These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE Information Portal

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Dev blog: CSM meeting minutes are out

First post First post
Author
Roime
Mea Culpa.
Shadow Cartel
#101 - 2013-01-17 14:52:15 UTC
Alexander Renoir wrote:

I explained it with: "It is a griefing tool." I got bounties from pilots I never meet nor I had done a harm to them.

And your argument "It does not effect my gamestyle" is not correct. It effects my game style. I am proud of my reputation and do not wish to have a bounty sign for NOTHING!

Example: For me the WANTED sign is the same as some one would say "fugg you" "dumb a$$hole" or would otherwise harass me!
I am not a criminal; I never want to be handled like a criminal without a reason!
I demand the border for not beeing able to spend bounties on chars with positive security rating. EXACT as it was before Retribution!

Ask yourself why CCP has exluded themself of getting bounties! They know that CCP Soundwave will be the most wanted. They saw it on the testserver! If he deserves the bounty is not the question now. But he would be the most wanted.


"It's a griefing tool" does not explain anything. I think you have obviously done harm to someone, and they put a bounty on you for their own reasons.

You are not being handled like a criminal, the bounty just means that someone out there does not like you, and is willing to pay some ISK to get your spaceship exploded. It is not in any way related to security status. Furthermore, low security status does not automatically make someone "bad"- if someone attacks me in lowsec, his security status is lowered. Even though I wanted him to attack me.

Would you place a bounty on Soundwave? Is that what you want to do? Do you want revenge?



.

Natsett Amuinn
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#102 - 2013-01-17 14:57:50 UTC
Wish you guys would come up with a better format for this.

Maybe address the specific talking points, and leave out the chit chat and stuff that gets published to a blog. Try and get it down to short story length as apposed to novelette.
None ofthe Above
#103 - 2013-01-17 15:22:02 UTC
Pak Narhoo wrote:
Bah, I want the old CCP back. The one that wasn't afraid of anything, who not only dreamt but also boldly did.
And now it's hiding behind phrases like, POS revamp is too big or it only affects small groups.

It's sad to see that the previous CSM minutes where just ink on paper.

POS management is a disaster and corp management pure hell. Yet CCP is too afraid to fix it, even in small steps.


In short, I'm very disappointed. Maybe time to vote with my wallet after 5 years.


What I see taking hold at CCP is something in business circles is called "Analysis Paralysis".

A bunch of really smart people sitting around convincing each other why they can't accomplish anything big because they can tear holes in each others ideas all day long. Not to mention fear of another Incarna.

Killed off walking in stations, okay. Next big idea is ring mining, put that off for POS revamp. POS redesign doesn't effect enough people due to the design of POSes (yes that is intended to point out the circular logic). Do they go back to Ring Mining? No. I am sure that's been thoroughly debunked internally at this point.

We have a big blank. A vision to have a vision.

I have seen this in companies before and I can tell you it doesn't end well, unless they can snap out of it.

CCP, get behind an idea and have faith in yourselves that you can work out the details. You guys are clearly smart people just getting in your own way right now.


The only end-game content in EVE Online is the crap that makes you rage quit.

Alexander Renoir
Covenant Trading Agency
#104 - 2013-01-17 15:26:59 UTC  |  Edited by: Alexander Renoir
Roime wrote:
Alexander Renoir wrote:

I explained it with: "It is a griefing tool." I got bounties from pilots I never meet nor I had done a harm to them.

And your argument "It does not effect my gamestyle" is not correct. It effects my game style. I am proud of my reputation and do not wish to have a bounty sign for NOTHING!

Example: For me the WANTED sign is the same as some one would say "fugg you" "dumb a$$hole" or would otherwise harass me!
I am not a criminal; I never want to be handled like a criminal without a reason!
I demand the border for not beeing able to spend bounties on chars with positive security rating. EXACT as it was before Retribution!

Ask yourself why CCP has exluded themself of getting bounties! They know that CCP Soundwave will be the most wanted. They saw it on the testserver! If he deserves the bounty is not the question now. But he would be the most wanted.


"It's a griefing tool" does not explain anything. I think you have obviously done harm to someone, and they put a bounty on you for their own reasons.

You are not being handled like a criminal, the bounty just means that someone out there does not like you, and is willing to pay some ISK to get your spaceship exploded. It is not in any way related to security status. Furthermore, low security status does not automatically make someone "bad"- if someone attacks me in lowsec, his security status is lowered. Even though I wanted him to attack me.

Would you place a bounty on Soundwave? Is that what you want to do? Do you want revenge?



This Char "Alexander" is barely known in EVE. But look.. I have a bounty. Do you want to know why? 5 Mill for complaining about the bounty mechanic in the forum and another 5 Million.. well I do not know why! This Char does not play in game nor do someone a harm! This is absolute impossible. But this char has a bounty!

I am a good guy who helped many years in the official german hilfe channel. But now you get bounties for writing there. You have no bounty at present? NOW YOU HAVE!
Good guys do not want to get marked as bad guy!
It is just a psychological issue for me. But it is enough to cancel my accounts after nearly 5 years continued sub and leave EVE for ever.

IT IS JUST BECAUSE OF THE BOUNTY SYSTEM CCP! READ THIS! At least one customer lost to the crappy bounty system!
How many do you need before you overthink this daft system again?
Jesspa
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#105 - 2013-01-17 16:05:36 UTC
Was trying to read all of the comments in this thread before posting, but every time I finish a page, a new one has appeared!

Enjoyed reading those minutes (ALL 113 PAGES). Whatever anyone's opinion of the outcomes is, I think we should all thank the members of the CSM for taking the time to attend and then put together such detailed minutes.

I felt, after reading the 'Next Decade' section that an opportunity was missed. It seems to me that Unifex was almost imploring the CSM for ideas for a theme and features to be included in the summer expansion, and yet they never really took the opportunity to offer any.

I don't care a whole lot about many of the specific things discussed - I'm sure that goes for many people - but I can't help feeling that the CSM always gets too bogged down in the micro-management of the game and its features and isn't great at taking a step back and getting involved in the discussion about the bigger, strategic picture, despite Unifex's attempts to illicit that discussion.

On a more positive notes, I like the strategy CCP are adopting in terms of themed expansions, with something for everyone. I like the idea of better, prettier transitions when docking and undocking (subject to no increase in wait times). The discussion about live events was very exciting.

On the topic of changes to the CSM voting mechanism, a lot of good points were raised, but I don't feel any good conclusions were reached. I'd like to see somebody like me (maybe even me!) be able to have a shot at running for CSM and then representing the views of players like me, which doesn't happen at the moment. But this doesn't seem like a realistic prospect, even under any of the proposed new systems.
Jesspa
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#106 - 2013-01-17 16:07:35 UTC  |  Edited by: Jesspa
Alexander Renoir wrote:
I am a good guy who helped many years in the official german hilfe channel. But now you get bounties for writing there. You have no bounty at present? NOW YOU HAVE!
Good guys do not want to get marked as bad guy!
It is just a psychological issue for me. But it is enough to cancel my accounts after nearly 5 years continued sub and leave EVE for ever.

IT IS JUST BECAUSE OF THE BOUNTY SYSTEM CCP! READ THIS! At least one customer lost to the crappy bounty system!
How many do you need before you overthink this daft system again?

Dude... I have some sympathy for your complaint, but seriously, you quit the game because of it? That's a bit over the top. And since when did rage-quit ever get anyone anywhere?
Bobby Kavanagh
Space Privateers
#107 - 2013-01-17 16:26:21 UTC
Quote:
Back up. We COULD get ponies?
Mortimer Civeri
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#108 - 2013-01-17 16:34:34 UTC
Do we need to blow up another statue in Jita, to get heard on the POS issue?

"I don't know which is worse, ...that everyone has his price, or that the price is always so low." Calvin

Natsett Amuinn
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#109 - 2013-01-17 16:39:40 UTC
None ofthe Above wrote:
Pak[quote=None ofthe Above wrote:
[quote=Pak Narhoo]Bah, I want the old CCP back. The one that wasn't afraid of anything, who not only dreamt but also boldly did.
And now it's hiding behind phrases like, POS revamp is too big or it only affects small groups.

It's sad to see that the previous CSM minutes where just ink on paper.

POS management is a disaster and corp management pure hell. Yet CCP is too afraid to fix it, even in small steps.


In short, I'm very disappointed. Maybe time to vote with my wallet after 5 years.


What I see taking hold at CCP is something in business circles is called "Analysis Paralysis".

A bunch of really smart people sitting around convincing each other why they can't accomplish anything big because they can tear holes in each others ideas all day long. Not to mention fear of another Incarna.

Killed off walking in stations, okay. Next big idea is ring mining, put that off for POS revamp. POS redesign doesn't effect enough people due to the design of POSes (yes that is intended to point out the circular logic). Do they go back to Ring Mining? No. I am sure that's been thoroughly debunked internally at this point.

We have a big blank. A vision to have a vision.

I have seen this in companies before and I can tell you it doesn't end well, unless they can snap out of it.

CCP, get behind an idea and have faith in yourselves that you can work out the details. You guys are clearly smart people just getting in your own way right now.



Interesting, I came away with the exact same impression.

And I'll say what I've said a lot of times before. They are really great at thinking up awesome ideas, prototyping them, showing them off, getting us excited, and then doing nothing. It's a running theme for CCP, and it's not just the "new" guys; the old guard was just as guilty as the new.

What really baffled me,
The entire idea of the PoS revamp was to make them ALL INCLUSIVE. I could have swore the point was that EVERYONE would be able to use them, and that they wanted to get away from it being something that only some people would use.

But, they won't do it because it's not used by everyone? I'm really confused.


2012 was NICE, inferno and retribution were GOOD. However, they didn't bring a load of new players to the game. New players aren't waiting for old systems and mechanics to get improved, they're waiting for CONTENT that they'd like to do.

More of the same is not going to grow EVE, and that's pretty much the impression I got from the minutes. We're going to scrap the larger more complex stuff and keep focusing on messing with what's here.

I feel like they're falling into the same development trap that other developers have, which is why none of those games are growing.


And in the back of my head, the thing that's bothering me most.
The chinese server reopened, and only 100k are playing. I can't help but feel, especially after reading the minutes, that CCP sees a nation of billions, and there game only attracting 100k.

And they want to know what they can do to get more of "those" players into EVE.


It read way to much like a lot of focus on dollars, and not enough sense.


One last thing/s.
The idea that new gameplay should be a new game is complete bullshit CCP. I do not want to play "another" game to get new eperience in the "eve universes". I want to play EVE and get those experiences. Dust is not EVE, I don't care what the connection, it's an entirely other game that people will eitehr play or they will not, but it's not something people are going to play because it's a part of the "eve universe".

They'll play it because it's a good game, and they won't if it's bad, no amount "this is EVE" is going to change that. I came away thinking that they think it will. They made it clear a year ago that Dust was consuming a lot of CCP resouces; those are also EVE resources. The idea that they don't want to devote resources to non FiS is rediculous when you've got one game in beta and another in perpectual pre development.

Dust and WoD are no less taking from EVE than if you spent time wroking on expanding things like WiS.
More FiS is never going to grow EVE, and neither will making new games that I have to play in order to ge tthe experience from EVE that CCP has always held firm in the past would be a part of EVE as it's future.




Maybe it's my unique perspective on life, as I go to bed every night knowing I may not have a tomorrow, and I wake every day with the same though.

Positive thought leads to positive action, and that generally has positive outcomes.
If you think it's to hard, it will be to hard. The minute made me feel that CCP doesn't really understand this, and that they've fallen into the "it's to hard, so it's not worth the effort" mentality.

EVE did not get where it is today by shucking difficulty. I feel some at CCP need to be reminded of this.
betoli
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#110 - 2013-01-17 16:49:41 UTC
None ofthe Above wrote:
Pak Narhoo wrote:
Bah, I want the old CCP back. The one that wasn't afraid of anything, who not only dreamt but also boldly did.
And now it's hiding behind phrases like, POS revamp is too big or it only affects small groups.

It's sad to see that the previous CSM minutes where just ink on paper.

POS management is a disaster and corp management pure hell. Yet CCP is too afraid to fix it, even in small steps.


In short, I'm very disappointed. Maybe time to vote with my wallet after 5 years.


What I see taking hold at CCP is something in business circles is called "Analysis Paralysis".

A bunch of really smart people sitting around convincing each other why they can't accomplish anything big because they can tear holes in each others ideas all day long. Not to mention fear of another Incarna.

Killed off walking in stations, okay. Next big idea is ring mining, put that off for POS revamp. POS redesign doesn't effect enough people due to the design of POSes (yes that is intended to point out the circular logic). Do they go back to Ring Mining? No. I am sure that's been thoroughly debunked internally at this point.

We have a big blank. A vision to have a vision.

I have seen this in companies before and I can tell you it doesn't end well, unless they can snap out of it.

CCP, get behind an idea and have faith in yourselves that you can work out the details. You guys are clearly smart people just getting in your own way right now.




Lol yes. good post :-)


Alexander Renoir
Covenant Trading Agency
#111 - 2013-01-17 16:53:03 UTC  |  Edited by: Alexander Renoir
Jesspa wrote:
Alexander Renoir wrote:
I am a good guy who helped many years in the official german hilfe channel. But now you get bounties for writing there. You have no bounty at present? NOW YOU HAVE!
Good guys do not want to get marked as bad guy!
It is just a psychological issue for me. But it is enough to cancel my accounts after nearly 5 years continued sub and leave EVE for ever.

IT IS JUST BECAUSE OF THE BOUNTY SYSTEM CCP! READ THIS! At least one customer lost to the crappy bounty system!
How many do you need before you overthink this daft system again?

Dude... I have some sympathy for your complaint, but seriously, you quit the game because of it? That's a bit over the top. And since when did rage-quit ever get anyone anywhere?


Unfortunately there are a lot of other changes I can not agree with CCP.
NPC AI which kills drones so fast that you are barely able to kill the frigs first. Do a BUZZ KILL now. Cry
The daft new sounds. Really "Skilltraining Completed BOING!!!" Who needs that ****?
Missile nerf and no missile bombardement in DUST available. CCP really hates Caldari. Blink
Most of the changes are things I can live with .. some day. But to top the crap in Retribution they implemented a bounty system which is now per fact just a griefing tool. I am a good guy and do not want to be marked as bad! If I steal from someone I demand a bounty! If I am rude to some one also! But not for a single answer to a question from a neewbie in a help channel! That is just dumb! And as it is.. you can read in the minutes that there are just a few persons who had petitioned the bounty system.. they say 40. That is a clear lie! If this would be true I would nearly know all of them? Strange! My petition was answered via mass response from one GM. There are more than just 40 persons in EVE who find the bounty system bad.

If a WANTED sign from CCP (I blame CCP for this Bounty System!) is CCP's "special thank" for nearly 5 years continued subscription AND WORK in their own official HILFE channel, I have to leave EVE and CCP. That is my only chance that CCP really sees that I hate their bounty system.. As you can read in the Minues:
CCP@ CSM meeting minutes wrote:

The general feeling from CCP is that if bounties are not causing people to leave the game then they aren’t likely to put resources on to a problem that doesn’t exist.


Listen CCP. Two Accounts canceled! Two from me. I know many others that also canceled during your daft new bounty system!
Perhaps it is a rage quit.. But I want to see it as a last chance to tell CCP how I think about their bad work! What?
Natsett Amuinn
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#112 - 2013-01-17 17:07:02 UTC  |  Edited by: Natsett Amuinn
Alexander Renoir wrote:


Listen CCP. Two Accounts canceled! Two from me. I know many others that also canceled during your daft new bounty system!
Perhaps it is a rage quit.. But I want to see it as a last chance to tell CCP how I think about their bad work! What?

Grow up.

Retribution was releaesed over a month ago. If there was problem with people quitting over the bounty system they'd know by now.

Here's a hint, people aren't.
Except you and a couple others. So you're SoL guy.
Alexander Renoir
Covenant Trading Agency
#113 - 2013-01-17 17:15:59 UTC
Natsett Amuinn wrote:
Alexander Renoir wrote:


Listen CCP. Two Accounts canceled! Two from me. I know many others that also canceled during your daft new bounty system!
Perhaps it is a rage quit.. But I want to see it as a last chance to tell CCP how I think about their bad work! What?

Grow up.

Retribution was releaesed over a month ago. If there was problem with people quitting over the bounty system they'd know by now.

Here's a hint, people aren't.
Except you and a couple others. So you're SoL guy.

Yeah! You know all facts and numbers? Just because it is not interesting for YOU and you do not talk to other peoples about that issue and therefore you do not know the problem, does not mean that there is no problem!
I have talked to others.. there are a lot of other players. I am not allone. Roll
Rek Seven
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#114 - 2013-01-17 17:21:47 UTC
Alexander Renoir wrote:

Yeah! You know all facts and numbers? Just because it is not interesting for YOU and you do not talk to other peoples about that issue and therefore you do not know the problem, does not mean that there is no problem!
I have talked to others.. there are a lot of other players. I am not allone. Roll


But you did admit that this was a personal psychological issue as your brain can't differentiate between "bad" and "wanted"... Maybe people just find you really sexually attractive and want the world to know, so they showering with isk. Smile
Natsett Amuinn
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#115 - 2013-01-17 17:51:38 UTC
Alexander Renoir wrote:
Natsett Amuinn wrote:
Alexander Renoir wrote:


Listen CCP. Two Accounts canceled! Two from me. I know many others that also canceled during your daft new bounty system!
Perhaps it is a rage quit.. But I want to see it as a last chance to tell CCP how I think about their bad work! What?

Grow up.

Retribution was releaesed over a month ago. If there was problem with people quitting over the bounty system they'd know by now.

Here's a hint, people aren't.
Except you and a couple others. So you're SoL guy.

Yeah! You know all facts and numbers? Just because it is not interesting for YOU and you do not talk to other peoples about that issue and therefore you do not know the problem, does not mean that there is no problem!
I have talked to others.. there are a lot of other players. I am not allone. Roll

You have no idea how many people I talk, or the amount of time I spend preaching the gospel of EVE, but I guarantee you I'm spending more time getting others to play this game than you can possibly imagine. I spend far more time trying to convince people to play this game than I probably should.

People are not quitting left and right ove rthe bounty system and I know this because they would have said in the minutes that they had plans to rectify a problem.

YOU didn't understand that CCP was telling YOU that there is NO PROBLEM.
You're so hurt over a stupid tag in the game that even when you're told no problem exists you can't hear it.


More than a month after it's introduction they know what it's impact was, and it wasn't enough to warrant changes. You're two accounts is trivial.
Garviel Tarrant
Beyond Divinity Inc
Shadow Cartel
#116 - 2013-01-17 18:20:19 UTC
Jesspa wrote:
Was trying to read all of the comments in this thread before posting, but every time I finish a page, a new one has appeared!

Enjoyed reading those minutes (ALL 113 PAGES). Whatever anyone's opinion of the outcomes is, I think we should all thank the members of the CSM for taking the time to attend and then put together such detailed minutes.

I felt, after reading the 'Next Decade' section that an opportunity was missed. It seems to me that Unifex was almost imploring the CSM for ideas for a theme and features to be included in the summer expansion, and yet they never really took the opportunity to offer any.

I don't care a whole lot about many of the specific things discussed - I'm sure that goes for many people - but I can't help feeling that the CSM always gets too bogged down in the micro-management of the game and its features and isn't great at taking a step back and getting involved in the discussion about the bigger, strategic picture, despite Unifex's attempts to illicit that discussion.

On a more positive notes, I like the strategy CCP are adopting in terms of themed expansions, with something for everyone. I like the idea of better, prettier transitions when docking and undocking (subject to no increase in wait times). The discussion about live events was very exciting.

On the topic of changes to the CSM voting mechanism, a lot of good points were raised, but I don't feel any good conclusions were reached. I'd like to see somebody like me (maybe even me!) be able to have a shot at running for CSM and then representing the views of players like me, which doesn't happen at the moment. But this doesn't seem like a realistic prospect, even under any of the proposed new systems.



You do realize that a 5 mill bounty has absolutely NO effect on your likelyhood of getting killed in high sec right? =/

BYDI recruitment closed-ish

Alexander Renoir
Covenant Trading Agency
#117 - 2013-01-17 21:36:34 UTC  |  Edited by: Alexander Renoir
Natsett Amuinn wrote:

You have no idea how many people I talk, or the amount of time I spend preaching the gospel of EVE, but I guarantee you I'm spending more time getting others to play this game than you can possibly imagine. I spend far more time trying to convince people to play this game than I probably should.

People are not quitting left and right over the bounty system and I know this because they would have said in the minutes that they had plans to rectify a problem.

YOU didn't understand that CCP was telling YOU that there is NO PROBLEM.
You're so hurt over a stupid tag in the game that even when you're told no problem exists you can't hear it.


More than a month after it's introduction they know what it's impact was, and it wasn't enough to warrant changes. You're two accounts is trivial.


Thank you for making me laugh! Lol
But I think you missed some facts:

FIRST: Patch notes for EVE Online: Retribution 1.0 ->Released on Tuesday, December 4, 2012
SECOND: Last December, the 12th to the 14th 2012, the CSM visited Iceland for a scheduled series of sessions with the EVE Online developers.

CCP barely has enough valid datas to be completely sure that there is no problem. Not enough time for a funded analysis i think. Roll

So I have to insist on my opinion.. There IS a problem.. I know many people who do not like the new bounty system. Twisted

40 people with petitions concerning the new bounty system within 8 days! OK.. you say there is no problem.. I say you have missed the time frame.

One note: I know you are a Goon.. but please dont be so condescending . What?
Niveuss Nye
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#118 - 2013-01-17 21:44:38 UTC
Alexander Renoir wrote:
Natsett Amuinn wrote:

You have no idea how many people I talk, or the amount of time I spend preaching the gospel of EVE, but I guarantee you I'm spending more time getting others to play this game than you can possibly imagine. I spend far more time trying to convince people to play this game than I probably should.

People are not quitting left and right over the bounty system and I know this because they would have said in the minutes that they had plans to rectify a problem.

YOU didn't understand that CCP was telling YOU that there is NO PROBLEM.
You're so hurt over a stupid tag in the game that even when you're told no problem exists you can't hear it.


More than a month after it's introduction they know what it's impact was, and it wasn't enough to warrant changes. You're two accounts is trivial.


Thank you making me laugh! Lol
But I think you missed some facts:

FIRST: Patch notes for EVE Online: Retribution 1.0 ->Released on Tuesday, December 4, 2012
SECOND: Last December, the 12th to the 14th 2012, the CSM visited Iceland for a scheduled series of sessions with the EVE Online developers.

CCP barely has enough valid datas to be completely sure that there is no problem. Not enough time for a funded analysis i think. Roll


I think after all these posts, at least a few in CCP may at least have to consider going through the process of having to look at revamping the code for POS/outpost/stations. I know it probably is not glamorous and a pain in the neck. But - if they do this Eve will be a better game for it.

Do not forget CQs for that as well along with ways to add incarna content if you choose to ever revisit.

Does not have to be all at once. It can be incremental while still working on "theme" stuff.

I am also sure future coders will be thankful of not having to deal with decades old code and in the future be able to do even cooler stuff without as much pain.
Xessej
Perkone
Caldari State
#119 - 2013-01-17 23:10:03 UTC
POS and corp management affect a lot more people than the ones who directly manage POS or corps.

My corp lives in wspace and we like it. It fits our playstyle very well. The problem is attrition and recruiting. real life happens and some players left or have less time. But recruiting replacements runs into the hassles of POS and corp management. To let a new player have enough access to do much of anything gives him way too much access. So instead of our corp recruiting some new like minded players who we gradually give more access to our corp will soon pack up and move back to hisec.

CCP needs to fix POS and corp management to make all of wspace better and it will make a lot of null bears happy too.
Natsett Amuinn
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#120 - 2013-01-17 23:20:22 UTC
Alexander Renoir wrote:
Natsett Amuinn wrote:

You have no idea how many people I talk, or the amount of time I spend preaching the gospel of EVE, but I guarantee you I'm spending more time getting others to play this game than you can possibly imagine. I spend far more time trying to convince people to play this game than I probably should.

People are not quitting left and right over the bounty system and I know this because they would have said in the minutes that they had plans to rectify a problem.

YOU didn't understand that CCP was telling YOU that there is NO PROBLEM.
You're so hurt over a stupid tag in the game that even when you're told no problem exists you can't hear it.


More than a month after it's introduction they know what it's impact was, and it wasn't enough to warrant changes. You're two accounts is trivial.


Thank you for making me laugh! Lol
But I think you missed some facts:

FIRST: Patch notes for EVE Online: Retribution 1.0 ->Released on Tuesday, December 4, 2012
SECOND: Last December, the 12th to the 14th 2012, the CSM visited Iceland for a scheduled series of sessions with the EVE Online developers.

CCP barely has enough valid datas to be completely sure that there is no problem. Not enough time for a funded analysis i think. Roll

So I have to insist on my opinion.. There IS a problem.. I know many people who do not like the new bounty system. Twisted

40 people with petitions concerning the new bounty system within 8 days! OK.. you say there is no problem.. I say you have missed the time frame.

One note: I know you are a Goon.. but please dont be so condescending . What?

Roughly 350k accounts are playing on TQ.

Just like your TWO are trivial, so are those 40 petitions.


Just beause it's a problem for YOU doesn't make it a problem for the game.
i understand that we all want to feel like special little snowflakes, and that it's vogue for parents to raise their children thinking that they are, but we're not.

Seriously, you need to come down a peg or two. Maybe take a break or move on if having a wanted sign bothers you that much.


And CCP doesn't need a month to see how many people cancel because of the bounty system. They should be able to find that stuff out on a daily basis.

Contrary to what you seem to think, CCP is not run by a bunch of morons.
Self projection doesn't work, guy.