These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Intergalactic Summit

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Tibus Heth Assassination Attempt

Author
Pieter Tuulinen
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#101 - 2012-12-29 04:17:39 UTC
Andreus Ixiris wrote:
Pieter Tuulinen wrote:
If I were you, I'd hope that the Executor continues to exercise sound judgement. After all, he does have a sizable taskforce within strike range of the Gallente homeworld and precious few reasons to feel any love towards you all.


Ah, so he'd orbitally bombard a homeworld to get what he wants, eh? My, but that sounds uncomfortably familiar...


I would expect the similarity to UNat policy to be uncomfortable for a Gallente, yes. However the Executor HASN'T actually bombarded Caldari Prime OR Gallentia.

For the first time since I started the conversation, he looks me dead in the eye. In his gaze are steel jackhammers, quiet vengeance, a hundred thousand orbital bombs frozen in still life.

James Syagrius
Luminaire Sovereign Solutions
#102 - 2012-12-29 04:28:42 UTC
Sakura Nihil wrote:

As such, he's content to keep a weapon of mass destruction in Luminaire, one short warp away from the Federal capital in the hope that if a situation arises, he can threaten the Gallente and get what he wants without firing a shot. In short, I'd argue that if anyone's afraid, it is the civilian population of Luminaire.


Ma'dame Nihil not to be impolite but while Gallente Prime (Luminaire VI) is the cultural capital and homeworld of the Gallente people, it isn't the "Federal Capital", Villore IV is.
Pieter Tuulinen
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#103 - 2012-12-29 04:30:29 UTC
Interesting. The State has never once said that as it's goal it has the destruction of the Federation at heart. It's possible that such a goal has never been within our grasp, is not now within our grasp and will never be within our grasp. We are a sovreign faction now, but we are not the size of the Gallente Federation, we have not the wealth of the Gallente Federation and we do not have the military strength of a fully called up and unified Gallente Federation.

We do not need to.

All the State has ever had as our goal is to be free to pursue our own vision of government. Free to pursue our own rights to self-determination and economic prosperity. James Sygarius disingenuously refers to the assault on 'Luminaire VII' so that he doesn't have to call it Caldari Prime - thus answering his own question regarding the necessity of seizing it.

Why was it necessary for the State to regain control over our birthplace? Why do any of you return home after your labours?

The State is not coming for territory or resources that is yours. We do not seek to enslave your children or seize your treasure. We do not wish to destroy your culture or threaten your way of life. Nothing that you hold dear is under threat - unless you hold dear the sometime Gallente hobby of exporting your culture where it is not wanted.

But Home? Home is ours.

For the first time since I started the conversation, he looks me dead in the eye. In his gaze are steel jackhammers, quiet vengeance, a hundred thousand orbital bombs frozen in still life.

Scherezad
Revenent Defence Corperation
Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive
#104 - 2012-12-29 04:30:36 UTC
Mekhana wrote:
That stooge would already have struck Gallente Prime if he believed he had the slightest chance of success.


Why in the name of the Ancestors would we want to strike Gallente Prime?
James Syagrius
Luminaire Sovereign Solutions
#105 - 2012-12-29 05:07:30 UTC  |  Edited by: James Syagrius
Pieter Tuulinen wrote:
James Sygarius disingenuously refers to the assault on 'Luminaire VII' so that he doesn't have to call it Caldari Prime - thus answering his own question regarding the necessity of seizing it.


Msr. Tuulinen I think if you read the associated posts to the one you chose to quote you would find I did refer to as Luminaire VII as Caldari Prime several times. The question stands.
Pieter Tuulinen
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#106 - 2012-12-29 05:11:12 UTC
James Syagrius wrote:
Pieter Tuulinen wrote:
James Sygarius disingenuously refers to the assault on 'Luminaire VII' so that he doesn't have to call it Caldari Prime - thus answering his own question regarding the necessity of seizing it.


Msr. Tuulinen I think if you read the associated posts to the one you chose to quote you would find I did refer to as Luminaire VII as Caldari Prime several times. The question stands.


Why was it necessary for the State to liberate Home? It was necessary BECAUSE IT IS HOME.

For the first time since I started the conversation, he looks me dead in the eye. In his gaze are steel jackhammers, quiet vengeance, a hundred thousand orbital bombs frozen in still life.

Sakura Nihil
Faded Light
#107 - 2012-12-29 05:12:00 UTC
James Syagrius wrote:
Sakura Nihil wrote:

As such, he's content to keep a weapon of mass destruction in Luminaire, one short warp away from the Federal capital in the hope that if a situation arises, he can threaten the Gallente and get what he wants without firing a shot. In short, I'd argue that if anyone's afraid, it is the civilian population of Luminaire.


Ma'dame Nihil not to be impolite but while Gallente Prime (Luminaire VI) is the cultural capital and homeworld of the Gallente people, it isn't the "Federal Capital", Villore IV is.

Fair enough. All the more reason it's more valuable as a negotiating tool than a strategic military target.
Lyn Farel
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#108 - 2012-12-29 11:03:21 UTC
Pieter Tuulinen wrote:
James Syagrius wrote:
Pieter Tuulinen wrote:
James Sygarius disingenuously refers to the assault on 'Luminaire VII' so that he doesn't have to call it Caldari Prime - thus answering his own question regarding the necessity of seizing it.


Msr. Tuulinen I think if you read the associated posts to the one you chose to quote you would find I did refer to as Luminaire VII as Caldari Prime several times. The question stands.


Why was it necessary for the State to liberate Home? It was necessary BECAUSE IT IS HOME.


Yes, we all know the cultural Caldari context behind, but using cultural excuses for everything sounds a little too convenient to me.
Desiderya
Blue Canary
Watch This
#109 - 2012-12-29 16:20:26 UTC
James Syagrius wrote:

Desiderya you would have me believe that Heth refrains from attacking Gallente Prime for humanitarian reasons? His new found concern for the lives of Federation citizens is touching and quite unexpected.

Please explain to me how the recent invasion and occupation of Luminaire VII was necessary for the continued survival and independence of the State? Nether of those considerations were paramount in the calculation to invade and you know it.

Perhaps we would be better served in discussing how short of the destruction of one or both of our civilizations this conflict can be ended once and for all.

That is the conversation I would like to have.



He refrains for strategic reasons, them being that the mere presence of this task force guarantees holding control of the homeworld, the sole reason for this conflict. This fleet is neither engaging targets in Luminaire nor is it blockading gallentean assets. It acts as a deterrant for any military action the federation would try outside of CEWMPA guidelines.
Note that while this a promise of vengeance, and not a bluff that can be called, it does not make it the objective of the Luminaire campaign. If the focus would've been on inflicting the most amount of damage this Titan would've been shelling targets in this solar system right in the beginning, even during the invasion.

The question for the necessity of this invasion? You took our homeworld from us, by force, and never intended to hand it back, not after years of war, not after centuries of so called peace and countless attempts at diplomacy. Every living Caldari can trace his or her ancestors back to this planet and you question the importance of it?
The federation has proven that it is unwilling to negotiate on a peaceful basis and continues to push its influence forward in any means possible, branding everyone who is not submitting to the idea behind the federation as an evildoer. The only means left to us was a show of strength, and even then, the federation was not willing to accept the loss of Caldari Prime and instead chose to go back to war again.

If you're asking for an end to this conflict it is so simple, you shouldn't have to ask in the first place. Make Luminaire a demilitarized zone, complete with a supply corridor, and acknowledge our rightful claim to our home. Then no further blood needs to be shed for your own pride and hubris.

Ruthlessness is the kindness of the wise.

Scherezad
Revenent Defence Corperation
Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive
#110 - 2012-12-29 17:06:05 UTC
Lyn Farel wrote:
Pieter Tuulinen wrote:
Why was it necessary for the State to liberate Home? It was necessary BECAUSE IT IS HOME.


Yes, we all know the cultural Caldari context behind, but using cultural excuses for everything sounds a little too convenient to me.


Why does anyone do anything, Ms Farel? Because they feel it to be right. You may be tired of hearing us explain the reason why we retook our homeworld, because you keep getting the same answer. Frankly, ma'am, we tire of saying it. It's a good answer, it's a correct answer, and the fact that it is asked repeatedly does not invalidate it. 1+1=2; asking again won't change that.

To be blunt, this line of discussion between Tuulinen-haan and Mr Sygarius well demonstrates the difficulty in this conflict. The Gallente do not want to believe that the millennia we spent on Caldari Prime, and the millions of ancestors who lived and died there, is reason enough to retake it forcefully. They didn't want to believe us when we cried revenge while fleeing our homeworld. They didn't want to believe us when we toasted their health with hakkin klen from our space stations and colonies in the Citadel. They couldn't believe it when our Leviathan punctured the skies above our homeworld once more. And they don't want to believe it is still there now.

We are not going away, gentle Gallente. We will not disappear back into the mists of time. We will not erase our past, we will not forget that which made us what we are. We will not forget the mountains of the homeworld, nor the grey white bloom of the Forge and Citadel, Lonetrek and the Black Rise.

We cannot proceed towards peace until you realize this fact and accept it.
Lyn Farel
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#111 - 2012-12-29 17:42:04 UTC
You sound like a warmonger. The good, correct answer might simply be that a lot of what makes that conflict difficult is your unwilligness to compromise.
Scherezad
Revenent Defence Corperation
Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive
#112 - 2012-12-29 18:09:47 UTC
Lyn Farel wrote:
You sound like a warmonger. The good, correct answer might simply be that a lot of what makes that conflict difficult is your unwilligness to compromise.


Being unwilling to compromise on the sanctity of of one's home is not warmongering, and it is a strange state of affairs that would suggest it to be so. But, alright, I will propose a compromise that respects all parties.

Let us make the system hallowed ground. It is the cradle of two proud people who have built great nations amongst the stars and ought be respected as sacred. We shall evacuate the surfaces of all planets in the system save support staff to ensure that the historic sites are maintained, and allow pilgrims to travel there to experience the magesty of their homeworlds. All citizens will be migrated to orbital stations or system nearby. The system itself will be considered a neutral zone to be policed jointly by the State and Federation, along with CONCORD. The Caldari will surrender their claim to return to live on their homeworld, and the Gallente will experience the same loss as the Caldari once did, albeit with no orbital bombardments. The ledger will be made even.

I think that this is a compromise which respects the dignity of all involved and would effectively bring peace between our peoples. Indeed, the co-operative efforts in securing the system as well as shared reverence for the birthplace of our ancestors could forge a powerful and lasting alliance.
Pieter Tuulinen
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#113 - 2012-12-29 19:35:45 UTC
Lyn Farel wrote:
You sound like a warmonger. The good, correct answer might simply be that a lot of what makes that conflict difficult is your unwilligness to compromise.


Imagine that I enter your home, knock you to the ground and place my boot on your throat, pressing down until your vision tunnels and you fight for consciousness.

Clearly the minimum acceptable resolution to this conflict is for me to remove my boot from your throat and retreat from your home. You would be well within your rights to demand further securities and reparations to compensate you for the experience and to deter me from doing so again. Should you recover your strength and set out from your home to track me to mine and wreak vengeance there would be many who would support your actions and many more who would understand and sympathise without agreeing with you - but you are a good and kindly person and seek nothing more than your freedom from my violence and my promise to never do this to you again.

Imagine, instead of this minimum accomodation, you were encouraged to accept my permanent presence in your home and the only dialog was over exactly how much pressure I ought to be able to apply to your throat?

I do not demand sanctions or reparations. I do not demand the return of other territories or the awarding of new ones. I do not suggest that first we must bombard Gallentia to atone for the mistakes of the past. I am willing to set aside the past in totality, start a fresh new peace and move forwards in amity and all I ask in return is that you remove your boot from my throat and leave my home, furnishing me with sufficient guarantees that you will not return unless invited.

For the first time since I started the conversation, he looks me dead in the eye. In his gaze are steel jackhammers, quiet vengeance, a hundred thousand orbital bombs frozen in still life.

Lyn Farel
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#114 - 2012-12-29 22:25:54 UTC  |  Edited by: Lyn Farel
Scherezad wrote:
Lyn Farel wrote:
You sound like a warmonger. The good, correct answer might simply be that a lot of what makes that conflict difficult is your unwilligness to compromise.


Being unwilling to compromise on the sanctity of of one's home is not warmongering, and it is a strange state of affairs that would suggest it to be so. But, alright, I will propose a compromise that respects all parties.

Let us make the system hallowed ground. It is the cradle of two proud people who have built great nations amongst the stars and ought be respected as sacred. We shall evacuate the surfaces of all planets in the system save support staff to ensure that the historic sites are maintained, and allow pilgrims to travel there to experience the magesty of their homeworlds. All citizens will be migrated to orbital stations or system nearby. The system itself will be considered a neutral zone to be policed jointly by the State and Federation, along with CONCORD. The Caldari will surrender their claim to return to live on their homeworld, and the Gallente will experience the same loss as the Caldari once did, albeit with no orbital bombardments. The ledger will be made even.

I think that this is a compromise which respects the dignity of all involved and would effectively bring peace between our peoples. Indeed, the co-operative efforts in securing the system as well as shared reverence for the birthplace of our ancestors could forge a powerful and lasting alliance.


Your idea for a compromise however is interesting, but how would you propose something like that to the Gallente, and to a greater extent to the Caldari people ? That sounds highly unlikely and hard to achieve. I am pretty sure that most Caldari would be quite offended with such a proposal. And a lot of Gallente too.

I also note the part on "the Gallente will experience the same hardships we have experienced". Isn't an eye for an eye a little childish and pointless ? Unless we wish for war escalation every time someone resorts to that...

I really appreciate your progressive views, for a constructive discussion, though.

Pieter Tuulinen wrote:
Lyn Farel wrote:
You sound like a warmonger. The good, correct answer might simply be that a lot of what makes that conflict difficult is your unwilligness to compromise.


Imagine that I enter your home, knock you to the ground and place my boot on your throat, pressing down until your vision tunnels and you fight for consciousness.

Clearly the minimum acceptable resolution to this conflict is for me to remove my boot from your throat and retreat from your home. You would be well within your rights to demand further securities and reparations to compensate you for the experience and to deter me from doing so again. Should you recover your strength and set out from your home to track me to mine and wreak vengeance there would be many who would support your actions and many more who would understand and sympathise without agreeing with you - but you are a good and kindly person and seek nothing more than your freedom from my violence and my promise to never do this to you again.

Imagine, instead of this minimum accomodation, you were encouraged to accept my permanent presence in your home and the only dialog was over exactly how much pressure I ought to be able to apply to your throat?

I do not demand sanctions or reparations. I do not demand the return of other territories or the awarding of new ones. I do not suggest that first we must bombard Gallentia to atone for the mistakes of the past. I am willing to set aside the past in totality, start a fresh new peace and move forwards in amity and all I ask in return is that you remove your boot from my throat and leave my home, furnishing me with sufficient guarantees that you will not return unless invited.


Illogical.

We are speaking about a home you have never been inside, never seen except on holos, and only heard off. The home of a stranger already.

However, reparations that make sense sound perfectly legitimate to me, but you do not seem very interested as you said.

Similar situation happened a long time ago on Starkmanir Prime. Events of that magnitude happened there too, probably in an even harsher way to the point of almost annihilating an entire culture, and the Minmatar continue to ask for the "liberation" of Arzad, often for very similar reasons, even if the planet has been an Amarrian world for centuries.

Out of curiosity, would you tell the Amarr that they are wrong ?
Pieter Tuulinen
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#115 - 2012-12-29 23:14:52 UTC
Lyn Farel wrote:

Illogical.

We are speaking about a home you have never been inside, never seen except on holos, and only heard off. The home of a stranger already.

However, reparations that make sense sound perfectly legitimate to me, but you do not seem very interested as you said.

Similar situation happened a long time ago on Starkmanir Prime. Events of that magnitude happened there too, probably in an even harsher way to the point of almost annihilating an entire culture, and the Minmatar continue to ask for the "liberation" of Arzad, often for very similar reasons, even if the planet has been an Amarrian world for centuries.

Out of curiosity, would you tell the Amarr that they are wrong ?


Whether the Minmatar can accept the invasion of their homeworld or not is a matter for them, not for me, to decide. I believe there was something of a disagreement between the Empire and their former slaves, resulting in the Minmatar recapturing Pator, their original homeworld as well as other systems.

But that's got nothing to do with OUR situation. The point is that the State does NOT accept our forcible eviction from Home, that we have always publicly maintained the desire to return and that we have, in fact, successfully encompassed that desire in our liberation of Home.

Let's be clear about it. There really is no acceptable resolution to this problem that doesn't involve State control of Home. None at all. If that doesn't go on the table then the fight is not over, no matter what short term solution is forced upon us. You cannot buy your way out of this and unless you're willing to utterly dismantle the State colony by colony, orbital by orbital, fleet by fleet, you cannot force any other resolution.

Anything else is negotiable.

For the first time since I started the conversation, he looks me dead in the eye. In his gaze are steel jackhammers, quiet vengeance, a hundred thousand orbital bombs frozen in still life.

Desiderya
Blue Canary
Watch This
#116 - 2012-12-30 00:38:46 UTC
You are standing there demanding a compromise when essentially everything that is asked is to return what is rightfully ours?

Ruthlessness is the kindness of the wise.

Scherezad
Revenent Defence Corperation
Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive
#117 - 2012-12-30 03:37:54 UTC
Lyn Farel wrote:
Your idea for a compromise however is interesting, but how would you propose something like that to the Gallente, and to a greater extent to the Caldari people ? That sounds highly unlikely and hard to achieve. I am pretty sure that most Caldari would be quite offended with such a proposal. And a lot of Gallente too.

I also note the part on "the Gallente will experience the same hardships we have experienced". Isn't an eye for an eye a little childish and pointless ? Unless we wish for war escalation every time someone resorts to that...

I really appreciate your progressive views, for a constructive discussion, though.


My proposal is not an escalation or purely retaliative. Nowhere have I mentioned retribution for the bombardments on Caldari during the evacuation. There would be no terror, no need for futile sacrifices, no families torn apart. A peaceful, orderly withdrawal. Many Caldari would consider allowing this to be a grave insult to our ancestors who suffered the same, but in the interest of peace I think it would make a fine compromise.

I think that many Caldari would accept the Homeworld as a place for pilgrimage and reverence. Would the Gallente accept silence in their crystal boulevards and eviction to strange new places? I'm more dubious of this.

Further, I doubt any such motion could pass in their Senate.
Sakura Nihil
Faded Light
#118 - 2012-12-30 03:51:01 UTC
Having Luminaire become a DMZ to be respected by both races makes a lot of sense.

Good luck getting either side to consider it though, it has as much chance being implemented as a fedo on ice skates in hell.
Scherezad
Revenent Defence Corperation
Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive
#119 - 2012-12-30 03:53:43 UTC
Sakura Nihil wrote:
Having Luminaire become a DMZ to be respected by both races makes a lot of sense.

Good luck getting either side to consider it though, it has as much chance being implemented as a fedo on ice skates in hell.


The proposal is mostly to help us consider the problem of how to find a peaceful solution. I don't foresee the Gallente ever agreeing to the terms.
Lyn Farel
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#120 - 2012-12-30 11:22:02 UTC
Pieter Tuulinen wrote:
Lyn Farel wrote:

Illogical.

We are speaking about a home you have never been inside, never seen except on holos, and only heard off. The home of a stranger already.

However, reparations that make sense sound perfectly legitimate to me, but you do not seem very interested as you said.

Similar situation happened a long time ago on Starkmanir Prime. Events of that magnitude happened there too, probably in an even harsher way to the point of almost annihilating an entire culture, and the Minmatar continue to ask for the "liberation" of Arzad, often for very similar reasons, even if the planet has been an Amarrian world for centuries.

Out of curiosity, would you tell the Amarr that they are wrong ?


Whether the Minmatar can accept the invasion of their homeworld or not is a matter for them, not for me, to decide. I believe there was something of a disagreement between the Empire and their former slaves, resulting in the Minmatar recapturing Pator, their original homeworld as well as other systems.

But that's got nothing to do with OUR situation. The point is that the State does NOT accept our forcible eviction from Home, that we have always publicly maintained the desire to return and that we have, in fact, successfully encompassed that desire in our liberation of Home.

Let's be clear about it. There really is no acceptable resolution to this problem that doesn't involve State control of Home. None at all. If that doesn't go on the table then the fight is not over, no matter what short term solution is forced upon us. You cannot buy your way out of this and unless you're willing to utterly dismantle the State colony by colony, orbital by orbital, fleet by fleet, you cannot force any other resolution.

Anything else is negotiable.



That is perfectly clear.

Anyway now, Caldari Prime is under Caldari control again. What interests me is not so much the current facts than what lies behind.

Scherezad wrote:
Lyn Farel wrote:
Your idea for a compromise however is interesting, but how would you propose something like that to the Gallente, and to a greater extent to the Caldari people ? That sounds highly unlikely and hard to achieve. I am pretty sure that most Caldari would be quite offended with such a proposal. And a lot of Gallente too.

I also note the part on "the Gallente will experience the same hardships we have experienced". Isn't an eye for an eye a little childish and pointless ? Unless we wish for war escalation every time someone resorts to that...

I really appreciate your progressive views, for a constructive discussion, though.


My proposal is not an escalation or purely retaliative. Nowhere have I mentioned retribution for the bombardments on Caldari during the evacuation. There would be no terror, no need for futile sacrifices, no families torn apart. A peaceful, orderly withdrawal. Many Caldari would consider allowing this to be a grave insult to our ancestors who suffered the same, but in the interest of peace I think it would make a fine compromise.

I think that many Caldari would accept the Homeworld as a place for pilgrimage and reverence. Would the Gallente accept silence in their crystal boulevards and eviction to strange new places? I'm more dubious of this.

Further, I doubt any such motion could pass in their Senate.


Both would refuse such a thing, no matter the faction. I do not foresee the Caldari ever agreeing to the terms either.

However, yes, it could make a fine compromise.