These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Player Features and Ideas Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

[T3 BC] Req: T3 subsystems revision
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Flashrain
Dragon.
Pandemic Horde
#1 - 2011-10-21 22:40:40 UTC  |  Edited by: Flashrain
Hi,

Since new Tier ships are under the scope, please consider giving them subsystems, changes and novel features:

1. Eliminate redundancy - replace 4 racial subsystems with 1 universal subsystem per bonus type, i.e. interdiction nullifier.

2. Area Effect subsystems - ecm bursts, smart bombs, void bombs, ecm bombs, damage bombs.

3. Big guns, small hull - subsystem reducing fitting requirement for dreadnaught guns, citadel launchers, doomsday weapons, fighters, fighter bombers..... without the benefit of a capital/supercap tank.

4. Small guns, big hull - subsystem increasing effectiveness of cruiser/frigate size guns, forcing ultra close engagements.


-F
Max Von Sydow
24th Imperial Crusade
Amarr Empire
#2 - 2011-10-21 22:42:47 UTC
TIER 3!!!
THEY'RE TIER 3!!!
NOT TECH 3!!!
Ingvar Angst
Nasty Pope Holding Corp
#3 - 2011-10-22 03:51:50 UTC
Hmm... refine subsystems due to ships that don't use any...

Why didn't I think of that!

Six months in the hole... it changes a man.
Vetruvius Valinor
Doomheim
#4 - 2011-10-22 03:56:27 UTC
No.

I'd leave it at that but I might be mistaken for trolling. These ships are not tech 3, they are tier 3, meaning a Tech 1 BC that needs more BC training to fly. They are not an Advanced Ship. Also, why would we change how subsystems work, thus changing how existing ships work and are fit, to accommodate new ships that shouldn't even use them according to EvE story and Lore?
Flashrain
Dragon.
Pandemic Horde
#5 - 2011-10-23 22:08:02 UTC
Not that far from t1 cruiser to strategic cruiser. Subsystems add more game play depth and breadth. And lore can be changed. Everything is still on the drawing board.

Look at the noctis, rorqual, primae - pretty boring after the initial release. Whereas T3 cruisers are still exciting after all this time. Graphically, all of them are great for modular subsystem designs.


Would be nice if subsystems expand the price range to something around 1 Mil - 100 mil.
XXSketchxx
Sniggerdly
Pandemic Legion
#6 - 2011-10-23 22:24:40 UTC
What the hell are you talking about?
Elindreal
Planetary Interactors
#7 - 2011-10-24 02:01:57 UTC
drugs
lots of them
Jack Carrigan
Order of the Shadow
#8 - 2011-10-24 05:53:19 UTC
And for a few ISK a day, you could teach illiterate mother ****ers like OP how to read and realize the blatant stupidity of their posts. Make all donations to Jack Carrigan with the note "stupid*** illiteracy fund."

Or we can just choke the biomass queue with all the ****tarded people floating around here.

It is amazing how some people are so blinded by their own stupid ideas that they can't even see the tip of their nose. For the love of all that is holy, ACTUALLY PAY ATTENTION TO **** THAT IS WRITTEN BEFORE YOU MAKE YOURSELF LOOK LIKE A DUMB***!

I am the One who exists in Shadow. I am the Devil your parents warned you about.

||CEO: Order of the Shadow||Executor: The Revenant Order||Creator: Bowhead||
Jita Shopper86
LAWL Corp
#9 - 2011-10-24 06:21:02 UTC
Max Von Sydow wrote:
TIER 3!!!
THEY'RE TIER 3!!!
NOT TECH 3!!!

It's someone from IRC. of course they got it wrong
Nova Fox
Novafox Shipyards
#10 - 2011-10-24 07:01:00 UTC
They are R 3 not T 3.

R3 T1

Dust 514's CPM 1 Iron Wolf Saber Eve mail me about Dust 514 issues.
Aesiron
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#11 - 2011-10-24 09:02:19 UTC
Tier 3 Tech 1.

Goddamnit!
De'Veldrin
Republic University
Minmatar Republic
#12 - 2011-10-24 13:23:08 UTC
Jita Shopper86 wrote:
Max Von Sydow wrote:
TIER 3!!!
THEY'RE TIER 3!!!
NOT TECH 3!!!

It's someone from IRC. of course they got it wrong


You have no idea how many times I have said that since the dev blog came out. Sad

De'Veldrin's Corollary (to Malcanis' Law): Any idea that seeks to limit the ability of a large nullsec bloc to do something in the name of allowing more small groups into sov null will inevitably make it that much harder for small groups to enter sov null.
Gypsio III
Questionable Ethics.
Ministry of Inappropriate Footwork
#13 - 2011-10-24 13:54:11 UTC
t3 ≠ T3

Loki = T3 t1
Tornado = T1 t3

This post ≠ interesting
Flashrain
Dragon.
Pandemic Horde
#14 - 2011-10-25 20:30:38 UTC
Let me rephrase: Make the new tier 3 ships into Tech 3 ships.

Hope that helps the TL;DR crowd.
Tanya Powers
Doomheim
#15 - 2011-10-25 20:34:11 UTC
Max Von Sydow wrote:
TIER 3!!!
THEY'RE TIER 3!!!
NOT TECH 3!!!


This tbh !!
Tyme Xandr
Weyl Manufacturing
#16 - 2011-10-25 22:36:30 UTC
These new ships are Tier 3 not Tech 3 as has been pointed out by several people.

As for Tech 3 ships in Frig, Destroyer, Battlecruiser, and Battleship size they are on their way. Go read through some dev blogs where they hinted at Frigate tech 3 ships on the drawing board.
Nova Fox
Novafox Shipyards
#17 - 2011-10-26 05:00:53 UTC
Max Von Sydow wrote:
TIER 3!!!
THEY'RE TIER 3!!!
NOT TECH 3!!!


once again.

Dust 514's CPM 1 Iron Wolf Saber Eve mail me about Dust 514 issues.
Roisin Connor
Fight Club Outfit
DammFam
#18 - 2011-10-26 10:18:03 UTC
Tyme Xandr wrote:
Go read through some dev blogs where they hinted at Frigate tech 3 ships on the drawing board.


This is very interesting. I've always thought Tech 3 cruisers were to expensive for my taste. Perhaps I'll look into tech 3 frigates.Cool

Sorry for going off topic...