These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Crime & Punishment

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Collective front launched against the New Order, James315 and miner bumping.

First post First post
Author
Celly S
Neutin Local LLC
#541 - 2013-01-17 04:19:40 UTC
Syaran wrote:


If all you miners are so angry that you're getting killed, why not do something about it? This is EVE, you have a wealth of options at your disposal. You could organise yourselves to safeguard you from getting ganked, you could mine somewhere else, hell, you might even consider actually fitting a combat ship and putting up some sort of an actual fight.



Truer words were never spoken.

Obviously no one expects a miner to be a PvPer, but, if you're flying a hulk already, then you should have no problem flying this and having almost 5 times the tank.

Skiff

Rigs:
2 x Medium Core defense field extender II

High Slot:
1 x Mod strip miner II with your crystal of choice (preferably T2 crystals)

Mids:
2x Invuln field II
1x EM ward field II
1x meta 4 shield extender
1 x Survey Scanner II
(if you don't care about wasting cycles, change the last 2 to something to make your tank bigger)

Lows:
1 x MLU II
1 x DCU II

Drones:
5 x Hobbie II
5 x Salvage drone

or 5 x Hammi IIs

Bigger ORE bay than hulk, almost the same pull, almost 90k HP without boosts of any sort (fleet or anything else) and that's on my armor toon.. my shield toon has 99k almost with same fit.

not "ungankable" by any stretch of the imagination, but it's survivability by far exceeds any other mining barge I can think of off the top of my head and if you're gonna get ganked in one, at least they'll have to work for it.

Just a thought.

o/
Celly

Don't mistake fact for arrogance, supposition for fact, or disagreement for dismissal. Perception is unique in that it can be shared or singular. Run with the pack if you wish, but think for yourself. A sandwich can be a great motivator.

Kuseka Adama
Garoun Investment Bank
Gallente Federation
#542 - 2013-01-17 05:28:46 UTC
Cant use the solution i'd like thats for sure.

I'd love the clearence to set up a ******* hictor in one of these systems right along a primary warp route in. Or just at the 500 km mark outside a field. Ever see a drop warp ambush? One of the greatest things in the world if you do it right.

But lets face facts. James 315 is a 'former' goonswarm member. Goons Set the table for the CSM and once again are pushing their agenda against high sec through. So really what should happen is an entire ceasing of mining operations and a deluge of just random violence with people not caring how much money is lost and just murder anyone and anything in null and low.

I have very little faith that any of this can actually be 'stopped' until CCP decides to clean up its game. *shrug* Maybe i wont buy that plex next month
Alana Charen-Teng
Garoun Investment Bank
Gallente Federation
#543 - 2013-01-17 06:46:45 UTC  |  Edited by: Alana Charen-Teng
Kuseka Adama wrote:

I'd love the clearence to set up a ******* hictor in one of these systems right along a primary warp route in. Or just at the 500 km mark outside a field. Ever see a drop warp ambush? One of the greatest things in the world if you do it right.


If you want to put bubbles in Highsec, you would get CONCORDed when you aggress an illegal target because they tried to initiate warp from inside your bubble. Admittedly, that would be pretty hilarious.
Diesel47
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#544 - 2013-01-17 08:39:01 UTC
LeHerp Aggin wrote:
It's about time someone has stood up to these clowns. They've tried to extort me several times, but to no avail. Noone should interfere with how i want to play Eve in High Sec.


But thats how THEY want to play in hisec.

Whats makes your desire to play in a certain way greater than theirs?
Eyana Starstruck
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#545 - 2013-01-17 11:07:47 UTC  |  Edited by: Eyana Starstruck
Aw it was lovely reading these posts. Big smile

I would like to first address the superhero link, that is a funny one, how can you call yourself superheros when you extort the "common citizen" for money, I can't say that I saw any of the superheros extorting the citizens they protect for money? Superheros go for the bad guys, in this case bots (don't give me that "and bot-aspirants", since we both know that is just an excuse) they don't extort the law abiding citizens of the respectful world (in eve the non bot users).

You call agent eunoli is very successful in her conversion and talk with blasters, yet there is no mention of her in kill-mails with any other of you pawns. Sad

One person mentioned that they scouted some of your liberated systems and found a bot miners doing their thing freely, wonder how they escaped the "punishment" from the order, or were you just told that the area was clear and to move to another one which you did like good little pawns you are? (how cute) Big smile

Emperor Crash, can you really expect anything grown up and dignified from people that don't even realize they are nothing but tools being used so that their contractors can cash in some big profits. When did you see in any movie of minions being able to have a mature conversation? Big smile

Well yeah, they are disposable since some of them have already been retired and are not being used or are rarely used, some of the "agents" were inactive for months or years and they suddenly now jump back into action, if they were not used before they will become unused again after a short period of time. Big smile
Lin Suizei
#546 - 2013-01-17 12:05:25 UTC
Eyana Starstruck wrote:
Well yeah, they are disposable since some of them have already been retired and are not being used or are rarely used, some of the "agents" were inactive for months or years and they suddenly now jump back into action, if they were not used before they will become unused again after a short period of time. Big smile


Wow, look at that, an action that's not against the rules!

My contractors are no doubt waiting for you to actually achieve something, anything, with your brave, brave posting.

Lol I can't delete my forum sig.

Danks
Fat Angry Toe Tappin Inbreds
#547 - 2013-01-17 12:10:21 UTC
Kuseka Adama wrote:
*shrug* Maybe i wont buy that plex next month


Then do it. Vote with your "wallet" I'd love to see everyone who says this follow though to see actual numbers. It would be interesting I think.
Eyana Starstruck
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#548 - 2013-01-17 12:23:07 UTC  |  Edited by: Eyana Starstruck
Runeme Shilter wrote:


Your definition of "disposable" seems to be flawed. Granted, english is not my native language but in my world, "disposable alt" does not mean "alternative character created for ganking".

If you have any proof for your claim that we are using disosable alts and biomass them after they reached a certain secstatus/reputation/whatever, please file a petition - as that would be against the EULA.

Nighty night!

RS


If you don't trust me at least trust one of your fellow pawns.

So little minion using disposable alts just for ganking is a violation of EULA. Big smile
Alana Charen-Teng
Garoun Investment Bank
Gallente Federation
#549 - 2013-01-17 12:33:39 UTC  |  Edited by: Alana Charen-Teng
Eyana Starstruck wrote:
He wrote some other things so don't take this out of context or as a sign of confession.

Runeme Shilter wrote:


...we are using disposable alts and biomass them after they reached a certain secstatus/reputation/whatever, please file a petition - as that would be against the EULA.

Nighty night!

RS


If you don't trust me at least trust one of your fellow pawns.

So little minion using disposable alts just for ganking is a violation of EULA. Big smile


I see you've added 'selective and dishonest quoting' to your repertoire of tricks, along with 'inane rambling' and 'failure to comprehend or provide good arguments'.

"If you have any proof for your claim that we are using disosable alts and biomass them after they reached a certain secstatus/reputation/whatever, please file a petition - as that would be against the EULA.
Runeme Shilter
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#550 - 2013-01-17 12:39:29 UTC
Eyana Starstruck wrote:
He wrote some other things so don't take this out of context or as a sign of confession.

Runeme Shilter wrote:


If you have any proof for your claim that we are using disposable alts and biomass them after they reached a certain secstatus/reputation/whatever, please file a petition - as that would be against the EULA.

Nighty night!

RS


If you don't trust me at least trust one of your fellow pawns.

So little minion using disposable alts just for ganking is a violation of EULA. Big smile


I see you fail at reading english. That's not bad per se, I do sometimes have a problem catching the nuances and idioms too. But, please, at least make a good try at understaning what I wrote.

RS
Eyana Starstruck
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#551 - 2013-01-17 13:28:28 UTC  |  Edited by: Eyana Starstruck
Well I guess you are the ones that fail at reading since I did write 1st and bolded it so people can see it 1st

He wrote some other things so don't take this out of context or as a sign of confession.

Silly minions. Big smile
Emperor Crash Zues
Guns N'Ore
#552 - 2013-01-17 13:42:15 UTC
Alana Charen-Teng wrote:
Emperor Crash Zues wrote:
Lin Suizei wrote:
Emperor Crash Zues wrote:
Because of my ego, I prefer to place my mining efficiency at risk, when I could mine peacefully by paying 10M ISK and following some simple rules.
i'm butthurt

Now this I really have to laugh at that cause for me to be butthurt would of required me have been killed by you and your goons which hasn't happen, I am an advocate for all miners under oppression.
Runeme Shilter
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#553 - 2013-01-17 13:42:23 UTC
Eyana Starstruck wrote:
Well I guess you are the ones that fail at reading since I did write 1st and bolded it so people can see it 1st

He wrote some other things so don't take this out of context or as a sign of confession.

Silly minions. Big smile


Ah, of course, the popular "I didn't mean what I wrote/said/did" excuse. You sure are a special little someone.

RS
Eyana Starstruck
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#554 - 2013-01-17 13:43:40 UTC
I didn't mean what I wrote/said excuse? What are you talking about? I meant every word I said and I never backed down from anything I said, unlike you minions. Big smile
Silus Morde
#555 - 2013-01-17 14:56:03 UTC
Celly Smunt wrote:
Syaran wrote:


If all you miners are so angry that you're getting killed, why not do something about it? This is EVE, you have a wealth of options at your disposal. You could organise yourselves to safeguard you from getting ganked, you could mine somewhere else, hell, you might even consider actually fitting a combat ship and putting up some sort of an actual fight.



Truer words were never spoken.

Obviously no one expects a miner to be a PvPer, but, if you're flying a hulk already, then you should have no problem flying this and having almost 5 times the tank.

Skiff

Rigs:
2 x Medium Core defense field extender II

High Slot:
1 x Mod strip miner II with your crystal of choice (preferably T2 crystals)

Mids:
2x Invuln field II
1x EM ward field II
1x meta 4 shield extender
1 x Survey Scanner II
(if you don't care about wasting cycles, change the last 2 to something to make your tank bigger)

Lows:
1 x MLU II
1 x DCU II

Drones:
5 x Hobbie II
5 x Salvage drone

or 5 x Hammi IIs

Bigger ORE bay than hulk, almost the same pull, almost 90k HP without boosts of any sort (fleet or anything else) and that's on my armor toon.. my shield toon has 99k almost with same fit.

not "ungankable" by any stretch of the imagination, but it's survivability by far exceeds any other mining barge I can think of off the top of my head and if you're gonna get ganked in one, at least they'll have to work for it.

Just a thought.

o/
Celly
thanks for the fit, was thinking of skiff and appreciate the fit. Fly safe.

Always forgive your enemies; nothing annoys them so much.

Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
#556 - 2013-01-17 18:17:58 UTC  |  Edited by: Jonah Gravenstein
Eyana Starstruck wrote:
Well I guess you are the ones that fail at reading since I did write 1st and bolded it so people can see it 1st

He wrote some other things so don't take this out of context or as a sign of confession.

Silly minions. Big smile


Your disclaimer makes no difference to the fact that you selectively and maliciously manipulated the quote concerned to make it appear that the poster was in breach of the EULA, have you considered journalism or politics as a career?

I'm still waiting for the proof that the New Order are taking money from a bot mining operation and that they recycle gank alts, which is a breach of the EULA.

In the beginning there was nothing, which exploded.

New Player FAQ

Feyd's Survival Pack

Kuseka Adama
Garoun Investment Bank
Gallente Federation
#557 - 2013-01-17 19:10:15 UTC
Alana Charen-Teng wrote:
Kuseka Adama wrote:

I'd love the clearence to set up a ******* hictor in one of these systems right along a primary warp route in. Or just at the 500 km mark outside a field. Ever see a drop warp ambush? One of the greatest things in the world if you do it right.


If you want to put bubbles in Highsec, you would get CONCORDed when you aggress an illegal target because they tried to initiate warp from inside your bubble. Admittedly, that would be pretty hilarious.


This is something i'd love to see change. They want to gank like this we should be able to defend in ways OTHER than running. Five dominix with sentry drones another long range battleships and a few frigates+cruisers and you'd see one very dead fleet.

This is why i CANT set up a hictor bubble by the way.
Celly S
Neutin Local LLC
#558 - 2013-01-17 20:17:40 UTC
Silus Morde wrote:

thanks for the fit, was thinking of skiff and appreciate the fit. Fly safe.



you're quite welcome, and you too.

o/
Celly

Don't mistake fact for arrogance, supposition for fact, or disagreement for dismissal. Perception is unique in that it can be shared or singular. Run with the pack if you wish, but think for yourself. A sandwich can be a great motivator.

Eyana Starstruck
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#559 - 2013-01-17 20:31:54 UTC  |  Edited by: Eyana Starstruck
Jonah Gravenstein wrote:

Your disclaimer makes no difference to the fact that you selectively and maliciously manipulated the quote concerned to make it appear that the poster was in breach of the EULA, have you considered journalism or politics as a career?

I'm still waiting for the proof that the New Order are taking money from a bot mining operation and that they recycle gank alts, which is a breach of the EULA.


It was never my intention to be malicious in any way, it just happens to look that way because of whole post of his I only needed that part where he is talking about disposable alts being breach of EULA but then again I did go far enough not to confuse people and wrote in bold letters and added 3 dots before that sentence which also started with a lower case letter, and since I don't find eve players illiterate and unable to read properly concluded safely there won't be any misunderstandings. However so that there will be no chance of misunderstandings I will edit that post and put the whole quote in there.

I do not stoop down that low to change and ridicule the original quotes of the differ minded people like these minions do...

Alana Charen-Teng wrote:
Emperor Crash Zues wrote:
Lin Suizei wrote:
Emperor Crash Zues wrote:
Because of my ego, I prefer to place my mining efficiency at risk, when I could mine peacefully by paying 10M ISK and following some simple rules.
i'm butthurt


I have no need to taint myself in such manner. Big smile

Well for them taking money from a bot mining operation concrete proof is bit hard to get however I visited the "liberated" systems and I have to say bots are still there, good % of them are Russians, about 70 players per ice field in there and at tries to start convos only a couple answered not to mention that all the new order mining permit holders did not respond which I found very interesting. Well this was just my 1st random visit to see are there really some changes so didn't take any pictures but next time I will make sure I bring a camera. Big smile

Now for the disposable alts well when you check new order logistics corp and their kill mails you can immediately see that 2 names for now, Agent Tivianne and Gladius Codicis had kills and were involved into miner kills have not entered a single fight in 2013, but as time passes toons like this will rise in numbers as their usefulness disappears. Big smile
Alana Charen-Teng
Garoun Investment Bank
Gallente Federation
#560 - 2013-01-17 21:01:00 UTC  |  Edited by: Alana Charen-Teng
Kuseka Adama wrote:

This is something i'd love to see change. They want to gank like this we should be able to defend in ways OTHER than running. Five dominix with sentry drones another long range battleships and a few frigates+cruisers and you'd see one very dead fleet.

This is why i CANT set up a hictor bubble by the way.


Plenty of ways to defend against ganks.
1) Remove yourself from a system frequented by gankers
2) D-scan and alignment to escape
3) Kill gankers early with high-alpha ships
4) Remove ganker dps with ecm and tracking disruption
5) Increase target survivability with tanking, ganglinks, logistics
6) Decrease ISK price of your ship and fittings, to make you a less attractive target