These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
123Next pageLast page
 

In defence of AFK mining

First post First post
Author
Amelia Torez
Doomheim
#1 - 2012-12-28 04:32:30 UTC
This article was first published on the blog of the Tolero Guard, located here.

A serious discussion is most definitely welcome, both for and against. However trolling will be completely ignored (and I encourage others to ignore trolling too).

In defence of AFK mining

The problem with the war on AFK mining is the line which defines what AFK mining and BOT mining actually is seems to have been blurred, whether intentionally or not. The reality is that they are two completely separate things and AFK mining is a perfectly acceptable practice in Eve. In this article, I’ll delve into why that is.

Let’s start by having a look at what Eve is. In the most simplest of words, it’s a sandbox that allows you to play whichever way you like. To further that though, that also allows other capsuleers to play however they like, which is what makes this game so interesting.

The important thing to note is, Eve has been tailored to accommodate all playing types. If you have a look at some of the features, such as the ability for skills to be trained and industry to churn even when you aren’t logged in is evidence that this game is specifically tailored for people who cannot be at the keyboard 23/7.

That is not to say that people who want to spend more time logged in will not receive further benefit for their time – that is certainly not the case. Those who want to devote more time to the game are rewarded for doing that just.

But the bottom line is, CCP has put the tools in place to allow you to play anyway you like and that specifically includes being away from the keyboard.

Now, onto AFK mining.

For some reason, many vocal members of the Eve community find being away from your keyboard for a few minutes or more as being tantamount to the destruction of Eve. The reality is much different – this ability to be away from the keyboard and still progress is what makes Eve such an accessible game.

Let me give you a few examples I have personally come across recently in Eve:

A mother of two young children – who happens to enjoy the company and companionship offered by the Eve community. However, her duties within her home don’t allow her to remain at the keyboard for extended periods.

A university student – who enjoys making a passive income mining asteroids semi-afk while completing their studies.

New players – It’s no secret that the learning curve of Eve is one of the harshest of any online game (as evidenced by the hugely popular image here). This steep learning curve requires many new players to do an awful lot of reading which while technically not AFK, requires them to be looking at other windows.

Traders – Traders spend an awful long time working on spreadsheets, calculating margins and working out where best to spend their ISK. Is there any harm in them making a passive income mining while they are doing this?

If you have a look at a few of the features that CCP has implemented, such a mining lasers that continue until the asteroid depletes and increasing the ore hold of mining vessels it is evident that CCP is trying to cater to all types of game play. On the flip side, the introduction of mining crystals, fleet boosts and so on also shows that they are actively rewarding people who spend more time at the keyboard.

The problem with the constant warfare on AFK miners is that it’s starting to make the game unplayable for those who want a more casual experience. Why would they bother logging into a game full of people who want to bully them out of existence? A game where trolls run rampant and take enjoyment in ruining the game play for these people?

While it’s completely understandable that with Eve being a sandbox, this makes that kind of bullying a side effect.

It may be worth considering – those kinds of actions are encouraging new and casual players to rethink investing their free time and money on Eve and without those casual gamers, the Eve universe would fall apart.

www.ToleroGuard.com

Mallak Azaria
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#2 - 2012-12-28 04:40:54 UTC
Amelia Torez wrote:
The problem with the constant warfare on AFK miners is that it’s starting to make the game unplayable for those who want a more casual experience.


If they're AFK then they aren't actually playing the game, making your entire argument irrelevant.

This post was lovingly crafted by a member of the Goonwaffe Posting Cabal, proud member of the popular gay hookup site somethingawful.com, Spelling Bee, Grammar Gestapo & #1 Official Gevlon Goblin Fanclub member.

Some Rando
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#3 - 2012-12-28 04:41:13 UTC
I lol'd. 5/10

CCP has no sense of humour.

Pyre leFay
Doomheim
#4 - 2012-12-28 04:42:07 UTC
Amelia Torez wrote:
Why would they bother logging into a game full of people who want to bully them out of existence?


Because it's not a game. It's a funded psychoanalytic study of the human condition. We all happen to suffer from digital masochism.
Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe
#5 - 2012-12-28 04:45:26 UTC
Mallak Azaria wrote:
Amelia Torez wrote:
The problem with the constant warfare on AFK miners is that it’s starting to make the game unplayable for those who want a more casual experience.


If they're AFK then they aren't actually playing the game, making your entire argument irrelevant.

Like an AFK cloaker can't attack you, but an afk miner can be mining.

We need to nerf local !

Triggered by: Wars of Sovless Agression, Bending the Knee, Twisting the Knife, Eating Sov Wheaties, Bombless Bombers, Fizzlesov, Interceptor Fleets, Running Away, GhostTime Vuln, Renters, Bombs, Bubbles ?

Rain6637
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
#6 - 2012-12-28 04:54:29 UTC
that word
i do not think it is spelled the way you think it is spelled
Eli Green
The Arrow Project
#7 - 2012-12-28 04:57:58 UTC
Mallak Azaria wrote:
Amelia Torez wrote:
The problem with the constant warfare on AFK miners is that it’s starting to make the game unplayable for those who want a more casual experience.


If they're AFK then they aren't actually playing the game, making your entire argument irrelevant.


But moon mining is ok to have AFK right? Lol

wumbo

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe
#8 - 2012-12-28 04:59:25 UTC
Eli Green wrote:
Mallak Azaria wrote:
Amelia Torez wrote:
The problem with the constant warfare on AFK miners is that it’s starting to make the game unplayable for those who want a more casual experience.


If they're AFK then they aren't actually playing the game, making your entire argument irrelevant.


But moon mining is ok to have AFK right? Lol

Yes we afk when the enemy comes to siege it.

Triggered by: Wars of Sovless Agression, Bending the Knee, Twisting the Knife, Eating Sov Wheaties, Bombless Bombers, Fizzlesov, Interceptor Fleets, Running Away, GhostTime Vuln, Renters, Bombs, Bubbles ?

Eli Green
The Arrow Project
#9 - 2012-12-28 05:01:37 UTC
Alavaria Fera wrote:
Eli Green wrote:
Mallak Azaria wrote:
Amelia Torez wrote:
The problem with the constant warfare on AFK miners is that it’s starting to make the game unplayable for those who want a more casual experience.


If they're AFK then they aren't actually playing the game, making your entire argument irrelevant.


But moon mining is ok to have AFK right? Lol

Yes we afk when the enemy comes to siege it.


If you still have enemies it's a sign you don't have enough blues Roll

wumbo

Pyre leFay
Doomheim
#10 - 2012-12-28 05:03:36 UTC
Eli Green wrote:

But moon mining is ok to have AFK right? Lol


Different mechanics, different problems.
Mallak Azaria
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#11 - 2012-12-28 05:17:40 UTC
Eli Green wrote:
Mallak Azaria wrote:
Amelia Torez wrote:
The problem with the constant warfare on AFK miners is that it’s starting to make the game unplayable for those who want a more casual experience.


If they're AFK then they aren't actually playing the game, making your entire argument irrelevant.


But moon mining is ok to have AFK right? Lol


I take it you've never had to keep 100 Tech moon towers fueled. You should talk to the guys that do it & they'll tell you all about how it's far from being an AFK activity.

This post was lovingly crafted by a member of the Goonwaffe Posting Cabal, proud member of the popular gay hookup site somethingawful.com, Spelling Bee, Grammar Gestapo & #1 Official Gevlon Goblin Fanclub member.

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe
#12 - 2012-12-28 05:25:22 UTC
Mallak Azaria wrote:
Eli Green wrote:
Mallak Azaria wrote:
Amelia Torez wrote:
The problem with the constant warfare on AFK miners is that it’s starting to make the game unplayable for those who want a more casual experience.

If they're AFK then they aren't actually playing the game, making your entire argument irrelevant.

But moon mining is ok to have AFK right? Lol

I take it you've never had to keep 100 Tech moon towers fueled. You should talk to the guys that do it & they'll tell you all about how it's far from being an AFK activity.

Don't, you might traumatize them. Maybe after the tech has been fully nerfed and we unchain them from the jump freighters...

Triggered by: Wars of Sovless Agression, Bending the Knee, Twisting the Knife, Eating Sov Wheaties, Bombless Bombers, Fizzlesov, Interceptor Fleets, Running Away, GhostTime Vuln, Renters, Bombs, Bubbles ?

Wescro
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#13 - 2012-12-28 05:37:42 UTC  |  Edited by: Wescro
Amelia Torez wrote:


A university student – who enjoys making a passive income mining asteroids semi-afk while completing their studies.

Traders – Traders spend an awful long time working on spreadsheets, calculating margins and working out where best to spend their ISK. Is there any harm in them making a passive income mining while they are doing this?


If you're a smart trader, you know not to put your shiny mining vessel at risk of being ganked while you're updating your orders. I know I don't. The extra 5m an hour is a pittance compared to what a semi-casual trader can make docked in a station at no risk of being ganked.

Mining simultaneously while trading is a waste, it's risky and makes very little ISK. It is one of those quintessentially "good on paper" ideas that you realize is bad once you actually do it. Park your mining ship, and trade. Or if your trading skills suck, stop trading and go mine while they train.

Also, I'm a university student. I don't do missions or low sec roams while I'm studying because those activities require attention and pose an inherent risk. You treat high-sec mining like there is no inherent risk. Would you afk drive a car? A plane? Of course not, you have to pay attention. You aren't invincible in high-sec you know?

This isn't about afk mining as much as it is about clinging on to the false notion that you are invincible in high-sec and concord will always protect you. I can safely say most high-sec miners haven't even seen concord swoop in, ever. They just believe it will happen instantly and that they are perfectly safe, because "hey, all these other miners are here, if they think its safe it must be safe for me too, right?"

All this tolero business is a joke, you don't want to get ganked? Fit a tank, orbit your ice, move to a quieter, higher security system, keep an eye on local and warp out if you suspect you are at risk. Don't whine and complain here. Go and actually play the game, instead of afk mining while posting here. The problem is with the miner, not the ganker.
Ryuji Takemiya
Doomheim
#14 - 2012-12-28 05:50:09 UTC
AFK Mining isn't sexy, but if you have a family or other real life distractions going on and you need your EVE fix... that's about the only defense against Wife Agro.

In a situation like that I'll go park myself somewhere quiet in High Sec so at least I don't get any corpmates killed if I have to step away to deal with life. The life without spaceships.

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe
#15 - 2012-12-28 06:00:51 UTC
Wescro wrote:
This isn't about afk mining as much as it is about clinging on to the false notion that you are invincible in high-sec and concord will always protect you. I can safely say most high-sec miners haven't even seen concord swoop in, ever. They just believe it will happen instantly and that they are perfectly safe, because "hey, all these other miners are here, if they think its safe it must be safe for me too, right?

But.. but CONCORD promised they would be there for me~~

Triggered by: Wars of Sovless Agression, Bending the Knee, Twisting the Knife, Eating Sov Wheaties, Bombless Bombers, Fizzlesov, Interceptor Fleets, Running Away, GhostTime Vuln, Renters, Bombs, Bubbles ?

Zol Interbottom
Blimp Requisition Services
#16 - 2012-12-28 06:23:58 UTC
I think we can see that AFK mining is the wrong way to play the game, it was never intended by the devs as one of the sandbox activities and should be removed poste haste, preferably by banning the perpetrators

"If you're quitting for the 3rd time you clearly ain't quitting" - Chribba

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe
#17 - 2012-12-28 06:24:53 UTC
Zol Interbottom wrote:
I think we can see that AFK mining is the wrong way to play the game, it was never intended by the devs as one of the sandbox activities and should be removed poste haste, preferably by banning the perpetrators

If anything, I'd say they were encouraging it by making AFKing easier and safer.

AFK mining is the basis of our whole industrial capability, we must never nerf it.

Triggered by: Wars of Sovless Agression, Bending the Knee, Twisting the Knife, Eating Sov Wheaties, Bombless Bombers, Fizzlesov, Interceptor Fleets, Running Away, GhostTime Vuln, Renters, Bombs, Bubbles ?

Ocih
Space Mermaids
#18 - 2012-12-28 06:34:31 UTC
EVE would be a very different game if minerals were like moon goo and our SP simply determined how much we could extract per cycle in a passive mining system. With Null offering better yields, allowing for more ships to be made.

That bridge was burned long ago though. I agree, mining is like watching paint dry and anyone who thinks mining ATK is "playing the game" has rocks in their head.
Zol Interbottom
Blimp Requisition Services
#19 - 2012-12-28 06:34:40 UTC
Alavaria Fera wrote:
Zol Interbottom wrote:
I think we can see that AFK mining is the wrong way to play the game, it was never intended by the devs as one of the sandbox activities and should be removed poste haste, preferably by banning the perpetrators

If anything, I'd say they were encouraging it by making AFKing easier and safer.

AFK mining is the basis of our whole industrial capability, we must never nerf it.


AFK mining is clearly against the very tenants of EVE, this isnt a casual game, if you arnt spending 14 hours a day playing EVE you are playing wrong

"If you're quitting for the 3rd time you clearly ain't quitting" - Chribba

Roime
Mea Culpa.
Shadow Cartel
#20 - 2012-12-28 06:39:05 UTC
Amelia Torez wrote:

It may be worth considering – those kinds of actions are encouraging new and casual players to rethink investing their free time and money on Eve and without those casual gamers, the Eve universe would fall apart.


You spent many words on explaining why it's nice for these people from their perspective to be able to play a game AFK, and in the end you present this "conclusion", completely opposite to your previous arguments.

It's their loss, not ours.



.

123Next pageLast page