These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Jita Park Speakers Corner

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

CSM Chairman Hotline - AMA (Ask Me Anything) non-NDA about EVE, the CSM & CCP

First post
Author
Seleene
Body Count Inc.
Mercenary Coalition
#221 - 2012-12-23 11:54:55 UTC
Cyprus Black wrote:
Seleene wrote:
HI, I'm Seleene, former CCP Game Designer and current Chairman of CSM 7.

As stated in the title, I may have ~things~ to say if you ask some questions. Twitter: @Seleene_EVE

I will do my best to answer questions as they happen but may be AFK from time to time. If I don't know or can't talk about something and say that, please just let it be. Otherwise, ask away! :)
Anything eh?

So I've got this "thing" on my ankle and I'm not sure what it is. It sort of looks like a zit but it's hard and yellow. I'm not sure what to classify it and thus am unsure how to deal with it. Advice?


Get an axe. Take off the foot. It's the only way to be sure.

2004-2008: Mercenary Coalition Boss

2007-2010: CCP Game Designer | 2011-2013: CSM6 Delegate & CSM7 Chairman

2011-2015: Pandemic Legionnaire

2015- : Mercenary Coalition Boss

Follow Seleene on Twitter!

Ossirrus
Imperial Academy
Amarr Empire
#222 - 2013-01-01 06:49:37 UTC
Hypothetically if you believed that changing POS mechanics in a way that would basically make POS/control towers operate in the way that stations in the game do now. This being that there is no way of knowing how many people are in said station without docking in the station yourself and that you can in no way know who/what is outside the station when you are docked(without another character undocked alt or otherwise relaying this information). And if these changes were made you would be an unhappy person.



Are you happy?
Seleene
Body Count Inc.
Mercenary Coalition
#223 - 2013-01-01 09:42:14 UTC
Ossirrus wrote:
Hypothetically if you believed that changing POS mechanics in a way that would basically make POS/control towers operate in the way that stations in the game do now. This being that there is no way of knowing how many people are in said station without docking in the station yourself and that you can in no way know who/what is outside the station when you are docked(without another character undocked alt or otherwise relaying this information). And if these changes were made you would be an unhappy person.



Are you happy?



What? I'm not sure what you just said / asked?

On another note, I just want to be able to look out of a window and see if BAD PEOPLE are waiting for me. v0v

2004-2008: Mercenary Coalition Boss

2007-2010: CCP Game Designer | 2011-2013: CSM6 Delegate & CSM7 Chairman

2011-2015: Pandemic Legionnaire

2015- : Mercenary Coalition Boss

Follow Seleene on Twitter!

Frying Doom
#224 - 2013-01-01 09:45:45 UTC
Seleene wrote:
Ossirrus wrote:
Hypothetically if you believed that changing POS mechanics in a way that would basically make POS/control towers operate in the way that stations in the game do now. This being that there is no way of knowing how many people are in said station without docking in the station yourself and that you can in no way know who/what is outside the station when you are docked(without another character undocked alt or otherwise relaying this information). And if these changes were made you would be an unhappy person.



Are you happy?



What? I'm not sure what you just said / asked?

On another note, I just want to be able to look out of a window and see if BAD PEOPLE are waiting for me. v0v

I would be happy to have a little flashing light letting me know my POS guns are firing Smile

Well maybe a nice alarm noise too

Any spelling, grammatical and punctuation errors are because frankly, I don't care!!

Benny Ohu
Royal Amarr Institute
Amarr Empire
#225 - 2013-01-01 09:54:39 UTC  |  Edited by: Benny Ohu
Seleene wrote:
What? I'm not sure what you just said / asked?

On another note, I just want to be able to look out of a window and see if BAD PEOPLE are waiting for me. v0v


You answered half the question. He also wants to know your opinion about being able to see into starbases from outside. It'd be difficult to discover if a player in local channel is a threat/target if you don't have rights to dock at all the starbases in system, and if there were a lot of starbases it'd be impractical to dock at all of them.

e: assuming the starbase revamp makes them dockable
Ossirrus
Imperial Academy
Amarr Empire
#226 - 2013-01-01 16:11:34 UTC
i was trying to go in a round about way to ask if they are breaking POS mechanics. Second try ill spare you the round aboutness.

Does CCP intend to re vamp POS in a way that makes them function like stations?

Meaning no intel can be gathered about who is online in what ship while they are docked.

Meaning you cannot foresee the impending doom waiting for you on the undock.

Meaning yay station games.

Does CCP intend to re vamp the POS in this fashion?
Seleene
Body Count Inc.
Mercenary Coalition
#227 - 2013-01-02 05:50:21 UTC
Ossirrus wrote:
i was trying to go in a round about way to ask if they are breaking POS mechanics. Second try ill spare you the round aboutness.

Does CCP intend to re vamp POS in a way that makes them function like stations?

Meaning no intel can be gathered about who is online in what ship while they are docked.

Meaning you cannot foresee the impending doom waiting for you on the undock.

Meaning yay station games.

Does CCP intend to re vamp the POS in this fashion?


Nothing I've seen or heard would seem to indicate this at all.

2004-2008: Mercenary Coalition Boss

2007-2010: CCP Game Designer | 2011-2013: CSM6 Delegate & CSM7 Chairman

2011-2015: Pandemic Legionnaire

2015- : Mercenary Coalition Boss

Follow Seleene on Twitter!

Lord Zim
Gallente Federation
#228 - 2013-01-02 16:52:32 UTC
Is water wet?

Cyno's lit, bridge is up, but one pilot won't be jumping home.

RIP Vile Rat

Hans Jagerblitzen
Ice Fire Warriors
#229 - 2013-01-03 16:54:38 UTC
Seleene wrote:
Nothing I've seen or heard would seem to indicate this at all.


To be honest we really have no idea exactly what will be done on POS's at this point in time. Hopefully we'll know more soon. I'm not kidding when I say that this summit was about the how in expansion building, not the what is coming this summer. Nobody should take anything for granted, whether it be POS's, or 0.0, or anything, until they hear more confirmation from CCP as we go through the release planning process.

CPM0 Chairman / CSM7 Vice Secretary

Scatim Helicon
State War Academy
Caldari State
#230 - 2013-01-04 18:45:57 UTC  |  Edited by: Scatim Helicon
CSM question:

How much of the CSM's day to day interaction with each other and CCP happens through the skype channel as opposed to the private CSM forums and other means of communication, and how much does that communication with CCP drop off outside of Icelandic daytime office hours?

I'm not contemplating running for CSM8 myself, but I'm wondering that if someone else in a similar position to myself (GMT timezone and in a job that precludes me installing Skype and being present in a chat channel all day) were to be elected, how much would they find their ability to contribute limited compared to those who can be available whilst CCP are in the office? Has this proved to be an issue during CSM6 or CSM7, and if so were any steps taken to mitigate it?

Every time you post a WiS thread, Hilmar strangles a kitten.

mynnna
State War Academy
Caldari State
#231 - 2013-01-04 19:23:54 UTC
Scatim Helicon wrote:
CSM question:

How much of the CSM's day to day interaction with each other and CCP happens through the skype channel as opposed to the private CSM forums and other means of communication, and how much does that communication with CCP drop off outside of Icelandic daytime office hours?

I'm not contemplating running for CSM8 myself, but I'm wondering that if someone else in a similar position to myself (GMT timezone and in a job that precludes me installing Skype and being present in a chat channel all day) were to be elected, how much would they find their ability to contribute limited compared to those who can be available whilst CCP are in the office? Has this proved to be an issue during CSM6 or CSM7, and if so were any steps taken to mitigate it?


I am planning to run myself, so I'm awfully curious to hear you (and others) weigh in on this as well.

Member of the Goonswarm Economic Warfare Cabal

Cyprus Black
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#232 - 2013-01-06 07:19:11 UTC  |  Edited by: Cyprus Black
Not sure if it's NDA, but I'll fire away.

The current ship rebalancing is great and all, but is there discussion on rebalancing modules as well? There are some that have meta 4's which are better than the T2's, some modules are inferior as others do the same thing plus more and have fewer fitting requirements. Then there are other modules that seem... well.... useless to put it kindly.

Is there any discussion or acknowledgement that Wardecs still need work within CCP? The last "revamp" seemed to be ineffective and exacerbated old problems. DecShield is still very much in operation as very little has changed in how they operate (that's not a bash on them, they just highlight the obvious flaws with the wardec mechanics).

Is there any chance of getting a mining profession overhaul? Specifically the distribution of specific asteroids in high, low, null and wormholes? There's little point in mining in lowsec when highsec asteroids contain almost the exact same minerals and quantity.

Can we get more stations in lowsec? Most don't have them and the systems that do typically are home to pirate and/or FW players. It's difficult to bring industry to lowsec when there's so few stations.

This is getting a little too specific, but can someone look at the NPC tax rates of PI in high and low? As they are now highsec pays 11% NPC tax and lowsec pays 17% NPC tax. It seems like it should be flipped. It's more profitable to run PI in highsec than lowsec because of this. Most player owned POCO tax rates average upwards of around 20% (the lowsec POCO tax max is 25% fyi). Player owned POCO's in lowsec can keep them high because their NPC competition is also high. I'm no economist, but the tax rates seem backwards.

I understand CSMs don't actually control content. They merely advise CCP. But I was wondering if they've considered the above. If it's on their radar or if they see it as an issue at all. That's not a backhanded inquiry btw. I'd just like to know.


BTW, the new micro jump drives are amazing. My Megathron now roams lowsec with little fear of gatecamps. It closes distance enough to allow my Mega to brawl like it should Big smile

Summary of EvEs last four expansions: http://imgur.com/ZL5SM33

mynnna
State War Academy
Caldari State
#233 - 2013-01-06 08:50:45 UTC
Cyprus Black wrote:

This is getting a little too specific, but can someone look at the NPC tax rates of PI in high and low? As they are now highsec pays 11% NPC tax and lowsec pays 17% NPC tax. It seems like it should be flipped. It's more profitable to run PI in highsec than lowsec because of this. Most player owned POCO tax rates average upwards of around 20% (the lowsec POCO tax max is 25% fyi). Player owned POCO's in lowsec can keep them high because their NPC competition is also high. I'm no economist, but the tax rates seem backwards.


The clear answer here is "highsec POCOs". Might even happen since Soundwave has said he likes the idea, if I recall.

Member of the Goonswarm Economic Warfare Cabal

Cyprus Black
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#234 - 2013-01-07 08:35:18 UTC
mynnna wrote:


The clear answer here is "highsec POCOs". Might even happen since Soundwave has said he likes the idea, if I recall.
As do I, however a few questions arise as to how to deal with the NPC ones as well as player owned ones by corps that disbanded.

Summary of EvEs last four expansions: http://imgur.com/ZL5SM33

Lord Zim
Gallente Federation
#235 - 2013-01-07 08:39:50 UTC
They, along with POSes which are owned by corps which have disbanded or haven't been maintained (i.e. fuelled) should be ripe for the picking. For POCOs, hack them into your ownership, for POSes, unanchor and run off with them.

Cyno's lit, bridge is up, but one pilot won't be jumping home.

RIP Vile Rat

Orakkus
ImperiaI Federation
Goonswarm Federation
#236 - 2013-01-08 19:14:21 UTC  |  Edited by: Orakkus
Question for the CSM, with preferred individual answers for the question.

Personally, I think the concept of "Walking In Stations" is viable, despite how badly CCP introduced it the first time around in Incarna. I think it would open up some really cool mission options, lore, industry, as well as personalize the game, which would make it easier for Eve Online to retain players. That being said, I know not everyone agrees with me, and I also am aware that they way CCP has done the code, while cool, has brought its own challenges.

My question is then, as individual CSM members, what do you think of Walking In Stations, would you like to see it happen, when do you think it could happen, what obstacles are in the way, and what would be the minimum amount of features it would need for it to be successful?

He's not just famous, he's "IN" famous. - Ned Nederlander

Alx Warlord
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#237 - 2013-01-08 19:27:09 UTC
Ossirrus wrote:
i was trying to go in a round about way to ask if they are breaking POS mechanics. Second try ill spare you the round aboutness.

Does CCP intend to re vamp POS in a way that makes them function like stations?

Meaning no intel can be gathered about who is online in what ship while they are docked.

Meaning you cannot foresee the impending doom waiting for you on the undock.

Meaning yay station games.

Does CCP intend to re vamp the POS in this fashion?


Well, assume that if you are hostile to the POS owner and you warp to the POS, it will kill you...

and as you undock, even from stations... you are invulnerable for a while... and the guns/ modules will cover you.

the big difference on docking will be that no one will know the ship you are using... this can happen now as you cloak, or when you change ships at pos, or are docked at an outpost... so no big deal...

I I don't see why you are concerned about it...
Alx Warlord
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#238 - 2013-01-08 19:29:58 UTC  |  Edited by: Alx Warlord
Hans Jagerblitzen wrote:
Seleene wrote:
Nothing I've seen or heard would seem to indicate this at all.


To be honest we really have no idea exactly what will be done on POS's at this point in time. Hopefully we'll know more soon. I'm not kidding when I say that this summit was about the how in expansion building, not the what is coming this summer. Nobody should take anything for granted, whether it be POS's, or 0.0, or anything, until they hear more confirmation from CCP as we go through the release planning process.


Well, last CSM minutes there was a big topic about pos revamp... yes the comunity is anxious about it... and yes we want it... and yes we remember someone saying "Ship it"... I just hope that CCP do it soon... And I can't stand the actual system now...

And I swore that if the ccp POS revamp is just a change on the buble colour i will be very upset...
Seleene
Body Count Inc.
Mercenary Coalition
#239 - 2013-01-11 13:00:28 UTC
Lord Zim wrote:
Is water wet?


It really depends on the temperature.

2004-2008: Mercenary Coalition Boss

2007-2010: CCP Game Designer | 2011-2013: CSM6 Delegate & CSM7 Chairman

2011-2015: Pandemic Legionnaire

2015- : Mercenary Coalition Boss

Follow Seleene on Twitter!

Seleene
Body Count Inc.
Mercenary Coalition
#240 - 2013-01-11 13:15:31 UTC
Scatim Helicon wrote:
CSM question:

How much of the CSM's day to day interaction with each other and CCP happens through the skype channel as opposed to the private CSM forums and other means of communication, and how much does that communication with CCP drop off outside of Icelandic daytime office hours?

I'm not contemplating running for CSM8 myself, but I'm wondering that if someone else in a similar position to myself (GMT timezone and in a job that precludes me installing Skype and being present in a chat channel all day) were to be elected, how much would they find their ability to contribute limited compared to those who can be available whilst CCP are in the office? Has this proved to be an issue during CSM6 or CSM7, and if so were any steps taken to mitigate it?


I'd hesitate to put a percentage on the use of the Skype channel(s), but it's easily over half of the information flow. Can you be an effective CSM by completely forgoing the Skype channels and just reading / posting on forums and email? It's possible to do the bare minimum and still contribute, but in my opinion, no, if you aren't involved in the Skype stuff then you aren't going to be very EFFECTIVE. That is certainly true in the current communication environment, especially if your fellow CSM's are extroverted animals that enjoy building social bridges.

CSM 7 has also really used TitanPad and Google Docs MUCH more than previous CSMs. We've made it kind of an unspoken policy that we group-think and contribute mutually to issues where possible. Working on things like that, while babbling about it in Skype (sometimes even doing short voice meetings) has been very productive. This allows you to still be involved if pesky things like working for a living or taking your kids to (insert random sport / activity) get in the way of being a space politician.

As for CCP's availability, they have tried very hard to accomodate timing meetings with the CSM to maximize our ability to be present. This assumes that you've given them reason to believe taking the time to talk to you about issues is a good idea, of course. Smile

2004-2008: Mercenary Coalition Boss

2007-2010: CCP Game Designer | 2011-2013: CSM6 Delegate & CSM7 Chairman

2011-2015: Pandemic Legionnaire

2015- : Mercenary Coalition Boss

Follow Seleene on Twitter!