These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Intergalactic Summit

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
12Next page
 

[Public Announcment] Black Dalphine Prison Facility

Author
Kraven Fawkes
Fawkes Dynamics Surveillance and Security Firm
#1 - 2012-12-30 18:15:29 UTC
Fawkes Dynamics Surveillance and Security Firm is pleased to announce that we have completed construction of our Black Dalphine facility and we are now accepting prisoners. Black Dalphine was designed with the latest specifications of a super max facility from technology from around the cluster. We are using the latest in Amarrian "Mind Warden" technology to help rehabilitate our prisoners in order to make them productive members of society.

While not all details of Black Dalphine can be disclosed for security reasons, what can be disclosed is that the facility is housed deep within a Dead Space pocket which itself houses a nebula that renders both navigation, shields and armor modules inert and the nebula itself is caustic to ships hulls that can only be navigated via telemetry from the facility itself making rescue or escape attempts fatal.

We are currently accepting detainees from capsuleer corporations under the following guidelines. One the prisoner must not be an Empyrean as pursuant to CONOCORD regulations which dictate that only CONCORD may regulate imprisonment, transport and punishment of Empyreans. Two the prisoner in question must have been legally convicted in a sovereign nations courts to be eligible to be rehabilitated at Black Dalphine and finally upon completion of the prisoners term, the host corporation must be willing to take the rehabilitated person back. The reason for this final caveat is that in order for a prisoner to be rehabilitated fully, they must have an opportunity available to them upon release or they will relapse.

Funding for Black Dalphine is provided by several humanitarian organizations against the brutal treatment of prisoners, capital punishment and interested parties wishing to partake in progressive rehabilitation programs of prisoners. Fawkes Dynamics Surveillance and Securities [Traded as FOXDY on the open net] is an LLC based in Jita and a provider of security and surveillance for many none capsuleer concerns.
Katrina Oniseki
Oniseki-Raata Internal Watch
Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive
#2 - 2012-12-30 18:34:45 UTC
I applaud this effort. I'm surprised I haven't seen more privatized prison ventures being taken up.

As a side note, what was so interesting on the ground during your CONCORD portrait photoshoot?

Katrina Oniseki

Ans Blix
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#3 - 2012-12-30 18:40:42 UTC
A noble effort.

Do you accept prisoners of war for holding? Can your Mind Wardens socially engineer such personnel away from fighting? Or persuade them to switch sides?

Ans Blix Director - Eleutherian Guard [EL-G] Alliance Diplomat - Villore Accords [GMVA]

Silence is a best friend that never betrays

Ston Momaki
Disciples of Ston
#4 - 2012-12-30 19:15:14 UTC
Could you explain the "mind warden" technology in more detail please. Thank you.

The Disciples of Ston bid you peace

James Syagrius
Luminaire Sovereign Solutions
#5 - 2012-12-30 19:52:05 UTC
Ston Momaki wrote:
Could you explain the "mind warden" technology in more detail please. Thank you.

I cuncure, I would like to know more as well.
Andreus Ixiris
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#6 - 2012-12-30 23:45:00 UTC
Wait, hang on. So you say you've built a personnel containment facility in a deadspace pocket only you know the location of (reasonable), in a nebula only you can find (less reasonable), that is so caustic it can damage shields (rare), so disruptive it can outright disable ship modules (nearly unheard of), completely baffles all conventional shipboard navigation and positional systems (literally unheard of) and cannot possibly be navigated without telemetry from the station facility that only you know how to contact.

Are you also selling jump bridges?

Andreus Ixiris > A Civire without a chin is barely a Civire at all.

Pieter Tuulinen > He'd be Civirely disadvantaged, Andreus.

Andreus Ixiris > ...

Andreus Ixiris > This is why we're at war.

Kraven Fawkes
Fawkes Dynamics Surveillance and Security Firm
#7 - 2012-12-31 03:21:53 UTC
Katrina Oniseki wrote:
As a side note, what was so interesting on the ground during your CONCORD portrait photoshoot?


At the time I was preparing to take the photo, my daughter Layla ran up to me to show me a picture she had drawn. The CONCORD agent taking the photo snapped the picture and said he was on a schedule and I would simply have to make do.

Ans Blix wrote:
A noble effort.

Do you accept prisoners of war for holding? Can your Mind Wardens socially engineer such personnel away from fighting? Or persuade them to switch sides?


We do accept prisoners of war, however we are not willing to use the Mind Warden technology in the manner you are asking about and I will answer they "why" in my reply to Mr Momaki and Syagrius.

Ston Momaki wrote:
Could you explain the "mind warden" technology in more detail please. Thank you.


Mind Warden technology was developed by the Amarr due too their stance on Capital Punishment. A prisoner is placed in a stasis tube much akin to those which hold our capsuleer clones until they are activated. Much like those tubes, the Mind Warden stasis tubes have neurological links that can send information into the mind of the occupant. In the case of Empyreans this information is the accumulation of a life, or several lives, worth of information in the matter of moments.

Where Mind Warden tubes and Capsuleer tubes differ is that on one end of the Mind Warden tube a trained psychologist may "jack in" and enter the mind of the prisoner. This Mind Warden may then, over the course of time, and neurological stimulus, work to correct the behavior that has gotten the prisoner to this point in their life. The Neurological stimulus in question varies from patient to patient, but as an example we will use a rapist murderer.

In this sort of case we have Mind Wardens doing their work, but we will also have the patient live through carefully constructed neuro-flashbacks of this event happening to themselves. The patient will feel a proximation of what their victims felt. The hopelessness, the violation, the rage and the pain. We further bolster this treatment with flooding the patients mind with images that we know will arouse the apatite we mean to curb, and when their mind acts in the affirmative of wanting to behave badly, we issue a pain response. When the patient acts in the negative towards their urges we offer a euphoric stimulus, thus rewarding good behavior and punishing the bad.

Mr Blix asked if we could engineer programs to shy away from the acts that they were incarcerated for and the answer is yes. He then asked if we could engineer them to flip sides, again the answer is yes but this is not only a violation of what we have taken upon ourselves to do, but also its effects do not last.

What I mean by this is that we can, again target the cognitive responses with pain and euphoric stimulus to "train" the patients mind. However such a deep penetration into the mind not only requires massive amounts of time but also constant reinforcement after the patients release. So for example if you were to deliver a Minmatar freedom fighter to us and we were inclined to make him flip sides we could do this. However he would not be a good "double agent" as being around his people again, with out reinforcement of his implanted new way of thinking would quickly deteriorate the new patterns and the old would emerge once more.

Andreus Ixiris wrote:
Wait, hang on. So you say you've built a personnel containment facility in a deadspace pocket only you know the location of (reasonable), in a nebula only you can find (less reasonable), that is so caustic it can damage shields (rare), so disruptive it can outright disable ship modules (nearly unheard of), completely baffles all conventional shipboard navigation and positional systems (literally unheard of) and cannot possibly be navigated without telemetry from the station facility that only you know how to contact.


The nebula in question is within the dead space pocket itself, not an altogether rare event seeing as if you remember back to your early days of pod piloting you were more then likely sent into such a pocket and tasked with using your burners to reach a destination before your ship exploded from the effects of the nebula. Also not all the phenomena listed is natural, we do have several installations which many pod pilots refer to as "**** stars" within the pocket. Piloting in a straight line in the pocket from say the entrance to the facility is not the issue, the issue is the constant churning of the radioactive eddies within the pocket and the inability to have your ships sensors guide you through the currents safely whilst said systems are jammed by our "**** stars".
James Syagrius
Luminaire Sovereign Solutions
#8 - 2012-12-31 07:05:05 UTC
Kraven Fawkes wrote:
We do accept prisoners of war, however we are not willing to use the Mind Warden technology in the manner you are asking about and I will answer they "why" in my reply to Mr Momaki and Syagrius.


Thank you for the information Msr. Fawkes. The ethics of such a "process" I would be interested in discussing at your convenience.
Kraven Fawkes
Fawkes Dynamics Surveillance and Security Firm
#9 - 2012-12-31 07:06:37 UTC
James Syagrius wrote:
Kraven Fawkes wrote:
We do accept prisoners of war, however we are not willing to use the Mind Warden technology in the manner you are asking about and I will answer they "why" in my reply to Mr Momaki and Syagrius.


Thank you for the information Msr. Fawkes. The ethics of such a "process" I would be interested in discussing at your convenience.


Please feel free to contact me via neocom mail if you feel so inclined sir.
Lyn Farel
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#10 - 2012-12-31 11:38:44 UTC
That method sounds quite crude and grim. I may not be an expert like you might be on the matter but it sounds to me like you are probably going to turn your rapists into - harmless, yes - into mindless vegetables mechanically controled to look for the bliss they have been made to crave for.
Kraven Fawkes
Fawkes Dynamics Surveillance and Security Firm
#11 - 2012-12-31 15:34:36 UTC  |  Edited by: Kraven Fawkes
Lyn Farel wrote:
That method sounds quite crude and grim. I may not be an expert like you might be on the matter but it sounds to me like you are probably going to turn your rapists into - harmless, yes - into mindless vegetables mechanically controled to look for the bliss they have been made to crave for.


As you said, you are no expert, No one who has ever under went this method of treatment in our care has become a vegetable that we did not intend on doing that to. The only method more effective at correcting, or changing behaviors is Sansha's True Slave implants.
Tiberious Thessalonia
True Slave Foundations
#12 - 2012-12-31 15:36:27 UTC
This is the proper method by which to deal with criminals. Bravo.
Mekhana
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#13 - 2012-12-31 15:40:11 UTC
I suppose brainwashers in the end will get along with each other.

Vide longe er eros di Luminaire VII, uni canse pra krage e determiniex! Sange por Sange! Descanse bravex eros, mie freires. Mortir por vostre Liberete, farmilie, ide e amis. lons Proviste sen mort! Luminaire liber mas! 

Lyn Farel
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#14 - 2012-12-31 15:47:16 UTC
Kraven Fawkes wrote:
The only method more effective at correcting, or changing behaviors is Sansha's True Slave implants.


There are other ones.

Also, "correcting" is a matter of definition.
Tiberious Thessalonia
True Slave Foundations
#15 - 2012-12-31 16:02:11 UTC
Mekhana wrote:
I suppose brainwashers in the end will get along with each other.


All prisons with a corrective focus brainwash their inmates. You would just rather they do this inefficiently, believing this to be more humane.

It isn't.
Silas Vitalia
Doomheim
#16 - 2012-12-31 18:39:51 UTC
Mr. Fawkes,

1. Does your organization license your technology for independent usage?

2. Do you accept capsuleers that volunteer for your services?

Sabik now, Sabik forever

Lyn Farel
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#17 - 2012-12-31 18:52:20 UTC
Tiberious Thessalonia wrote:
Mekhana wrote:
I suppose brainwashers in the end will get along with each other.


All prisons with a corrective focus brainwash their inmates. You would just rather they do this inefficiently, believing this to be more humane.

It isn't.


It depends what value and definition you put behind "brainwashing".

One can use technology and mind altering methods to forcefully change the subject perception on a certain matter.

One can use mere rhetorics without physically altering the mind of the subject or putting the subject in certain favorable conditions.

Of course, one is often more efficient than the other, indeed.
Scherezad
Revenent Defence Corperation
Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive
#18 - 2012-12-31 20:01:03 UTC
Silas Vitalia wrote:
Mr. Fawkes,

1. Does your organization license your technology for independent usage?

2. Do you accept capsuleers that volunteer for your services?



I would like to take this opportunity to point out that Lai Dai Research Biomedical and Cybernetic is available to assist in neural therapeudics and other cognitive aids.
Andreus Ixiris
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#19 - 2012-12-31 21:04:59 UTC
Kraven Fawkes wrote:
The nebula in question is within the dead space pocket itself, not an altogether rare event seeing as if you remember back to your early days of pod piloting you were more then likely sent into such a pocket and tasked with using your burners to reach a destination before your ship exploded from the effects of the nebula. Also not all the phenomena listed is natural, we do have several installations which many pod pilots refer to as "**** stars" within the pocket. Piloting in a straight line in the pocket from say the entrance to the facility is not the issue, the issue is the constant churning of the radioactive eddies within the pocket and the inability to have your ships sensors guide you through the currents safely whilst said systems are jammed by our "**** stars".


I'm absolutely familiar with the concept of a "dickstar" - I've run several in the past. They're capable of disabling targetting systems and disrupting warp and sublight propulsion, but they have absolutely no ability whatsoever to "jam" modules. The closest they'd come to such a thing would be an energy neutralising array, which still doesn't shut down a ship's modules directly - and your original claim was that the deadspace pocket

Kraven Fawkes wrote:
houses a nebula that renders both navigation, shields and armor modules inert.


So you've now backpedalled on what precisely causes the disruption. Incidentally, CONCORD starbase safety features prevent capsuleers from anchoring starbases outside the orbit of a moon, or from anchoring them too close together (and CONCORD's definition of "too close together" is synonymous with "in orbit of the same moon") so this explanation doesn't really hold water. Incidentally, the toxic cloud environments found in certain deadspace pockets are easily survivable in a correctly-fitted battlecruiser, let alone a strategic cruiser or a battleship.

I've spent seven years as a capsuleer. I know scams and lies when I see them.

Andreus Ixiris > A Civire without a chin is barely a Civire at all.

Pieter Tuulinen > He'd be Civirely disadvantaged, Andreus.

Andreus Ixiris > ...

Andreus Ixiris > This is why we're at war.

Katrina Oniseki
Oniseki-Raata Internal Watch
Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive
#20 - 2012-12-31 22:10:42 UTC  |  Edited by: Katrina Oniseki
Andreus Ixiris wrote:

So you've now backpedalled on what precisely causes the disruption. Incidentally, CONCORD starbase safety features prevent capsuleers from anchoring starbases outside the orbit of a moon, or from anchoring them too close together (and CONCORD's definition of "too close together" is synonymous with "in orbit of the same moon") so this explanation doesn't really hold water. Incidentally, the toxic cloud environments found in certain deadspace pockets are easily survivable in a correctly-fitted battlecruiser, let alone a strategic cruiser or a battleship.

I've spent seven years as a capsuleer. I know scams and lies when I see them.


You're assuming these starbases are directly owned or operated by a capsuleer. As long as the OP isn't in direct control and ownership of that starbase, it does not fall under CONCORD regulations. Just local regulations, which would likely make it very difficult to secure operating rights in a deadspace pocket without being targeted by mission agents for the local navy.

But then again, if it's not owned and operated by a capsuleer, it's not going to be a "****-star". Standard civilian starbases are orders of magnitude easier to destroy.

Silas Vitalia wrote:
Mr. Fawkes,
1. Does your organization license your technology for independent usage?


It's not his technology. He himself is using licensed technology from the Amarrians. How he got it from them is what you should be asking.

Lyn Farel wrote:
That method sounds quite crude and grim. I may not be an expert like you might be on the matter but it sounds to me like you are probably going to turn your rapists into - harmless, yes - into mindless vegetables mechanically controled to look for the bliss they have been made to crave for.


As I pointed out above, this isn't his technology... and it's not something new either. The Amarrians (and Ammatar, like you), have been using it in their prisons for more years than I know of. If you have a problem with the ethical ramifications of Mind Warden tech, consider looking at your own Ammatar Mandate, the Khanid Kingdom, and the Amarr Empire itself.

Unless of course, you simply mean to say you don't trust an independent licensee with this technology.

Katrina Oniseki

12Next page