These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Crime & Punishment

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Collective front launched against the New Order, James315 and miner bumping.

First post First post
Author
Alana Charen-Teng
Garoun Investment Bank
Gallente Federation
#341 - 2012-12-30 10:48:18 UTC  |  Edited by: Alana Charen-Teng
Benny Ohu wrote:
Alana Charen-Teng wrote:
Scaramanga Erquilenne wrote:

Maybe us new players should get some cheap ships and go and pod the one day old accounts coming out of a station unless they pay us 10 mil sure CCP would like that . Its the same principle as what New order is trying to do and its a game breaker.


Maybe you should - others are doing it already.

Don't tell him that. There's a huge difference between actual newbies still in the tutorials and a newish player a month old. The gamemasters expand the definition of harassment greatly when it comes to rookies. If I remember a GM post I saw correctly, the rules aren't absolutely set but are to the spirit of 'don't **** with rookies'.

The difference is between ganking a player who doesn't know how to move their ship and ganking a month-old who understands game mechanics to the extent of being able to support themselves and affect other players in a meaningful way. A month-old who can avoid danger if they think, pay attention and realise that sometimes they have to compromise. EVE is harsh and you* can't define yourself as a rookie for as long as you find it convenient to the detriment of the game of those around you.

*e: not you


I completely misread his post. I thought it had meant that he should create new alts to pod the gankers as they leave station - which I have seen several players do. So I must retract my earlier statement. Disruptive activities are not permitted in Rookie systems or Sisters of EVE mission systems. They are, however, permitted outside of these locations regardless of player age.
Alana Charen-Teng
Garoun Investment Bank
Gallente Federation
#342 - 2012-12-30 11:07:01 UTC
Fruga MorDanKin wrote:

Alana Charen-Teng wrote:

Fruga MorDanKin wrote:
That's why I suggest if you really feel that they're harassing you, send a petition about it - even if you think it won't do anything. One, or even a hundred won't cause them to move but thousands may have them perk up and take notice.

This attitude is all too common in highsec miners, and is exactly the attitude the New Order opposes. This is why we do what we do.


You do what you do beause the majority of people don't like what you're doing? That is one definition of a harasser.


I don't think you understand what the majority of EVE players want and don't want. The only definition of harassment that's relevant in this discussion is the definition used by CCP - everything else is just people complaining about how their feelings have been hurt because something bad happened to them.

Fruga MorDanKin wrote:

I mine in hi-sec so I don't have to deal with people using cowardly or petty tactics to interrupt my game. That's what Hi-sec is suppose to be about - no matter what the lag time of CONCORD is.

Highsec is not a place where you can play uninterrupted. There is no place for that aside from being docked in station. Non-consensual player interaction is not isolated to lowsec and zerosec. What you *want* highsec to be is not what highsec *is*, nor what it *should* be.
Runeme Shilter
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#343 - 2012-12-30 11:07:22 UTC
Scaramanga Erquilenne wrote:
And it would be fine if they had to live with the consequence of their actions but they don't, sure all the alts will disappear in a short while and new ones will appear and repeat.


That would be a ban-able offense. I fully intend to use and play on this alt for long time to come.
TheGunslinger42
All Web Investigations
#344 - 2012-12-30 12:35:54 UTC
Scaramanga Erquilenne wrote:
My expriance with the so called new order last night

Four months in to eve and still enjoying it apart from a few things like the sheer expense of every thing in game and the lack of financial reward from missions exploration and mining compared to the costs of good ships and good moduals .I am slowly working though all the different ways to play the game and decided to invest in a blueprint research in and build some stuff as well as exploration and running missions.Unless you want to grind for endless hours you have no option but to buy plex and well as you 10 euro a month sub at least for the fist year.

I Invested 30 mil in a retriever and 7 mil on insurance and another 10 mil on fitting it out to mine some ice now that's almost 40 mil there.It takes many hours of game play for a new player to get 40 mil.I found a ice Field last night in brapelille 07 and started to mine some blue ice.Seemed to take for ages to fill up the ore hold and to my surprise about 1 hour on mining blueice only yielded me 4 million isk .So that would work out at 10 hours of mining blue ice just to cover the cost of what i spent on the equipment and ship.

Understand that as the weeks , months, years pass and i improve my skills and equipment that the yield will increase.But at the moment as a new player this is were i am.So i am sitting mining the ice and i notice some odd behaviour and ships coming in and out of the sector and some one talking about having to pay 100 million for a licence to mine ice in the area .I Align my ship to the gate and got ready to jump and sure enough 1 min later 8 catalysts warp in on a suicide mission i warp out and manage to get away.

I changed ship and returned to the sector to see what happened and i noticed that the player who was mining ice next to me did not make it out and lost his ship and he was Not AFK are a Bot.Now unless he was using a alt this player was also a new player like my self according to his profile.So i read the local chatter and it turns out the new order is trying to run a extortion racket on the mine field.Plain to see that they were all alts used by experienced eve players to suicide miners under the guise of a supposed cause.

My guess is they all have great incomes from there other alts are some goo ISK rolling in with little effort.And it would be fine if they had to live with the consequence of their actions but they don't, sure all the alts will disappear in a short while and new ones will appear and repeat.Now if i lost my 40 mil investment while grinding for just 4 mil a hour in a ice field in 07 space I would start to think the cards are all stacked against new players and its pointless.At least use your main alt and stop hideing behind two months old alts if your all for the cause.

Its just experienced bored players, with lots of spare ISK preying upon new players for laughs and giggles and in the end i am sure all it will do is turn new players away from the game.I would be happy with this if these people stayed with these characters and used them as their main but they dont .Just seems a lame war to fight to me, plenty battles out there they could get involved in with people who can fight back.

Not saying all high sec should be safe have no problem with losing a ship in high sec and if ccp want to make it more of a challenge throw in some harder AI at high sec mining sites i just think experienced players with ISK to burn who suicide new players who grinds for hours and days weeks to make a start in the game is bad for the game.The use of alts just make it all pointless and why on earth would any station let wanted players dock in it anyway.If ccp want to stop people AFK mining are bots they should introduce a new mineing system

Maybe us new players should get some cheap ships and go and pod the one day old accounts coming out of a station unless they pay us 10 mil sure CCP would like that . Its the same principle as what New order is trying to do and its a game breaker.


Since you're a new player you may be forgiven for not understanding that these escapades do not drive players from the game, but in fact draw more new players. Hope this helps.
Danks
Fat Angry Toe Tappin Inbreds
#345 - 2012-12-30 22:37:10 UTC
Fruga MorDanKin wrote:
my game.


It's Our game dude, not single player.
Fruga MorDanKin
Atlastra Space Services
#346 - 2012-12-30 22:59:05 UTC
Danks wrote:
Fruga MorDanKin wrote:
my game.


It's Our game dude, not single player.


You are correct, I should have said "my gaming experience."

As for knowing what the majority of the players want, that is also correct. All I can go off of is what I see and hear. And granted, it is usually the vocal minority that gets heard the most.

But for others to believe to know what the other players want (suicide ganking in Hi-sec) and changing the game to fit their ideals is no real difference. The only difference is that I am not destroying players who are at their keyboards mining away or attempting to extort money from them.

And as for what CCP wants - that can change with player input. We are the customers and we can inform them as to our feelings on things. They can either call it whining or decide it is a valid concern. It's up to them but they won't know what the majority of players want if their players don't tell them.

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe
#347 - 2012-12-31 01:16:08 UTC
Alana Charen-Teng wrote:
I don't think you understand what the majority of EVE players want and don't want. The only definition of harassment that's relevant in this discussion is the definition used by CCP - everything else is just people complaining about how their feelings have been hurt because something bad happened to them.
Fruga MorDanKin wrote:
I mine in hi-sec so I don't have to deal with people using cowardly or petty tactics to interrupt my game. That's what Hi-sec is suppose to be about - no matter what the lag time of CONCORD is.

Highsec is not a place where you can play uninterrupted. There is no place for that aside from being docked in station. Non-consensual player interaction is not isolated to lowsec and zerosec. What you *want* highsec to be is not what highsec *is*, nor what it *should* be.

Highsec cannot be allowed to harbor bumpers any more than it is gankers. It has far too many of both.

Triggered by: Wars of Sovless Agression, Bending the Knee, Twisting the Knife, Eating Sov Wheaties, Bombless Bombers, Fizzlesov, Interceptor Fleets, Running Away, GhostTime Vuln, Renters, Bombs, Bubbles ?

Scaramanga Erquilenne
#348 - 2012-12-31 01:49:42 UTC
Benny Ohu wrote:
Alana Charen-Teng wrote:
Scaramanga Erquilenne wrote:

Maybe us new players should get some cheap ships and go and pod the one day old accounts coming out of a station unless they pay us 10 mil sure CCP would like that . Its the same principle as what New order is trying to do and its a game breaker.


Maybe you should - others are doing it already.

Don't tell him that. There's a huge difference between actual newbies still in the tutorials and a newish player a month old. The gamemasters expand the definition of harassment greatly when it comes to rookies. If I remember a GM post I saw correctly, the rules aren't absolutely set but are to the spirit of 'don't **** with rookies'.

The difference is between ganking a player who doesn't know how to move their ship and ganking a month-old who understands game mechanics to the extent of being able to support themselves and affect other players in a meaningful way. A month-old who can avoid danger if they think, pay attention and realise that sometimes they have to compromise. EVE is harsh and you* can't define yourself as a rookie for as long as you find it convenient to the detriment of the game of those around you.

*e: not you


Don't worry i have no Intention of doing this was just used as a example.Its just about risk and reward and loss ,These members of the new order have nothing to lose so hence they cant ever lose the only people who lose are the victems.New miners who invest in a ship and fit to mine ice have a great deal to lose.

As i said if they used there main char i would be fine with this and i can see how it adds to the game and it brings a bit more variety and game play to high sec which is good. And it brings a bit more fun to mining and maybe encourages more people to get involved in PVP etc.

But lets have them put some of there assets on the line and stop hiding behind 1 month old alts .CCP should put harder enemy AI around mining sites if they want to make sure people are playing when they are mining.Lets see how many of these alts are still logging on in 1 month.

You have your way. I have my way. As for the right way, the correct way, and the only way, it does not exist 
Lin Suizei
#349 - 2012-12-31 02:47:28 UTC
Scaramanga Erquilenne wrote:
Don't worry i have no Intention of doing this was just used as a example.Its just about risk and reward and loss ,These members of the new order have nothing to lose so hence they cant ever lose the only people who lose are the victems.New miners who invest in a ship and fit to mine ice have a great deal to lose..


10M ISK is not "alot" to lose for someone who can afford a Mining Barge.

Scaramanga Erquilenne wrote:
As i said if they used there main char i would be fine with this and i can see how it adds to the game and it brings a bit more variety and game play to high sec which is good. And it brings a bit more fun to mining and maybe encourages more people to get involved in PVP etc

But lets have them put some of there assets on the line and stop hiding behind 1 month old alts .CCP should put harder enemy AI around mining sites if they want to make sure people are playing when they are mining.Lets see how many of these alts are still logging on in 1 month.


It doesn't matter which character we do this with. Our assets aren't at risk because people such as yourself aren't doing anything (non-ridiculous) to put them at risk.

Lol I can't delete my forum sig.

Bing Bangboom
DAMAG Safety Commission
#350 - 2012-12-31 15:43:15 UTC
So we get through 18 pages of this thread and what we arrive at is:

1) Petition CCP to get them to stop the New Order from interrupting my Hi sec mining experience.
2) Gank on your main.
3) New players will quit and Eve will die.
4) There is no way to stop the New Order (that the poster could actually be bothered to do).

and the universally popular

5) Rich, bored, bitter vets go to lo-sec (null) and leave Hisec the way CCP (ME!) wants it to be!

We heard all these months ago. And we will hear them months from now when the New Order is 10 times the size it is now.

We're just getting started.

Highsec is worth fighting for.

Bing Bangboom
Agent of the New Order of Highsec
Belligerent Undesirable

Highsec is worth fighting for.

By choosing to mine in New Order systems, highsec miners have agreed to follow the New Halaima Code of Conduct.  www.minerbumping.com

Tortise Winkle VonDudenberg
Doomheim
#351 - 2012-12-31 18:13:49 UTC  |  Edited by: Tortise Winkle VonDudenberg
Winchester Steele wrote:
Tortise Winkle VonDudenberg wrote:
Winchester Steele wrote:
Ahahahaha. You miner folk are hilarious! Please add me to your sad little list as I am a huge supporter of James 315 and proud shareholder in the New Order. Make sure you get my alt Garrison Woods too. He's murdered a mountain of defenceless miners, and will surely murder many more.

Thank James for this great emergent game content. Never in my highest hopes did I expect to see such a huge return on my investment.

PRAISE JAMES!! ALL HAIL THE NEW ORDER OF HI-SEC.



Your alliance says you are only able to think frigate. Never not think for yourself.


And your alliance sa.... Oh wait, your just a shiptoasting npc alt, your argument is invalid.

Nvm then, carry on.


Your corp is more npc than mine. At least my corp has actual people who play.

A Perfectly Normal Corp. [-PNC-]
Tax Rate 0.00 %Bille IX - Moon 3 - Impetus Development Studio
Shares 1000
Member Count 4
ho chiminh
SlackaNova
#352 - 2012-12-31 20:05:18 UTC
Please gank in your mains.

Due to the mandatory "Throttling" by Canadian ISP's my last experience with new order was:
Reds jump into belt, hit warp to station,screen freezes - 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8, wake up in new pod 15 jumps away. A thrilling experience to be sure.

Now I have killrights for 7 or 8 new players flying catalysts- whoopee! I'm sure I'll catch a few in Bawilan or Brapellille, but really not worth more than a couple hours to pop pilots with nothing ships.

I don't consider it griefing, but still I mine in my main, please gank in yours.
TheGunslinger42
All Web Investigations
#353 - 2012-12-31 20:21:01 UTC
ho chiminh wrote:
Please gank in your mains.

Due to the mandatory "Throttling" by Canadian ISP's my last experience with new order was:
Reds jump into belt, hit warp to station,screen freezes - 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8, wake up in new pod 15 jumps away. A thrilling experience to be sure.

Now I have killrights for 7 or 8 new players flying catalysts- whoopee! I'm sure I'll catch a few in Bawilan or Brapellille, but really not worth more than a couple hours to pop pilots with nothing ships.

I don't consider it griefing, but still I mine in my main, please gank in yours.


No.

Phew, glad we got that sorted!
Bing Bangboom
DAMAG Safety Commission
#354 - 2012-12-31 20:49:47 UTC
ho chiminh wrote:
Please gank in your mains.

Due to the mandatory "Throttling" by Canadian ISP's my last experience with new order was:
Reds jump into belt, hit warp to station,screen freezes - 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8, wake up in new pod 15 jumps away. A thrilling experience to be sure.

Now I have killrights for 7 or 8 new players flying catalysts- whoopee! I'm sure I'll catch a few in Bawilan or Brapellille, but really not worth more than a couple hours to pop pilots with nothing ships.

I don't consider it griefing, but still I mine in my main, please gank in yours.


Sorry your ISP kept you from getting the full Knights of the New Order experience. May I recommend the following so you can see what you missed.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j--VIJanLm4

BBB

Highsec is worth fighting for.

By choosing to mine in New Order systems, highsec miners have agreed to follow the New Halaima Code of Conduct.  www.minerbumping.com

FloppieTheBanjoClown
Arcana Imperii Ltd.
#355 - 2012-12-31 23:27:55 UTC
Having been a miner, I know a number of methods to foil bumpers. I've never seen anyone employ them.

Having spent a fair bit of time observing the activities of the New Order, I know several ways they could be effectively countered until they adapted with a strategy that would be far less efficient for them. There have been times I could have done considerable damage to their operations if it had suited me.

However, I will not reveal my secrets for free, as I highly enjoy watching these guys work. In fact I invited them into a system and watched the drama unfold over several days. It was great fun.

Want to know what I know? Make an offer.

Founding member of the Belligerent Undesirables movement.

Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
#356 - 2013-01-01 00:14:47 UTC
FloppieTheBanjoClown wrote:
Having been a miner, I know a number of methods to foil bumpers. I've never seen anyone employ them.

Having spent a fair bit of time observing the activities of the New Order, I know several ways they could be effectively countered until they adapted with a strategy that would be far less efficient for them. There have been times I could have done considerable damage to their operations if it had suited me.

However, I will not reveal my secrets for free, as I highly enjoy watching these guys work. In fact I invited them into a system and watched the drama unfold over several days. It was great fun.

Want to know what I know? Make an offer.


I like your style, watching them work is pretty amusing, they're getting pretty good at forcibly clearing systems of people who don't pay them.

In the beginning there was nothing, which exploded.

New Player FAQ

Feyd's Survival Pack

FloppieTheBanjoClown
Arcana Imperii Ltd.
#357 - 2013-01-01 00:22:04 UTC
Jonah Gravenstein wrote:
I like your style, watching them work is pretty amusing, they're getting pretty good at forcibly clearing systems of people who don't pay them.

I spent a while in Kamio recently watching them work. I got to the point that I was able to be a step ahead of them every step of the way, and they had no idea I was there. I could have easily shut down their operations for a short time and forced them to figure out how to deal with me. I'd have definitely been able to considerably slow them down and compromise everything they thought was secure. But I'd no sooner smash a stained glass window...unless there was profit in it.

Founding member of the Belligerent Undesirables movement.

Lady Katherine Devonshire
Royal Ammatar Engineering Corps
#358 - 2013-01-01 00:25:59 UTC
ho chiminh wrote:
Now I have killrights for 7 or 8 new players flying catalysts- whoopee!


There is little point, however, as you can be fairly certain that they will all be biomassed by the end of the month and replaced with new disposable suicide gank alts.
FloppieTheBanjoClown
Arcana Imperii Ltd.
#359 - 2013-01-01 00:41:04 UTC
Lady Katherine Devonshire wrote:
ho chiminh wrote:
Now I have killrights for 7 or 8 new players flying catalysts- whoopee!


There is little point, however, as you can be fairly certain that they will all be biomassed by the end of the month and replaced with new disposable suicide gank alts.

Actually, that's quite against the rules. Biomassing to escape consequences is not allowed.

Founding member of the Belligerent Undesirables movement.

Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
#360 - 2013-01-01 00:46:35 UTC
Lady Katherine Devonshire wrote:
ho chiminh wrote:
Now I have killrights for 7 or 8 new players flying catalysts- whoopee!


There is little point, however, as you can be fairly certain that they will all be biomassed by the end of the month and replaced with new disposable suicide gank alts.


If you see people doing that then by all means petition them, it's against the rules. I doubt you'll see much of it though.

In the beginning there was nothing, which exploded.

New Player FAQ

Feyd's Survival Pack