These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Player Features and Ideas Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Skill reallocation Option needs to finally be added and why

Author
Joe Risalo
State War Academy
Caldari State
#461 - 2013-01-17 04:04:41 UTC
Daichi Yamato wrote:
Joe Risalo wrote:



Oh my god... You're either trolling, or I'm going to have to say this a little slower so you can understand it.


u


fly


da


ship


2


no


if


u


like


da


ship



ha ha ha

let me add this...

why

did

u

invest

all

ur

skill

points

into

one

ship

if

u

didnt

even

know

whether

u

liked

it

or

not.

the

truth

is

u

already

knew

that

it

was

great

because

someone

told

u.

u

frikken

genius

edit- hilarious post. +1



yes, I am a genius because I already knew that I liked missile boats.
I had flown the drake and liked it, so it was fairly reasonable that I would like the tengu.

Not much of a push to say I'd like the tengu when I can say I liked the drake and like missiles.

However, flying a drake isn't going to tell me whether I'd like a harbinger.
Flying a tengu isn't going to tell me if I'd like hybrid weapons.

Hell, using small hybrid weapons wouldn't even tell me if i'd like large hybrid weapons.


So,


If

someone

tells

a

missile

lover

the

tengu

is

a

good

missile

boat

it's

probably

safe

to

say

they'll

like

the

tengu

but

if

someone

likes

missiles

a

tengu

won't

tell

them

if

they'll

like

a

proteus.



This is fun...
Daichi Yamato
Jabbersnarks and Wonderglass
#462 - 2013-01-17 04:05:00 UTC
Joe Risalo wrote:

STFU and play. When something breaks the game in a way that f#cks everything up, then say something.

Until then do what you suggest that the rest of us do and HTFU and get over it.


my sentiments exactly. ur ship has been nerfed, but it has not ****** everything up. it has made it more balanced. HTFU and get over it \o/

ships get nerfed, it happens. this char was an indy pilot for over a year and then i had to train him to PvP because of incoming decs. do u know what ship i decided to train him into first? yeah, the cane. i knew it was the best ship for my needs and even referred it to others as an 'all in one package', cause it is. it was no surprise to me that it got nerfed. luckily i have other options if i need them (though i will probably still fly a cane because it still looks stronger for hi-sec wars than the rest)

i have a lot to gain from a skill respec, (a **** ton of indy SP's i dnt use anymore), but at least i realise how respecs would screw the game up. and i can admit to myself why i trained for a specific ship in the first place.

EVE FAQ "7.2 CAN I AVOID PVP COMPLETELY? No; there are no systems or locations in New Eden where PvP may be completely avoided"

Daichi Yamato's version of structure based decs

Sean Parisi
Blackrise Vanguard
#463 - 2013-01-17 04:05:43 UTC
The game isn't going to stop evolving because it inconveniences you.
Sean Parisi
Blackrise Vanguard
#464 - 2013-01-17 04:07:35 UTC
Believe it or not! All ships in the game can fulfill a variety of versatile roles except maybe the E-War and Logistical boats. Because of this, each ship does not have a "Designation". Until the re-balance which has given them a role of sorts, they can still be used in a multitude of ways.
Daichi Yamato
Jabbersnarks and Wonderglass
#465 - 2013-01-17 04:07:52 UTC
Joe Risalo wrote:
Daichi Yamato wrote:
Joe Risalo wrote:



Oh my god... You're either trolling, or I'm going to have to say this a little slower so you can understand it.


u


fly


da


ship


2


no


if


u


like


da


ship



ha ha ha

let me add this...

why

did

u

invest

all

ur

skill

points

into

one

ship

if

u

didnt

even

know

whether

u

liked

it

or

not.

the

truth

is

u

already

knew

that

it

was

great

because

someone

told

u.

u

frikken

genius

edit- hilarious post. +1



yes, I am a genius because I already knew that I liked missile boats.
I had flown the drake and liked it, so it was fairly reasonable that I would like the tengu.

Not much of a push to say I'd like the tengu when I can say I liked the drake and like missiles.

However, flying a drake isn't going to tell me whether I'd like a harbinger.
Flying a tengu isn't going to tell me if I'd like hybrid weapons.

Hell, using small hybrid weapons wouldn't even tell me if i'd like large hybrid weapons.


So,


If

someone

tells

a

missile

lover

the

tengu

is

a

good

missile

boat

it's

probably

safe

to

say

they'll

like

the

tengu

but

if

someone

likes

missiles

a

tengu

won't

tell

them

if

they'll

like

a

proteus.



This is fun...


whats the big deal ten. missiles got an amazing buff and u can fly a drake...if the drake doesnt do level 4's fast enough for u it wont take long before u have a wtfpwn navy raven. in what way has anything broken or ur character crippled?

EVE FAQ "7.2 CAN I AVOID PVP COMPLETELY? No; there are no systems or locations in New Eden where PvP may be completely avoided"

Daichi Yamato's version of structure based decs

Lili Lu
#466 - 2013-01-17 04:17:24 UTC
Joe Risalo wrote:
Tippia wrote:
So, 20 pages later, and neither the OP nor his poor ally has been able to explain what the problem is; why it needs to be solved; or produce any kind of rebuttal to the massive list of issues with the non-solution proposed for this undefined problem. Instead, they've only managed to completely misunderstand not just EVE's business model, but also fundamentals such as F2P and P2W.

Is that about right?


What massive list of issues?

. . .

Obviously you have not read this long tortuous thread. Here's a hint - just look for Tippia's posts destroying the OP's persistent typewritten diarrhea. This has been suggested by stupid people that don't understand the value of the game design multiple times over many years. Tippia and others are there to shoot it down with logic each time. More importantly the devs have stated this will not be done, and was not even hinted at as a possibility at the height of their Incarna lunacy. So,

~ gas thread lock op ~
Jorma Morkkis
State War Academy
Caldari State
#467 - 2013-01-17 04:23:04 UTC
Joe Risalo wrote:
Flying a tengu isn't going to tell me if I'd like hybrid weapons.


http://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/Tengu_Offensive_-_Magnetic_Infusion_Basin

Try it.
Joe Risalo
State War Academy
Caldari State
#468 - 2013-01-17 04:29:44 UTC
Lili Lu wrote:

Obviously you have not read this long tortuous thread. Here's a hint - just look for Tippia's posts destroying the OP's persistent typewritten diarrhea. This has been suggested by stupid people that don't understand the value of the game design multiple times over many years. Tippia and others are there to shoot it down with logic each time. More importantly the devs have stated this will not be done, and was not even hinted at as a possibility at the height of their Incarna lunacy. So,

~ gas thread lock op ~


Well, CCP also said years ago that they didn't want to introduce microtransactions into Eve because it would break immersion and the very concept and foundation of Eve.



Then they introduced the Plex program which was a direct contradiction of statements like that.


So, it's safe to say that many things CCP has said don't mean sh!t.


CCP said they were happy with learning skills...That changed.

CCP said the drake was balanced as an individual ship, but much like any other ship was powerful in blobs...that changed


CCP at one point in time said they were happy with the current design of the tengu...that changed.

CCP said they were happy with the current balance of all missile systems...that changed

CCP said that hybrids seemed fine.. That was two hybrid buffs ago.


CCP has been saying things like that for years and many of those things have later been contradicted.

Remember when they said the Nex store was going to include vanity items for ships as well as characters?

Well, where's my custom skin colors and/or custom markers? Or anthing that could go on my ship for that matter?
Sean Parisi
Blackrise Vanguard
#469 - 2013-01-17 04:35:35 UTC
Joe Risalo wrote:
Lili Lu wrote:

Obviously you have not read this long tortuous thread. Here's a hint - just look for Tippia's posts destroying the OP's persistent typewritten diarrhea. This has been suggested by stupid people that don't understand the value of the game design multiple times over many years. Tippia and others are there to shoot it down with logic each time. More importantly the devs have stated this will not be done, and was not even hinted at as a possibility at the height of their Incarna lunacy. So,

~ gas thread lock op ~


Well, CCP also said years ago that they didn't want to introduce microtransactions into Eve because it would break immersion and the very concept and foundation of Eve.



Then they introduced the Plex program which was a direct contradiction of statements like that.


So, it's safe to say that many things CCP has said don't mean sh!t.


CCP said they were happy with learning skills...That changed.

CCP said the drake was balanced as an individual ship, but much like any other ship was powerful in blobs...that changed


CCP at one point in time said they were happy with the current design of the tengu...that changed.

CCP said they were happy with the current balance of all missile systems...that changed

CCP said that hybrids seemed fine.. That was two hybrid buffs ago.


CCP has been saying things like that for years and many of those things have later been contradicted.

Remember when they said the Nex store was going to include vanity items for ships as well as characters?

Well, where's my custom skin colors and/or custom markers? Or anthing that could go on my ship for that matter?



Now you understand. All things in EvE change - congratulations you've won EvE. Thread over, Hurricanes and skills will get changed.
Joe Risalo
State War Academy
Caldari State
#470 - 2013-01-17 04:36:50 UTC
Daichi Yamato wrote:


whats the big deal ten. missiles got an amazing buff and u can fly a drake...if the drake doesnt do level 4's fast enough for u it wont take long before u have a wtfpwn navy raven. in what way has anything broken or ur character crippled?



I trained for the tengu because I saw it as the most efficient missile boat for running lvl 4 missions.

With the nerf to heavy missiles and probable nerf to the tengu directly, this is no longer the case.

Sure, I can fly many other ships... Golem, navy raven, nightmare(though to replace the tengu), maxed out exhumers, maxed basilisk, manticore, blah blah blah, the list goes on.

But the point still is that I trained for the tengu specifically because of its high efficiency in lvl 4 missions.

This is no longer the case, and will probably get worse.

This means the tengu is no longer what I trained for and is thus useless to me.

Sure, there may be players that will continue to use it for missions, and they'll be other players that will use it as their pvp boat.

However, I had one intended purpose. High efficiency missionining. Withtout the high efficiency that I trained for, I no longer need that SP for that ship because I will not use it ever again(unless of course it gets buffed back to or higher efficiency).

So, yeah, nerfing and rebalancing happens, but when it nullifies the very reason for me training for that ship, then I should be given that SP to place into other skills that I probably would have put it into had CCP balanced the ship right the first time.
Joe Risalo
State War Academy
Caldari State
#471 - 2013-01-17 04:39:03 UTC
Sean Parisi wrote:
Joe Risalo wrote:
Lili Lu wrote:

Obviously you have not read this long tortuous thread. Here's a hint - just look for Tippia's posts destroying the OP's persistent typewritten diarrhea. This has been suggested by stupid people that don't understand the value of the game design multiple times over many years. Tippia and others are there to shoot it down with logic each time. More importantly the devs have stated this will not be done, and was not even hinted at as a possibility at the height of their Incarna lunacy. So,

~ gas thread lock op ~


Well, CCP also said years ago that they didn't want to introduce microtransactions into Eve because it would break immersion and the very concept and foundation of Eve.



Then they introduced the Plex program which was a direct contradiction of statements like that.


So, it's safe to say that many things CCP has said don't mean sh!t.


CCP said they were happy with learning skills...That changed.

CCP said the drake was balanced as an individual ship, but much like any other ship was powerful in blobs...that changed


CCP at one point in time said they were happy with the current design of the tengu...that changed.

CCP said they were happy with the current balance of all missile systems...that changed

CCP said that hybrids seemed fine.. That was two hybrid buffs ago.


CCP has been saying things like that for years and many of those things have later been contradicted.

Remember when they said the Nex store was going to include vanity items for ships as well as characters?

Well, where's my custom skin colors and/or custom markers? Or anthing that could go on my ship for that matter?



Now you understand. All things in EvE change - congratulations you've won EvE. Thread over, Hurricanes and skills will get changed.



Lol, I love how you twisted that to be a possitive for your side of the arguement... Well played.

yet the very reason I mentioned this is just because CCP said(though I've never heard it) that they weren't going to allow SP reallocation means absolutely nothing because they have said one thing and done the other countless times...
Astroniomix
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#472 - 2013-01-17 04:40:23 UTC
Joe Risalo wrote:
Sean Parisi wrote:
Joe Risalo wrote:
Lili Lu wrote:

Obviously you have not read this long tortuous thread. Here's a hint - just look for Tippia's posts destroying the OP's persistent typewritten diarrhea. This has been suggested by stupid people that don't understand the value of the game design multiple times over many years. Tippia and others are there to shoot it down with logic each time. More importantly the devs have stated this will not be done, and was not even hinted at as a possibility at the height of their Incarna lunacy. So,

~ gas thread lock op ~


Well, CCP also said years ago that they didn't want to introduce microtransactions into Eve because it would break immersion and the very concept and foundation of Eve.



Then they introduced the Plex program which was a direct contradiction of statements like that.


So, it's safe to say that many things CCP has said don't mean sh!t.


CCP said they were happy with learning skills...That changed.

CCP said the drake was balanced as an individual ship, but much like any other ship was powerful in blobs...that changed


CCP at one point in time said they were happy with the current design of the tengu...that changed.

CCP said they were happy with the current balance of all missile systems...that changed

CCP said that hybrids seemed fine.. That was two hybrid buffs ago.


CCP has been saying things like that for years and many of those things have later been contradicted.

Remember when they said the Nex store was going to include vanity items for ships as well as characters?

Well, where's my custom skin colors and/or custom markers? Or anthing that could go on my ship for that matter?



Now you understand. All things in EvE change - congratulations you've won EvE. Thread over, Hurricanes and skills will get changed.



Lol, I love how you twisted that to be a possitive for your side of the arguement... Well played.

yet the very reason I mentioned this is just because CCP said(though I've never heard it) that they weren't going to allow SP reallocation means absolutely nothing because they have said one thing and done the other countless times...
Refunding sp from removing learning skills was a one time deal and does not qualify as "countless times"
Joe Risalo
State War Academy
Caldari State
#473 - 2013-01-17 04:43:20 UTC
Jorma Morkkis wrote:
Joe Risalo wrote:
Flying a tengu isn't going to tell me if I'd like hybrid weapons.


http://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/Tengu_Offensive_-_Magnetic_Infusion_Basin

Try it.


ok, yeah, that was a bad example.

the tengu won't teach me about using lasers....
Joe Risalo
State War Academy
Caldari State
#474 - 2013-01-17 04:45:51 UTC
Astroniomix wrote:
Joe Risalo wrote:
Sean Parisi wrote:
Joe Risalo wrote:
Lili Lu wrote:

Obviously you have not read this long tortuous thread. Here's a hint - just look for Tippia's posts destroying the OP's persistent typewritten diarrhea. This has been suggested by stupid people that don't understand the value of the game design multiple times over many years. Tippia and others are there to shoot it down with logic each time. More importantly the devs have stated this will not be done, and was not even hinted at as a possibility at the height of their Incarna lunacy. So,

~ gas thread lock op ~


Well, CCP also said years ago that they didn't want to introduce microtransactions into Eve because it would break immersion and the very concept and foundation of Eve.



Then they introduced the Plex program which was a direct contradiction of statements like that.


So, it's safe to say that many things CCP has said don't mean sh!t.


CCP said they were happy with learning skills...That changed.

CCP said the drake was balanced as an individual ship, but much like any other ship was powerful in blobs...that changed


CCP at one point in time said they were happy with the current design of the tengu...that changed.

CCP said they were happy with the current balance of all missile systems...that changed

CCP said that hybrids seemed fine.. That was two hybrid buffs ago.


CCP has been saying things like that for years and many of those things have later been contradicted.

Remember when they said the Nex store was going to include vanity items for ships as well as characters?

Well, where's my custom skin colors and/or custom markers? Or anthing that could go on my ship for that matter?



Now you understand. All things in EvE change - congratulations you've won EvE. Thread over, Hurricanes and skills will get changed.



Lol, I love how you twisted that to be a possitive for your side of the arguement... Well played.

yet the very reason I mentioned this is just because CCP said(though I've never heard it) that they weren't going to allow SP reallocation means absolutely nothing because they have said one thing and done the other countless times...
Refunding sp from removing learning skills was a one time deal and does not qualify as "countless times"


read, think about what you just read...read it again, think again...

Sleep on it....read it again, think with all your might, then comment.

I was not refurring to SP related changes.

I am referring to times that they have said they weren't going to do something or something was in good shape, or that they weren't going to do something, only to turn around and do/undo the very thing they said they were/weren't going to do.
Astroniomix
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#475 - 2013-01-17 04:52:05 UTC
Joe Risalo wrote:


read, think about what you just read...read it again, think again...

Sleep on it....read it again, think with all your might, then comment.

I was not refurring to SP related changes.

I am referring to times that they have said they weren't going to do something or something was in good shape, or that they weren't going to do something, only to turn around and do/undo the very thing they said they were/weren't going to do.
We are talking about something they specifically said they would not do. That is not the same as changing their opinions on what is and is not "balanced" My point remains.
Joe Risalo
State War Academy
Caldari State
#476 - 2013-01-17 04:55:59 UTC
Astroniomix wrote:
Joe Risalo wrote:


read, think about what you just read...read it again, think again...

Sleep on it....read it again, think with all your might, then comment.

I was not refurring to SP related changes.

I am referring to times that they have said they weren't going to do something or something was in good shape, or that they weren't going to do something, only to turn around and do/undo the very thing they said they were/weren't going to do.
We are talking about something they specifically said they would not do. That is not the same as changing their opinions on what is and is not "balanced" My point remains.



Except when I stated that ccp had said they were not going to remove learning skills and they did.

I'm also fairly certain they said the destroyer and bc skills were not going to be made racial, yet that is about to happen.

Ccp has a bad habit when it comes to contradicting themselves.
Joe Risalo
State War Academy
Caldari State
#477 - 2013-01-17 05:02:22 UTC
Oh, and those very things have been the topic of many threads which which many people like all you nay sayers on this thread have come in a bashed it as hard as they could.

So again, what the players say on the forums has no merit it is merely discussion.

So, just because you are adamant that this shouldn't for whatever reasons doesn't mean it won't happen.

However, I on the other hand am not saying it will happen, just merely stating that I would like it to happen, and defending my point.
Lili Lu
#478 - 2013-01-17 05:04:22 UTC
Joe Risalo wrote:
Well, CCP also said years ago that they didn't want to introduce microtransactions into Eve because it would break immersion and the very concept and foundation of Eve. . . .


For microtransactions they reaped a whirlwind of protest. It was a fundamental change to the game design that would break it. The same would happen with sp reallocation. And that would induce a similar reaction among the player base. Because it would be the end of EVE for all the reasons you've chosen not to read and address.

As for the rest of your list, rebalancing changes are not in the same league and are not good examples with which to try and support your position. **** in the game gets nerfed and buffed all the time. Also, you fail to note that the people responsible for balancing in the game changed (and for the better).

The mechanics are even changed from time to time on specific weapon systems (missiles, etc) and modules (ECM, prop modules, tackle modules) but something as fundamental to the base of how eve works such as the skill system has not been changed. Even with the removal of racial attribute differences and removal of the learning skills there was not a change such as what the op and many before him have suggested to no avail. Reread Tippia's first few posts itt. It's all there as to why it will destroy eve and is not even floated by anyone from CCP. if you look past your selfish desire to hop into an all level 5 skill set for whatever ship it is that you think is all that, maybe you will understand. But I doubt you can.
Joe Risalo
State War Academy
Caldari State
#479 - 2013-01-17 05:12:00 UTC
Lili Lu wrote:
Joe Risalo wrote:
Well, CCP also said years ago that they didn't want to introduce microtransactions into Eve because it would break immersion and the very concept and foundation of Eve. . . .


For microtransactions they reaped a whirlwind of protest. It was a fundamental change to the game design that would break it. The same would happen with sp reallocation. And that would induce a similar reaction among the player base. Because it would be the end of EVE for all the reasons you've chosen not to read and address.

As for the rest of your list, rebalancing changes are not in the same league and are not good examples with which to try and support your position. **** in the game gets nerfed and buffed all the time. Also, you fail to note that the people responsible for balancing in the game changed (and for the better).

The mechanics are even changed from time to time on specific weapon systems (missiles, etc) and modules (ECM, prop modules, tackle modules) but something as fundamental to the base of how eve works such as the skill system has not been changed. Even with the removal of racial attribute differences and removal of the learning skills there was not a change such as what the op and many before him have suggested to no avail. Reread Tippia's first few posts itt. It's all there as to why it will destroy eve and is not even floated by anyone from CCP. if you look past your selfish desire to hop into an all level 5 skill set for whatever ship it is that you think is all that, maybe you will understand. But I doubt you can.



actually, the only skills I would wish to reallocate are those skills into the tengu, hybrid weapons(not support skills), gallente ships(only up to bs 3 and everything else is bare minimum), and those skills I have into armor tanking.

In my case that's probably not very much SP, but it would assist in a small part towards other things.
Astroniomix
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#480 - 2013-01-17 05:41:30 UTC
Joe Risalo wrote:
Lili Lu wrote:
Joe Risalo wrote:
Well, CCP also said years ago that they didn't want to introduce microtransactions into Eve because it would break immersion and the very concept and foundation of Eve. . . .


For microtransactions they reaped a whirlwind of protest. It was a fundamental change to the game design that would break it. The same would happen with sp reallocation. And that would induce a similar reaction among the player base. Because it would be the end of EVE for all the reasons you've chosen not to read and address.

As for the rest of your list, rebalancing changes are not in the same league and are not good examples with which to try and support your position. **** in the game gets nerfed and buffed all the time. Also, you fail to note that the people responsible for balancing in the game changed (and for the better).

The mechanics are even changed from time to time on specific weapon systems (missiles, etc) and modules (ECM, prop modules, tackle modules) but something as fundamental to the base of how eve works such as the skill system has not been changed. Even with the removal of racial attribute differences and removal of the learning skills there was not a change such as what the op and many before him have suggested to no avail. Reread Tippia's first few posts itt. It's all there as to why it will destroy eve and is not even floated by anyone from CCP. if you look past your selfish desire to hop into an all level 5 skill set for whatever ship it is that you think is all that, maybe you will understand. But I doubt you can.



actually, the only skills I would wish to reallocate are those skills into the tengu, hybrid weapons(not support skills), gallente ships(only up to bs 3 and everything else is bare minimum), and those skills I have into armor tanking.

In my case that's probably not very much SP, but it would assist in a small part towards other things.
Just train like the rest of us. Because farther down the line more stuff is going to change, and you will wish you hadn't slegehammered your skillsheet.