBODY HAS CASUALTIES.

There should be a threshhold in eve whereby ur ships starts incurring extensive structural damage once the enemy has dealt a critical amount of damage to u.

And the cost of this damage should be subtantial to make the pirates BLEED from their aholes.

CCP IF U MAKE THIS HAPPEN I SWEAR I WILL BE HAPPY TO ENGAGE IN PVP ALL DAY LONG EVEN IF I KNOW I WOULD LOSE 100% OF THE TIME JUST THE FACT THAT I MADE THE BASTARD HURT IN SOME WAY.


I approve of the extreme amount of butthurt in this thread.

http://killalliance.co.uk/tears/tears-holeysheet/

StarReign
#40 - 2013-01-22 12:23:20 UTC
thanks i noticed in the history of eve,with great whining comes great change.

Kristopher Rocancourt wrote:
StarReign wrote:
well its kinda simple really,something occured to me while being stalked by pirates today....
ubtantial to make the pirates BLEED from their aholes.

CCP IF U MAKE THIS HAPPEN I SWEAR I WILL BE HAPPY TO ENGAGE IN PVP ALL DAY LONG EVEN IF I KNOW I WOULD LOSE 100% OF THE TIME JUST THE FACT THAT I MADE THE BASTARD HURT IN SOME WAY.


I approve of the extreme amount of butthurt in this thread.