These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Jita Park Speakers Corner

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
Previous page123
 

what do you people actually do?

First post
Author
Cyprus Black
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#41 - 2013-01-13 04:46:45 UTC
Issler Dainze wrote:
Nicolo da'Vicenza wrote:
ban npc corps from csm forums


I'd throw support to a candidate that adds this to their platform.

Issler
Easily circumvented by one man corps.

Summary of EvEs last four expansions: http://imgur.com/ZL5SM33

ground ctrl
Goose Swarm Coalition
#42 - 2013-01-13 04:59:55 UTC
Alphea Abbra wrote:
ground ctrl wrote:
I tell you that null sec sheep will vote for whoever they are told even if that person doesn't tell them what they want to happen with the game. I say mittani did this as a case in point.

You say I have no proof.

First, to split hairs: You haven't presented any proof. You have presented one claim where I have shown you that even if that claim is exactly as you say, it's not proof of any flaw.

Quote:
I say read what he wrote when he ran for the evidence.

If it's that important, please by all means link me to the relevant threads.

Quote:
You refuse and just say my claim is drivel. I can't force you to read the evidence if you are intent on being a drooling zombie supporing your brave leader, but that doesn't mean there is no evidence.

I'm not sure you can show your ignorance of the matter in any clearer case than this. Please, grow a brain or something before you enter debates with sentient beings.
I can't see how it's my job to find evidence for your position.

Your ball.


I looked it up on eve search. It is even more ridiculous than I remember it.

http://www.eve-search.com/thread/1473855-0/page/1
Cyprus Black
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#43 - 2013-01-13 05:50:28 UTC
ground ctrl wrote:

I looked it up on eve search. It is even more ridiculous than I remember it.

http://www.eve-search.com/thread/1473855-0/page/1
Just curious if you've ever encountered someone named Major Tom.

Summary of EvEs last four expansions: http://imgur.com/ZL5SM33

Alphea Abbra
Project Promethion
#44 - 2013-01-13 11:01:51 UTC
ground ctrl wrote:
I looked it up on eve search. It is even more ridiculous than I remember it.

http://www.eve-search.com/thread/1473855-0/page/1

Now please tell me all about how that supports your "null sec are sheep and are voting exactly identical to their corporate masters wishes"-hypothesis.
rswfire
#45 - 2013-01-13 11:33:08 UTC
Alphea Abbra wrote:
ground ctrl wrote:
I looked it up on eve search. It is even more ridiculous than I remember it.

http://www.eve-search.com/thread/1473855-0/page/1

Now please tell me all about how that supports your "null sec are sheep and are voting exactly identical to their corporate masters wishes"-hypothesis.


Let it go already. How can you get so emotionally charged over another person's point of view? You're arguing with yourself. You believe one thing; they believe something else. Accept it and move on. By the way, I disagree with much of what you say but I've not sat here posting repeatedly harsh remarks at you because I disagree. Perhaps you should take a moment to read your own material and ask yourself it that's really the kind of person you wish to be.
Alphea Abbra
Project Promethion
#46 - 2013-01-13 13:27:36 UTC
rswfire wrote:
Alphea Abbra wrote:
ground ctrl wrote:
I looked it up on eve search. It is even more ridiculous than I remember it.

http://www.eve-search.com/thread/1473855-0/page/1

Now please tell me all about how that supports your "null sec are sheep and are voting exactly identical to their corporate masters wishes"-hypothesis.


Let it go already. How can you get so emotionally charged over another person's point of view? You're arguing with yourself. You believe one thing; they believe something else. Accept it and move on. By the way, I disagree with much of what you say but I've not sat here posting repeatedly harsh remarks at you because I disagree. Perhaps you should take a moment to read your own material and ask yourself it that's really the kind of person you wish to be.

Unless ground ctrl is my alt, then no I am not arguing with myself.
I am not sure where my harsh remarks are. I have questioned ground ctrls ability at reading comprehension, cognitive understanding, backpedalling and probably hinted at a lot more. You might wonder if my "style" or "technique" is helping my "case", but that doesn't make them harsh.
I'm responding to ground ctrl in kind, only I am not making junk up.

If you disagree with what I am saying then please show me where I went wrong, what flaws my arguments contained, what evidence I missed or left out, etc. If I'm wrong then by all means, show me where.
ground ctrl
Goose Swarm Coalition
#47 - 2013-01-13 17:31:26 UTC
Alphea Abbra wrote:
ground ctrl wrote:
I looked it up on eve search. It is even more ridiculous than I remember it.

http://www.eve-search.com/thread/1473855-0/page/1

Now please tell me all about how that supports your "null sec are sheep and are voting exactly identical to their corporate masters wishes"-hypothesis.



My point was null sec alliance don't even have to bother to give details about what they want to happen in the game yet they still get elected.

What plans for the game do you see in that post?
Alphea Abbra
Project Promethion
#48 - 2013-01-13 19:09:28 UTC
Alphea Abbra wrote:
I like that if I wanted to, I could agree with your point about The Mittani, rescind those few lines, and still have decimated your argument, leaving you with an empty hat and a bill to pay... Nice attempt, now could you please stop dodging?

(I'll look up the finer details about The Mittani's CSM 6 and 7 campaigns and respond to that tiny and non-essential part of the argument when done. The stuff I said about him was from memory, so perhaps I'm slightly off on that one.)

So, I acknowledge that The Mittanis posted platform for CSM6 contained none of the specific changes that you think the CSM should advocate.
It still had a vision, and it still had a clear course of action ahead.
It's just wasn't dumb enough to promise all the specifics of how sec status should improve in the future or exactly how ice mining should be changed.

Now please explain how your lack of a single data point prove your hypothesis.
ground ctrl
Goose Swarm Coalition
#49 - 2013-01-13 20:37:23 UTC
Alphea Abbra wrote:
Alphea Abbra wrote:
I like that if I wanted to, I could agree with your point about The Mittani, rescind those few lines, and still have decimated your argument, leaving you with an empty hat and a bill to pay... Nice attempt, now could you please stop dodging?

(I'll look up the finer details about The Mittani's CSM 6 and 7 campaigns and respond to that tiny and non-essential part of the argument when done. The stuff I said about him was from memory, so perhaps I'm slightly off on that one.)

So, I acknowledge that The Mittanis posted platform for CSM6 contained none of the specific changes that you think the CSM should advocate.
It still had a vision, and it still had a clear course of action ahead.
It's just wasn't dumb enough to promise all the specifics of how sec status should improve in the future or exactly how ice mining should be changed.

Now please explain how your lack of a single data point prove your hypothesis.



Please feel free to quote the part where he talked at all about what he actually wanted to happen to the game.

It's not a hypothesis it's a fact. I gave you a link yet you still won't look at it. He ran and didn't tell anyone what he wanted to happen with eve, yet goons and friends still voted for who they were told to vote for.
ground ctrl
Goose Swarm Coalition
#50 - 2013-01-13 20:38:05 UTC
Cyprus Black wrote:
ground ctrl wrote:

I looked it up on eve search. It is even more ridiculous than I remember it.

http://www.eve-search.com/thread/1473855-0/page/1
Just curious if you've ever encountered someone named Major Tom.



Yes indeed. Last I heard from him he was

Floating in a cyclone
Far above the world

Then his circuit went dead.
But that was back in 1969 not sure if he plays anymore.
Previous page123