These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Player Features and Ideas Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
12Next page
 

RMT and CCP

Author
Malcorian Vandsteidt
Alpha Trades
Solyaris Chtonium
#1 - 2013-01-14 00:36:49 UTC
So, everyone knows about ISK farmers.. Item Sellers, and ISK sellers... And how they plague this game and every other MMO.

Solution -

CCP should add a secondary market which deals in Real Money. So people can buy and sell every item in game.. for cash.

* Obviously Margin trading is not allowed in this Market :P.

* CCP would obviously get a cut of the % of profit.

*** CCP and the Player both make money, and "External" RMTers can't function anymore because of this market sicne player prices will always be lower then outside illegal website prices.
Omnathious Deninard
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#2 - 2013-01-14 00:44:20 UTC
No, never. Pay to win is stupid and destroies games

If you don't follow the rules, neither will I.

Malcorian Vandsteidt
Alpha Trades
Solyaris Chtonium
#3 - 2013-01-14 00:51:44 UTC
Omnathious Deninard wrote:
No, never. Pay to win is stupid and destroies games


Its not pay to win.... You still have to train the skills in eve to use anything.. jeez...

You can buy all the battleships you like, fat lot of good it will do you if you can't even get into it.
Luc Chastot
#4 - 2013-01-14 00:56:28 UTC
Do you sit and think thoroughly before posting?

https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=193026

https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=2456598#post2456598

Please stop driving the good ideas into the second page, stop posting this drivel or at least, if you're gonna keep doing it, bump the good threads.

Make it idiot-proof and someone will make a better idiot.

Destination SkillQueue
Doomheim
#5 - 2013-01-14 00:58:16 UTC
That's not really a solution to the problems caused by RMT. That's making it legal and encouraging more of it. Personally I'd hate to see CCP go down this road and it attracts the worst type of people to a game. Games should be games and not jobs or income sources. PLEXes already provide a good alternative for people who want to buy ISKies and all the profit goes to CCP instead of a small cut. People who want to make a living playing EVE shouldn't be catered to in any way.
Malcorian Vandsteidt
Alpha Trades
Solyaris Chtonium
#6 - 2013-01-14 02:53:52 UTC
Destination SkillQueue wrote:
That's not really a solution to the problems caused by RMT. That's making it legal and encouraging more of it. Personally I'd hate to see CCP go down this road and it attracts the worst type of people to a game. Games should be games and not jobs or income sources. PLEXes already provide a good alternative for people who want to buy ISKies and all the profit goes to CCP instead of a small cut. People who want to make a living playing EVE shouldn't be catered to in any way.


While I would agree with you in general, The truth is Games are jobs for a lot of people. And RMT will happen whether CCP chooses to allow it or not, this simply ensures CCP gets a cut of the profits, and makes it a lot harder for the external RMT traders to amke a profit.
Sean Parisi
Blackrise Vanguard
#7 - 2013-01-14 03:16:16 UTC
Malcorian Vandsteidt wrote:
Destination SkillQueue wrote:
That's not really a solution to the problems caused by RMT. That's making it legal and encouraging more of it. Personally I'd hate to see CCP go down this road and it attracts the worst type of people to a game. Games should be games and not jobs or income sources. PLEXes already provide a good alternative for people who want to buy ISKies and all the profit goes to CCP instead of a small cut. People who want to make a living playing EVE shouldn't be catered to in any way.


While I would agree with you in general, The truth is Games are jobs for a lot of people. And RMT will happen whether CCP chooses to allow it or not, this simply ensures CCP gets a cut of the profits, and makes it a lot harder for the external RMT traders to amke a profit.


Yes the will of a minority should ruin the game for the majority. PLEX works because it is players trading something of equal value. RMT would divide the market and ruin the game. I don't care if some idiots job is to play the game and do that for the rest of his life, we shouldn't have to cater to his play-style at the expense of everyone else's.
Commander Ted
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#8 - 2013-01-14 03:44:41 UTC
Oh yeah because this worked so well for diablo III. *sarcasm

https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=174097 Separate all 4 empires in eve with lowsec.

Malcorian Vandsteidt
Alpha Trades
Solyaris Chtonium
#9 - 2013-01-14 05:39:03 UTC  |  Edited by: Malcorian Vandsteidt
Commander Ted wrote:
Oh yeah because this worked so well for diablo III. *sarcasm


Actual RMT is not why Diablo failed.

Diablo 3 failed because of Blizzards **** poor release and non caring attitude toward fixing it. They released it and no one could log in for 6 months after release. That's what killed it.

Blizzard had over 2,000,000 people ready to play and excited about it. You should read the forums on blizzards main site sometime, you'll see it had 0 to do with the RMT and that players as a whole LOVED the idea. And even dureing the hard times players did not complain about the rmt market, They complained about the servers constantly crashing, hackers hacking accounts, and the servers being down for weeks on end.

And um.. I also know this because I was one of the people who were working to fix Blizzards mistakes on it after it released. So I had to read everything the players wrote on about it.

After we figured out blizzard had already made its money on the sales and didn't give a ****, we walked off the project.

But anyway back on topic, No it had absolutely nothing to do with the RMT market.
Derath Ellecon
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#10 - 2013-01-14 06:42:44 UTC
Would never happen. Much for the same reasons game companies would not condone RMT. It brings the game world into the real world. Which opens a can of worms both legal, and regulatory,which is made even more complex due to its international nature.

Malcorian Vandsteidt
Alpha Trades
Solyaris Chtonium
#11 - 2013-01-14 07:24:06 UTC
Derath Ellecon wrote:
Would never happen. Much for the same reasons game companies would not condone RMT. It brings the game world into the real world. Which opens a can of worms both legal, and regulatory,which is made even more complex due to its international nature.



Using Paypal as the 3rd party transfer service solves those issues. Thats what Blizzard did
Siobhan MacLeary
Doomheim
#12 - 2013-01-14 08:09:18 UTC  |  Edited by: Siobhan MacLeary
Malcorian Vandsteidt wrote:
Commander Ted wrote:
Oh yeah because this worked so well for diablo III. *sarcasm


Actual RMT is not why Diablo failed.

Diablo 3 failed because of Blizzards **** poor release and non caring attitude toward fixing it. They released it and no one could log in for 6 months after release. That's what killed it.

Blizzard had over 2,000,000 people ready to play and excited about it. You should read the forums on blizzards main site sometime, you'll see it had 0 to do with the RMT and that players as a whole LOVED the idea. And even dureing the hard times players did not complain about the rmt market, They complained about the servers constantly crashing, hackers hacking accounts, and the servers being down for weeks on end.

And um.. I also know this because I was one of the people who were working to fix Blizzards mistakes on it after it released. So I had to read everything the players wrote on about it.

After we figured out blizzard had already made its money on the sales and didn't give a ****, we walked off the project.

But anyway back on topic, No it had absolutely nothing to do with the RMT market.


I call bullshit, specifically on that 6 months figure. I own a copy of Diablo III which I had preordered and picked up from the store within a week of launch. I never, ever, ever had any issues logging in a playing, and by the time I'd brought it home from the store the login issues were largely solved.

In addition, you clearly know nothing about the potential legal and regulatory issues of making an international EVE Real Money Market. Just using Paypal as the payment processor does not solve any of those potential issues, and would not make sense since CCP already uses a payment processor of their own when you pay for game time

But that's a different discussion, and you're a flat out idiot for even suggesting this. I'm making a note of your name and placing a 5 million ISK bounty upon your head.

In short: Bad idea, and I encourage everyone to place a bounty on this fool's head.

E: In addition, your poor grasp of the mechanics of the English language further convinces me that you are of subnormal intelligence and are either mistaken or lying in regards to working for Blizzard. If you find the latter to be insulting, I encourage you to post verifiable photographic evidence of your employment by Blizzard.

Point out to me a person who has been harmed by an AFK cloaker and I will point out a person who has no business playing this game.” - CCP Soundwave

Zan Shiro
Doomheim
#13 - 2013-01-14 08:22:00 UTC
Malcorian Vandsteidt wrote:
Commander Ted wrote:
Oh yeah because this worked so well for diablo III. *sarcasm


Actual RMT is not why Diablo failed.

Diablo 3 failed because of Blizzards **** poor release and non caring attitude toward fixing it. They released it and no one could log in for 6 months after release. That's what killed it..




You couldn't log in because blizzard was releasing a plethora of patches daily to it.

First it was the rebalance daily patching. To keep AH viable they released knee jerk after knee jerk balance patches. Barb fit A is op and farming like crazy....patch Monday to shut it down. Now the sorc buld B is op, patch tuesday.

Wedneday would be something different, the loot/ drop/xp patch to fix farming instance xyz in chapter abc.

Thursday...security patch since the AH had blizzard on the top of every script kiddies radar. D3 was my first ever hacked account in several years of online gaming. It drew the haxors in like flies to crap.

Friday....wtf now Barb build B is farming bad, patch that one as well.

Next monday....start up the patching again. All to keep the AH viable.

To keep from abuse blizzard was patching way too damn much. Why eve doesn't need this. It has pve way more readily farmable. To keep the AH legit, it would involve bring in the knee jerk patching. While I'd prefer the rebalance patching comes sooner, I appreciate its well testedl when it hits in eve (people cba to play on sisi thats on them). I also appreciate the fact ccp focuses on balance based on pvp not pve.

And it be nerf via pve with an AH. I could give a rats ass if a CNR pilot spams rats like no tomorrow....until a pve inspired patch breaks its torps or makes lol cruise even more lol for pvp use.
Sam Korak
Doomheim
#14 - 2013-01-14 09:19:48 UTC
Sorry but this is the worst idea ever, honestly.
Griffin Omanid
Knights of the Zodiac
#15 - 2013-01-14 14:34:00 UTC
Really bad idea.

I will tell you what would happen if CCP include a kind of RMT.

All highly expensiv faction and T2 BS, T3 Cruiser and Capitals, which normally coast arround 500 to 1.500 million ISK or 1 to 3 Plexs or 20 to 45 € (or respectivly other currencies), would be sold for real money. Why the heck should I if i want to sell one of these ships sell them for ISK´s. This would result in a lot more Carebearers, because no one would risk a ship which is worth over 20 €.
Also you now can use Plexes to get ISK to buy ships, you do more or less nothing more then paying the subscription fee for an other player. But there is no way to legally get money out of playing eve.
MortisLegati
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#16 - 2013-01-14 14:37:36 UTC
PLEX
/thread
De'Veldrin
Republic University
Minmatar Republic
#17 - 2013-01-14 19:49:38 UTC
No.

De'Veldrin's Corollary (to Malcanis' Law): Any idea that seeks to limit the ability of a large nullsec bloc to do something in the name of allowing more small groups into sov null will inevitably make it that much harder for small groups to enter sov null.

Garviel Tarrant
Beyond Divinity Inc
Shadow Cartel
#18 - 2013-01-14 20:12:30 UTC
Would ruin the games economy..


Extremelly extremelly stupid idea..

We already have a very elegant way to do RMT without ******* up the market and that is plex.

BYDI recruitment closed-ish

ShahFluffers
Ice Fire Warriors
#19 - 2013-01-14 20:59:02 UTC
De'Veldrin wrote:
No.

Not empty quoting.
Malcorian Vandsteidt
Alpha Trades
Solyaris Chtonium
#20 - 2013-01-14 21:05:59 UTC
Garviel Tarrant wrote:
Would ruin the games economy..


Extremelly extremelly stupid idea..

We already have a very elegant way to do RMT without ******* up the market and that is plex.


Plex isn't RMT however, Because RMT specifically deals with "Player" profits. When Client side. Yuo would need to sell your ISK to be an RMTer for example.

CCP is an RMTer and makes Profits through Plex, as this is simply them selling ISK for Real Money. Not the player.



Plex is also sold by external non CCP organizations. so are Items, ISK, and other things. Even Accounts.


RMT will happen in every MMO no matter what the company does to try and stop it, and anyone who has done any research knows you can make some REAL money with Eve online. Its ISK is the highest valued currency of any MMO at 12.00 to 15.00 US per Billion. (If you sold it).

This is Money CCP should get, not some random website owner or External RMTer.


*** My goal with this suggestions was to help eliminate "External" RMT.
12Next page