These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Wormholes

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Looking for wormhole related questions you want to ask CSM candidates!

First post
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
S'No Flake
Native Freshfood
Minmatar Republic
#61 - 2012-12-21 14:59:44 UTC  |  Edited by: S'No Flake
Tas Nok wrote:
Getting back to the OP request here are questions I'd want asked:

--Would you favor making Rorquals able to use their clone bays to jump into/out of WH space?

--As part of the POS revamp will a module be allowed in WH space to allow clone jumping?


This two will make things way too easy.
All the corps/alliances which fight together will just leave clones and ships in the friendly WHs.

When a WH it is invaded, they will just jump clones and will be ready to defend.
No more rolling statics, bringing limited number of ships, etc. Everything will be there... ready... nothing to work for.

I would personally want to see a full fitting service so i can change subsystems on T3 without having to go out only to do that.
Sandslinger
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#62 - 2012-12-21 16:45:55 UTC
S'No Flake wrote:
Tas Nok wrote:
Getting back to the OP request here are questions I'd want asked:

--Would you favor making Rorquals able to use their clone bays to jump into/out of WH space?

--As part of the POS revamp will a module be allowed in WH space to allow clone jumping?


This two will make things way too easy.
All the corps/alliances which fight together will just leave clones and ships in the friendly WHs.

When a WH it is invaded, they will just jump clones and will be ready to defend.
No more rolling statics, bringing limited number of ships, etc. Everything will be there... ready... nothing to work for.

I would personally want to see a full fitting service so i can change subsystems on T3 without having to go out only to do that.


Clone jumping to Rorqual in WH would be imbalanced as hell towards defenders.

What I would like to see is ability to switch out clones on Rorqual. once every 24 hours like jump clones.

So we can have some control over which pirate set we're in
Robot Monster
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#63 - 2012-12-21 20:54:34 UTC
Sandslinger wrote:
S'No Flake wrote:
Tas Nok wrote:
Getting back to the OP request here are questions I'd want asked:

--Would you favor making Rorquals able to use their clone bays to jump into/out of WH space?

--As part of the POS revamp will a module be allowed in WH space to allow clone jumping?


This two will make things way too easy.
All the corps/alliances which fight together will just leave clones and ships in the friendly WHs.

When a WH it is invaded, they will just jump clones and will be ready to defend.
No more rolling statics, bringing limited number of ships, etc. Everything will be there... ready... nothing to work for.

I would personally want to see a full fitting service so i can change subsystems on T3 without having to go out only to do that.


Clone jumping to Rorqual in WH would be imbalanced as hell towards defenders.

What I would like to see is ability to switch out clones on Rorqual. once every 24 hours like jump clones.

So we can have some control over which pirate set we're in


This. No one wants the ability to jump from high sec to a WH or set the Rorq as your new clone when you are podded. You get podded you're in k-space. We just want the ability to have different clones available. Like a wardrobe. Going to null sec? Cool I'll leave my slaves here and grab a cheap clone.
Dark Calling
Native Freshfood
Minmatar Republic
#64 - 2012-12-27 06:55:31 UTC  |  Edited by: Dark Calling
I would love personal hangars.. At the moment it's all a little messy in that area

A renewed focus on sleepers would also be great.. Perhaps some type of expansion that focuses purely on them and purely on WH space and that releases a new strain of them which in turn this new strain brings new salvage and blue loot maybe.. Which again in turn could give us T3 Frigates or some new type of sleeper technology..

I wouldn't expect that to happen tommorrow.. But somewhere down the line perhaps

It might also give people the incentive to get into WH space if there was a large expansion about it.. Something exiting and new that can only be done or found in Wormholes..

There is so much that can be done with WH space.. The potential is there but sadly the number of people in them is not many compared to other aspects of EVE and our voices are not heard enough..

Also if they really do take away POS shields i for one do not see that ending well and i really hope that docking games do not come to WH space..

Failure Is Not Falling Down.. Failure Is Refusing To Get Back Up
Lloyd Roses
Artificial Memories
#65 - 2012-12-31 12:29:56 UTC
I will give every CSM candidate my vote that complies on the following:

1
Keep wormholes free of timers (Not free from creating timers/suspect flags etc, but wormhole-space itself should nowehere be affected by any kind of timer ever. Polarisation timer excluded, he is a good friend of mine)

2
Keep Local delayed like it is now

3
Insist on only implementing a FULLY working revamped POS system (as some pony pointed out)

4
Don't fiddle with the wormhole masses and lifetimes. Other people got jump bridges and constant stargates to plan their roams, chaincollapsing and k-holing anywhere is the usual way we find pvp inside wormholes.

5
I got absolutely no objections to massively increase the number of N432s spawning in SOV-nullsec. Or any nullsec.
Every CSM considering that option is working towards the total number of pvp-oppurtunities I got. So me like.

I live off the timezones, so I rather pve in nullsec anyways, can't speak about how wonderful or not c5s are. Doing nullsec anoms/mags/plexes is quite awesome though. Don't know if c5/c6 escalations can compete with nullsec mags tbh.
Lloyd Roses
Artificial Memories
#66 - 2012-12-31 12:34:04 UTC
Dark Calling wrote:
I would love personal hangars.. At the moment it's all a little messy in that area


Butbut... Orca-alts! A personal Hangar you can even log-out :D
WInter Borne
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#67 - 2013-01-03 20:10:33 UTC  |  Edited by: WInter Borne
Messoroz wrote:
We could just permacamp AHARM poses and keep podding TwoStep until he realizes how dumb the idea is.

You act like Twostep can tap a dev on the shoulder and say, "henceforth there will be docking games".
TomyLobo
U2EZ
#68 - 2013-01-04 22:34:28 UTC  |  Edited by: TomyLobo
"Clone jumping to Rorqual in WH would be imbalanced as hell towards defenders.

What I would like to see is ability to switch out clones on Rorqual. once every 24 hours like jump clones.

So we can have some control over which pirate set we're in"

This ^^. I can't emphasize enough how important it is that this gets implemented. As for POS changes, please do remember that it's not only whs that will be affected here but all of EvE. If we get to dock in a POS, what sort of protection will supers have or will they be able to dock in a POS too? I also find it critical to see whoever is in a POS at any given time but one can also say that it'll prevent defenders from SDing ships and wh dwellers will be required to have scouts cloaked outside their POS at all times. It's like giving with one hand and taking with the other but CCP tends to somehow have three hands in cases such as these.

Although, it has to be said, this will add more spice to wh fights especially when you are evicting a group from a wh. Everyone becomes vulnerable on undock and if POS undock/dock timers & docking range are increased and reduced respectively, unlike that of normal stations, then this might just be the change we need to spice things up in whs. I for one know that more ganks will occur and if you refuse to fight, you'll lose it all. Logging off won't save you this time around neither will self-destructing.

Of course, all these speculations are based on the fact that force fields will be removed during the change.
Indo Nira
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#69 - 2013-01-05 08:06:23 UTC
WInter Borne wrote:
Messoroz wrote:
We could just permacamp AHARM poses and keep podding TwoStep until he realizes how dumb the idea is.

You act like Twostep can tap a dev on the shoulder and say, "henceforth there will be docking games".



well.... he did tap one to close down a forum thread and delete some posts... sooooo... yeah