These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

NBSI Nullsec = Fail

First post
Author
Lord Zim
Gallente Federation
#421 - 2013-01-08 10:20:36 UTC
That's what, half a JF trip to deklein, one way?

Cyno's lit, bridge is up, but one pilot won't be jumping home.

RIP Vile Rat

Malcanis
Vanishing Point.
The Initiative.
#422 - 2013-01-08 10:22:22 UTC
Andski wrote:
Oh and it cost over two million ISK to put that 12bn of cruisers into build. How hideously expensive.



TWO million??? ShockedShockedShocked

Andski, you have opened my eyes to the tragic conditions in hi-sec! How the poor oppressed populace manage to scratch a living under such conditions amazes me.

This calls for a huge charity operation. I will be calling on all of 0.0 to shame CCP into relieving the burden from these noble, tragic victims.

Fellow 0.0ers, please donate today. For just 1 million ISK, you can enable a hi-sec industrialist to make 1300 cruisers.

"Just remember later that I warned against any change to jump ranges or fatigue. You earned whats coming."

Grath Telkin, 11.10.2016

Mayhaw Morgan
State War Academy
Caldari State
#423 - 2013-01-08 10:26:47 UTC
Andski wrote:
Please tell me more about how POSes are supposed to be the backbone of industr . . .

I'm not doing the math for you, silly Goon. Doesn't Goonhorde have an accounting department? (I'm not an alt, BTW.)

Mocam wrote:
NBSI is a policy based upon {"trespassers will be shot"} and there's nothing wrong with such a policy.

I don't think anyone is really opposed to it on the grounds that it is wrong. One might even question whether one can DO something that is immorally wrong in a video game, or under the influence of drugs or alcohol, or to a non-sentient lifeform, or in Vegas.

I think the question is whether or not the NBSI policy is contributing to or hurting the success of organizations that have adopted it.

Malcanis wrote:
Tell the world how "entitled" we are, please do.

You certainly seem to think you're entitled to an industrial base and markets that are as good as high sec. You seem to think you are entitled to more people trafficking through your space despite trying to blow a good portion of them up for no good reason, based exclusively on a blanket suspicion. You seem to think you are entitled to your "own" space based on your capacity to muster force to shoot stationary objects. You seem to think you are entitled to the best resources in the game, since you so willingly take them from others even though you won't be able to utilize them effectively yourself.

I said you "bully" people out of space. Some of you seem to object to the term, but I would suggest you consult a dictionary.

You don't know how to use the space. It's that simple. NBSI is the policy you used to take the space, but taking space is not the same as having and using space. I can beat a mathematician up and take his calculator. That doesn't mean I can solve an equation. Similarly, you can muster a swarm of goons to take Delve or Providence or where ever. That doesn't mean you can make it into an empire. The last laugh is had by the people in high sec, who despite having access to mostly lower end resources (and, seriously, when is the last time a level 4 mission dropped a deadspace module or yielded LPs to buy a pirate battleship) have managed to create so much that your goons have to come slinking back to high sec every time they need another ship or more ISK to fund their "pew pew". If your NBSI policy works so well, you shouldn't need to come to high or low sec at all. In fact, it should be us who are bitching and moaning about not having belts full of zydrine and megacyte yielding ores and not having Hubs and Havens and Sanctums out the yin yang to run while we ***** and moan about the lack of noobs and miners to gank. If you think your NBSI policy has made null into a veritable utopia versus the horrid, tyrannical NRDS of high sec, enforced by the supposedly all-seeing, infallible, and invincible CONCORD, then stay the **** out of high sec.

See you in Jita!
Malcanis
Vanishing Point.
The Initiative.
#424 - 2013-01-08 10:30:45 UTC
Mayhaw Morgan wrote:
Andski wrote:
Please tell me more about how POSes are supposed to be the backbone of industr . . .

I'm not doing the math for you, silly Goon. Doesn't Goonhorde have an accounting department? (I'm not an alt, BTW.)

Mocam wrote:
NBSI is a policy based upon {"trespassers will be shot"} and there's nothing wrong with such a policy.

I don't think anyone is really opposed to it on the grounds that it is wrong. One might even question whether one can DO something that is immorally wrong in a video game, or under the influence of drugs or alcohol, or to a non-sentient lifeform, or in Vegas.

I think the question is whether or not the NBSI policy is contributing to or hurting the success of organizations that have adopted it.

Malcanis wrote:
Tell the world how "entitled" we are, please do.

You certainly seem to think you're entitled to an industrial base and markets that are as good as high sec. You seem to think you are entitled to more people trafficking through your space despite trying to blow a good portion of them up for no good reason, based exclusively on a blanket suspicion. You seem to think you are entitled to your "own" space based on your capacity to muster force to shoot stationary objects. You seem to think you are entitled to the best resources in the game, since you so willingly take them from others even though you won't be able to utilize them effectively yourself.

I said you "bully" people out of space. Some of you seem to object to the term, but I would suggest you consult a dictionary.

You don't know how to use the space. It's that simple. NBSI is the policy you used to take the space, but taking space is not the same as having and using space. I can beat a mathematician up and take his calculator. That doesn't mean I can solve an equation. Similarly, you can muster a swarm of goons to take Delve or Providence or where ever. That doesn't mean you can make it into an empire. The last laugh is had by the people in high sec, who despite having access to mostly lower end resources (and, seriously, when is the last time a level 4 mission dropped a deadspace module or yielded LPs to buy a pirate battleship) have managed to create so much that your goons have to come slinking back to high sec every time they need another ship or more ISK to fund their "pew pew". If your NBSI policy works so well, you shouldn't need to come to high or low sec at all. In fact, it should be us who are bitching and moaning about not having belts full of zydrine and megacyte yielding ores and not having Hubs and Havens and Sanctums out the yin yang to run while we ***** and moan about the lack of noobs and miners to gank. If you think your NBSI policy has made null into a veritable utopia versus the horrid, tyrannical NRDS of high sec, enforced by the supposedly all-seeing, infallible, and invincible CONCORD, then stay the **** out of high sec.

See you in Jita!


That was amazing. Simply amazing. Well, I think with this contribution, we finally have all the material we need.

"Just remember later that I warned against any change to jump ranges or fatigue. You earned whats coming."

Grath Telkin, 11.10.2016

Nicolo da'Vicenza
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#425 - 2013-01-08 10:31:25 UTC  |  Edited by: Nicolo da'Vicenza
lol skydell you're really going to have to take it to the next level if you're going to top that post
Malcanis
Vanishing Point.
The Initiative.
#426 - 2013-01-08 10:32:58 UTC
"LOL" is a much over-used internet meme, but I am actually laughing out loud in real life now, comrade Mayhaw.

Thank you for the gift of laughter!

"Just remember later that I warned against any change to jump ranges or fatigue. You earned whats coming."

Grath Telkin, 11.10.2016

Malcanis
Vanishing Point.
The Initiative.
#427 - 2013-01-08 10:39:08 UTC
Nicolo da'Vicenza wrote:
lol skydell you're really going to have to take it to the next level if you're going to top that post


I for one am enthralled to see how he's going to manage it and stay within the forum rules.

"Just remember later that I warned against any change to jump ranges or fatigue. You earned whats coming."

Grath Telkin, 11.10.2016

Lord Zim
Gallente Federation
#428 - 2013-01-08 10:40:16 UTC
Mayhaw Morgan wrote:
I'm not doing the math for you, silly Goon. Doesn't Goonhorde have an accounting department? (I'm not an alt, BTW.)

Read: "I don't know what you're talking about oh god stop bothering me with demands for numbers!"

Mayhaw Morgan wrote:
I think the question is whether or not the NBSI policy is contributing to or hurting the success of organizations that have adopted it.

NBSI isn't hurting the organizations which have adopted it.

Mayhaw Morgan wrote:
You certainly seem to think you're entitled to an industrial base and markets that are as good as high sec.

It makes perfect sense that the part of the game which requires the most work, the most investment and carries the heaviest penalty for losing, is also the most desirable part of the game for all gameplay styles. It makes no sense that hisec, with next to no risk and absolutely no requirement on behalf of the individual players to setup, keep and maintain the infrastructure required to build anything, should surpass the other areas of the game to the extent trying to be a manufacturer in f.ex nullsec is a losing proposition.

And I repeat: http://cdn1.eveonline.com/community/devblog/2011/nullsec-board-for-blog_t.jpg

Cyno's lit, bridge is up, but one pilot won't be jumping home.

RIP Vile Rat

Lord Zim
Gallente Federation
#429 - 2013-01-08 10:40:28 UTC
Mayhaw Morgan wrote:
You seem to think you are entitled to more people trafficking through your space despite trying to blow a good portion of them up for no good reason, based exclusively on a blanket suspicion.

We don't care about joe random chucklefuck trafficking through our space, we want our people to use our space.

Mayhaw Morgan wrote:
You seem to think you are entitled to your "own" space based on your capacity to muster force to shoot stationary objects.

We are entitled to own the space we've taken. If we weren't, we wouldn't be able to hold it, because someone else would've taken it away from us.

Mayhaw Morgan wrote:
You seem to think you are entitled to the best resources in the game, since you so willingly take them from others even though you won't be able to utilize them effectively yourself.

If we weren't entitled to the best resources in the game, then someone else would've taken it away from us, wouldn't they?

Mayhaw Morgan wrote:
I said you "bully" people out of space. Some of you seem to object to the term, but I would suggest you consult a dictionary.

Next you'll say it's amoral. Roll

Mayhaw Morgan wrote:
You don't know how to use the space. It's that simple.

You've no idea what nullsec actually entails. None, zip, zilch, nada, nuh uh, nope, njet.

Cyno's lit, bridge is up, but one pilot won't be jumping home.

RIP Vile Rat

Mayhaw Morgan
State War Academy
Caldari State
#430 - 2013-01-08 11:00:22 UTC
Lord Zim wrote:
You've no idea what nullsec actually entails. None, zip, zilch, nada, nuh uh, nope, njet.


Of course I do. Why do you think I don't live there?Shocked
Malcanis
Vanishing Point.
The Initiative.
#431 - 2013-01-08 11:38:26 UTC
Mayhaw Morgan wrote:
Lord Zim wrote:
You've no idea what nullsec actually entails. None, zip, zilch, nada, nuh uh, nope, njet.


Of course I do. Why do you think I don't live there?Shocked


I assume because to live in 0.0, you need to be liked by at least one other player. No wonder you're so angry at being excluded.

"Just remember later that I warned against any change to jump ranges or fatigue. You earned whats coming."

Grath Telkin, 11.10.2016

Andski
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#432 - 2013-01-08 11:41:55 UTC  |  Edited by: Andski
so it's obvious that you know nothing about POSes, industry, or nullsec at all

nobody can possibly suggest that there is a way to get enough manufacturing slots into a single POS to make it worthwhile over the ~240k isk/slot/month in an NPC station

fyi, it costs ~350M isk/month to run a POS, plus the work required to fuel it, and the risk of having the POS reinforced in minutes

Twitter: @EVEAndski

"It's easy to speak for the silent majority. They rarely object to what you put into their mouths."    - Abrazzar

Andski
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#433 - 2013-01-08 11:50:35 UTC
wait wait wait

did you just say "nullsec has hubs, havens and sanctums, there is therefore no problem with nullsec industry"

because wow

Twitter: @EVEAndski

"It's easy to speak for the silent majority. They rarely object to what you put into their mouths."    - Abrazzar

Lord Zim
Gallente Federation
#434 - 2013-01-08 11:54:22 UTC
Mayhaw Morgan wrote:
Lord Zim wrote:
You've no idea what nullsec actually entails. None, zip, zilch, nada, nuh uh, nope, njet.

Of course I do. Why do you think I don't live there?Shocked

So you're a lonely sissy who can't hack it in nullsec, because that entails making friends.

Cyno's lit, bridge is up, but one pilot won't be jumping home.

RIP Vile Rat

Malcanis
Vanishing Point.
The Initiative.
#435 - 2013-01-08 12:08:05 UTC
Andski wrote:
wait wait wait

did you just say "nullsec has hubs, havens and sanctums, there is therefore no problem with nullsec industry"

because wow


Those limited-number, spawn-timered anomalies which can be found in 8 seconds with the onboard scanner are totally different from unlimited, instantly replenished missions which require scan probes for hostiles to find.

Of course.

"Just remember later that I warned against any change to jump ranges or fatigue. You earned whats coming."

Grath Telkin, 11.10.2016

Skydell
Bad Girl Posse
#436 - 2013-01-08 12:40:11 UTC
Andski wrote:
so it's obvious that you know nothing about POSes, industry, or nullsec at all

nobody can possibly suggest that there is a way to get enough manufacturing slots into a single POS to make it worthwhile over the ~240k isk/slot/month in an NPC station

fyi, it costs ~350M isk/month to run a POS, plus the work required to fuel it, and the risk of having the POS reinforced in minutes


Go go Gadget forum warrior.

free PI and a couple of national ICE Ops, running a POS shouldn't cost you anything.

The trouble with you and all your pets is, you built an empire on the power of ISK, seen through the lense and dictated by the values of high sec. Your ISK backed empire depends on pubie scrubs like me to do your dirty work. Mine your Ice, Mine your low end minerals, build your trash modules, react your junk components. You don't want autonomy, you want the throne. Because at the end of the day you don't have the active members to do it all and keep you out of Jita.

You sound more and more like an RMTer every day. Ships and pods to fill them hold the power in EVE Null sec and you seem a little too obsessed with the ISK. To be fair, maybe you were taught Sov 101 by an RMTer but either way you stand to lose because as Madoff showed the world, all good scams come to an end.
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#437 - 2013-01-08 12:50:44 UTC
Skydell wrote:
free PI and a couple of national ICE Ops, running a POS shouldn't cost you anything.
...because stuff you mine yourself is free. Roll

Quote:
Because at the end of the day you don't have the active members to do it all and keep you out of Jita.
Sure they do. Pretty much anyone able to get a foothold in null does. The problem is that the stuff you're talking about is horribly horribly inefficient to do outside of highsec to the point where it's better in every way to build there and then jump-freight it to the end-use site.
Lord Zim
Gallente Federation
#438 - 2013-01-08 13:16:21 UTC
Skydell wrote:
free PI and a couple of national ICE Ops, running a POS shouldn't cost you anything.

Because of course, our time is free, and the concept of "opportunity costs" is invalid. Roll

Skydell wrote:
The trouble with you and all your pets is, you built an empire on the power of ISK, seen through the lense and dictated by the values of high sec. Your ISK backed empire depends on pubie scrubs like me to do your dirty work. Mine your Ice, Mine your low end minerals, build your trash modules, react your junk components. You don't want autonomy, you want the throne. Because at the end of the day you don't have the active members to do it all and keep you out of Jita.

So we've been saying "hey so we want CCP to change the game mechanics in null to allow us to be less dependent on hisec" for quite a while, and you somehow manage to intepret that as "you don't want autonomy".

Fascinating.
Skydell wrote:
You sound more and more like an RMTer every day. Ships and pods to fill them hold the power in EVE Null sec and you seem a little too obsessed with the ISK. To be fair, maybe you were taught Sov 101 by an RMTer but either way you stand to lose because as Madoff showed the world, all good scams come to an end.

Puff puff pass, dude. Your interpretation is ... psychedelic, share the good stuff.

Cyno's lit, bridge is up, but one pilot won't be jumping home.

RIP Vile Rat

Skydell
Bad Girl Posse
#439 - 2013-01-08 13:18:50 UTC
Tippia wrote:
Skydell wrote:
free PI and a couple of national ICE Ops, running a POS shouldn't cost you anything.
...because stuff you mine yourself is free. Roll

Quote:
Because at the end of the day you don't have the active members to do it all and keep you out of Jita.
Sure they do. Pretty much anyone able to get a foothold in null does. The problem is that the stuff you're talking about is horribly horribly inefficient to do outside of highsec to the point where it's better in every way to build there and then jump-freight it to the end-use site.


Setting aside the classic GD propaganda style quoting you just used, two things come to mind.

PI is passive, it doesn't work like mining. I can run 12 planets per account and avoid the dreaded level 5 skills to do it. Also you are doing the exact same thing he did. Seeing your success strictly from your wallet.

As for low and high being easier to manufacture in, the problem is what? Run it in Low and high that is in your beacon range and call it a win? Running Industrial out of stations eliminates all the cumbersome management, so? Do it that way! The trouble is again, you don't have the mining members base, willing to do it cheaper than high sec, willing to make the cumbersome more? Profitable! You guys see everything from a profit stand point.
Lord Zim
Gallente Federation
#440 - 2013-01-08 13:33:16 UTC
Skydell wrote:
As for low and high being easier to manufacture in, the problem is what? Run it in Low and high that is in your beacon range and call it a win?

Or we could get CCP to fix the game mechanics so nullsec is a preferrable place to go to for people who aren't complete sissies.

Skydell wrote:
Running Industrial out of stations eliminates all the cumbersome management, so?

It makes no sense for nullsec to be completely incapable of being built up to the point where we can handily compete with f.ex hisec, and as such poach back our industrial characters back into nullsec.

Skydell wrote:
Do it that way! The trouble is again, you don't have the mining members base, willing to do it cheaper than high sec, willing to make the cumbersome more? Profitable! You guys see everything from a profit stand point.

Why should they make it cheaper than hisec, when it's more risk, more work and higher cost?

Cyno's lit, bridge is up, but one pilot won't be jumping home.

RIP Vile Rat