These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

You did it to yourselves - Yet Another Boost null/low, nerf hi thread, except not.

Author
Malcanis
Vanishing Point.
The Initiative.
#141 - 2012-12-30 21:45:47 UTC
Ines Tegator wrote:
I nominate Perimiter as the new trade hub if Jita is changed.

Really... why do you guys think that would accomplish anything? Highbears don't want nullsec play- if they did, they'd already be there. You won't be able to attract them by giving them something they don't want in the first place.


We don't give two short ***** where the "Highbears" want to play. If they want to stay in hi-sec, more power to them! What we'd like is for it to be actually to our advantage to have our hi-sec alts in the space that we own.

That OK with you?

"Just remember later that I warned against any change to jump ranges or fatigue. You earned whats coming."

Grath Telkin, 11.10.2016

Natsett Amuinn
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#142 - 2012-12-30 21:46:15 UTC
Malcanis wrote:
Randolph Rothstein wrote:

if you dont understand what is this thread about i suggest you leaving and post in one of them nerf threads


If your best response to being asked to explain your suggestion is a demand that the questioner leave then that does throw the value of your response into question.

Perhaps you'd like to answer a different question instead. Previously you asserted that hisec should have the best industry because it's the "heart of civilisation" - the developed world, compared to Afghanistan hill country. Presumably therefore you would agree that hi-sec should pay developed-world level taxation rates? Say... 25%? That seems pretty moderate.

You don't understand.

Why would you pay taxes in a utopian society?
Ines Tegator
Serious Business Inc. Ltd. LLC. etc.
#143 - 2012-12-30 21:47:12 UTC
Malcanis wrote:
Ines Tegator wrote:
I nominate Perimiter as the new trade hub if Jita is changed.

Really... why do you guys think that would accomplish anything? Highbears don't want nullsec play- if they did, they'd already be there. You won't be able to attract them by giving them something they don't want in the first place.


We don't give two short ***** where the "Highbears" want to play. If they want to stay in hi-sec, more power to them! What we'd like is for it to be actually to our advantage to have our hi-sec alts in the space that we own.

That OK with you?


What's stopping you?
Natsett Amuinn
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#144 - 2012-12-30 21:49:03 UTC
Ines Tegator wrote:
Malcanis wrote:
Ines Tegator wrote:
I nominate Perimiter as the new trade hub if Jita is changed.

Really... why do you guys think that would accomplish anything? Highbears don't want nullsec play- if they did, they'd already be there. You won't be able to attract them by giving them something they don't want in the first place.


We don't give two short ***** where the "Highbears" want to play. If they want to stay in hi-sec, more power to them! What we'd like is for it to be actually to our advantage to have our hi-sec alts in the space that we own.

That OK with you?


What's stopping you?

Obvioiusly not ignorance.

Some of us know full well that NPC corp alts are overpowered.
Qolde
Scrambled Eggs Inc.
#145 - 2012-12-30 21:51:36 UTC
Ines Tegator wrote:
Malcanis wrote:
Ines Tegator wrote:
I nominate Perimiter as the new trade hub if Jita is changed.

Really... why do you guys think that would accomplish anything? Highbears don't want nullsec play- if they did, they'd already be there. You won't be able to attract them by giving them something they don't want in the first place.


We don't give two short ***** where the "Highbears" want to play. If they want to stay in hi-sec, more power to them! What we'd like is for it to be actually to our advantage to have our hi-sec alts in the space that we own.

That OK with you?


What's stopping you?

Only ourselves. I think even the dissenters are realizing what's possible. Now is the time to leverage our total control of the supply of t2 materials. Let us make the game better for ourselves. We can at least move to lowsec. Jeez it ain't harder than flying through 0.0 in a solo carrier or battleship.

If someone craps in your sandbox: 1. Light it on fire 2. Grab your shovel 3. Throw it back at them.

Ines Tegator
Serious Business Inc. Ltd. LLC. etc.
#146 - 2012-12-30 21:52:52 UTC
Qolde wrote:

Only ourselves. I think even the dissenters are realizing what's possible. Now is the time to leverage our total control of the supply of t2 materials. Let us make the game better for ourselves. We can at least move to lowsec. Jeez it ain't harder than flying through 0.0 in a solo carrier or battleship.

Now that's an EVE attitude. Let's take control for ourselves muahaha....
Buzzy Warstl
Quantum Flux Foundry
#147 - 2012-12-30 22:03:34 UTC
No reason the main trade hub for nullsec sourced materials needs to be in highsec.

I'll go wherever the market is.

http://www.mud.co.uk/richard/hcds.htm Richard Bartle: Players who suit MUDs

The Utensils
Scrambled Eggs Inc.
#148 - 2012-12-30 22:34:54 UTC
misaba
gehi
ostingele
ishomilken
nalvula
obe
akkio
skarkon
These all seem like fine specimen for new places to shop. Go forth and sell!
Gilbaron
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#149 - 2012-12-30 22:41:07 UTC
Randolph Rothstein
whatever corp.
#150 - 2012-12-31 01:09:34 UTC
has this thread turned into nerf high sec or is it still about what OP suggested?
Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe
#151 - 2012-12-31 01:13:40 UTC
Gilbaron wrote:

CCP ended our 0.0 dream before it even truly began.

Triggered by: Wars of Sovless Agression, Bending the Knee, Twisting the Knife, Eating Sov Wheaties, Bombless Bombers, Fizzlesov, Interceptor Fleets, Running Away, GhostTime Vuln, Renters, Bombs, Bubbles ?

Qolde
Scrambled Eggs Inc.
#152 - 2012-12-31 01:25:16 UTC
It's a thread designed to motivate people to break free of the status quo of being a slave of Jita mostly. I am reminded of how much I hate to travel to jita everytime i am there.

Places I don't want to go in order:
Jita
The rest of hisec
isolated lowsec pockets while having a negative sec status (Aeman constellation and its neighbors. it's literally a prison, theres no way to 0.0, or any other lowsec without going through hisec)

If someone craps in your sandbox: 1. Light it on fire 2. Grab your shovel 3. Throw it back at them.

Gilbaron
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#153 - 2012-12-31 01:51:19 UTC
so, you still have not understood that it is not a problem with peoples minds, but a game design problem ? that is pretty impressive
Qolde
Scrambled Eggs Inc.
#154 - 2012-12-31 01:57:55 UTC
You still don't understand that lowsec has pretty much just as many slots as hisec, and npc null ain't too bad either.

If someone craps in your sandbox: 1. Light it on fire 2. Grab your shovel 3. Throw it back at them.

Malcanis
Vanishing Point.
The Initiative.
#155 - 2012-12-31 03:03:25 UTC
Ines Tegator wrote:
Malcanis wrote:
Ines Tegator wrote:
I nominate Perimiter as the new trade hub if Jita is changed.

Really... why do you guys think that would accomplish anything? Highbears don't want nullsec play- if they did, they'd already be there. You won't be able to attract them by giving them something they don't want in the first place.


We don't give two short ***** where the "Highbears" want to play. If they want to stay in hi-sec, more power to them! What we'd like is for it to be actually to our advantage to have our hi-sec alts in the space that we own.

That OK with you?


What's stopping you?


What part of "The system of Nonni in Lonetrek has more production capability than any sov 0.0 region" is difficult for you to understand?

"Just remember later that I warned against any change to jump ranges or fatigue. You earned whats coming."

Grath Telkin, 11.10.2016

Malcanis
Vanishing Point.
The Initiative.
#156 - 2012-12-31 03:04:21 UTC
Qolde wrote:
You still don't understand that lowsec has pretty much just as many slots as hisec, and npc null ain't too bad either.


What's the relevence of this to sov 0.0, unless maybe you're trying to point out just how big the anomaly of how crappy player built outposts are?

"Just remember later that I warned against any change to jump ranges or fatigue. You earned whats coming."

Grath Telkin, 11.10.2016

Rellik B00n
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#157 - 2012-12-31 03:04:32 UTC
Marlona Sky wrote:

I say let them sleep in the bed they made. P


this.
[Of a request for change ask: Who Benefits?](https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&find=unread&t=199765)
Zifrian
The Frog Pond
Ribbit.
#158 - 2012-12-31 03:36:44 UTC  |  Edited by: Zifrian
There is a reason T2 production is done in high sec and until that changes, you won't have large scale production of the items used in null locally.

Maximze your Industry Potential! - Download EVE Isk per Hour!

Import CCP's SDE - EVE SDE Database Builder

Akita T
Caldari Navy Volunteer Task Force
#159 - 2012-12-31 03:41:51 UTC  |  Edited by: Akita T
Very long story somewhat short, (some of) the "not from highsec" material producers COULD (at least theoretically) agree to NOT sell in highsec.
Depending on just how many people agree to participate, their market share, and the time they're willing to go along with it, the following things might happen (and a lot of things in between):

(a) practically next to nothing if only a handful of people do it for a short while (the most likely realistic option)

(b) a noticeable but not critical amount of people doing it for a decently long but not really that significant while -> highsec prices would go up a bit while non-highsec prices will go down a bit, and (third party) people will simply start running actual trade routes (from non-highsec to highsec, and in particular Jita), with some of the losses of materials to non-highsec ganks ever so slightly assisting a longer period of time until all remaining material producers get fed up with the lower profits and resume shipping directly to Jita for sales -> this could BORDERLINE happen, but I wouldn't hold my breath

(c) a slight simple majority by volume (but overwhelming majority by player count) doing it for a noticeable amount of time -> initially same as above, but much longer lived, and eventually with less of a price discrepancy IN TIME. "High risk hauling" becomes a fairly decent profession, and non-highsec producers won't really be bothered by the lack of extra profits if they don't need to go through the hassle of complete hauling themselves. Some smaller lowsec hubs on the edge of 0.0 space might see the light of day in time, but it still won't compare to Jita -> this is HIGHLY IMPROBABLE, to say the least

(d) almost all non-highsec producers doing it for a very long time -> somewhat similar to the above, but the price differential is a bit greater, more and slightly better-stocked lowsec hubs spring up, and actual Jita trade volume drops noticeably -> this is a completely unrealistic expectation, has almost no chance whatsoever of ever happening UNLESS a lot of other things change as far as "the flow of resources" is concerned (i.e. something that makes large-scale transport far more dangerous and time consuming than it is now)


The only REALISTIC way anything similar MIGHT ever happen is if a VERY large non-highsec alliance (or coalition of alliances) takes it upon themselves to almost completely cut themselves off from the rest of the game from a base-level economic standpoint and decide to only sell end-user-level completely processed products instead of ever selling the unprocessed or only slightly processed materials.

Basically, it most likely won't happen, and if anything will actually happen, it will probably be akin to a drop of water in a large bucket.
Gilbaron
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#160 - 2012-12-31 03:55:37 UTC
Quote:
You still don't understand that lowsec has pretty much just as many slots as hisec, and npc null ain't too bad either.


and those slots are of the SAME quality as the highsec slots

there is NO reason to do ANYTHING in lowsec that can also be done in highsec