These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Wormholes

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
Previous page12
 

worth living in hs static?

Author
Hathrul
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#21 - 2012-12-28 10:54:17 UTC
Gradur Dohr wrote:
thanks again for all of you!

its funny that after some ears in this game you can see that o lot of thing you should learn and im liking this new adventure in wh.

just one (stupid) question, whats the best fighter to use in wh?


theyre all terrible. a carrier is a big logistics boat in wh space. just get some toons with high dps ships and the carrier will keep them alive
Spheranzinne
Color of Violence
#22 - 2012-12-28 12:07:28 UTC
I was wondering myself if fighters do any damage to sleeper rats. Assigned fighters would bring 500-600 dps depending on skills, so it may let one tank more and approach harder sites easier. Anyway, sleepers do enjoy killin drones so if i was to use any id go for the caldari or minnie ones who have better shields and might survive more on the battlefield of farming.
SojournerRover
Explorer Corps
#23 - 2012-12-28 12:59:52 UTC
Sleepers will kill your fighters, use century's

Or

Depends on what type ships your fighting.

[b][u]ROVER[/u] (REDRUM)[/b]

Oxandrolone
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#24 - 2012-12-29 01:37:28 UTC
Sleepers only kill your fighters if you dont rep them, they can tank a few battleships no problem.

I use caldari ones, they do decent damage, gallante do better damage but they have a smaller optimal so on targets that are moving fairly quickly (ie crusers) the caldari ones are better and i mostly just use fighters for clearing up cruiser sleepers while cap escalating.

really though, if you can use a carrier dont waste time in sub-c5s with it.
Spheranzinne
Color of Violence
#25 - 2012-12-29 11:04:29 UTC
Oxandrolone wrote:
Sleepers only kill your fighters if you dont rep them, they can tank a few battleships no problem.

I use caldari ones, they do decent damage, gallante do better damage but they have a smaller optimal so on targets that are moving fairly quickly (ie crusers) the caldari ones are better and i mostly just use fighters for clearing up cruiser sleepers while cap escalating.

really though, if you can use a carrier dont waste time in sub-c5s with it.


thanks for the tip
Asura Twlight
Ministry of War
Amarr Empire
#26 - 2012-12-31 10:25:51 UTC
Gradur Dohr wrote:
hello, im not a begginer in eve, i lived lot of time in null sec and now me and some corpmates decided to move in a wormhole. All of my mates lived in WH before, but im not, my doubt is, we negotiating a c3 with hs static and rorqual and carriers but worth living in HS static? In a HS static don’t have people passing all time? Or its possible t scout the wh exits and ratting in peace?



1' c3's see the most traffic from systems with a static c3 of their own.
2 you will farm the c3 out quickly and be unable to connect to other wh systems by your own terms you be depending on random spawns.
3 c3's with a static hs is pretty much useless to live in but awesome for people that live in c4'-6's to use as a transit hub getting out ( aka people that can **** 30b into a pvp fleet like nothing)

i could keep going but i think you can get my point that living in a c3 with a static hs is a very very very very bad idea especially if you are going to house rorquals and capitals in it. a c3 with a static null is a good idea as it will detour people from using it as a hub but the point still stands that being a small man operation looking to pve with capitals and god knows what else invested in the operation is going to get you raped like a 80 pound white boy with long hair in prison. if u guys move to c3 space you will be spending many countless hours hiding in your pos (prison cell).

im dead serious about this all, what your trying to do with this c3 is precisely what dozens of corps are setup in wh space to prey on. if you pursue this you will be found you will be killed and you will lose many billions and whom ever finds you will have a sadistic grin on their face as they do it.

what i recommend is a c4 with a static c4, c4's are VERY very good money with minimal risk investment and require only a few people to do sites. do not bother with capitals unless you have a large man corp, do not field any carriers in anything under a c5 due to the fact it is too risky for the isk per hour and a pvpers wet dream. c4's are also relatively quiet so you will be able to mine, the rorqual isnt too heavy a investment and will help you majorly with c4 mining so go with it.
a fleet setup as simple as 2 nightmares setup to cap chain and shield transport each other could run sites in a c4 if you are careful about it.
Asura Twlight
Ministry of War
Amarr Empire
#27 - 2012-12-31 10:40:54 UTC
golden eve statement if its red its dead, in wh space you can and will be red to very many people and thus be dead. if you want lots of isk with no risk of pvp go run incursions or missions in highsec, you CANNOT avoid pvp in any area of the game where pvp is possible too many people live to prey on carebears and station camp them.

it sucks i know so much space filled with jacks that are out to ruin other peoples day but thats why theres a highsec and even it isnt 100% safe people will war dec you, people will suicide gank you. by that logic the goal of primary pve in other area's is kind of silly.

sorry if its harsh but everything i said is true. if you still wish to pursue wh space do as i said in my previous post c4 space isnt too bad, in the 4 months that i lived there we made billions a day and only got pvped 5 or 6 times. scout with probes and proper mapping of each system before you farm it and you will be semi ok
Oxandrolone
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#28 - 2012-12-31 11:47:47 UTC
confirming c4's are so empty that most people interested in PvP wont even check there.

seriously though, whats the point only doing solo PvE in this game? may aswell just play a single player game with no subscription. wormholes offer you the chance to do both. you make so much isk in c5's and c6's isk is rarely a consideration. thats why anyone living in them doesnt care that much when they lose 5bil dreads, there replaceable, dont get trapped in the endless cycle of making isk to make more isk to make more isk etc. is it really fun to just see numbers in your wallet?
Gal'o Sengen
Doomheim
#29 - 2013-01-02 06:41:45 UTC
Sushi Nardieu wrote:
All you want to do is shoot sleepers?

Then take a wormhole static because you can shoot more in there. Obviously there are no w-space statics for C3. There will be plenty of traffic for your high-sec wormhole.

K-space is easy to find if you are a capable scanner. They are abundant in my opinion.

As for building caps in a sub-C5 WH... no idea but I hear it's a lot of logistics. That or mining.


I once scanned down a chain that was C2 with HS and C1 Static and it had a dozen carriers inside.

I was... well. I don't even.
Mister Tuggles
Task Force 641
Empyrean Edict
#30 - 2013-01-03 13:34:32 UTC
Gradur Dohr wrote:
final objective is ratting, PI and maybe some mining. dont want lot of pvp im leaving null sec for that. we can be hard in pvp if needed but its not our primary goal tis time.



If you are leaving null to get away from PvP, w-space is probably not the place for you. I assume whatever area in null you lived in your alliance had every other alliance in a 50 jump radius blued up. W-space is the complete opposite. Everyone is a hostile, and they are just sitting in your system cloaked up waiting.
chris elliot
Lazerhawks
L A Z E R H A W K S
#31 - 2013-01-03 21:49:15 UTC
We may be massive scrubs, but we love ratting wormhole carriers in c4's and c3's. We wish more people would fly them.

Rorquals are nice too. Very handy to have.
Previous page12